Article published in:Weak Referentiality
Edited by Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Bert Le Bruyn and Joost Zwarts
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 219] 2014
► pp. 157–182
Many a plural
The aim of the present paper is to contribute to the literature on plurals by showing that, cross-linguistically, not all plurals are unmarked semantically. Focusing on Arabic, where the plural comes in many guises, and proposing different syntactic positions for its different manifestations, I show that, while classifying plurals (broken and sound plurals) allow an inclusive reading ( one or more ), counting plurals (plural of the singulative and double plurals) do not: they tolerate only exclusive readings ( more than one ). I then show that classifying plurals in Arabic allow inclusive readings in environments that favour number neutrality (modals, negation, etc.) and argue that, in these contexts, plurals denote kinds (in the sense of Carlson 1977 and following Grimm 2013 for English plurals). Such plural nominals do not presuppose the existence of any particular referents: they are weakly referential and that is why they allow inclusive readings.
Published online: 03 December 2014
Abdel-Massih, E., Abdel-Malek, Z.N., Badawi, E. M. & McCarus, E.N.
1979 A Reference Grammar of Egyptian Arabic. Ann Arbor MI: Center for Near Eastern and North African Studies.
2008 Lexical Plurals: A Morphosemantic Approach. Oxford: OUP.
Anand, P., Andrews, C., Farkas, D. & Wagers, M.
2011 The exclusive interpretation of plural nominals in quantificational environments. Proceedings of SALT 21:176–196.
Bale, A., Gagnon, M. & Khanjian, H.
1977 Reference to Kinds in English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
2003 No lack of determination. In The Second Glot International State-of-the-article Book: The Latest in linguistics, L. Cheng & R. Sybesma (eds), 149–178. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
de Swart, H. & Zwarts, J.
1997 Quantifiers and Selection: On the Distribution of Quantifying Expressions in French, Dutch and English [HIL dissertations]. The Hague: HAG.
1963 A Short Reference Grammar of Iraqi Arabic [Arabic series]. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
Farkas, D. & de Swart, H.
Fassi Fehri, A.
2003 Nominal classes and parameters across interfaces and levels, with a particular reference to Arabic. In Linguistic Research. Rabat: IERA Publications.
1996 Maltese 'collective nouns': A typological perspective. Rivista di Linguistica 8: 53–87.
1966 Language Universals, With Special Reference to Feature Hierarchies [Janua Linguarum Series Minor]. The Hague: Mouton.
1972 Numeral classifiers and substantival number: Problems in the genesis of a linguistic type. Working Papers on Language Universals 9: 2–39.
2013 Plurality is distinct from number-neutrality. In Proceedings of the 41st Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, L. Fainleib, N. LaCara & Y. Park (eds). Amherst MA: GLSA.
1962 A Short Reference Grammar of Moroccan Arabic. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.
1991 Artikel und Definitheit. In Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung, A. von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (eds), 487–535. Berlin: De Gruyter.
1990 Gulf Arabic [Croom Helm Descriptive Grammars]. London: Routledge.
2012 A split analysis of plurality: Evidence from Amharic. Proceedings of WCCFL 30: 226–236.
1989 Nominal reference, temporal constitution and quantification in event semantics. In Semantics and Contextual Expression, R. Bartsch, J. van Benthem & P. van Emde Boas (eds), 75–115. Dordrecht: Foris.
2002 Gender 'polarity': Theoretical aspects of Somali nominal morphology. In Many Morphologies, P. Boucher & M. Plénat (eds), 109–141. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.
1983 The logical analysis of plural and mass nouns: A lattice-theoretic approach. In Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze & A. von Stechow (eds), 302–323. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
1994 Reference and proper names: A theory of N movement in syntax and logical form. Linguistic Inquiry 25: 609–665.
2008 On n, nP and √. In The Sounds of Silence: Empty Elements in Syntax and Phonology, J. Hartmann, V. Hegedus & H. van Riemsdijk (eds), 105–144. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
2009 On the mass/count distinction in Ojibwe: Paper presented at Mass/count workshop, organized by Diane Massam, University of Toronto, February 7-8.
1981 Everything that Linguists have Always Wanted to Know about Logic (But were Ashamed to Ask). Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
1996 The collective in Maltese. Rivista di Linguistica 8: 29–51.
1992 The semantics of number in Arabic. In SALT II: Proceedings of the Second Conference on Semantics and Linguistic Theory, C. Barker & D. Dowty (eds), 303–325. Columbus OH: Ohio State University.
Quirk, R., Greenbaugh, S., Leech, G. & Svartvik, J.
1985 A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.
1991 Two functional categories in noun phrases: evidence from Modern Hebrew. In Syntax and Semantics, Vol. 25: Perspective on Phrase Structure, S. Rothstein (ed.), 37–62. New York NY: Academic Press.
1993 Where's gender? Linguistic Inquiry 24: 795–803.
Ritter, E. & Wiltschko, M.
1986 Modal Subordination, Anaphora and Distributivity. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
Sanches, M & Slobin, L.
1973 Numeral classifiers and plural marking: An implicational universal. Working papers in language universals (Stanford University) 11: 1–22.
2003 A new semantics for number. In Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory SALT 13, R. Young & Y. Zhou (eds), 258–275. Ithaca NY: CLC publications.
Sauerland, U., Andersen, J. & Yatsushiro, K.
1980 The Arabic dialect of Sûsa (Tunisia). Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
1963 A Grammar of the Arabic Language, Vol. 1. Cambridge: CUP.
2002 The semantics of number in the Arabic noun phrase. University of Calgary.
2006 Monotonicity in opaque verbs. Linguistics and Philosophy 29:7 15–761.
Cited by other publications
Cyrino, Sonia & M.Teresa Espinal
Dali, Myriam & Eric Mathieu
Mathieu, Eric & Gita Zareikar
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 june 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.