Article published in:
Weak ReferentialityEdited by Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Bert Le Bruyn and Joost Zwarts
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 219] 2014
► pp. 311–334
Inalienable possession
the status of the definite article
We argue that the use of the definite article in French inalienable possession constructions does not lead us to abandon a unified analysis of definite articles. We face two challenges. First, the definite article in French inalienable possession constructions does not seem to convey uniqueness:
Jean l�ve la main
�John raises the hand� is felicitous independently of whether Jean has one or two hands. Second, if the definite article in these constructions is a run-of-the-mill definite article we seem to be left without an explanation for the variation between French and English that led both Gu�ron (1983, 1985) and Vergnaud and Zubizarreta (1992) to assume that the definite article in French is structurally different from the one in English.
Published online: 03 December 2014
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.219.13bru
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.219.13bru
References
References
Aguilar-Guevara, A. & Zwarts, J.
Alexiadou, A.
Barker, C.
Chappell, H. & McGregor, W.
Cheng, L. & Ritter, E.
Dahl, Ö. & Koptjevskaja-Tamm, M.
Hole, D.
Koenig, E. & Haspelmath, M.
Koenig, J.-P.
Lucas, C.
Nicol, F.
1997 Syntaxe minimaliste et sémantique conceptuelle: Recherches sur la syntaxe et la sémantique comparées du français et de l’anglais. PhD dissertation, Université de Paris-X.
Ojeda, A.
Partee, B.
Seiler, H.
Szabolcsi, A.
Tellier, C.
Vergnaud, J.-R. & Zubizarreta, M.-L.
Vikner, C. & Jensen, P.