Cover not available
Part of
Studies in Övdalian Morphology and Syntax: New research on a lesser-known Scandinavian language
Edited by Kristine Bentzen, Henrik Rosenkvist and Janne Bondi Johannessen †
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 221] 2015
► pp. 87–105

Optional V-to-I movement 
in Övdalian

| Buskerud and Vestfold University College
The paper examines causes of the ongoing loss of V-to-I movement in Övdalian, in the light of the parametric correlation between rich verbal agreement and verb movement to I (since Kosmeijer 1986). I show that the once obligatory V-to-I movement in Classical Övdalian has not only become optional, but also dispreferred in Traditional Övdalian, while at the same time the verbal inflection has been kept intact. Therefore, I conclude that there is no visible correlation between rich verbal agreement and V-to-I movement in Övdalian. Instead, I argue that the loss of V-to-I movement was caused by a high placement of negation that blurred evidence for verb movement.
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 3.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 22 January 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.221.04gar
References (46)
References
Alexiadou, Artemis & Fanselow, Gisbert. 2002. On the correlation between morphology and syntax: the case of V-to-I. In Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax. Proceedings form the 15th Workshop on Comparative Germanic Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 53], C. Jan-Wouter Zwart & Werner Abraham (eds), 219–242. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Angantýsson, Ásgrímur. 2011. The Syntax of Embedded Clauses in Icelandic and Related Languages. Reykjavík: Hugvísindastofun Háskóla Íslands.Google Scholar
Bentzen, Kristine. 2003. Acquiring V-to-I movement in the absence of morphological cues. In The Proceedings of the 19th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, 573–588. Tromsø: University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
. 2007. Order and Structure in Embedded Clauses in Northern Norwegian. PhD dissertation, CASTL, University of Tromsø.
Bentzen, Kristine, Garbacz, Piotr, Heycock, Caroline & Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn. 2009. On variation in Faroese verb placement. In NORMS Papers on Faroese, Nordlyd:Tromsø University Working Papers on Language and Linguistics 36(2): 78–102.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric. 2012. Considerations pertaining to the nature of logodiversity, or how to construct a parametric space without parameters. LingBuzz. [URL]
. In press. What principles and parameters got wrong. In Linguistic Variation in the Minimalist Framework, Carme Picallo (ed.). Oxford: OUP.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David & Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1998. Two heads are not always better than one. Syntax 1: 37–71. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 1995. Morphosyntax: The Syntax of Verbal Inflection. PhD dissertation,MIT.
. 2002. Realizing Germanic inflection: Why morphology does not drive syntax. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 6(2): 129–167. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax]. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Falk, Cecilia. 1993. Non-Referential Subjects in the History of Swedish. PhD dissertation, Lund University.
Garbacz, Piotr. 2007. What determines V0-to-I0 movement in Övdalian? Paper presented at the Grand Meeting for ScanDiaSyn at Mývatn, Iceland, August 2007. [URL]
. 2010. Word Order in Övdalian. A Study in Variation and Change. PhD dissertation, Lund University.
. 2012. Morphology and syntax in the Scandinavian vernaculars of Ovansiljan. LingBuzz. [URL]
. 2013. Huvudsatsordföljd i bisatser: Skandinaviska skriftspråk vs. skandinaviska dialekter. In Filologiskt smörgåsbord, 2: Bidrag från skandinavistiken i Kraków, Ewa Data-Bukowska & Magdalena Wasilewska-Chmura (eds), 67–81. Kraków: Jagiellonian University Press.Google Scholar
Garbacz, Piotr & Johannessen, Janne Bondi. This volume. Övdalian from 1909 to 2009.
Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn & Wiklund, Anna-Lena. 2010. AGR and V2. Theoretical Linguistics 36: 57–68. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Håkansson, Gisela & Dooley-Collberg, Sheila. 1994. The preference for modal + neg: An L2 perspective applied to Swedish L1 children. Second Language Research 10: 95–124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Henry, Alison & Cottell, Siobhan. 2007. A new approach to transitive expletives: Evidence from Belfast English. English Language and Linguistics 11(2): 279–299. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Heycock, Caroline, Sorace, Antonella & Hansen, Zakaris Svabo. 2010. V-to-I and V2 in subordinate clauses: An investigation of Faroese in relation to Icelandic and Danish. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 13: 61–97. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Holmberg, Anders & Platzack, Christer. 1995. The Role of Inflection in Scandinavian Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2010. Parameters in minimalist theory: The case of Scandinavian. Theoretical Linguistics 36: 1–48. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hróarsdóttir, Þorbjörg, Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn, Wiklund, Anna-Lena & Bentzen, Kristine. 2006. The Tromsø guide to Scandinavian verb movement. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 78:1–36Google Scholar
Iversen, Ragnvald. 1918. Syntaksen i Tromsø bymaal. En kort oversigt. Kristiania: Bymaals-laget.Google Scholar
Johnson, Kyle. 1990. On the syntax of inflectional paradigms. Ms, University of Wisconsin, Madison.
Jonas, Dianne. 2002. Residual V-to-I. In Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, David Lightfoot (ed.), 251–270. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kosmeijer, Wim. 1986. The status of the finite inflection in Icelandic and Swedish. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 26: 1–41.Google Scholar
Levander, Lars. 1909. Älvdalsmålet i Dalarna. Ordböjning ock syntax. Stockholm: Kungl. boktryckeriet P. A. Norstedt & Söner.Google Scholar
. 1925. Dalmålet. Beskrivning och historia, I. Uppsala.Google Scholar
Newmeyer, Frederick J. 2004. Against a parameter-setting approach to language variation. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 4: 181–234. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. A rejoinder to ‘On the role of parameters in Universal Grammar: A reply to Newmeyer’ by Ian Roberts & Anders Holmberg. [URL]
Pettersson, Gertrud. 1988. Bisatsledföljden i svenskan eller Varifrån kommer BIFF-regeln? Arkiv för nordisk filologi 103:157–180.Google Scholar
Platzack, Christer & Holmberg, Anders. 1989. The role of AGR and finiteness in Germanic VO languages. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 43: 51–76.Google Scholar
Rohrbacher, Bernhard W. 1999. Morphology-Driven Syntax, A Theory of V to I Raising and Pro-drop [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 15]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rosenkvist, Henrik. 1994. Tecken på syntaktisk utveckling i älvdalsmålet under senare tid. BA-dissertation, Lund University.
. 2011. Verb raising and referential null subjects in Övdalian. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 88: 1–20.Google Scholar
Sundquist, John Donald. 2002. Morphosyntactic Change in the History of the Mainland Scandinavian Languages. Indiana University, Dept. of Germanic Studies.Google Scholar
. 2003. The rich agreement hypothesis and Early Modern Danish embedded-clause word order. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 26(2): 233–258. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 1996. On the non-universality of functional categories. In Minimal Ideas. Syntactic Studies in the Minimalist Framework, Werner Abraham, Samuel David Epstein, Höskuldur Thráinsson & C. Jan-Wouter Zwart (eds), 253–281. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2007. The Syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Predictable and unpredictable sources of variable verb and adverb placement in Scandinavian. Lingua 120: 1062–1088. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1995a. Verb Movement and Expletive Subjects in the Germanic Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 1995b. V0-to-I0 movement and inflection for persons in all tenses. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 55: 1–27.Google Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena, Hrafnbjargarson, Gunnar Hrafn, Bentzen, Kristine & Hróarsdóttir, Thorbjörg. 2007. Rethinking Scandinavian verb movement. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 10(3): 203–233. DOI logoGoogle Scholar