Part of
Bavarian Syntax: Contributions to the theory of syntax
Edited by Günther Grewendorf and Helmut Weiß
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 220] 2014
► pp. 5182
Ackema, Peter & Neeleman, Ad
2003Context-sensitive Spell-out. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 681–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2004Beyond Morphology. Interface Conditions on Word Formation. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Altmann, Hans
1984Das System der enklitischen Personalpronomina in einer mittelbairischen Mundart. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 51(2): 191–211.Google Scholar
Bayer, Josef
1984COMP in Bavarian syntax. The Linguistic Review 3: 209–274. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Klitisierung, Reanalyse und die Lizensierung von Nullformen: Zwei Beispiele aus dem Bairischen. In Dialektologie in neuem Gewand [Linguistische Berichte, Sonderheft 19], Werner Abraham & Elisabeth Leiss (eds), 29-45. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Bennis, Hans & Haegeman, Liliane
1984On the status of agreement and relative clauses in West Flemish. In Sentential Complementation, Wim de Geest & Yvan Putseys (eds), 33–55. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Benveniste, Emile
1966Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Editions Gallimard.Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rhajesh & Walkow, Martin
2011Locating agreement in grammar. Paper presented at WCCFL 29.
Bobaljik, Jonathan
2008Where’s ϕ? Agreement as a post-syntactic operation. In Phi-Theory: Phi Features across Interfaces and Modules, Daniel Harbour, David Adger & Susana Béjar (eds), 295–328. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Brandner, Ellen
2011A new perspective on complementizer agreement. Paper presented at BCGL 6, Brussels.
Bresnan, Joan
1973The syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 275–343.Google Scholar
Carstens, Vicki
2003Rethinking complementizer agreement: Agree with a Case-checked goal. Linguistic Inquiry 34(3): 393–412. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
2000Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2004Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 104–131. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2008On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2013Problems of projection. Lingua 130: 33–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris
1968The Sound Pattern of English. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville
1983Resolution rules: Agreement in person, number, and gender. In Order, Concord and Constituency, Gerald Gazdar, Ewan Klein & Geoffrey K. Pullum (eds), 175–206. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
2000Number. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dalrymple, Mary & Kaplan, Ronald
1997A set-based approach to feature resolution. In Proceedings of the LFG 97 Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracy Halloway King (eds). Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Dikken, Marcel den
2013Prepare and repair: On pre-emptive strikes and post-hoc patches. In Repairs. The Added Value of Being Wrong, Patrick Brandt & Eric Fuß (eds), 131-153. Berlin:Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
(eds) 2009Duden: Die Grammatik, Vol. 4, 8th edn. Mannheim: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Embick, David
1997Voice and the Interfaces of Syntax. PhD dissertation, University of Pennsylvania.
Embick, David & Noyer, Rolf
2001Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 555-595. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuß, Eric
2005The Rise of Agreement. A Formal Approach to the Syntax and Grammaticalization of Verbal Inflection [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 81]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008Multiple agreement and the representation of inflection in the C-domain. Linguistische Berichte 213: 78–108.Google Scholar
Gruber, Bettina
2008Complementizer Agreement: New Evidence from the Upper Austrian Variant of Gmunden. MA thesis,University of Vienna.
de Haan, Germen & Weerman, Fred
1986Finiteness and verb fronting in Frisian. In Verb Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages, Hubert Haider & Martin Prinzhorn (eds), 77–110. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
1990Subject pronouns and subject clitics in West Flemish. The Linguistic Review 7: 333–363. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1992Theory and Description in Generative Syntax: A Case Study in West-Flemish. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & van Koppen, Marjo
2012Complementizer agreement and the relation between C0 and T. Linguistic Inquiry 43(3): 441–454. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
1993Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20, Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Ken Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris
1997Distributed morphology: Impoverishment and fission. In PF: Papers At the Interface [MITWPL 30], Benjamin Bruening, Yoonjung Kang & Martha McGinnis (eds), 425–450. Cambridge MA: Department of Linguistics and Philosophy, MIT.Google Scholar
Harbour, Daniel
2003The Kiowa case for feature insertion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21: 543–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, Katharina
Hoekstra, Jarich & Marácz, Laszlo
1989On the position of inflection in West Germanic. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 44: 75–88.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Eric & Smits, Caroline
1999Everything you always wanted to know about complementizer agreement. In Proceedings of WECOL 1998, Elly van Gelderen & Vida Samiian (eds). Fresno CA: California State University Press.Google Scholar
Jäger, Agnes
2010Der Komparativzyklus und die Position der Vergleichspartikeln. Linguistische Berichte 224: 467–493.Google Scholar
Kathol, Andreas
2001Syntactic categories and positional shape alternations. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 3: 59–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1994The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1973‘Elsewhere’ in phonology. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds), 93–106.New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
1982Word-formation and the lexicon. In Proceedings of the 1982 Mid-America Linguistics Conference, Frances Ingemann (ed.). Lawrence KS: University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Kollmer, Michael
1987Die schöne Waldlersprach, Bd. I–III. Prackenbach: Kollmer.Google Scholar
van Koppen, Marjo
2005One Probe – Two Goals: Aspects of Agreement in Dutch Dialects. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
2006One probe, multiple goals: The case of first conjunct agreement. Special Issue of Leiden Papers in Linguistics 3(2): 25–52. Marjo van Koppen, Pepijn Hendriks, Frank Landsbergen, Mika Poss & Jenneke van der Wal (eds).Google Scholar
2012The distribution of phi-features in pronouns. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30: 135–177. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Koppen, Marjo & Rooryck, Johan
2008Resolving resolution: Underspecification and the law of coordination of likes. Ms, Utrecht University & Leiden University.
Lechner, Winfried
1999Comparatives and DP-structure. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
2001Reduced and phrasal comparatives. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 19: 683–735. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1992Case and licensing. In Proceedings of ESCOL 1991, 234–253.
Miyagawa, Shigeru
2009Why Agree? Why Move? Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Munn, Alan
1993Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Coordinate Structures. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
1999First conjunct agreement: Against a clausal analysis. Linguistic Inquiry 30(4): 643–668. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noyer, Rolf
1997Features, Positions, and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Ouali, Hamid
2006Unifying agreement relations. A minimalist analysis of Berber. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor.
2008On C-to-T ϕ-feature transfer: The nature of agreement and anti-agreement in Berber. In Agreement Restrictions, Roberta D'Alessandro, Gunnar Hrafn Hrafnbjargarson & Susann Fischer (eds), 159–180. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Richards, Marc
2007On feature inheritance: An argument from the phase impenetrability condition. Linguistic Inquiry 38(3): 563–572. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012What (if anything) does complementizer agreement tells us about Feature Inheritance (and vice versa)? Paper presented at GIST 6, University of Ghent.
Roberts, Ian
1994Second position effects and agreement in Comp. Ms, University of Wales, Bangor.
Ross, John Robert
1970Gapping and the order of constituents. In Progress in Linguistics, Manfred Bierwisch & M. Heidolph (eds), 249–259. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan, Kaplan, Ronald, Karttunen, Lauri, Kay, Martin, Pollard, Carl, Shieber, Stuart & Zaenen, Annie
1985Unification and grammatical theory. In Proceedings of the Fifth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Mary Dalrymple, Jeffrey Goldberg, Kristin Hanson & Michael Inman (eds), 238–254. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur
1994Agreement in Comp. The Linguistic Review 11: 351-375. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sternefeld, Wolfgang
2008Syntax. Eine merkmalbasierte generative Beschreibung des Deutschen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg.Google Scholar
de Vogelaer, Gunther, Neuckermans, Annemie & Vanden Wyngaerd
Guido 2002. Complementizer agreement in the Flemish dialects. In Meertens Institute Electronic Publications in Linguistics (MIEPiL) II: Syntactic Microvariation, Sjef Barbiers, Leonie Cornips & Susanne van der Kleij (eds) Amsterdam Meertens Institute
Weiß, Helmut
1998Die Syntax des Bairischen. Studien zur Grammatik einer natürlichen Sprache. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005Inflected complementizers in Continental West Germanic Dialects. Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik 72: 148–166.Google Scholar
Wiesinger, Peter
1989Die Flexionsmorphologie des Verbums im Bairischen. Wien: Verlag der Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Zwart, Jan-Wouter
1993Clues from dialect syntax: Complementizer agreement. In Dialektsyntax. Linguistische Berichte Sonderheft 5, Werner Abraham & Josef Bayer (eds), 246–270. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
1997Morphosyntax of Verb Movement. A Minimalist Approach to the Syntax of Dutch. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2006Complementizer agreement and dependency marking typology. Leiden Working Papers in Linguistics 3(2): 53–72.Google Scholar
2012Agreement without agree. Paper presented at GIST 6, University of Ghent.
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Fingerhuth, Matthias & Alexandra N. Lenz
2021. Variation and dynamics of “complementizer agreement” in German. Linguistic Variation 21:2  pp. 322 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 february 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.