Cover not available
Part of
Advances in the Syntax of DPs: Structure, agreement, and case
Edited by Anna Bondaruk, Gréte Dalmi and Alexander Grosu
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 217] 2014
► pp. 295–317

Transparent free relatives

two challenges for the grafting approach

This chapter argues for the view that Standard Free Relatives and Transparent Free Relatives have exactly the same bi-dimensional configurational structures, and against the view that they have distinct multi-dimensional structures, the transparent variety being externally headed by a token of a CP-internal post-copular phrase. It is argued that the proposed view yields superior analyses of the following facts: [i] Transparent Free Relatives are typically construed as existentially quantified, regardless of the quantificational force of the pivot, and [ii] certain case mismatch effects, predicted by the competing approach, fail to materialize in most idiolects, and are only weakly manifested in a small number of idiolects, in which they affect both Standard and Transparent Free Relatives, contrary to predictions.
Published online: 14 October 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.217.12gro
References (28)
References
Bausewein (Pittner), Karin. 1990. Akkusativobjekt, Akkusativobjektsätze und Objektprädikate im Deutschen. Untersuchungen zu ihrer Syntax und Semantik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef. 1984. COMP in Bavarian Syntax. The Linguistic Review 3: 209–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Grimshaw, Jane. 1978. The syntax of free relatives in English. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 331–391.Google Scholar
Gallmann, Peter. 1990, Kategoriell Komplexe Wortformen: Das Zusammenwirken von Morphologie und Syntax bei der Flexion von Nomen und Adjektiv. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Grosu, Alexander. 2003. A unified theory of ‘standard’ and ‘transparent’ free relatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 247–331. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. ‘Direct’ versus ‘indirect’ approaches to transparent free relatives. In Pitar Moş: A Building with a View. Papers in Honour of Alexandra Cornilescu, Gabriela Alboiu, Andrei A. Avram, Larisa Avram & Daniela Isac (eds), 107–124. Bucharest: University of Bucharest Press.Google Scholar
. 2010. On the pre-theoretical notion phrasal head: Ignoring the left periphery is always at your own risk. In Edges, Heads and Projections. Interface Properties [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 156], Anna-Maria Di Sciullo & Virginia Hill (eds),151–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosu, Alexander & Landman, Fred. 1998. Strange relatives of the third kind. Natural Language Semantics 6: 125–170. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. A quantificational disclosure approach to Japanese and Korean internally headed relatives. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 21: 159–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grosu, Alexander & Hoshi, Koji. 2013. Japanese IHRCs: Towards an improved understanding of their syntactic, semantic and pragmatic properties. Ms.
Harbert, Wayne. 1983. On the nature of the matching parameter. The Linguistic Review 2: 237–284.Google Scholar
Hinterwimmer, Stefan. 2013. Free relatives as kind-denoting terms. In Genericity, Claire Beyssade, Fabio Del Prete & Alda Mari (eds), 140–156. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hoshi, Koji. 1995. Structural and Interpretive Aspects of Head-internal and Head-external Relative Clauses. PhD dissertation, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Pauline. 1995. On the quantificational force of English free relatives. In Quantification in Natural Languages,Vol.2, Emmon Bach, Elinor Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer & Barbara Partee (eds), 451– 486. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kajita, Masaru. 1977. Towards a dynamic model of syntax. Studies in English Linguistics 5: 44–66.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward, 1987. A semantic definition of indefinite NP . In The Representation of (In)definiteness, Eric Reuland & Alice ter Meulen (eds), 286–317. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok 2011. English transparent free relatives: Interactions between the lexicon and constructions. English Language and Linguistics 172: 153–181.Google Scholar
Landman, Fred. 2013. Japanese internally headed relatives. Phantom gaps, Kuroda functions, and how to stay away from scope. Ms, Tel Aviv UniversityGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David. 1968. Counterpart theory and quantified modal logic. Journal of Philosophy 65: 113–126. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nakau, Minoru. 1971. The grammar of the pseudo-free relative pronoun what . English Linguistics 6: 2–47.Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk. 1998. Trees and scions, science and trees. Chomsky 70th Birthday Celebration Fest Webpage. [URL]Google Scholar
. 2000. Free relatives inside out: Transparent free relatives as grafts. In PASE papers in language studies. Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference of the Polish Association for the Study of English , Bożena Rozwadowska (ed.), 223–233. Wrocław: University of Wrocław Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. A far from simple matter: Syntactic reflexes of syntax-pragmatics misalignments. In Semantics, Pragmatics and Discourse. Perspectives and Connections. A Festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 90], István Kenesei & Robert M. Harnish (eds), 21–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006a. Grafts follow from Merge . In Phases of Interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 17–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006b. Free relatives. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Martin Everaert, Henk van Riemsdijk, Rob Goedemans & Bart Hollebrandse (eds), 338–382. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Discerning default datives: Some properties of the dative case in German. In Discourse and Grammar, Günther Grewendorf & Ede T. Zimmermann (eds), 247–287. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Shimoyama, Junko. 1999. Internally headed relative clauses in Japanese and E-type anaphora. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8: 147–182. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wilder, Christopher. 1998. Transparent free relatives. ZAS Papers in Linguistics10: 191–199. Berlin: Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissen­­schaft.Google Scholar
Cited by (5)

Cited by five other publications

Agulló, Jorge
2024. El pronombre reasuntivo en español como mecanismo de concordancia. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 97 ► pp. 121 ff. DOI logo
Keizer, Evelien & Lotte Sommerer
2022. Major trends in research on the English NP. In English Noun Phrases from a Functional-Cognitive Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series, 221], ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
MATSUYAMA, TETSUYA
2018. TRANSPARENT FREE RELATIVES AS SPECIFYING COORDINATION. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 34:2 ► pp. 235 ff. DOI logo
Grosu, Alexander & Fred Landman
2017. Amount Relatives. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
van Riemsdijk, Henk C.
2017. Free Relatives. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.