Part of
Weak ReferentialityEdited by Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Bert Le Bruyn and Joost Zwarts
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 219] 2014
► pp. 213–235
Edited by Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Bert Le Bruyn and Joost Zwarts
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 219] 2014
► pp. 213–235
How weak and how definite are Weak Definites?
This paper explores the potential for a unified analysis of Weak Definites and regular definites. I first consider and argue against assimilating Weak Definites to co-varying interpretations of regular definites via general mechanisms. Next, I present a new proposal for analyzing Weak Definites, which sees them as regular definites occurring in verb phrases that denote kinds of events. This has the promise of allowing us to maintain a unified analysis of definites in terms of uniqueness while at the same time capturing the special properties of Weak Definites.
References (41)
Aguilar-Guevara, A. & Zwarts, J. 2011. Weak definites and reference to kinds. In Proceedings of SALT 20, N. Li & D. Lutz (eds),179–196. Vancouver BC.
Asic, T. & Corblin, F. 2012. Telic definites and their preposition (s): French vs. Serbian. Talk presented at the Workshop on ‘Languages with and without articles’, Paris, France.
Axelrod, M. 1990. Incorporation in Koyukon Athapaskan. International Journal of American Linguistics 56(2): 179–195. 
Barker, C. 2005. Possessive weak definites. In Possessives and Beyond: Semantics and Syntax, J. Kim, Y. Lander & B.H. Partee (eds), 89–113. Amherst MA: GLSA.
Borthen, K. 2003. Norwegian Bare Singulars. PhD dissertation, NTNU, Trondheim.
Bosch, P. 2010. Weak definites and German preposition-determiner contraction. Talk presented at the Workshop on ‘Specificity from theoretical and empirical points of view’, University of Stuttgart.
Bosch, P. & Cieschinger, M. 2010. Weak definites. Linguistic evidence for cognitive constraints. Talk presented at the Cognitive Science Research Training School, Universität Osnabrück.
Carlson, G. 2006. The meaningful bounds of incorporation. In Nondefiniteness and Plurality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 95], S. Vogeleer & L. Tasmowski (eds), 35–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
. 1977. Reference to Kinds in English. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Carlson, G., Sussman, R., Klein, N. & Tanenhaus, M. 2006. Weak definite noun phrases. In Proceedings of NELS 36, C. Davis, A.-R. Deal & Youri Zabbal (eds), 179–196. Amherst, MA: GLSA.
Chierchia, G. 1984. Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives and Gerunds. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
. 1995. Dynamics of Meaning. Anaphora, Presupposition and the Theory of Grammar. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
. 1998. Reference to kinds across languages. Natural Language Semantics 6(4): 339–405.
Clark, H.H. 1975. Bridging. In Theoretical Issues in Natural Language Processing, R.C. Schank & B.L. Nash-Webber (eds), 169–174.New York NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
Dayal, V. 2004. Number marking and (in)definiteness in kind terms. Linguistics and Philosophy 27(4): 393–450.
. 2011. Hindi pseudo-incorporation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29(1):123–167.
Elbourne, P. 2005. Situations and Individuals. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
von Fintel, K. 1994. Restrictions on Quantifier Domains. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Hawkins, J.A. 1978. Definiteness and Indefiniteness. London: Croom Helm.
Heim, I. 1991. Artikel und Definitheit. In Semantik: Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung, A. von Stechow & D. Wunderlich (eds), 487–535. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Kadmon, N. 1987. On Unique and Non-unique Reference and Asymmetric Quantification. PhD thesis, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
Kratzer, A. 1989. An investigation of the lumps of thought. Linguistics and Philosophy 12(5): 607–653.
. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, J. Rooryck & L. Zaring (eds), 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
. 2007a. On the plurality of verbs. In Event Structures in Linguistic Form and Interpretation, J. Dölling, T. Heyde-Zybatow & M. Schäfer (eds), 269–300. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
. 2007b. Situations in natural language semantics. In Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, E.N. Zalta (ed.), Stanford CA: CSLI.
Krifka, M., Pelletier, F.J., Carlson, G.N., ter Meulen, A., Chierchia, G. & Link, G. 1995. Introduction to genericity. In The Generic Book, G.N. Carlson & F.J. Pelletier (eds), 1–124. Chicago IL: Chicago University Press.
Landman, F. 1996. Plurality. In The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory, S. Lappin (ed.), 425–457. Cambridge: Blackwell.
. 2000. Events and Plurality. The Jerusalem Lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Mithun, M. 1984. The evolution of noun incorporation. Language 60(4): 847–894.
Partee, B.H. 1986. Noun phrase interpretation and type-shifting principles. In Studies in Discourse Representation Theory and the Theory of Generalized Quantifiers, J. Groenendijk, D.H.J. Jongh & M. Stokhof, 115–144. Dordrecht: Foris.
Poesio, M. 1994. Weak definites. In Proceedings of SALT IV, M. Harvey & L. Santelmann (eds), Vol. 4, 282–299. Ithaca CA: Cornell University Press.
Postal, P.M. 1969. On so-called ‘pronouns’ in English. In Modern Studies in English, D. Reibel & S. Schane (eds), 201–224. Englewood Cliffs NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Prince, E.F. 1981. Toward a taxonomy of given/new information. In Radical Pragmatics, P. Cole (ed), 223–255. New York NY: Academic Press.
Pustejovsky, J. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
de Reuse,. J. 1994. Noun incorporation in Lakota (Siouan). International Journal of American Linguistics 60(3):199–260.
Roberts, C. 2003. Uniqueness in definite noun phrases. Linguistics and Philosophy 6(3): 287–350.
Rothstein, S. 1995. Adverbial quantification over events. Natural Language Semantics 3(1):1–32.
Scholten, J. & Aguilar-Guevara, A. 2010. Assessing the discourse referential properties of weak definite NP’s. In Linguistics in the Netherlands, Vol. 27, J. van Kampen & R. Nouwen (eds),115–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Schwarz, F. 2009. Two Types of Definites in Natural Language. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst.
. 2012a. Different types of definites crosslinguistically. Ms, University of Pennsylvania.
. 2012b. Situation pronouns in determiner phrases. Natural Language Semantics 20(4): 431–475.
Cited by (16)
Cited by 16 other publications
Aguilar‐Guevara, Ana & Carolina Oggiani
2023. Weak definite nominals. Language and Linguistics Compass 17:6 
Driemel, Imke
2023. Pseudo-Noun Incorporation and Differential Object Marking,
Krifka, Manfred & Fereshteh Modarresi
2023. Anaphoric potential of bare nominals, incorporated objects and weak definites in German. In Reference [Studies in Language Companion Series, 228], ► pp. 27 ff.
Tollet, Andrew
2023. The case for weak null in English. Kalbotyra 76 ► pp. 131 ff.
Luo, Qiongpeng
2022. Bare nouns, incorporation, and event kinds in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 31:2 ► pp. 221 ff.
McKenzie, Andrew
2022. Mediating functions and the semantics of noun incorporation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 40:2 ► pp. 505 ff.
Pinzin, Francesco & Cecilia Poletto
2022. Indefinite Objects in Micro‐variation. A Cross‐linguistic Analysis of the Distribution of Partitives Articles, Bare Nominals and Definite Determiners in Northern Italy*. Studia Linguistica 76:1 ► pp. 13 ff.
Sağ, Yağmur
2022. Bare singulars and singularity in Turkish. Linguistics and Philosophy 45:4 ► pp. 741 ff.
Tsiakmakis, Evripidis, Joan Borràs-Comes & M.Teresa Espinal
2021. The interpretation of plural mass nouns in Greek. Journal of Pragmatics 181 ► pp. 209 ff.
Dayal, Veneeta & Yağmur Sağ
2020. Determiners and Bare Nouns. Annual Review of Linguistics 6:1 ► pp. 173 ff.
Koring, Loes
2020. Producing figurative meanings. In Producing Figurative Expression [Figurative Thought and Language, 10], ► pp. 237 ff.
Gehrke, Berit & Louise McNally
2019. Idioms and the syntax/semantics interface of descriptive content vs. reference. Linguistics 57:4 ► pp. 769 ff.
Aguilar-Guevara, Ana & Maartje Schulpen
2014. Modified weak definites. In Weak Referentiality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 219], ► pp. 237 ff.
Gehrke, Berit & Cristina Marco
2014. Different by-phrases with adjectival and verbal passives: Evidence from Spanish corpus data. Lingua 149 ► pp. 188 ff.
Schumacher, Petra B. & Hanna Weiland
2014. Referential properties of definites and salience spreading. In Weak Referentiality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 219], ► pp. 365 ff.
Klein, Natalie M., Whitney M. Gegg-Harrison, Greg N. Carlson & Michael K. Tanenhaus
2013. Experimental investigations of weak definite and weak indefinite noun phrases. Cognition 128:2 ► pp. 187 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 24 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.