Article published in:
Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti
Edited by Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann and Simona Matteini
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 223] 2015
► pp. 6782


Aikhenvald, Alexandra, Y.
2007Typological distinctions in word-formation. In Language Typology 3 (Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon), Timothy Shopen (ed.). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Azeb, Amha
2001The Maale Language. Leiden: CNWS Publications. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Mark
1985The mirror principle and morphosyntactic explanation. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 373–415.Google Scholar
Bailey, Carolina
2007Piapoco and natural morphology theory. In Proceedings of WIGL 2007 (LSO Working Papers in Linguistics, University of Wisconsin-Madison), Rebecca Shields (ed.), 33–53. http://​vanhise​.lss​.wisc​.edu​/ling​/files​/ling​_old​_web​/lso​/wpl​/7​/bailey​.pdf
Bauer, Laurie
1997Evaluative morphology: In search of universals. Studies in Language 21: 533–575. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier Marco
2009Ayoreo (Zamuco). A grammatical sketch. In Quaderni del laboratorio di linguistica della Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa 8, Ilaria Ricci & Carlo Bertini (eds), 1–59, http://​linguistica​.sns​.it​/QLL​/QLL09​/Bertinetto​_1​.PDFGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, Robert L.
2007Fuyug Grammar Sketch. Data Papers in Papua New Guinea Languages 53. Ukarumpa, Papua New Guinea: SIL-PNG Academic Publications. http://​www​.sil​.org​/pacific​/png​/pubs​/49610​/Fuyug​_%20Grammar​_sketch​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1994On the Evidence for Partial N-Movement in the Romance DP. In Paths Towards Universal Grammars. Studies in Honor of Richard S. Kayne, Guglielmo Cinque, Jan Koster, Jean-Yves Pollock, Luigi Rizzi & Raffaella Zanuttini (eds), 85–110. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Gugliemo
2005Deriving Greenberg’s Universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36: 315–332. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
2007La natura grammaticale del diminutivo e del vezzeggiativo. In Miscellanea di Studi Linguistici offerti a Laura Vanelli da amici e allievi padovani, Roberta Maschi, Nicoletta Penello & Piera Rizzolatti (eds), 229–236. Udine: Forum Editrice.Google Scholar
2010The Syntax of Adjectives. A Comparative Study. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
De Belder, Mar, Faust, Noam & Lampitelli, Nicola
2014On a low and a high diminutive: Evidence from Italian and Hebrew. In The Syntax of Roots, the Roots of Syntax, Artemis Alexiadou, Hagit Borer & Florian Schäfer (eds). Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Den Dikken, Marcel
2003The Structure of the Noun Phrase in Rotuman. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Derzhanski, Ivan A.
2005On diminutive plurals and plural diminutives. In Morphology and Linguistic Typology. On-line Proceedings of the Fourth Mediterranean Morphology Meeting (MMM4) Catania 21–23 September 2003, Geert Booij, Emiliano Guevara, Angela Ralli, Salvatore Sgroi & Sergio Scalise (eds), 73–90. University of Bologna. http://​morbo​.lingue​.unibo​.it​/mmm/Google Scholar
Dressler, Wolfgang & Merlini Barbaresi, Lavinia
1994Morphopragmatics: Diminutives and Intensifiers in Italian, German and Other Languages. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ettinger, Stefan
1974Diminutiv- und Augmentativbildung. Regeln und Restriktionen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Haas, Mary R.
1972The expression of the diminutive. In Studies in Linguistics in Honor of George L. Trager, Estellie M. Smith (ed.), 148–152. The Hague: Mouton (Also in Dil, Anwar S. (ed.). 1978. Language, Culture and History: Essays by Mary R. Haas, 82–88. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press).Google Scholar
Julien, Marit
2005Nominal Phrases from a Scandinavian Perspective [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 87]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Jurafsky, Daniel
1996Universal tendencies in the semantics of the diminutive. Language 72: 533–578. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard, S.
2007Several, few and many. Lingua 117: 832–858 (Reprinted in Kayne, Richard S. 2010. Comparisons and Contrasts. 29–56. Oxford: OUP). CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kruisinga, Etsko
1942.Diminutieve en affektieve suffixen in de germaanse talen. Mededelingen der Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, Afdeeling Letterkunde 5: 443–504.Google Scholar
Lepschy, Giulio
1989Diminutivi veneti e italiani (a proposito di Libera nos a malo), in Nuovi saggi di linguistica italiana, Giulio Lepschy (ed.), 185–197. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
Lojenga, Constance, Kutsch
1994Ngiti: A Central-Sudanic Language of Zaire. Köln: Köppe. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matisoff, James
1992The mother of all morphemes: Augmentatives and diminutives in areal and universal perspective. In Papers from the First Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 1991, Martha Ratliff & Eric Schiller (eds), 293–349. Tempe AZ: Arizona State University).Google Scholar
Mosel, Ulrike & Thiesen, Yvonne
Nichols, Johanna
1971Diminutive consonant symbolism in western North America. Language 47: 826–848. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nieuwenhuis, Paul
1985Diminutives. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
Sapir, Edward
1911Diminutive and augmentative consonantism in Wishram. In Handbook of American Indian Languages, Bulletin 40, Part 1,Franz Boas (ed.), 638–645. Washington DC: Bureau of American Ethnology. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, Hans
2002Rotuman. In The Oceanic Languages, John Lynch, Malcom Ross & Terry Crowley (eds), 815–832. Richmond: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Gary-John
2002Stacked adjectival modification and the structure of the nominal phrases. In Functional Structure in DP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol.1, Gugliemo Cinque (ed.), 91–120. Oxford: OUP. http://​lear​.unive​.it​/handle​/10278​/1355Google Scholar
Small, Priscilla C.
1990Syntactic sketch of Coatzospan Mixtec. In Studies in the Syntax of Mixtecan Languages 2, C. Henry Bradley & Barbara E. Hollenbach (eds), 261–479. Dallas TX: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas, Arlington.Google Scholar
Sohn, Ho-min
1994Korean. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Spaulding, Crag & Spaulding, Pat
1994.Phonology and grammar of Nankina. Data Papers on Papua New Guinea Languages 41. Ukarumpa: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Sproat, Richard & Shih, Chilin
1990The cross-linguistic distribution of adjective ordering restrictions. In Interdisciplinary Approaches to Language: Essays in Honor of S.-Y. Kuroda, C. Georgopoulos & R. Ishihara (eds), 565–593. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Voeykova, Maria D.
1998Acquisition of diminutives by a Russian child: Preliminary observations in connection with the early adjectives. In Studies in the Acquisition of Number and Diminutive Marking [Antwerp Papers in Linguistics 95], Steven Gillis (ed.), 97–113. http://​webhost​.ua​.ac​.be​/apil​/apil95​/diminutives1​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina
2006Why should diminutives count? In Organizing Grammar. Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver, Riny Huijbregts, Ursula Kleinhenz & Jan Koster (eds), 669–679. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

No author info given
2019.  In A Contrastive Grammar of Brazilian Pomeranian [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 248],  pp. 273 ff. Crossref logo
Dékány, Éva
2021.  In The Hungarian Nominal Functional Sequence [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 100],  pp. 15 ff. Crossref logo
Fornasiero, Elena
2021. Description and analysis of evaluative constructions in Italian Sign Language (LIS). Sign Language & Linguistics 24:1  pp. 97 ff. Crossref logo
Franco, Ludovico, Benedetta Baldi & Leonardo M. Savoia
2020. Collectivizers in Italian (and beyond). The interplay between collectivizing and evaluating morphology (and the Div paradox). Studia Linguistica 74:1  pp. 2 ff. Crossref logo
Hankamer, Jorge & Line Mikkelsen
2021. CP Complements to D. Linguistic Inquiry 52:3  pp. 473 ff. Crossref logo
Rizzi, Luigi & Guglielmo Cinque
2016. Functional Categories and Syntactic Theory. Annual Review of Linguistics 2:1  pp. 139 ff. Crossref logo
Steriopolo, Olga
2021. Grammatical gender reversals: A morphosyntactic and sociopragmatic analysis. Open Linguistics 7:1  pp. 136 ff. Crossref logo
Ziková, Markéta & Michaela Faltýnková
2021. How to derive allomorphy: a case study from Czech. The Linguistic Review 0:0 Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.