Part of
Weak Referentiality
Edited by Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Bert Le Bruyn and Joost Zwarts
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 219] 2014
► pp. 213235
Aguilar-Guevara, A. & Zwarts, J
2011Weak definites and reference to kinds. In Proceedings of SALT 20, N. Li & D. Lutz (eds),179–196. Vancouver BC.Google Scholar
Asic, T. & Corblin, F
2012Telic definites and their preposition (s): French vs. Serbian. Talk presented at the Workshop on ‘Languages with and without articles’, Paris, France.
Axelrod, M
1990Incorporation in Koyukon Athapaskan. International Journal of American Linguistics 56(2): 179–195. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Barker, C
2005Possessive weak definites. In Possessives and Beyond: Semantics and Syntax, J. Kim, Y. Lander & B.H. Partee (eds), 89–113. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Borthen, K
2003Norwegian Bare Singulars. PhD dissertation, NTNU, Trondheim.
Bosch, P
2010. Weak definites and German preposition-determiner contraction. Talk presented at the Workshop on ‘Specificity from theoretical and empirical points of view’, University of Stuttgart.
Bosch, P. & Cieschinger, M
2010. Weak definites. Linguistic evidence for cognitive constraints. Talk presented at the Cognitive Science Research Training School, Universität Osnabrück.
Carlson, G
2006The meaningful bounds of incorporation. In Nondefiniteness and Plurality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 95], S. Vogeleer & L. Tasmowski (eds), 35–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1977Reference to Kinds in English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Carlson, G., Sussman, R., Klein, N. & Tanenhaus, M
2006Weak definite noun phrases. In Proceedings of NELS 36, C. Davis, A.-R. Deal & Youri Zabbal (eds), 179–196. Amherst, MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Chierchia, G
1984Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives and Gerunds. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
1995Dynamics of Meaning. Anaphora, Presupposition and the Theory of Grammar. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1998Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6(4): 339–405. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Clark, H.H
1975Bridging. In Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing, R.C. Schank & B.L. Nash-Webber (eds), 169–174.New York NY: Association for Computing Machinery.Google Scholar
Dayal, V
2004Number marking and (in)definiteness in kind terms. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(4): 393–450. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011Hindi pseudo-incorporation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29(1):123–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elbourne, P
2005Situations and Individuals. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
von Fintel, K
1994Restrictions on Quantifier Domains. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Hawkins, J.A
1978Definiteness and Indefiniteness. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Heim, I
1991Artikel und Definitheit. In Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung, A. von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (eds), 487–535. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kadmon, N
1987On Unique and Non-unique Reference and Asymmetric Quantification. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Kratzer, A
1989An investigation of the lumps of thought. Linguistics and Philosophy 12(5): 607–653. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1996Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (eds), 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2007aOn the plurality of verbs. In Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation, J. Dölling, T. Heyde-Zybatow & M. Schäfer (eds), 269–300. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2007bSituations in natural language semantics. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, E.N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Krifka, M., Pelletier, F.J., Carlson, G.N., ter Meulen, A., Chierchia, G. & Link, G
1995Introduction to genericity. In The Generic Book, G.N. Carlson & F.J. Pelletier (eds), 1–124. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Landman, F
1996Plurality. In The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, S. Lappin (ed.), 425–457. Cambridge: Blackwell.Google Scholar
2000Events and Plurality. The Jerusalem Lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mithun, M
1984The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 60(4): 847–894. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Partee, B.H
1986Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, J. Groenendijk, D.H.J. Jongh & M. Stokhof, 115–144. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Poesio, M
1994Weak definites. In Proceedings of SALT IV, M. Harvey & L. Santelmann (eds), Vol. 4, 282–299. Ithaca CA: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Postal, P.M
1969On so-called ‘pronouns’ in English. In Modern Studies in English, D. Reibel & S. Schane (eds), 201–224. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Prince, E.F
1981Toward a taxonomy of given/new information. In Radical Pragmatics, P. Cole (ed), 223–255. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, J
1995The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
de Reuse,. J
1994Noun incorporation in Lakota (Siouan). International Journal of American Linguistics 60(3):199–260. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, C
2003Uniqueness in definite noun phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 6(3): 287–350. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, S
1995Adverbial quantification over events. Natural Language Semantics 3(1):1–32. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Scholten, J. & Aguilar-Guevara, A
2010Assessing the discourse referential properties of weak definite NP’s. In Linguistics in the Netherlands, Vol. 27, J. van Kampen & R. Nouwen (eds),115–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, F
2009Two Types of Definites in Natural Language. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
2012aDifferent types of definites crosslinguistically. Ms, University of Pennsylvania.
2012bSituation pronouns in determiner phrases. Natural Language Semantics 20(4): 431–475. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 14 other publications

Aguilar-Guevara, Ana & Maartje Schulpen
2014. Modified weak definites. In Weak Referentiality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 219],  pp. 237 ff. DOI logo
Dayal, Veneeta & Yağmur Sağ
2020. Determiners and Bare Nouns. Annual Review of Linguistics 6:1  pp. 173 ff. DOI logo
Driemel, Imke
2023. Pseudo-Noun Incorporation and Differential Object Marking, DOI logo
Gehrke, Berit & Cristina Marco
2014. Different by-phrases with adjectival and verbal passives: Evidence from Spanish corpus data. Lingua 149  pp. 188 ff. DOI logo
Gehrke, Berit & Louise McNally
2019. Idioms and the syntax/semantics interface of descriptive content vs. reference. Linguistics 57:4  pp. 769 ff. DOI logo
Klein, Natalie M., Whitney M. Gegg-Harrison, Greg N. Carlson & Michael K. Tanenhaus
2013. Experimental investigations of weak definite and weak indefinite noun phrases. Cognition 128:2  pp. 187 ff. DOI logo
Koring, Loes
2020. Producing figurative meanings. In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10],  pp. 237 ff. DOI logo
Krifka, Manfred & Fereshteh Modarresi
Luo, Qiongpeng
2022. Bare nouns, incorporation, and event kinds in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 31:2  pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
McKenzie, Andrew
2022. Mediating functions and the semantics of noun incorporation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 40:2  pp. 505 ff. DOI logo
Pinzin, Francesco & Cecilia Poletto
2022. Indefinite Objects in Micro‐variation. A Cross‐linguistic Analysis of the Distribution of Partitives Articles, Bare Nominals and Definite Determiners in Northern Italy*. Studia Linguistica 76:1  pp. 13 ff. DOI logo
Sağ, Yağmur
2022. Bare singulars and singularity in Turkish. Linguistics and Philosophy 45:4  pp. 741 ff. DOI logo
Schumacher, Petra B. & Hanna Weiland
Tsiakmakis, Evripidis, Joan Borràs-Comes & M.Teresa Espinal
2021. The interpretation of plural mass nouns in Greek. Journal of Pragmatics 181  pp. 209 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 12 may 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.