Cover not available
Part of
Bavarian Syntax: Contributions to the theory of syntax
Edited by Günther Grewendorf and Helmut Weiß
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 220] 2014
► pp. 51–82

Complementizer agreement (in Bavarian)

Feature inheritance or feature insertion?

| IDS Mannheim

In recent minimalist work, it has been argued that C-agreement provides conclusive support for the following theoretical hypotheses (cf. Carstens 2003; van Koppen 2005; Haegeman & van Koppen 2012): (i) C hosts a separate set of phi-features, a parametric choice possibly linked to the V2 property; (ii) feature checking/valuation is accomplished under (closest) c-command (i.e. by the operation Agree, cf. Chomsky 2000 and subsequent work). This paper reviews the significance of C-agreement for syntactic theory and argues that certain systematic asymmetries between regular verbal agreement and complementizer agreement suggest that the latter does not result from operations that are part of narrow syntax. The case is based on the observation that at least in some Germanic varieties (most notably Bavarian), the realization of inflectional features in the C-domain is sensitive to adjacency effects and deletion of the finite verb in right node raising and comparatives. The fact that C may not carry inflection when the finite verb has been elided is taken to suggest that complementizer agreement does not involve a dependency between C and the subject, but rather between C and the finite verb (i.e. T). More precisely, it is argued that inflectional features present in the C-domain are added post-syntactically via a process of feature insertion (cf. e.g. Embick 1997; Embick & Noyer 2001; Harbour 2003) that creates a copy of T’s (valued) f-set. It will then be shown that this account can also capture phenomena like first conjunct agreement (FCA) and external possessor agreement, which are often presented as crucial evidence of the syntactic nature of complementizer agreement (cf. van Koppen 2005; Haegeman & van Koppen 2012).

Published online: 26 November 2014
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.220.03fub
References (71)
Ackema, Peter & Neeleman, Ad
2003 Context-sensitive Spell-out. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 681–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004 Beyond Morphology. Interface Conditions on Word Formation. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altmann, Hans
1984 Das System der enklitischen Personalpronomina in einer mittelbairischen Mundart. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 51(2): 191–211.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef
1984 COMP in Bavarian syntax. The Linguistic Review 3: 209–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013 Klitisierung, Reanalyse und die Lizensierung von Nullformen: Zwei Beispiele aus dem Bairischen. In Dialektologie in neuem Gewand [Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 19], Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 29-45. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Bennis, Hans & Haegeman, Liliane
1984 On the status of agreement and relative clauses in West Flemish. In Sentential Complementation, Wim de Geest & Yvan Putseys (eds), 33–55. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile
1966 Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Editions Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rhajesh & Walkow, Martin
2011 Locating agreement in grammar. Paper presented at WCCFL 29.
Bobaljik, Jonathan
2008 Where’s ϕ? Agreement as a post-syntactic operation. In Phi-Theory: Phi Features across Interfaces and Modules, Daniel Harbour, David Adger & Susana Béjar (eds), 295–328. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Brandner, Ellen
2011 A new perspective on complementizer agreement. Paper presented at BCGL 6, Brussels.
Bresnan, Joan
1973 The syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 275–343.Google Scholar
Carstens, Vicki
2003 Rethinking complementizer agreement: Agree with a Case-checked goal. Linguistic Inquiry 34(3): 393–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
2000 Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2004 Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 104–131. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2008 On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2013 Problems of projection. Lingua 130: 33–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris
1968 The Sound Pattern of English. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville
1983 Resolution rules: Agreement in person, number, and gender. In Order, Concord and Constituency, Gerald Gazdar, Ewan Klein & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 175–206. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
2000 Number. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary & Kaplan, Ronald
1997 A set-based approach to feature resolution. In Proceedings of the LFG 97 Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracy Halloway King (eds). Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Dikken, Marcel den
2013 Prepare and repair: On pre-emptive strikes and post-hoc patches. In Repairs. The Added Value of Being Wrong, Patrick Brandt & Eric Fuß (eds), 131-153. Berlin:Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Dudenredaktion
(eds) 2009 Duden: Die Grammatik, Vol. 4, 8th edn. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Embick, David
1997 Voice and the Interfaces of Syntax. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Embick, David & Noyer, Rolf
2001 Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 555-595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuß, Eric
2005 The Rise of Agreement. A Formal Approach to the Syntax and Grammaticalization of Verbal Inflection [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 81]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Multiple agreement and the representation of inflection in the C-domain. Linguistische Berichte 213: 78–108.Google Scholar
Gruber, Bettina
2008 Complementizer Agreement: New Evidence from the Upper Austrian Variant of Gmunden. MA thesis,University of Vienna.
de Haan, Germen & Weerman, Fred
1986 Finiteness and verb fronting in Frisian. In Verb Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages, Hubert Haider & Martin Prinzhorn (eds), 77–110. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1990 Subject pronouns and subject clitics in West Flemish. The Linguistic Review 7: 333–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992 Theory and Description in Generative Syntax: A Case Study in West-Flemish. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & van Koppen, Marjo
2012 Complementizer agreement and the relation between C0 and T. Linguistic Inquiry 43(3): 441–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
1993 Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20, Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Ken Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris
1997 Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In PF: Papers At the Interface [MITWPL 30], Benjamin Bruening, Yoonjung Kang & Martha McGinnis (eds), 425–450. Cambridge MA: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.Google Scholar
Harbour, Daniel
2003 The Kiowa case for feature insertion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 543–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Katharina
2000 Right Node Raising and Gapping. Interface Conditions on Prosodic Deletion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hoekstra, Jarich & Marácz, Laszlo
1989 On the position of inflection in West Germanic. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 44: 75–88.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Eric & Smits, Caroline
1999 Everything you always wanted to know about complementizer agreement. In Proceedings of WECOL 1998, Elly van Gelderen & Vida Samiian (eds). Fresno CA: California State University Press.Google Scholar
Jäger, Agnes
2010 Der Komparativzyklus und die Position der Vergleichspartikeln. Linguistische Berichte 224: 467–493.Google Scholar
Kathol, Andreas
2001 Syntactic categories and positional shape alternations. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 3: 59–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1994 The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1973 ‘Elsewhere’ in phonology. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds), 93–106.New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
1982 Word-formation and the lexicon. In Proceedings of the 1982 Mid-America Linguistics Conference, Frances Ingemann (ed.). Lawrence KS: University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Kollmer, Michael
1987 Die schöne Waldlersprach, Bd. I–III. Prackenbach: Kollmer.Google Scholar
van Koppen, Marjo
2005 One Probe – Two Goals: Aspects of Agreement in Dutch Dialects. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
2006 One probe, multiple goals: The case of first conjunct agreement. Special Issue of Leiden Papers in Linguistics 3(2): 25–52. Marjo van Koppen, Pepijn Hendriks, Frank Landsbergen, Mika Poss & Jenneke van der Wal (eds).Google Scholar
2012 The distribution of phi-features in pronouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30: 135–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Koppen, Marjo & Rooryck, Johan
2008 Resolving resolution: Underspecification and the law of coordination of likes. Ms, Utrecht University & Leiden University.
Lechner, Winfried
1999 Comparatives and DP-structure. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
2001 Reduced and phrasal comparatives. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19: 683–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1992 Case and licensing. In Proceedings of ESCOL 1991, 234–253.
Miyagawa, Shigeru
2009 Why Agree? Why Move? Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Munn, Alan
1993 Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Coordinate Structures. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
1999 First conjunct agreement: Against a clausal analysis. Linguistic Inquiry 30(4): 643–668. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noyer, Rolf
1997 Features, Positions, and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Ouali, Hamid
2006 Unifying agreement relations. A minimalist analysis of Berber. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
2008 On C-to-T ϕ-feature transfer: The nature of agreement and anti-agreement in Berber. In Agreement Restrictions, Roberta D'Alessandro, Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson & Susann Fischer (eds), 159–180. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Richards, Marc
2007 On feature inheritance: An argument from the phase impenetrability condition. Linguistic Inquiry 38(3): 563–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 What (if anything) does complementizer agreement tells us about Feature Inheritance (and vice versa)? Paper presented at GIST 6, University of Ghent.
Roberts, Ian
1994 Second position effects and agreement in Comp. Ms, University of Wales, Bangor.
Ross, John Robert
1970 Gapping and the order of constituents. In Progress in Linguistics, Manfred Bierwisch & M. Heidolph (eds), 249–259. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan, Kaplan, Ronald, Karttunen, Lauri, Kay, Martin, Pollard, Carl, Shieber, Stuart & Zaenen, Annie
1985 Unification and grammatical theory. In Proceedings of the Fifth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Mary Dalrymple, Jeffrey Goldberg, Kristin Hanson & Michael Inman (eds), 238–254. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur
1994 Agreement in Comp. The Linguistic Review 11: 351-375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sternefeld, Wolfgang
2008 Syntax. Eine merkmalbasierte generative Beschreibung des Deutschen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
de Vogelaer, Gunther, Neuckermans, Annemie & Vanden Wyngaerd
Guido 2002. Complementizer agreement in the Flemish dialects. In Meertens Institute Electronic Publications in Linguistics (MIEPiL) II: Syntactic Microvariation, Sjef Barbiers, Leonie Cornips & Susanne van der Kleij (eds) Amsterdam Meertens Institute
Weiß, Helmut
1998 Die Syntax des Bairischen. Studien zur Grammatik einer natürlichen Sprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005 Inflected complementizers in Continental West Germanic Dialects. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 72: 148–166.Google Scholar
Wiesinger, Peter
1989 Die Flexionsmorphologie des Verbums im Bairischen. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Zwart, Jan-Wouter
1993 Clues from dialect syntax: Complementizer agreement. In Dialektsyntax. Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 5, Werner Abraham & Josef Bayer (eds), 246–270. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
1997 Morphosyntax of Verb Movement. A Minimalist Approach to the Syntax of Dutch. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006 Complementizer agreement and dependency marking typology. Leiden Working Papers in Linguistics 3(2): 53–72.Google Scholar
2012 Agreement without agree. Paper presented at GIST 6, University of Ghent.
Cited by (1)

Cited by 1 other publications

Fingerhuth, Matthias & Alexandra N. Lenz
2021. Variation and dynamics of “complementizer agreement” in German. Linguistic Variation 21:2 ► pp. 322 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 23 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.