Cover not available
Part of
Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti
Edited by Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann and Simona Matteini
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 223] 2015
► pp. 67–82

Augmentative, pejorative, diminutive and endearing heads in the extended nominal projection

In this paper evidence will be provided that augmentative, pejorative, diminutive and endearing morphemes are rigidly ordered with respect to one another, pointing to the existence of correspondingly ordered functional heads in the extended nominal projection. The evidence will primarily come from the relative order of the augmentative, pejorative, diminutive and endearing suffixes of Italian, but also from the order of the corresponding bound and unbound morphemes of other languages.
Keywords: associated ordered functional heads, augmentative/pejorative/diminutive/endearing ordered morphemes, extended nominal projection.
Published online: 27 August 2015
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.223.04cin
References (36)
References
Aikhenvald, Alexandra, Y. 2007. Typological distinctions in word-formation. In Language Typology 3 (Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon), Timothy Shopen (ed.). Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Azeb, Amha. 2001. The Maale Language. Leiden: CNWS Publications. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1985. The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 373–415.Google Scholar
Bailey, Carolina. 2007. Piapoco and natural morphology theory. In Proceedings of WIGL 2007 (LSO Working Papers in Linguistics, University of Wisconsin-Madison), Rebecca Shields (ed.), 33–53. <[URL]>
Bauer, Laurie. 1997. Evaluative morphology: In search of universals. Studies in Language 21: 533–575. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco. 2009. Ayoreo (Zamuco). A grammatical sketch. In Quaderni del laboratorio di linguistica della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa 8, Ilaria Ricci & Carlo Bertini (eds), 1–59, <[URL]>Google Scholar
Bradshaw, Robert L. 2007. Fuyug Grammar Sketch. Data Papers in Papua New Guinea Languages 53. Ukarumpa, Papua New Guinea: SIL-PNG Academic Publications. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1994. On the Evidence for Partial N-Movement in the Romance DP. In Paths Towards Universal Grammars. Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne, Guglielmo Cinque, Jan Koster, Jean-Yves Pollock, Luigi Rizzi & Raffaella Zanuttini (eds), 85–110. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Gugliemo. 2005. Deriving Greenberg’s Universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 315–332. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2007. La natura grammaticale del diminutivo e del vezzeggiativo. In Miscellanea di Studi Linguistici offerti a Laura Vanelli da amici e allievi padovani, Roberta Maschi, Nicoletta Penello & Piera Rizzolatti (eds), 229–236. Udine: Forum Editrice.Google Scholar
. 2010. The Syntax of Adjectives. A Comparative Study. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
De Belder, Mar, Faust, Noam & Lampitelli, Nicola. 2014. On a low and a high diminutive: Evidence from Italian and Hebrew. In The Syntax of Roots, the Roots of Syntax, Artemis Alexiadou, Hagit Borer & Florian Schäfer (eds). Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Den Dikken, Marcel. 2003. The Structure of the Noun Phrase in Rotuman. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Derzhanski, Ivan A. 2005. On diminutive plurals and plural diminutives. In Morphology and Linguistic Typology. On-line Proceedings of the Fourth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM4) Catania 21–23 September 2003, Geert Booij, Emiliano Guevara, Angela Ralli, Salvatore Sgroi & Sergio Scalise (eds), 73–90. University of Bologna. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang & Merlini Barbaresi, Lavinia. 1994. Morphopragmatics: Diminutives and Intensifiers in Italian, German and Other Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ettinger, Stefan. 1974. Diminutiv- und Augmentativbildung. Regeln und Restriktionen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R. 1972. The expression of the diminutive. In Studies in Linguistics in Honor of George L. Trager, Estellie M. Smith (ed.), 148–152. The Hague: Mouton (Also in Dil, Anwar S. (ed.). 1978. Language, Culture and History: Essays by Mary R. Haas, 82–88. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Julien, Marit. 2005. Nominal Phrases from a Scandinavian Perspective [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 87]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jurafsky, Daniel. 1996. Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language 72: 533–578. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard, S. 2007. Several, few and many. Lingua 117: 832–858 (Reprinted in Kayne, Richard S. 2010. Comparisons and Contrasts. 29–56. Oxford: OUP). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kruisinga, Etsko. 1942.Diminutieve en affektieve suffixen in de germaanse talen. Mededelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afdeeling Letterkunde 5: 443–504.Google Scholar
Lepschy, Giulio. 1989. Diminutivi veneti e italiani (a proposito di Libera nos a malo), in Nuovi saggi di linguistica italiana, Giulio Lepschy (ed.), 185–197. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Lojenga, Constance, Kutsch. 1994. Ngiti: A Central-Sudanic Language of Zaire. Köln: Köppe. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matisoff, James. 1992. The mother of all morphemes: Augmentatives and diminutives in areal and universal perspective. In Papers from the First Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 1991, Martha Ratliff & Eric Schiller (eds), 293–349. Tempe AZ: Arizona State University).Google Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike & Thiesen, Yvonne. 2007. Teop sketch grammar. Ms, University of Kiel. <[URL]>
Nichols, Johanna. 1971. Diminutive consonant symbolism in western North America. Language 47: 826–848. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nieuwenhuis, Paul. 1985. Diminutives. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
Sapir, Edward. 1911. Diminutive and augmentative consonantism in Wishram. In Handbook of American Indian Languages, Bulletin 40, Part 1,Franz Boas (ed.), 638–645. Washington DC: Bureau of American Ethnology. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Hans. 2002. Rotuman. In The Oceanic Languages, John Lynch, Malcom Ross & Terry Crowley (eds), 815–832. Richmond: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Gary-John. 2002. Stacked adjectival modification and the structure of the nominal phrases. In Functional Structure in DP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol.1, Gugliemo Cinque (ed.), 91–120. Oxford: OUP. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Small, Priscilla C. 1990. Syntactic sketch of Coatzospan Mixtec. In Studies in the Syntax of Mixtecan Languages 2, C. Henry Bradley & Barbara E. Hollenbach (eds), 261–479. Dallas TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas, Arlington.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-min. 1994. Korean. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spaulding, Crag & Spaulding, Pat. 1994.Phonology and grammar of Nankina. Data Papers on Papua New Guinea Languages 41. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Sproat, Richard & Shih, Chilin. 1990. The cross-linguistic distribution of adjective ordering restrictions. In Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language: Essays in Honor of S.-Y. Kuroda, C. Georgopoulos & R. Ishihara (eds), 565–593. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Voeykova, Maria D. 1998. Acquisition of diminutives by a Russian child: Preliminary observations in connection with the early adjectives. In Studies in the Acquisition of Number and Diminutive Marking [Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 95], Steven Gillis (ed.), 97–113. <[URL]>Google Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina. 2006. Why should diminutives count? In Organizing Grammar. Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver, Riny Huijbregts, Ursula Kleinhenz & Jan Koster (eds), 669–679. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (13)

Cited by 13 other publications

Kagan, Olga
2024. The Slavic suffix -in/-yn as partition shifter. Natural Language Semantics 32:1 ► pp. 35 ff. DOI logo
Ritter, Elizabeth & Martina Wiltschko
2023. Evaluative Morphology: Universals and Variation. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Gouskova, Maria & Jonathan David Bobaljik
2022. The lexical core of a complex functional affix: Russian baby diminutive -onok. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 40:4 ► pp. 1075 ff. DOI logo
Robbe, Joost & Jeroen Willemsen
2022. Phonaesthemic alternations in Flemish dialects: a matter of language contact in the emergence of phonaesthesia?. Folia Linguistica 56:1 ► pp. 57 ff. DOI logo
Dékány, Éva
2021. The Functional Sequence up to QP. In The Hungarian Nominal Functional Sequence [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 100], ► pp. 15 ff. DOI logo
Fornasiero, Elena
2021. Description and analysis of evaluative constructions in Italian Sign Language (LIS). Sign Language & Linguistics 24:1 ► pp. 97 ff. DOI logo
Hankamer, Jorge & Line Mikkelsen
2021. CP Complements to D. Linguistic Inquiry 52:3 ► pp. 473 ff. DOI logo
Steriopolo, Olga
2021. Grammatical gender reversals: A morphosyntactic and sociopragmatic analysis. Open Linguistics 7:1 ► pp. 136 ff. DOI logo
Ziková, Markéta & Michaela Faltýnková
2021. How to derive allomorphy: a case study from Czech. The Linguistic Review 38:3 ► pp. 517 ff. DOI logo
Franco, Ludovico, Benedetta Baldi & Leonardo M. Savoia
2020. Collectivizers in Italian (and beyond). The interplay between collectivizing and evaluating morphology (and the Div paradox). Studia Linguistica 74:1 ► pp. 2 ff. DOI logo
Rizzi, Luigi & Guglielmo Cinque
2016. Functional Categories and Syntactic Theory. Annual Review of Linguistics 2:1 ► pp. 139 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2019. References. In A Contrastive Grammar of Brazilian Pomeranian [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 248], ► pp. 273 ff. DOI logo
[no author supplied]
2024. Elementary Predicates and Related Categories [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 285], DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.