Cover not available
Part of
Left Sentence Peripheries in Spanish: Diachronic, Variationist and Comparative Perspectives
Edited by Andreas Dufter and Álvaro S. Octavio de Toledo y Huerta
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 214] 2014
► pp. 383–418

Chapter 13. A comparative look at Focus Fronting 
in Romance

| University of Vienna
The aim of this paper is to describe the syntax and semantics of Focus Fronting (FF) constructions in a range of Romance languages, including both regional and diachronic varieties, in order to reclassify these constructions on the basis of a common comparative ground. I shall begin with a look at some Sardinian data, mostly already presented in earlier research literature, since this Romance language uses FF in more contexts than other Modern Romance varieties. Sardinian not only employs FF with argumental and adjunct constituents, but also with predicates. Moreover, Sardinian FF does not necessarily yield a contrastive interpretation, as FF of constituents usually does in Italian and Spanish, but it can also encode pure Information Focus, although an emphatic value is often added. Using a set of syntactic and semantic-pragmatic properties defined principally for Sardinian, I will analyze similar FF data – Quantifier Raising (QP-fronting), Stylistic Fronting (SF), Mirative Fronting, Emphatic Focus etc. – in other Romance varieties and outline the similarities and differences found between these varieties. This will result in a systematic, descriptive overview of the crosslinguistic variation of FF found across the Romance languages.
Published online: 31 July 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.214.19rem
References

Primary Sources

Archivi del Sud
1996  Contami unu Contu. Racconti popolari della Sardegna. Vol. I: Logudoro. Alghero: Archivi del Sud.Google Scholar
CREA – Real Academia española: Banco de datos (CREA)
[online]. Corpus de referencia del español actual . [URL] (13 October 2012).
Falconi, Nanni
2003  Su cuadorzu . Cagliari:Condaghes.Google Scholar
Sa-Limba
1999–2011  Electronic corpus of the mailing list ‘Sa-Limba’ . Cologne/Berlin. [URL] (1 April 2012).

Research Literature

Arregi, Karlos
2003 Clitic left dislocation is contrastive topicalization. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium [U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 9.1], Elsi Kaiser & Sudha Arunchalam (eds), 31–44. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania, Department of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola
1988 L’ ordine degli elementi della frase e le costruzioni marcate. In Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione , Vol. 1, Lorenzo Renzi (ed.), 129–194. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
2004 The left periphery of Medieval Romance. Studi Filologici e Linguistici Online 2(2): 243–297.Google Scholar
2006 A detailed map of the left periphery of Medieval Romance. In Crosslinguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics: Negation, Tense, and Clausal Architecture , Raffaella Zanuttini, Héctor Campos, Elena Herburger & Paul Portner (eds), 53–86. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bentley, Delia
2011 Sui costrutti esistenziali sardi. Effetti di definitezza, deissi, evidenzialità. Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 127(1): 111–140. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Blasco Ferrer, Eduardo
1994  Ello ellus: Grammatica sarda . Nuoro: Poliedro.Google Scholar
Blühdorn, Hardarik
2012 Faktizität, Wahrheit, Erwünschtheit: Negation, Negationsfokus und “Verum”-Fokus im Deutschen. In Wahrheit – Fokus – Negation [Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 18], Horst Lohnstein & Hardarik Blühdorn (eds), 137–170. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Bowers, John
1993 The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24(4): 591–656.Google Scholar
Brunetti, Lisa
2004  A Unification of Focus . Padua: Unipress.Google Scholar
2009 Discourse functions of fronted foci in Italian and Spanish. In Focus and Background in Romance Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 112], Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jacob (eds), 43–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Büring, Daniel
1999 Topic. In Focus. Linguistic, Cognitive, and Computational Perspectives , Peter Bosch & Rob van der Sandt (eds), 142–165. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Camus Bergareche, Bruno
2008 Avance de cuantificadores en español medieval. In Actas del VII Congreso Internacional de Historia de la Lengua Española , Vol. 1, Concepción Company Company & José G. Moreno de Alba (eds.), 431–448. Madrid: Arco Libros.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna
2005 Stylistic fronting in Italian. In Grammar in Focus , Lars-Olof Delsing, Cecilia Falk, Gunlög Josefsson & Halldór Ármann Sigurðsson (eds), 47–55. Lund: Department of Scandinavian Languages, Lund University.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1990  Types of A’-dependencies . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Corda, Francesco
1994  Grammatica moderna del sardo logudorese con una proposta ortografica, elementi di metrica e un glossario. Cagliari: Della Torre.Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio
2006 Informational focus in Sicilian and the left periphery. In Phases of Interpretation . Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 363–385. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 Fronting as focalization in Sicilian. In Syntactic Variation. The Dialects of Italy , Roberta D’Alessandro, Ian Roberts & Adam Ledgeway (eds), 247–260. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2011 Focalization and word order in Old Italo-Romance. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 10: 92–135.Google Scholar
2012  Discourse-related Features and Functional Projections . Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio & Remberger, Eva-Maria
2009  Focus Fronting in Sardinian and Sicilian . In Proceedings XXXV Incontro di Grammatica Generativa 2009 [University of Siena CISCL Working Papers 3], Vincenzo Moscati & Emilio Servidio (eds), 118–130. Siena: Università di Siena.Google Scholar
Egerland, Verner
2011 Fronting, background, focus: A comparative study of Sardinian and Icelandic. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 87: 103–135.Google Scholar
Escandell, María Victoria & Leonetti, Manuel
2009 La expresión del Verum Focus en español. Español Actual 92: 11–46.Google Scholar
2011  Bastantes problemas (*no) tenemos . In 60 problemas de gramática , María Victoria Escandell, Manuel Leonetti & Cristina Sánchez (eds), 253–260. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar
Fernández-Ordóñez, Inés
2009 Orden de palabras, tópicos y focos en la prosa alfonsí. Alcanate 6: 139–172.Google Scholar
Fischer, Susann
2005 Construcciónes con avance estilístico en el catalán antiguo. Caplletra 38: 119–135.Google Scholar
Floricic, Franck
2004 Negation et interrogation en Sarde. Ms. of a talk given at the Colloque Typologie des langues, universaux linguistiques: La négation et les énoncés non susceptibles d’être niés (TYPO 4). Paris: Institut Universitaire de France.Google Scholar
2009 Negation and focus clash in Sardinian. In Information Structure and its Interfaces , Lunella Mereu (ed.), 129–152. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 ‘Bare quantifiers’ and topics in Italian. Ms, Université de Paris III-Sorbonne Nouvelle & LPP (CNRS).Google Scholar
Franco, Irene
2009 Verbs, Subjects and Stylistic Fronting: A comparative analysis of the Interaction of CP Properties with Verb movement and Subject Positions in Icelandic and Old Italian. PhD dissertation. University of Siena.Google Scholar
Frey, Werner
2010 Ā-Movement and conventional implicatures: About the grammatical encoding of emphasis in German. Lingua 120(6): 1416–1435. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallego, Angel
2007 Defectivitat morfològica i variació sintàctica. Caplletra 42: 219–250.Google Scholar
Giurgea, Ion
. 2011. How can a bare quantifier be a topic? Talk given at The 41th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages , University of Ottawa.Google Scholar
Giurgea, Ion & Remberger, Eva-Maria
2011a Left peripheral interactions in Romance and the syntactic representation of information-structural features. Ms. , University of Konstanz.Google Scholar
2011b Indefinite pronouns as contrastive topics. Talk given at the 44th Annual Meeting of the Societas Linguistica Europaea , Universidad de la Rioja, Logroño, September 2011.Google Scholar
2012a Zur informationsstrukturellen Konfiguration und Variation postverbaler Subjekte in den romanischen Null-Subjekt-Sprachen. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 31(1): 43–99. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012b Verum focus and polar questions. Bucharest Working Papers in Linguistics 14(2): 21–40.Google Scholar
Giurgea, Ion&Remberger, Eva-Maria
. In press. Polarity fronting in Romanian and Sardinian. In Selected proceedings of LSRL 41 , Marie-HélèneCôté, ÉricMathieu&ShanaPoplack (eds).
Grimaldi, Lucia
2010 Dalla LSU alla LSC: Itinerari della standardizzazione del sardo. In Actes du XXVe Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes , Vol. 3, Maria Iliescu, Heidi Siller-Runggaldier & Paul Danler (eds), 563–572. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Höhle, Tilman
1992 Über Verum-Fokus im Deutschen. In Informationsstruktur und Grammatik , Joachim Jacobs (ed.), 112–141. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jones, Michael Allan
1988 Auxiliary verbs in Sardinian. Transactions of the Philological Society 86(2): 173–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1993  Sardinian Syntax . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ladd, Robert
1981 A first look at the semantics and pragmatics of negative questions and tag questions. In Papers from the Seventeenth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society , 164–171. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistics Society.
Leonetti, Manuel
2009 Remarks on focus structure and non-specificity. In Proceedings of the IV International NEREUS Workshop ‘Definiteness and DP Structure in Romance Languages’ , María Teresa Espinal, Manuel Leonetti & Louise McNally (eds), 83–111. Konstanz: Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Konstanz.Google Scholar
Leonetti, Manuel & Escandell, María Victoria
2009 Fronting and verum focus in Spanish. In Focus and Background in Romance Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 112], Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jacob (eds), 155–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2010 Las anteposiciones inductoras de foco de polaridad. In La renovación de la palabra en el bicentenario de la Argentina. Los colores de la mirada lingüística , Victor M. Castel & Liliana Cubo de Severino (eds), 733–743. Mendoza: Ed. de la Universidad Nacional de Cuyo.Google Scholar
Lepori, Antonio
2001  Gramàtiga sarda po is campidanesus: Duas obras in d-unu libru. Compendio di grammatica campidanese per italofoni. Quartu Sant’Elena: Ed. C.R.Google Scholar
Lohnstein, Horst & Stommel, Hildegard
2009 Verum focus and phases. In Linguistic Analysis 35: 109–140. Special Issue Phase Edge Investigations , Phoevos Panagiotis & Kleanthes Grohmann (eds).Google Scholar
Lohnstein, Horst
2012 Verum Fokus – Satzmodus – Wahrheit. In Wahrheit – Fokus – Negation [Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 18], Horst Lohnstein & Hardarik Blühdorn (eds), 31–67. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Lombardi, Alessandra
2007 Posizione dei clitici e ordine dei costituenti nella lingua sarda medievale. In Sui dialetti italoromanzi. Saggi in onore di Nigel B. Vincent [The Italianist 27, Special supplement 1], Delia Bentley & Adam Ledgeway (eds), 133–147. Norfolk: Biddles.Google Scholar
Lörinczi, Marinella
1999 L’interrogazione in sardo / Preguntai in sardu. Romanistik in Geschichte und Gegenwart 5(1): 101–112.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan
1990 Inversion in embedded clauses in Modern Icelandic. In Syntax & Semantics, Modern Icelandic Syntax 24, Joan Maling & Annie Zaenen (eds), 191–215. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Mensching, Guido & Grimaldi, Lucia
2005  Limba Sarda Unificada: Zu den jüngsten Bestrebungen der Standardisierung des Sardischen. In Normen und Normenkonflikte in der Romania , Carsten Sinner (ed.), 59–87. Munich: Peniope/Anja Gärtig.Google Scholar
Mensching, Guido & Remberger, Eva-Maria
2010a Focus Fronting and the left periphery in Sardinian. In Syntactic Variation. The Dialects of Italy , Roberta D’Alessandro, Ian Roberts & Adam Ledgeway (eds), 261–276. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2010b La periferia sinistra romanza: topicalizzazione, focalizzazione e interrogazione in sardo. In Actes du XXVe Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes , Vol. 7, Maria Iliescu, Heidi Siller-Runggaldier & Paul Danler (eds), 189–197. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Laura
2001 Exclamative constructions. In Language Typology and Language Universals , Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1038–1050. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Molnár, Valéria
2010 Stylistic fronting and discourse. Ms. of the talk given at the colloquium Focus, Contrast, and Givenness in Interaction with Extraction and Deletion , University of Tübingen, SFB 833-A7, March 2010.
Pittau, Massimo
1972  Grammatica del sardo nuorese: il più conservativo dei parlari neo-latini . Bologna: Patron.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia
2006 Parallel phases: A study on the high and low left periphery of Old Italian. In Phases of Interpretation , Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 261–295. Berlin: Mouton De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Die linke Peripherie der “unteren Phase”: OV-Stellung im Altitalieni-schen. In Romanistische Syntax – Minimalistisch , Guido Mensching & Eva-Maria Remberger (eds), 131–156. Tübingen:Narr.Google Scholar
Poole, Geoffrey
2007 Defending the “subject gap” requirement: Stylistic fronting in Germanic and Romance. In Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 79, Christopher Platzack (ed.), 1–19. Lund: Centre of Language and Literature.Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher
2012 Conventional implicature and expressive content. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning , Vol. 3, Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds), 2516–2536. Berlin: de Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Quer, Josep
2002 Edging quantifiers. On QP-fronting in Western Romance. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2000 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 232], Claire Beyssade, Reineke Bok-Bennema, Frank Drijkoningen & Paola Monachesi (eds), 253–270. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Remberger, Eva-Maria
2010a Left peripheral interactions in Sardinian. Lingua 120(3): 555–581. Special Issue: Exploring the Left Periphery , Kleanthes K. Grohmann & Ianthi-Maria Tsimpli (eds). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010b Left peripheral Interactions in Romance. Talk given at the colloquium Focus, Contrast, and Givenness in Interaction with Extraction and Deletion , University of Tübingen, SFB 833-A7, March 2010.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar: Handbook in Generative Syntax , Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard
1969  Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti, Vol. 3: Sintassi e formazione delle parole . Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Romani, Patrizia
2006 Tiempos de formación romance I. Los tiempos compuestos. In Sintaxis histórica de la lengua española. Primera parte: La frase verbal , Vol. 1, Concepción Company Company (ed.), 241–346. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica y Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Romero, Maribel
2006 Biased yes/no questions: The role of VERUM. Sprache und Datenverarbeitung 30: 9–24.Google Scholar
Romero, Maribel & Chung-Hye Han
2004 On negative yes/no questions. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(5): 609–658. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre
1995  Relevance: Communication and Cognition . 2nd edn . Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur
2007  The Syntax of Icelandic . Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vanelli, Laura
1999 Ordine delle parole e articolazione pragmatica dell’italiano antico: La ‘prominenza’ pragmatica della prima posizione nella frase. Medioevo Romanzo 23(2): 229–246.Google Scholar
Zanuttini, Raffaella & Portner, Paul
2003 Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface. Language 79(1): 39–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Cruschina, Silvio
2015. Some notes on clefting and fronting*. In Structures, Strategies and Beyond [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 223], ► pp. 181 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 9 december 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.