Article published in:
Studies in Övdalian Morphology and Syntax: New research on a lesser-known Scandinavian language
Edited by Kristine Bentzen, Henrik Rosenkvist and Janne Bondi Johannessen †
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 221] 2015
► pp. 47–85

On the morpho-syntax of verb/adverb placement and fronting in embedded clauses in Modern Övdalian

| University of Iceland
The constructions under investigation in this chapter include verb second (V2) and topicalization in various types of embedded clauses, stylistic fronting (SF) and transitive expletive constructions (TECs). It turns out that the older speakers of Övdalian allow V2 more freely than the younger speakers and the results from a verbal paradigm fill-in task reveal substantial variation in the use of verbal affixes and, interestingly, a tendency, especially by the younger speakers, to simplify the verbal morphology. Both SF and TECs receive very low acceptance scores. The data does not provide support for the ‘strong version’ of the Rich Agreement Hypothesis (RAH) but it is argued that the facts regarding verb/adverb placement can be accounted for under a ‘weak’ RAH analysis.
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 3.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at rights@benjamins.nl.

Published online: 22 January 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.221.03ang
References

References

Åkerberg, Bengt
2012 Älvdalsk grammatik. Älvdalen: Ulum Dalska.Google Scholar
Angantýsson, Ásgrímur
2007 Verb-third in embedded clauses in Icelandic. Studia Linguistica 61(3): 237–260. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011 The Syntax of Embedded Clauses in Icelandic and Related Languages. PhD dissertation, University of Iceland.
Bentzen, Kristine
2007 Order and Structure in Embedded Clauses in Northern Norwegian. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.
Forthcoming. Kronoby revisited: Verb movement in embedded non-V2 contexts in Northern Ostrobothnian. Nordlyd: Tromsø Working Papers in language and Linguistic s.
Bentzen, Kristine, Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn, Hróarsdóttir, Þorbjörg, & Wiklund, Anna-Lena
2007 The Tromsø guide to the Force behind V2. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 79: 93–118.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David
1995 Morphosyntax: The Syntax of Verbal Inflection. PhD dissertation, MIT.
2002 Realizing Germanic inflection: Why morphology does not drive syntax. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 6: 129–167. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David & Jonas, Dianne
1996 Subject positions and the role of TP. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 195–236.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David & Thráinsson, Höskuldur
1998 Two heads aren’t always better than one. Syntax 1: 37–71 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bošković, Žjelko
2001 PF merger in Scandinavian: Stylistic fronting and object shift. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 68: 75–115.Google Scholar
Bowers, John
2001 Predication. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Mark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds), 299–333. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Arguments as Relations. Linguistic Inquiry Monograph 58. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris & Thráinsson, Höskuldur
1996 VP-internal structure and object shift in Icelandic. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 391–444.Google Scholar
Cornips, Leonie & Poletto, Cecilia
2005 On standardising syntactic elicitation techniques (Part 1). Lingua 115(7): 939–957. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen & Haegeman, Liliane
2007 The derivation of subject-initial V2. Linguistic Inquiry 38(1): 167–178. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Cuba, Carlos Francisco
2007 On (Non)Factivity, Clausal Complementation and the CP-Field. PhD dissertation, Stony Brook, New York.
Diesing, Molly
1992 Indefinites. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph
2004 Unspecified categories as the key to root constructions. In Peripheries. Syntactic Edges and their Effects, David Adger, Cécile de Cat & George Tsoulas (eds.), 75–120. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Emonds, Joseph & Whitney, Roemarie
2006 Double object constructions. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol.II, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), 73–144. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Falk, Cecilia
1993 Non-Referential Subjects in the History of Swedish. PhD dissertation, University of Lund.
Garbacz, Piotr
2006 Verb movement and negation in Övdalian. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 78: 173–190.Google Scholar
2010 Word Order in Övdalian. PhD dissertation, Lund University.
2011 Sambandet mellan morfologi och syntax i de nordiska dialekterna. In Studier i dialektologi och sociolingvistik, Lars-Erik Edlund, Lennart Elmevik & Maj Reinhammar (eds.), 113–122. Uppsala: Kungl. Gustav Adolfs Akademien för svensk folkkultur.Google Scholar
Garbacz, Piotr, Håkansson, David & Rosenkvist, Henrik
2007 [Review of] John D. Sundquist, Morphosyntactic Change in the History of Mainland Scandinavian Languages. Ann Arbor MI: ProQuest, 2002, 389 pp. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 30(1): 137–146. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Haan, Germen J.
2001 More is going on upstairs than downstairs: embedded root phenomena in West Frisian. Journal of Comparative Germanic Syntax 4(1): 3–38.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
2003 Conditional clauses: External and internal syntax. Mind and Language 18(4): 317–339. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006a Argument fronting in English, Romance CLLD and the left periphery. In Negation, Tense and Clausal Architecture: Cross-linguistic Investigations Raffaela Zanuttini, Hector Campos, Elena Herburger & Paul Portner (eds.), 27–52. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
2006b Conditionals, factives and the left periphery. Lingua 116(10): 1651–1669. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010a The internal syntax of adverbial clauses. Lingua 120(3): 628–648. Crossref
2010b The Movement Derivation of Conditional Clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 41(4): 595–621. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heycock, Caroline, Sorace, Antonella & Hansen, Zakaris Svabo
2010 V-to-I and V2 in subordinate clauses: An investigation of Faroese in relation to Icelandic and Danish. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 13(3): 61–97. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heycock, Caroline, Sorace, Antonella, Hansen, Zakaris Svabo, Wilson, Frances & Vikner, Sten
2012 Detecting the late stages of syntactic change: The loss of V-to-T in Faroese. Language 88(3): 558–600. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2000 Scandinavian stylistic fronting: How any category can become an expletive. Linguistic Inquiry 31: 445–483. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006 Stylistic fronting. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. IV, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), 532–565. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders & Platzack, Christer
1995 The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hooper, Joan B. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1973 On the applicability of Root Transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 465–497.Google Scholar
Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn
2004 Stylistic fronting. Studia Linguistica 58: 88–134. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Iatridou, Sabine, & Kroch, Anthony S.
1992 The licensing of CP-recursion and its relevance to the Germanic verb-second phenomenon. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 50: 1–24.Google Scholar
Jonas, Dianne
1996a Clause Structure and Verb Syntax in Scandinavian and English. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.
1996b Clause structure, expletives, and verb movement. In Minimal Ideas: Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 12] Werner Abraham, Samuel David Epstein, Höskuldur Thráinsson & C. Jan-Wouter Zwart (eds.), 167–188. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jónsson, Jóhannes Gisli
1991 Stylistic fronting in Icelandic. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 48: 1–44.Google Scholar
1996 Clausal Architecture and Case in Icelandic. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Julien, Marit
2007 Embedded V2 in Norwegian and Swedish. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 80: 103–161.Google Scholar
Koeneman, Olaf & Zeijlstra, Hedde
2012 One law for the rich and another for the poor: The rich agreement hypothesis rehabilitated. lingbuzz/001462.
Larson, Richard K.
1988 On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–391.Google Scholar
Levander, Lars
1909 Älvdalsmålet i Dalarna. Ordböjning ock syntax (Övdalian. Inflection and syntax). Stockholm: Kungl. boktryckeriet P. A. Norstedt & söner.Google Scholar
Maling, Joan
1980 Inversion in embedded clauses in Modern Icelandic. Íslenskt mál 2: 175–193.Google Scholar
Ottósson, Kjartan
1989 VP-specifier subjects and the CP/IP distinction in Icelandic and mainland Scandinavian. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 44: 89–100.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer
1987 The Scandinavian languages and the null-subject parameter. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 5(3): 377–401. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989 Verb movement, universal grammar and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20: 365–424.Google Scholar
Poole, Geoffrey
1992 The case filter and stylistic fronting in Icelandic. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 1: 19–31.Google Scholar
1996 Optional movement in the minimalist program. In Minimal Ideas. Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 12], Werner Abraham, Samuel David Epstein, Höskuldur Thráinsson & C. Jan-Wouter Zwart (eds.), 199–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar. Handbook in Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Rohrbacher, Bernard W.
1999 Morphology-Driven Syntax. A Theory of V-to-I Raising and Pro-Drop [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rosenkvist, Henrik
1994 Tecken på syntaktisk utveckling i älvdalsmålet under senare tid. BA dissertation, University of Lund.
2011 Verb raising and referential null subjects in Övdalian. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 88: 1–20.Google Scholar
Rögnvaldsson, Erikur & Thráinsson, Höskuldur
1990 On Icelandic word order once more. In Syntax and Semantics 24. Modern Icelandic Syntax, Joan B. Maling & Annie Zaenen (eds.), 3–40. San Diego CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ámann
1989 Verbal Syntax and Case in Icelandic. Lund: Department of Scandinavian Languages, University of Lund.Google Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann
2010 On EPP effects. Studia Linguistica 64(2): 159–189.Google Scholar
Sundquist, John D.
2002 Morphosyntactic Change in the History of the Mainland Scandinavian Languages. PhD dissertation, Indiana University.
Thráinsson, Höskuldur
1986 V1, V2, V3 in Icelandic. In Verb Second Phenomena in Germanic Languages, Hubert Haider & Martin Prinzhorn (eds.), 169–174. Dordrecht Foris.Google Scholar
1993 On the structure of infinitival complements. Harvard Working Papers in Linguistics 3: 181–213.Google Scholar
1996 On the non-universality of functional categories. In Minimalist Ideas: Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework [Linguisik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 12], Werner Abraham, Samuel David Epstein, Höskuldur Thráinsson & C. Jan-Wouter Zwart (eds.), 253–281. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 Object shift and scrambling. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Mark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds.), 148–202. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003 Syntactic variation, historical development and minimalism. In Minimalist Syntax, Randall Hendrick (ed.), 152–191. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 The Syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2010 Predictable and unpredictable sources of variable verb and adverb placement in Scandinavian. Lingua 120: 1062–1088. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vangsnes, Øystein Alexander
2002 Icelandic expletive constructions and the distribution of subject types. In Subjects, Expletives and the EPP, Peter Svenonius (ed.), 43–70. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten
1995 Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
1997 V-to-I movement and inflection for person in all tenses. In The New Comparative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 189–213. London: Longman.Google Scholar
2006 Object shift. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. III, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), 392–436. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena, Bentzen, Kristine, Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn & Hróarsdóttir, Þorbjörg
2009 On the distribution and illocution of V2 in Scandinavian that-clauses. Lingua 119: 1914–1938. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena, Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn, Bentzen, Kristine & Hróarsdóttir, Þorbjörg
2007 Rethinking Scandinavian verb movement. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 10(3): 203–233 CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zwart, C. Jan-Wouter
1997 The Germanic SOV languages and the universal base hypothesis. In The New Comparative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 246–264. London: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar