Article published in:
Advances in the Syntax of DPs: Structure, agreement, and case
Edited by Anna Bondaruk, Gréte Dalmi and Alexander Grosu
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 217] 2014
► pp. 295317
References

References

Bausewein (Pittner), Karin
1990Akkusativobjekt, Akkusativobjektsätze und Objektprädikate im Deutschen. Untersuchungen zu ihrer Syntax und Semantik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef
1984COMP in Bavarian Syntax. The Linguistic Review 3: 209–274. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan & Grimshaw, Jane
1978The syntax of free relatives in English. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 331–391.Google Scholar
Gallmann, Peter
1990, Kategoriell Komplexe Wortformen: Das Zusammenwirken von Morphologie und Syntax bei der Flexion von Nomen und Adjektiv. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Grosu, Alexander
2003A unified theory of ‘standard’ and ‘transparent’ free relatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 247–331. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007‘Direct’ versus ‘indirect’ approaches to transparent free relatives. In Pitar Moş: A Building with a View. Papers in Honour of Alexandra Cornilescu, Gabriela Alboiu, Andrei A. Avram, Larisa Avram & Daniela Isac (eds), 107–124. Bucharest: University of Bucharest Press.Google Scholar
2010On the pre-theoretical notion phrasal head: Ignoring the left periphery is always at your own risk. In Edges, Heads and Projections. Interface Properties [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 156], Anna-Maria Di Sciullo & Virginia Hill (eds),151–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grosu, Alexander & Landman, Fred
1998Strange relatives of the third kind. Natural Language Semantics 6: 125–170. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012A quantificational disclosure approach to Japanese and Korean internally headed relatives. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 21: 159–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grosu, Alexander & Hoshi, Koji
2013Japanese IHRCs: Towards an improved understanding of their syntactic, semantic and pragmatic properties. Ms.
Harbert, Wayne
1983On the nature of the matching parameter. The Linguistic Review 2: 237–284.Google Scholar
Hinterwimmer, Stefan
2013Free relatives as kind-denoting terms. In Genericity, Claire Beyssade, Fabio Del Prete & Alda Mari (eds), 140–156. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hoshi, Koji
1995Structural and Interpretive Aspects of Head-internal and Head-external Relative Clauses. PhD dissertation, University of Rochester.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Pauline
1995On the quantificational force of English free relatives. In Quantification in Natural Languages,Vol.2, Emmon Bach, Elinor Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer & Barbara Partee (eds), 451– 486. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kajita, Masaru
1977Towards a dynamic model of syntax. Studies in English Linguistics 5: 44–66.Google Scholar
Keenan, Edward
1987A semantic definition of indefinite NP . In The Representation of (In)definiteness, Eric Reuland & Alice ter Meulen (eds), 286–317. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kim, Jong-Bok
2011English transparent free relatives: Interactions between the lexicon and constructions. English Language and Linguistics 172: 153–181.Google Scholar
Landman, Fred
2013Japanese internally headed relatives. Phantom gaps, Kuroda functions, and how to stay away from scope. Ms, Tel Aviv UniversityGoogle Scholar
Lewis, David
1968Counterpart theory and quantified modal logic. Journal of Philosophy 65: 113–126. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nakau, Minoru
1971The grammar of the pseudo-free relative pronoun what . English Linguistics 6: 2–47.Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk
1998Trees and scions, science and trees. Chomsky 70th Birthday Celebration Fest Webpage. <http://​cognet​.mit​.edu​/library​/books​/chomsky​/celebration​/>Google Scholar
2000Free relatives inside out: Transparent free relatives as grafts. In PASE papers in language studies. Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference of the Polish Association for the Study of English , Bożena Rozwadowska (ed.), 223–233. Wrocław: University of Wrocław Press.Google Scholar
2001A far from simple matter: Syntactic reflexes of syntax-pragmatics misalignments. In Semantics, Pragmatics and Discourse. Perspectives and Connections. A Festschrift for Ferenc Kiefer [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 90], István Kenesei & Robert M. Harnish (eds), 21–41. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006aGrafts follow from Merge . In Phases of Interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 17–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006bFree relatives. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Martin Everaert, Henk van Riemsdijk, Rob Goedemans & Bart Hollebrandse (eds), 338–382. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Discerning default datives: Some properties of the dative case in German. In Discourse and Grammar, Günther Grewendorf & Ede T. Zimmermann (eds), 247–287. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Shimoyama, Junko
1999Internally headed relative clauses in Japanese and E-type anaphora. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8: 147–182. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wilder, Christopher
1998Transparent free relatives. ZAS Papers in Linguistics10: 191–199. Berlin: Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissen­­schaft.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

MATSUYAMA, TETSUYA
2018. TRANSPARENT FREE RELATIVES AS SPECIFYING COORDINATION. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 34:2  pp. 235 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.