Symmetry Breaking in Syntax and the Lexicon

| Goethe University Frankfurt
ISBN 9789027255990 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00
ISBN 9789027270122 | EUR 105.00 | USD 158.00
This book is a research monograph that explores the implications of the strongest minimalist thesis from an antisymmetric perspective. Three empirical domains are investigated: nominal root compounds in German and English, nominal gerunds in English and their German counterparts, and small clauses in Russian and English. A point of symmetry that has the potential of stalling the derivation emerges in the derivation of all of these constructions. Building on certain assumptions on how Merge works, this book shows that the points of symmetry can all be resolved in the same way; despite the fact that the three empirical domains under investigation are standardly derived from distinct structural configurations, such as head-head merger in the case of root compounds, head-phrase merger as it arises from standard complementation/predication structures for nominal gerunds, and phrase-phrase merger in small clauses. This book is of interest to all researchers working on syntax and its interfaces.
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 216]  2014.  xi, 304 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
List of abbreviations
Chapter 1. Introduction
Chapter 2. Nominal root compounds
Chapter 3. The nominalizing of nominalizations
Chapter 4. Small clauses (and Verb-particle constructions)
Chapter 5. Theoretical implications
Chapter 6. Conclusion


Aarts, B.
1992 Small Clauses in English. The Non-verbal Types . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Abels, K.
2003Successive-cyclicity, Anti-locality and Adposition Stranding. PhD dissertation, UConn.
2007Towards a restrictive theory of (remnant) movement. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 7: 53–120. Crossref link
2009Some implications of improper movement for cartography. In Alternatives to Cartography , Jeroen van Craenenbroeck (ed.), 325–259. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Abney, S. P.
1987The English Noun Phrase in its Sentential Aspect. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Adger, D.
2003 Core Syntax . Oxford: OUP.
2010A minimalist theory of feature structure. In Features. Perspectives on a Key Notion in Linguistics , A. Kibort & G. Corbett (eds), 185–218. Oxford: OUP.
Alexiadou, A.
2001 Functional Structure in Nominals: Nominalization and Ergativity . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
2008On the role of syntactic locality in morphological processes: The case of (Greek) derived nominals. In Quantification, Definiteness and Nominalization , A. Giannakidou & M. Rathert (eds), 253–280. Oxford: OUP.
Alexiadou, A., Haegeman, L. & Stavrou, M.
2007 Noun Phrases in the Generative Perspective . Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. Crossref link
Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E. & Schäfer, F.
2009PP licensing in nominalizations. In Proceedings of NELS 38, A. Schardl, M. Walkow & M. Abdurrahman (eds), 39–52. Amherst MA: GLSA.
Alexidaou, A., Iordăchioaia, G. & Soare, E.
2010Plural marking in argument supporting nominalizations. In Layers of Aspect , P. Cabredo-Hofherr & B. Laca (eds), 1–22. Stanford CA: CSLI.
Allen, M. R.
1978Morphological Investigations. PhD dissertation, UConn.
Anagnostopoulou, E.
2009Domains for idioms. Handout from talk at Roots Workshop. University of Stuttgart.
Baker, M.
1988 Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing . Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
1995Lexical and nonlexical noun incorporaion. In Lexical Knowledge in the Organization of Language , U. Egli, P. Pause & C. Schwarze (eds), 3–34. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
2003On the loci of agreement: Inversion constructions in Mapudungun. In Proceedings from NELS 33, M. Kadowaski & S. Kawahara (eds), 25–49. Amherst MA: GLSA.
2008The macroparameter in a microparametric world. In The Limits of Syntactic Variation , T. Biberauer (ed.). 351–374. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
2009Is head movement still needed for incorporation? Lingua 119: 148–165. Crossref link
Baker, M. Aranovich, R. & Golluscio, L.
2005Two types of syntactic incorporation: Noun incorporation in Mapudungun and its typological implications. Language 81: 138–176. Crossref link
Baker, M. & Collins, C.
2006Linkers and the internal structure of vP. NLLT 24: 307–354.
Barrie, M.
2006Dynamic Antisymmetry and the Syntax of Noun Incorporation. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.
2010on Noun incorporation as symmetry breaking. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 53(3): 273–301. Crossref link
Barrie, M. & Spreng, B.
2009Noun incorporation and the progressive in German. Lingua 119: 374–388. Crossref link
Bauer, L.
2004 A Glossary of Morphology . Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Bauke, L.
2009On nominal compounds in German. Ms, UMass.
Bauke, L. & Roeper, T.
. 2012. How phase-based interpretations dictate the typology of nominalizations. In Discourse and grammer , G. Grewendorf & E. Zimmermann (eds). 289–320.
de Belder, M.
2011Roots and Affixes: Eliminating Lexical Categories from Syntax. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University/Uil-OTS & HUBrussel/CRISSP.
Berwick, R. & Chomsky, N.
2011The biolinguistic program: the current state of its development. In The Biolinguistic Enterprise , C. Boeckx & A. M. DiSciullo (eds), 19–41. Oxford: OUP.
Bieberauer, T., Holmberg, A., Roberts, I. & Sheehan, M.
2009 Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory . Cambridge: CUP. Crossref link
Bisetto, A.
2010Recursiveness in Italian compounds. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 7(1): 14–35.
Blume, K.
2004 Nominalisierte Infinitive . Eine empirisch basierte Studie zum Deutschen . Tübingen: Niemeyer. Crossref link
Boeckx, C.
2006 Linguistic Minimalism . Oxford: OUP.
2007 Understanding Minimalist Syntax: Lessons from Locality in Long-Distance Dependencies . Oxford: Blackwell.
2008a Bare Syntax . Oxford: OUP.
2008bI-semantics. Handout from talk at Biosemantics Workshop at Leiden University.
2009On the locus of asymmetry in UG. Catalan journal of linguistics 8: 41–53.
2010aWhat principles & parameters got wrong. Ms, ICREA/UAB.
2010bDefeating lexicocentrism. Ms, ICREA/UAB.
Boeckx, C. & Stjepanović, S.
2001Head-ing toward PF. LI 32(2): 345–355.
Boeckx, C. & Grohmann, K.
2007Putting phases into perspective. Syntax 10: 204–222. Crossref link
Boeckx, C. & Uriagereka, J.
2007Minimalism. In Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces , G. Ramchand & C. Reiss (eds), 541–573. Oxford: OUP.
Booij, G.
1992Compounding in Dutch. Rivista di Linguistica 4: 37–59.
Borer, H.
1984 Parametric Syntax . Dordrecht: Foris.
1999The formation, the forming and the form of nominals. Handout from talk at Round Table on Event Struture. Simon Fraser University, Vancouver.
2003Exo-skeletal vs. endo-skeletal explanations. In The Nature of Explanation in Linguistic Theory , J. Moore & M. Polinsky (eds), 31–67. Stanford CA: CSLI.
2005a In Name Only. Structuring Sense , Vol. I. Oxford: OUP. Crossref link
2005b The Normal Course of Events. Structuring Sense , Vol. II. Oxford: OUP. Crossref link
2009Roots and categories. Handout from talk at 19th Colloquium on Generative Grammar. University of the Basque country, Vitoria.
Bošković, Z.
2005On the locality of left branch extraction and the structure of NP. Studia Linguistica 59: 589–644. Crossref link
2007On the locality and motivation of Move and Agree: An even more minimal theory. LI 38: 589–644.
Branigan, P.
2005The Phase theoretic bass for subject-aux inversion. Ms, Memorial University.
Cable, S.
2010 The Grammar of Q: Q-particles, Wh-Movement and Pied-piping . Oxford: OUP.
Chametzky, R.
2000 Phrase Structure . Oxford: Blackwell.
Chierchia, G.
1998aReference to kinds across languages. Natural language semantics 6(4): 339–405. Crossref link
1998bPlurality of mass nouns and the notion of ‘semantic parameter’. In Events in Grammar , S. Rothstein (ed.), 53–103. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
Chomsky, N.
1955 [1975] The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory . New York NY: Plenum.
1957 Syntactic Structures . The Hague: Mouton.
1959Review of Skinner’s Verbal Behavior. Language 35: 26–58. Crossref link
1964 Current Issues in Linguistic Theory . The Hague: Mouton.
1965 Aspects of a Theory of Syntax . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
1966 Topics in the Theory of Generative Grammar . The Hague: Mouton.
1970Remarks on nominalization. In Readings in Transformational Grammar , J. Roderick & P. Rosenbaum (eds), 184–221. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
1981 Lectures on Government and Binding . Dordrecht: Foris.
1982 Some Concepts and Consequences of the Theory of Government and Binding . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
1986a Barriers . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
1986b Knowledge of Language . New York, NY: Praeger.
1991On formalization and formal linguistics. NLLT 8: 134–147.
1995a The Minimalist Program . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
1995bBare phrase structure. In Government and Binding and the Minimalist Program , G. Webelhuth (ed.), 385–439. Oxford: Blackwell.
2000Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step , R. Martin, D. Michaels & J. Uriagereka (eds), 89–115. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
2001Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale. A Life in Language , M. Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
2004Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Structures and Beyond , A. Belletti (ed.). 104–131. Oxford: OUP.
2005Three factors in language design. LI 36: 1–22.
2007Approaching UG from below. In Interfaces + Recursion = Language? Chomsky’s Minimalism and the View from Ssyntax-semantics , U. Sauerland & H. M. Gärtner (eds), 1–30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
2008On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory , R. Freidin, C. Otero & M. L. Zubizarreta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130: 33–49. Crossref link
Chomsky, N. & Lasnik, H.
1995Principles and parameters theory. In Syntax an International Handbook of Contemporary Research , J. Jacobs, A. van Stechow & T. Vennemann (eds), 506–569. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Cinque, G.
1980On extraction from NP in Italian. Journal of Italian Linguistics 5: 47-99.
Citko, B.
2008aSmall clauses reconsidered: Not so small and not all alike. Lingua 118: 261–295. Crossref link
2008bMissing labels. Lingua 118: 907–944. Crossref link
Collins, C.
2002Eliminating labels. In Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program , S. Epstein & D. Seely (eds). Oxford: Blackwell.
van Craenenbroeck, J. & de Belder, M.
2011How to merge a root. Ms, CRISSP/HUB/FUSL/KUL & CRISSP/HUB/UiL-OTS/Utrecht.
Cuervo, M. C.
2007Double objects in Spanish as a Second Language: Acquisition of Morphosyntax and Semantics. SSLA 29: 583–615.
Delfitto, D., Fábregas, A. & Melloni, C.
2008Compounding at the interfaces. Ms, University of Verona & CASTL Universitetet i Tromsø.
den Dikken, M.
2006 Relators and linkers: The syntax of predication, predicate inversion, and copulas . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
2007aPhase extension. Contours of a theory of the role of head movement in phrasal extraction. Theoretical Linguistics 33(1): 1–41. Crossref link
2007bPhase extension: A reply. Theoretical Linguistics 33(1): 133–163. Crossref link
den Dikken, M., Meinunger, A. & Wilder, C.
2000Pseudoclefts and ellipsis. Studia Linguistica 54(1): 41–89. Crossref link
Di Sciullo, A. M.
2005 Asymmetry in Morphology . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Di Sciullo, A. M. & Williams, E.
1987 On the Definition of Word . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Di Sciullo, A. M. & Isac, D.
2008aThe asymmetry of merge. Biolinguistics 2(4): 260–290.
2008bMovement chains at the interfaces. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 53(2–3): 181–217. Crossref link
Donati, C. & Cechetto, C.
2010On labeling: Principle C and Head Movement. Syntax 13(3): 241–78. Crossref link
Donati, C.
2006On wh-movement. In L. Cheng&N. Corver (eds.). Wh-movement. Moving on . Cambridge MA: MIT Press. 21–46.
Dowty, D.
1989On the semantic content of the notion of ‘Thematic Role’. In Properties, Types and Meaninigs , Vol II, G. Chirechia, B. Partee & R. Turner (eds), 69–129. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
Dubinsky, S. & Simango, S.
1996Passsive and stative in Chichewa: Evidence for modular distinctions in grammar. Language 72: 749–781. Crossref link
2007 6. überarbeitete Auflage . Mannheim: Dudenverlag.
Embick, D. & Marantz, A.
2008Architecture and blocking. LI 39(1): 1–53.
Embick, D. & Noyer, R.
2007Distributed mophology and the syntax-mrophology interface. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Interfaces , G. Ramchand & C. Reiss, 289–324. Oxford: OUP.
Epstein, S.
1999Un-principled syntax and the derivation of syntactic relations. In Working Minimalism , S. Epstein & N. Hornstein (eds), 317–345. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Epstein, S., Groat, E., Kawashima, R. & Kitahara, H.
1998 A Derivational Approach to Syntactic Relations . Oxford: OUP.
Epstein, S. & Seely, T.
2002Rule applications as cycles in a level-free syntax. In Explanation and Derivation in the Minimalist Program , S. Epstein & T. Seely (eds), 65–89. Oxford: Blackwell. Crossref link
Fitch T., Hauser, M. & Chomsky, N.
2005The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. Cognition 97: 179–210. Crossref link
Fortuny, J.
2006The Emergence of Order in Syntax. PhD dissertation, UAB.
Fox, D. & Pesetsky, D.
2003Cyclic linearization and the typology of movement. Ms, MIT.
2005Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure. Theoretical Linguistics 31: 1–46. Crossref link
Frampton, J. & Gutmann, S.
2002Crash-proof syntax. In Explanation and Derivation in the Minimalist Program , S. Epstein & T. Seely (eds), 90–105. Oxford: Blackwell. Crossref link
Fu, J., Roeper, T. & Borer, H.
2001The VP within process nominals: Evidence from adverbs and the VP anaphor do-so . NLLT 19(3): 549–582.
Gallego, A.
2010 Phase Theory . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
2011Lexical items and feature bundling. Handout from talk at Workshop on Formal Grammar and Syntactic Variation. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Gallego, A. & Uriagereka, J.
2007A critique of phase extension with a comparison to phase sliding. Theoretical Linguistics 33(1): 65–74. Crossref link
Gallmann, P.
1998Case underspecification in Morphology, syntax and the lexicon. In: A. Alexiadou. &C. Wilder. (eds.). Possessors, predicates and movement in the determiner phrase . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 141–176. Crossref link
Giegerich, H.
1999 Lexical Strata in English: Morphological Causes, Phonological Effects . Cambridge: CUP. Crossref link
2004Compound or phrase? English noun-plus-noun constructions and the stress criterion. Journal of Linguistics 8: 1–24.
2009Compounding and lexicalism. In Handbook of Compounding , R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (eds), 178–200. Oxford: OUP.
Grela, S., Snyder, W. & Hiramatsu, K.
2005The production of novel root compounds in children with specific language impairment. Clinical linguistics & phonetics 19(8): 701–715. Crossref link
Grewendorf, G. & Kremers, J.
2009Phases and cycles: Some problems with phase theory. The Linguistic Review 26: 385–430. Crossref link
Grimshaw, J.
1990 Argument Structure . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Grohmann, K.
2003 Prolific Peripheries . Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Guimarães, M.
2000In defense of vacuous projections in bare phrase structure. UMDWPL 9: 90–115.
Grosz, P.
2008A different view on ergativity in German nominalizations. Handout from talk at ECO5. UConn.
Haider, H.
1993 Deutsche Syntax generativ . Tübingen: Narr.
2010 The Syntax of German . Cambridge: CUP. Crossref link
2013 Symmetry Breaking in Syntax . Cambridge: CUP.
Hale, K. & Keyser, S.
1992The syntactic character of thematic structure. In Thematic Structure: Its Role in Grammar , I. Roca (ed.), 107–143. Berlin: Foris.
1993On the argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger , K. Hale & S. Keyser (eds), 53–109. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
2002 Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Halle, M. & Marantz, A.
1993Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger , K. Hale & S. Keyser (eds), 117–176. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
1994Some key features in distributed morphology. MITWPL 21: 275–288.
Harley, H.
1995Subjects Events and Licensing. PhD dissertation, MIT.
1998You’re having me on: Aspects of have . In La grammaire de la possession , J. Guéron & A. Zribi- Hertz (eds), 195–226. Paris-Nanterre: Université Paris X.
2002Theta theory and minimalism. Handout from talk at Mayfest. University of Maryland.
2004Merge, conflation and head movement. In Proceedings from NELS 34 , K. Moulton & M. Wolf (eds), 239–254. Amherst MA: GLSA.
2005Bare phrase structure, acategorial roots, one-replacement and unaccusativity. In Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics , Vol. 11, S. Gorbachov & A. Nevins (eds), 59–78. Cambridge MA: Harvard University.
2008The morphology of nominalizations and the syntax of vP. In A. Giannakidou & M. Rathert (eds). Quantification, Definiteness and Nominalization , 321–343. Oxford: OUP.
2009Compounding in distributed morphology. In The Oxford Handbook on Compounding , R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (eds). 129–144. Oxford: OUP.
Harley, H. & Noyer, R.
1998aLicensing in the non-lexicalist lexicon: Nominalizations, vocabulary items and the encyclopedia. MITWPL 32: 119–138.
1998bMixed nominalizations, short verb movement and object shift in English. In Proceedings of NELS 28, P. N. Tamanji & K. Kusumoto (eds), 143–157. Amherst MA: GLSA.
1999Distributed morphology. GLOT 4(4): 3–19.
Harris, J.
1991The exponence of gender in Spanish. LI 22(1): 2–62.
Hauser, M., Chomsky, N. & Fitch, T.
2002The faculty of language: what is it, who has it and how did it evolve? Science 298: 1569–1579. Crossref link
Hazout, I.
1995Action nominalization and the lexicalist hypothesis. NLLT 13(3): 355–404.
Heck, F., Müller, G. & Trommer, J.
2008A phase-based approach to Scandinavian definiteness marking. In Proceedings of WCCFL 26 , C. B. Chang & H. J. Haynie (eds), 226–233. Somerville MA: Cascadilla.
Herbeck, P.
. In preparation. The (non-)Existence of Empty Categories. PhD Dissertation. University of Wuppertal.
Heim, I. & Kratzer, A.
1998 Semantics in Generative Grammar . Oxford: Blackwell.
Heycock, C. & Kroch, A.
1999Pseudocleft conectedness: Implications for the LF interface level. LI 30: 365–398.
Higginbotham, J.
1986Linguistic theory and Davidson’s program. In Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation , E. Lepore (ed.), 29–48. Oxford: OUP.
Hicks, G.
2009 The Derivation of Anaphoric Relations . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Hinzen, W.
2007 An Essay on Naming and Truth . Oxford: OUP.
Hiraiwa, K.
2005Dimensions of Symmetry in Syntax: Agreement and Clausal Architecture. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Hollebrandse, B., Hobbs, K., de Villiers, J. & Roeper, T.
2008Second order embedding and second order false belief. In Language Acquisition and Development: Proceedings of GALA 2007 , A. Gavano & M. J. Freitas (eds), 270–280. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
Holmberg, A.
1999Remarks on Holmberg’s generalization. Studia Linguistica 53: 1–39. Crossref link
2010Parameters in minimalist theory: The case of Scandinavian. Theoretical Linguistics 36(1): 1–48. Crossref link
Al-Horais, N.
2007The categorial status of the small clause node: A minimalist approach. NDWPL 13: 96–108.
Hornstein, N.
2001 Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal . Oxford: Blackwell.
2009 Theory of Syntax . Cambridge: CUP.
Hornstein, N. & Nunes, J.
2008Adjunction, labeling and bare phrase structure. Biolinguistics 2(1): 57–86.
Hornstein, N., Nunes, J. & Grohman, K.
2006 Understanding Minimalism . Cambridge: CUP.
van Hout, A. & Roeper, T.
1998Events and aspectual structure in derivational morphology. MITWPL 32: 175–200.
Huang, S. F.
1998Chinese as a headless language in compounding morphology. In New Approaches to Chinese Word Formation , J. L. Packard (ed.), 261–283. Berlin: de Gruyter.
Iacobini, C. & Masini, F.
2007The emergence of verb-particle constructions in Italian: Locative and actional meanings. Morphology 16: 155–188. Crossref link
Iordăchioaia, G. & Soare, E.
2008Two kinds of event plurals: Evidence from Romanian nominalizations. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics: Papers from CSSP , O. Bonami & P. Cabredo-Hofherr (eds), 193–217. <http://​www​.cssp​.cnrs​.fr​/eiss6​/index​_en​.html>
Johns, A.
2009Additional facts about noun incorporation (in Inuktitut). Lingua 119: 185–198. Crossref link
Johnson, K.
1991Object positions. NLLT 9(4): 577–636.
Julien, M.
2002 Syntactic Heads and Word Formation . Oxford: OUP.
Kayne, R.
1984 Connectedness and Binary Branching . Dordrecht: Foris.
1994 The Antisymmetry of Syntax . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
2009Antisymmetry and the lexicon. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 8: 1–31. Crossref link
2010Why are there no directionality parameters? Ms, NYU.
Keyser, S. & Roeper, T.
1992Re: The abstract clitic hypothesis. LI 23: 89–125.
Koopman, H. & Szabolsci, A.
2000 Verbal Complexes . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Kratzer, A.
1996Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon , J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (eds), 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
Larson, R. & Segal, G.
1995 Knowledge of Meaning: An Introduction to Semantic Theory . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Lasnik, H. & Saito, M.
1984On the nature of proper government. LI 15: 235–289.
Lebeaux, D.
1988Language Acquisition and the Form of the Grammar. PhD Dissertation, UMass Amherst.
Legate, J. A.
2003Some interface properties of the phase. LI 34: 506–516.
Liceras, J. M., Días, L. & Salomaa-Robertson, T.
2002The compounding parameter and the word-marker hypothesis: Accounting for adult L2 acquisition of Spanish N – N compounds. In The Acquisition of Spanish Morphosyntax , A. T. Pérez-Leroux & J. M. Liceras (eds), 209–237. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
Lieber, R.
2005English word-formation processes: observations, issues and thoughts on future research. In Handbook of Word-formation , R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (eds), 375–427. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
Longobardi, G.
1996The syntax of N-raising: A minimalist theory. OTS Working Papers in Linguistics . 1–56.
2001aThe structure of DPs: Some principles, parameters and problems. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory , M. Baltin & C. Collins (eds), 562–604. Oxford: Blackwell. Crossref link
2001bFormal syntax, diachronic minimalism, and etymology: The history of French chez. LI 32(2): 275–302.
Marantz, A.
1997No escape from syntax. In Proceedings from the 21st Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium , A. Dimitriadis, L. Siegel, C. Surek-Clark & A. Wiliams (eds), 201–225. Philadelphia, PA: PWPL.
2001Words. Ms, MIT.
2007Phases and words. Ms, NYU.
Marchand, H.
1969 The Categories and Types of Present-day English Word-formation . München: Beck.
Marušič, F. L.
2005On Non-simultaneous Phases. PhD Dissertation, Stony Brook University.
Massam, D.
2001Pseudo noun incorporation in Niuean. NLLT 19: 153–197.
2009Existential incorporation constructions. Lingua 119: 166–184. Crossref link
Mateu, J.
2002Argument structure. Relational construal at the syntax-semantics interface. Dissertation. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Mateu, J.. & Rigau, G.
2010Verb particle constructions in Romance: a lexical-syntactic account. Probus 22: 241–269.
Matushansky, O.
2005Going through a phase. In Perspectives on phases , M. McGinnis & N. Richards (eds), 157–181. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
2006Head movement in linguistic theory. LI 37(1): 69–109.
2007a What’s in a name . Handout from talk at PALMYR: Paris.
2007bPredication and escape hatches in phase extension theory. Theoretical Linguistics 33(1): 93–104. Crossref link
May, R.
1985 Logical Form . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Miyoshi, N.
1999Compounds and complex predicates: Japanese evidence for a ‘global’ parameter. In Proceedings from the Boston Conference on Language Development 23 , A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield & C. Tano (eds), 453–461. Somerville MA: Cascadilla.
Moro, A.
1995Topics in small clauses with predicative nominals. In Small Clauses , A. Cardinaletti & M. T. Guasti (eds), 109–132. New York: Academic Press.
1997 The Raising of Predicates: Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure . Cambridge: CUP. Crossref link
2000 Dynamic Antisymmetry . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
2007 Some Notes on Unstable Structures . Ms, Vita Salute San Rafaelle University.
2009Rethinking symmetry: A note on labeling and the EPP. Snippets 19: 17–18.
Müller, G.
1996A constraint on remnant movement. NLLT 14: 355–407.
2004Verb-second as vP-first. Journal of comparative Germanic linguistics 7: 179–234. Crossref link
2010On deriving CED effects from the PIC. LI 41(1): 35–82.
Müller, G. & Heck, F.
2008Derivational optimization of wh-movement. Linguistic Analysis 33: 97–148.
Mukai, M.
2004Headedness of compound words in a minimalist framework. Ms, University of Durham.
Narita, H.
2009Full interpretation of optimal labeling. Biolinguistics 3(2–3): 213–254.
2011Phasing-in full interpretation. Ms, Harvard.
Nilsen, O.
2003Eliminating Positions: Syntax and Semantics of Sentence Modification. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.
Nübling, D. & Szczepaniak, R.
2009Religion+s+freiheit, Stabilität+s+pakt und Subjekt+s+ pronomen: Fugenelemente als Marker phonologischer Wortgrenzen. In Studien zur Fremdwortbildung , P.O. Müller (ed.), 195–222. Zürich: Georg Olms.
2010Was erklärt die Diachronie für die Synchronie der deutschen Gegenwartssprache? Am Beispiel schwankender Fugenelemente. In Perspektiven der germanistischen Sprachgeschichtsforschung , H. U. Schmid (ed.), 205–224. Berlin: De Gruyter. Crossref link
2011Merkmal(s?)analyse, Seminar(s?)arbeit und Essen(s?)ausgabe: Zweifelsfälle der Verfugung als Indikatoren für sprachlichen Wandel. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 30: 45–72. Crossref link
Nunes, J.
2004Linearization of chains and sideward movement. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Ott, D.
2008Notes on noun ph (r)ases. Ms, Harvard.
Parrot, J.
2001A morphological theory of head movement. Ms, Georgetown University.
Parsons, T.
1990 Events in the Semantics of English . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Pereltsvaig, A.
2001On the Nature of Intra-clausal Relations: A Study of Copular Sentences in Russian and Italian. PhD dissertation, McGill University.
Pesetsky, D. & Torrego, E.
2006Probes, goals, and the nature of syntactic categories. In Proceedings of the Seventh Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics , Y. Otsu (ed.), 25–60. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.
2007The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Phrasal and Clausal Architecture , S. Karimi, V. Samiian & W. K. Wilkins (eds), 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Pietroski, P.
2002Function and concatenation. In Logical Form , G. Preyer & G. Peters (eds), 91–117. Oxford: OUP.
2005 Events and Semantic Interpretation . Oxford: OUP.
2006Interpreting concatenation and concatenates. Philosophical Issues 16: 221–245. Crossref link
Pietroski, P. & Hornstein, N.
2009Basic operations. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 8: 113–139.
Poletto, C. & Pollock, Y. I.
2004On the left periphery of some Romance wh-questions. In The Structure of IP and CP , L. Rizzi (ed.), 251–269. Oxford: OUP.
Pollock, Y. I.
2006Subject clitics and complement inversion. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax , Vol. IV., M. Everaert & H. van Riemsdijk (eds), 601–659. Oxford: Blackwell. Crossref link
Pustejovsky, J.
1995The generative lexicon. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
Pylkkänen, L.
2000Deriving adversity. In Proceedings of WCCFL 19 , R. Billery & B. D. Lillehaugen (eds), 399–410. Somerville MA: Cascadilla.
2002Introducing Arguments. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Radford, A.
1997 Syntactic Theory and the Structure of English: A Minimalist Approach . Cambridge: CUP. Crossref link
2004 Minimalist Syntax: Exploring the Structure of English . Cambridge: CUP. Crossref link
Ralli, A.
1992Compounding in modern Greek. Rivista di Linguistica 4(1): 143–174.
2008Compound markers and parametric variation. Language Typology and Universals 61(1): 19–38. Crossref link
Ramchand, G.
2008 Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First-phase Syntax . Cambridge: CUP. Crossref link
Rauh, G.
1997aEnglische Präpositionen zwischen lexikalischen und funktionalen Kategorien. In Lexikalische Kategorien und Merkmale , E. Löbel & G. Rauh (eds), 125–167. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
1997bLokale Präpositionen und referentielle Argumente. Linguistische Berichte 171: 415–442.
1999Adverb oder Präposition? Von der Notwendigkeit einer Abgrenzung von Wortarten und grammatischen Kategorien und der Gefahr einer terminologischen Falle. In Florilegium Linguisticum. Festschrift für Wolfgang P. Schmid zum 70. Geburtstag , E. Eggers, J. Becker, J. Udolph & D. Weber (eds), 367–392. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
2002Prepositions, features and projections. In Perspectives on Prepositions , H. Cuyckens & P. Radden (eds), 3–23. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
2010 Syntatic Categories: Their Identification and Description in Linguistic Theories . Oxford: OUP.
Richards, M. D.
2007On feature inheritance: And argument from the phase impenetrability condition. LI 38: 563–572.
2010Deriving the edge: What’s in a phase? Syntax 14(1): 75–95.
2012No phase is an island (?): An attempt to constrain internal ‘free merge’ via the edge feature. Handout from talk at syntax seminar. University of Frankfurt.
Ritter, E.
1991Two functional categories in noun phrases: evidence from modern Hebrew. In Perspectives on Phrase Structure , S. Rothstein (ed.), 37–62. New York NY: Academic Press.
Rizzi, L.
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar , L. Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
Roberts, I.
2005 Principles and Parameters in a VSO Language: A Case Study in Welsh . Oxford: OUP. Crossref link
2010 Agreement and Head Movement: Clitics, Incorporation and Defective Goals . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. Crossref link
2011aHead movement and the minimalist program. In The Oxford Handbook of Minimalism , C. Boeckx (ed.), 195–219. Oxford: OUP.
2011bParametric hierarchies: some observations. Handout from talk at Workshop on Formal Grammar and Syntactic Variation. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Roeper, T.
1987Implicit arguments and the head-complement relation. LI 18: 267–310.
1993Explicit syntax in the lexicon: The representation of nominalizations. In Semantics and the Lexicon , J. Pustejovsky (ed.), 185–220. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
1999Leftward movement in morphology. MITWPL 34: 35–66.
2005Chomsky’s Remarks and the transformationalist hypothesis. In Handbook of Word-formation , R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (eds), 125–144. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
2007 The Prism of Grammar . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
. In preparation. Vacate Phase.
Roeper, T. & Siegel, M.
1978A lexical transformation for verbal compounds. LI 9: 199–260.
Roeper, T. & van Hout, A.
1999The impact of nominalization on passive, -able and middle: Burzio’s generalization and feature-movement in the lexicon. MITWPL 35:185–211.
Roeper, T., Snyder, W. & Hiramatsu, K.
2002Learnability in a minimalist framework: Root compounds, merger and the syntax-morphology interface. In The Process of Language Acquisition , I. Lasser (ed.), 25–35. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Roeper, T. & Snyder, W.
2005Language learnability and the forms of recursion. In UG and External Systems , A. M. Di Sciullo (ed.), 155–169. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Roeper, T. & Hollebrandse, B.
. Forthcoming. Recursion and propositional exclusivity. Ms. UMass Amherst & University of Groningen.
Rothstein, S.
2000 Predicates and their Subjects . Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Roodenburg, J.
2006The role of number within nominal arguments. Handout from talk at 36th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages. Rutgers University, NJ.
Samuels, B.
2008The Structure of Phonological Theory. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
Sauerland, U. & Elbourne, P.
2002Total reconstruction, PF-movement and derivational order. LI 33: 283–319.
Scalise, S.
1986 Generative Morphology . Dordrecht: Foris. Crossref link
1992Compounding in Italian. Rivista di Linguistica 4(1): 175–200.
Scalise, S. & Guevara, E.
2005The lexicalist approach to word-formation and the notion of the lexicon. In Handbook of Word-formation , R. Lieber & P. Štekauer (eds), 147–187. Dordrecht: Kluwer. Crossref link
Schein, B.
1993 Plurals and Events . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Schorlemmer, E. & Temmermann, T.
2011Head movement as a PF-phenomenon. Evidence from identity under ellipsis. Handout from talk at WCCFL 29. University of Arizona.
Selkirk, L.
1982 The Syntax of Words . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Sheehan, M. & Hinzen, W.
2011PF-parameters and clausal/nominal denotation. Handout from talk at Workshop on Formal Grammar and Syntactic Variation. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Sichel, I.
2009New evidence for the structural realization of the implicit external argument in nominalizations. LI 40(4): 712–723.
2010Towards a typology of control in DP. In Movement Theory of Control , M. Polinski & N. Hornstein (eds), 245–266. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Siegel, L.
1997Gerundive nominals and the role of aspect. In Proceedings of the Fourteenth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics , J. Austin & A. Lawson (eds), 170–179. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.
Slabakova, R.
1999The complex predicate/N – N compounding relation in L2 acquisition. In Proceedings from the Boston Conference on Language Development 23, A. Greenhill, H. Littlefield & C. Tano (eds), 642–653. Somerville MA: Cascadilla.
Snyder, W.
1995Language Acquisition and Language Variation: The Role of Morphology. PhD dissertation, MIT.
2001On the nature of syntactic variation: Evidence from complex predicates and word-formation. Language 77: 324–342. Crossref link
Snyder, W. & Chen, D.
1997The syntax-morphology interface in the acquisition of French and English. In K Kusumoto (ed.). Proceedings of NELS 27 . Amherst MA: GSLA.
Snyder, W. & Stromswold, K.
1997The structure and acquisition of English dative constructions. LI 28: 281–317.
Spencer, A.
1991 Morphological Theory: An Introduction to Word Structure in Generative Grammar . Oxford: Blackwell.
Stabler, E.
1998Acquiring languages without movement. Syntax 1(1): 72–97. Crossref link
Starke, M.
2010Nanosyntax: A short primer to a new approach to language. Nordlyd 36(1): 1–6.
Stroik, T.
2009 Locality in Minimalist Syntax . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. Crossref link
Svenonius, P.
2003Limits on P: Filling in holes vs. falling in holes . Nordlyd 31(2): 431–445.
2004On the edge. In Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and their Effects , D. Adger, C. de Cat & G. Tsoulas (eds). 261–287. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Sugisaki, K. & Isobe, M.
2000Resultative result from the compounding parameter: On the acquisitional correlation between resultatives and N – N compounds in Japanese. In Proceedings of WCCFL 19, R. Billery & B. D. Lillehaugen (eds), 493–506. Somerville MA: Cascadilla.
Talmy, L.
2000 Towards a Cognitive Semantics . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Takano, Y.
2000Illicit remnant movement. LI 31: 141–156.
Travis, L.
1984Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Uriagereka, J.
1998 Rhyme and Reason . Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
1999Multiple spell-out. In Working Minimalism , S. Epstein & N. Hornstein (eds), 251–282. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
2008 Syntactic Anchors . Cambridge: CUP. Crossref link
Vincente, L.
2007The Syntax of Heads and Phrases. A Study of Verb (Phrase) Fronting. PhD dissertation, Unversity of Leiden.
Wassow, T.
1977Transformations and the lexicon. In Formal Syntax , P. Culicover; T. Wassow & A. Akmajian (eds), 327–360. New York NY: Academic Press.
Wiese, R.
1996The phonology of German. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Williams, E.
1980Predication. LI 11: 203–238.
1981Argument structure and morphology. The Linguistic Review 1: 81–114. Crossref link
Zeller, J.
2001 Particle Verbs and Local Domains . Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Crossref link
Zhang, N.
2007Root merger in Chinese compounds. Studia Linguistica 61(2): 170–184. Crossref link
Zwarts, J.
1992 X’-syntax – X’-semantics. The interpretation of functional and lexical heads . Utrecht: LEd.
BIC Subject: CFK – Grammar, syntax
BISAC Subject: LAN009000 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / General
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2014011671