This chapter argues for the view that Standard Free Relatives and Transparent Free Relatives have exactly the same bi-dimensional configurational structures, and against the view that they have distinct multi-dimensional structures, the transparent variety being externally headed by a token of a CP-internal post-copular phrase. It is argued that the proposed view yields superior analyses of the following facts: [i] Transparent Free Relatives are typically construed as existentially quantified, regardless of the quantificational force of the pivot, and [ii] certain case mismatch effects, predicted by the competing approach, fail to materialize in most idiolects, and are only weakly manifested in a small number of idiolects, in which they affect both Standard and Transparent Free Relatives, contrary to predictions.
1990Akkusativobjekt, Akkusativobjektsätze und Objektprädikate im Deutschen. Untersuchungen zu ihrer Syntax und Semantik. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Bayer, Josef
1984COMP in Bavarian Syntax. The Linguistic Review 3: 209–274.
Bresnan, Joan & Grimshaw, Jane
1978The syntax of free relatives in English. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 331–391.
Gallmann, Peter
1990, Kategoriell Komplexe Wortformen: Das Zusammenwirken von Morphologie und Syntax bei der Flexion von Nomen und Adjektiv. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Grosu, Alexander
2003A unified theory of ‘standard’ and ‘transparent’ free relatives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 247–331.
Grosu, Alexander
2007‘Direct’ versus ‘indirect’ approaches to transparent free relatives. In Pitar Moş: A Building with a View. Papers in Honour of Alexandra Cornilescu, Gabriela Alboiu, Andrei A. Avram, Larisa Avram & Daniela Isac (eds), 107–124. Bucharest: University of Bucharest Press.
1998Strange relatives of the third kind. Natural Language Semantics 6: 125–170.
Grosu, Alexander & Landman, Fred
2012A quantificational disclosure approach to Japanese and Korean internally headed relatives. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 21: 159–196.
Grosu, Alexander & Hoshi, Koji
2013Japanese IHRCs: Towards an improved understanding of their syntactic, semantic and pragmatic properties. Ms.
Harbert, Wayne
1983On the nature of the matching parameter. The Linguistic Review 2: 237–284.
Hinterwimmer, Stefan
2013Free relatives as kind-denoting terms. In Genericity, Claire Beyssade, Fabio Del Prete & Alda Mari (eds), 140–156. Oxford: OUP.
Hoshi, Koji
1995Structural and Interpretive Aspects of Head-internal and Head-external Relative Clauses. PhD dissertation, University of Rochester.
Jacobson, Pauline
1995On the quantificational force of English free relatives. In Quantification in Natural Languages,Vol.2, Emmon Bach, Elinor Jelinek, Angelika Kratzer & Barbara Partee (eds), 451– 486. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Kajita, Masaru
1977Towards a dynamic model of syntax. Studies in English Linguistics 5: 44–66.
Keenan, Edward
1987A semantic definition of indefinite NP. In The Representation of (In)definiteness, Eric Reuland & Alice ter Meulen (eds), 286–317. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Kim, Jong-Bok
2011English transparent free relatives: Interactions between the lexicon and constructions. English Language and Linguistics 172: 153–181.
Landman, Fred
2013Japanese internally headed relatives. Phantom gaps, Kuroda functions, and how to stay away from scope. Ms, Tel Aviv University
Lewis, David
1968Counterpart theory and quantified modal logic. Journal of Philosophy 65: 113–126.
Nakau, Minoru
1971The grammar of the pseudo-free relative pronoun what. English Linguistics 6: 2–47.
van Riemsdijk, Henk
1998Trees and scions, science and trees. Chomsky 70th Birthday Celebration Fest Webpage. [URL]
van Riemsdijk, Henk
2000Free relatives inside out: Transparent free relatives as grafts. In
PASE papers in language studies. Proceedings of the 8th Annual Conference of the Polish Association for the Study of English
, Bożena Rozwadowska (ed.), 223–233. Wrocław: University of Wrocław Press.
2006aGrafts follow from Merge. In Phases of Interpretation, Mara Frascarelli (ed.), 17–44. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
van Riemsdijk, Henk
2006bFree relatives. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Martin Everaert, Henk van Riemsdijk, Rob Goedemans & Bart Hollebrandse (eds), 338–382. Oxford: Blackwell.
van Riemsdijk, Henk
2012Discerning default datives: Some properties of the dative case in German. In Discourse and Grammar, Günther Grewendorf & Ede T. Zimmermann (eds), 247–287. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Shimoyama, Junko
1999Internally headed relative clauses in Japanese and E-type anaphora. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 8: 147–182.
Wilder, Christopher
1998Transparent free relatives. ZAS Papers in Linguistics10: 191–199. Berlin: Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.
Cited by
Cited by 5 other publications
Agulló, Jorge
2024. El pronombre reasuntivo en español como mecanismo de concordancia. Círculo de Lingüística Aplicada a la Comunicación 97 ► pp. 121 ff.
Grosu, Alexander & Fred Landman
2017. Amount Relatives. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition, ► pp. 1 ff.
2018. TRANSPARENT FREE RELATIVES AS SPECIFYING COORDINATION. ENGLISH LINGUISTICS 34:2 ► pp. 235 ff.
van Riemsdijk, Henk C.
2017. Free Relatives. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Second Edition, ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 13 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.