Article published in:Bavarian Syntax: Contributions to the theory of syntax
Edited by Günther Grewendorf and Helmut Weiß
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 220] 2014
► pp. 51–82
Complementizer agreement (in Bavarian)
Feature inheritance or feature insertion?
In recent minimalist work, it has been argued that C-agreement provides conclusive support for the following theoretical hypotheses (cf. Carstens 2003; van Koppen 2005; Haegeman & van Koppen 2012): (i) C hosts a separate set of phi-features, a parametric choice possibly linked to the V2 property; (ii) feature checking/valuation is accomplished under (closest) c-command (i.e. by the operation Agree, cf. Chomsky 2000 and subsequent work). This paper reviews the significance of C-agreement for syntactic theory and argues that certain systematic asymmetries between regular verbal agreement and complementizer agreement suggest that the latter does not result from operations that are part of narrow syntax. The case is based on the observation that at least in some Germanic varieties (most notably Bavarian), the realization of inflectional features in the C-domain is sensitive to adjacency effects and deletion of the finite verb in right node raising and comparatives. The fact that C may not carry inflection when the finite verb has been elided is taken to suggest that complementizer agreement does not involve a dependency between C and the subject, but rather between C and the finite verb (i.e. T). More precisely, it is argued that inflectional features present in the C-domain are added post-syntactically via a process of feature insertion (cf. e.g. Embick 1997; Embick & Noyer 2001; Harbour 2003) that creates a copy of T’s (valued) f-set. It will then be shown that this account can also capture phenomena like first conjunct agreement (FCA) and external possessor agreement, which are often presented as crucial evidence of the syntactic nature of complementizer agreement (cf. van Koppen 2005; Haegeman & van Koppen 2012).
Published online: 26 November 2014
Ackema, Peter & Neeleman, Ad
Bennis, Hans & Haegeman, Liliane
Bhatt, Rhajesh & Walkow, Martin
2011 Locating agreement in grammar. Paper presented at WCCFL 29.
2011 A new perspective on complementizer agreement. Paper presented at BCGL 6, Brussels.
Dalrymple, Mary & Kaplan, Ronald
Dikken, Marcel den
1997 Voice and the Interfaces of Syntax. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
2008 Complementizer Agreement: New Evidence from the Upper Austrian Variant of Gmunden. MA thesis,University of Vienna.
de Haan, Germen & Weerman, Fred
Haegeman, Liliane & van Koppen, Marjo
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
Hoekstra, Jarich & Marácz, Laszlo
Hoekstra, Eric & Smits, Caroline
van Koppen, Marjo & Rooryck, Johan
2008 Resolving resolution: Underspecification and the law of coordination of likes. Ms, Utrecht University & Leiden University.
1999 Comparatives and DP-structure. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
1992 Case and licensing. In Proceedings of ESCOL 1991, 234–253.
1993 Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Coordinate Structures. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
2006 Unifying agreement relations. A minimalist analysis of Berber. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
2012 What (if anything) does complementizer agreement tells us about Feature Inheritance (and vice versa)? Paper presented at GIST 6, University of Ghent.
1994 Second position effects and agreement in Comp. Ms, University of Wales, Bangor.
Ross, John Robert
Sag, Ivan, Kaplan, Ronald, Karttunen, Lauri, Kay, Martin, Pollard, Carl, Shieber, Stuart & Zaenen, Annie
de Vogelaer, Gunther, Neuckermans, Annemie & Vanden Wyngaerd
Guido 2002. Complementizer agreement in the Flemish dialects. In Meertens Institute Electronic Publications in Linguistics (MIEPiL) II: Syntactic Microvariation, Sjef Barbiers, Leonie Cornips & Susanne van der Kleij (eds) Amsterdam Meertens Institute
2012 Agreement without agree. Paper presented at GIST 6, University of Ghent.
Cited by 1 other publications
Fingerhuth, Matthias & Alexandra N. Lenz
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.