Part of
Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana BellettiEdited by Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann and Simona Matteini
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 223] 2015
► pp. 163–180
Edited by Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann and Simona Matteini
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 223] 2015
► pp. 163–180
Exhaustivity operators and fronted focus in Italian
In this contribution we present an original analysis of Fronted Focus in Italian (contrastive/corrective focus in the terminology of Belletti 2004), based on the insight that Fronted Focus can be decomposed into Contrast and the Exhaustivity Operator involved in the computation of grammaticalized implicatures. We argue that the different varieties of alleged Contrastive Focus in Italian are amenable to an analysis according to which the trigger for movement is an attracting Q-feature in the clausal left-periphery, as with focus-movement in Hungarian. The difference between Italian and Hungarian can be derived from the properties of lexical endowment of the Exhaustivity Operator Exh, together with the fact that the latter ‘associates’ with Focus in Hungarian and with Contrast in Italian.
References
Belletti, Adriana
2004 Aspects of the low IP area. In The Structure of CP and IP, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 16–51. Oxford: OUP.
2008 The CP of clefts. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 33: 191–204.
Bianchi, Valentina
2013 On focus movement in Italian. In Information Structure and Agreement [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 197], María Victoria Camacho-Taboada, Ángel Jiménez-Fernández, Javier Martín-Gonzáles & Mariano Reyes-Tejedor (eds), 193–216. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 
Bianchi, Valentina & Bocci, Giuliano
2012 Should I stay or should I go? Optional focus movement in Italian. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9, Christopher Piñon (ed.), 1–18. [URL]
Bocci, Giuliano
2008 On the syntax/prosody interface: An analysis of the prosodic properties of postfocal material in Italian and its implications. Nanzan Linguistics 5: 13–42. Special issue.
2013 The Syntax-prosody Interface. A Cartographic Perspective with Evidence from Italian [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 204]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bocci, Giuliano & Avesani, Cinzia
2006 Focus contrastivo nella periferia sinistra della frase: Un solo accento, ma non solo un accento. In Teorie, modelli e sistemi di annotazione. Atti del II Convegno Nazionale AISV, Associazione Italiana di Scienze della Voce, Renata Savy & Claudia Crocco (eds), 1–30. Padova: EDK Editore.
Büring, Daniel
2003 On D-Trees, Beans, and B-Accents. Linguistics and Philosophy 26(5): 511–545.
Chierchia, Gennaro, Fox, Danny & Spector, Benjamin
2010 Hurford’s constraint and the theory of scalar implicatures. Evidence for embedded implicatures. Ms. Harvard University, MIT and Institut Jean-Nicod.
É. Kiss, Katalin
1998 Identificational focus versus informational focus. Language 74: 245–273.
Frascarelli, Mara & Hinterhölz, Roland
2007 Types of topics in German and Italian. In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 100], Susanne Winkler & Kerstin Schwabe (eds), 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Hamblin, Charles Leonard
1973 Questions in Montague Grammar. Foundations of Language 10: 42–53.
Horvath, Julia
2010 Discourse features, syntactic displacement and the status of contrast. Lingua 120: 1346–1369.
Jacobs, Joachim
1983 Fokus und Skalen. Zur Syntax und Semantik der Gradpartikel im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
Krifka, Manfred
1992 A compositional semantics for multiple focus constructions. In Informationsstruktur und Grammatik, Joachim Jacobs (ed.), 17–53. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
2006 Association with focus phrases. In The Architecture of Focus, Valerie Molnar & Susanne Winkler (eds), 105–136. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Neeleman, Ad, Titov, Elena, van de Koot, Hans & Vermeulen, Reiko
2009 A syntactic typology of topic, focus and contrast. In Alternatives to Cartography, Jeroen van Craenenbroeck (ed.), 15–52. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Reinhart, Tanya
2006 Interface Strategies: Optimal and Costly Computations. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Reuland, Eric
2011 Anaphora and Language Design. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 The fine structure of the left-periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Rooth, Mats
1992 A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116.
Sauerland, Uli
2004 On embedded implicatures. Journal of Cognitive Science 5: 107–137.
2010 Embedded implicatures and experimental constraints: A reply to Geurts & Pouscoulous and Chemla. Semantics and Pragmatics 3(2): 1–13.
2012 The computation of scalar implicatures: Pragmatic, lexical or grammatical? Language and Linguistics Compass, 36–49.
von Stechow, Arnim
1990 Focusing and backgrounding operators. In Discourse Particles [Pragmatics & Beyond New Series 12], Werner Abraham (ed.), 37–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Torregrossa, Jacopo
2012 Encoding Topic, Focus and Contrast. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Verona.
Vallduví, Enric & Vilkuna, Maria
1998 On rheme and kontrast. In The Limits of Syntax [Syntax & Semantics 29], Peter Culicover & Louise McNally (eds), 79–108. San Diego CA: Academic Press.
Cited by
Cited by 2 other publications
Dal Farra, Chiara
2018. Towards a Fine-Grained Theory of Focus. Annali di Ca’ Foscari. Serie occidentale :1 
Rizzi, Luigi & Giuseppe Samo
2022. Introduction: On the Role of Romance in Cartographic Studies. Probus 34:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.