Article published in:
Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti
Edited by Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann and Simona Matteini
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 223] 2015
► pp. 237256
References

References

Belletti, Adriana
2001Inversion as focalization. In Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar, Aafke Hulk & Jean-Yves Pollock (eds), 60–90. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004Aspects of the low IP area. In The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 16–51. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005aAnswering with a cleft. The role of the null subject parameter and the vP periphery. In Proceedings of the XXX Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, Laura Brugé, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro, Walter Schweikert & Giuseppina Turano (eds), 63–82. Venezia: Cafoscarina.Google Scholar
2005bExtended doubling and the vP periphery. Probus 17(1): 1–35. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Answering strategies. A view from acquisition. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2005 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 291], Sergio Baauw, Frank Drijkonigen & Manuela Pinto (eds), 19–38. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2009aAnswering strategies. New information subjects and the nature of clefts. In Structures and Strategies, Chapter 10, Adriana Belletti.London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2009bPronouns at the edge of the clause. In Structures and Strategies, Chapter 11, Adriana Belletti.London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2012Revisting the CP of clefts. In Discourse and Grammar. From Sentence Types to Lexical Categories [Studies in Generative Grammar 112], Ede Zimmermann & Günther Grewendorf (eds), 91–114. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013On fin: Italian che, Japanese no, and the selective properties of the copula in clefts. In Deep Insights, Broad Perspectives. Essays in Honor of Mamoru Saito, Yoichi Miyamoto, Daiko Takahashi, Hideki Maki, Masao Ochi,Koji Sugisaki & Asako Uchibori (eds), 41–55. Tokyo: Kaitakusha.Google Scholar
2015The focus map of clefts: Extraposition and Predication. In Beyond Functional Sequence, Ur Shlonsky (ed.), 42–59. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana, Bennati, Elisa & Sorace, Antonella
2007Theoretical and developmental issues in the syntax of subjects: Evidence from near-native Italian. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 657–689. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Leonini, Chiara
2004Subject inversion in L2 Italian. In Eurosla Yearbook 4, Susan Forster Cohen, Michael Sharwood Smith, Antonella Sorace & Mitsuhiko Ota (eds), 95–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bennati, Elisa & Di Domenico, Elisa
2008Individual and task- related differences in the L2 acquisition of English ‘s- Genitive Constructions by native speakers of Italian, Poster presented at the XVIII Colóquio de Gramática Generativa, Lisboa, April 17–19.
Bloomfield, Leonard
1945About foreign language teaching. The Yale Review 34: 625–641. Reprinted in A Leonard Bloomfield Anthology, Charles F. Hockett (ed.), 1970, 297–309. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit
1984Parametric Syntax: Case studies in Semitic and Romance languages. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005In Name Only. Structuring Sense, Vol.1. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Calabrese, Andrea
1986Pronomina. In Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, Naoki Fukui, Tova R. Rapoport & Elizabeth Sagey (eds), 1–46. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Carminati, Maria Nella
2002The Processing of Italian Subject Pronouns. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Massachussetts at Amherst.
Chomsky, Noam
1981Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio
2012Discourse-Releted Features and Functional Projections. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Villiers, Jill
1996Defining the open and closed program for acquisition: The case of wh-questions. In Towards a Genetics of Language, Mabel Rice (ed.), 145–184. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Di Domenico, Elisa
2012Focus and Focus positions: The case of Perugino. In Enjoy Linguistics! Papers offered to Luigi Rizzi on the occasion of his 60th birthday, Valentina Bianchi & Cristiano Chesi (eds), 117–133. Siena: CISCL Press.Google Scholar
2013Setting parameters in L2A: On the English ‘s morpheme. In Proceedings of the 12th Generative Approaches to Second Language Acquisition (GASLA 2013), Jennifer Cabrelli-Amaro, Tiffany Judy & Diego Pascual y Cabo (eds), 32–38. Sommerville CA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Doca, George
1979A psycholinguistic approach to linguistic interference. International Journal of Psycholinguistics 6(1): 5–25.Google Scholar
Dulay, Heidy & Burt, Marina
1974You can’t learn without goofing. An analysis of children’s second language ‘errors’. In Error Analysis: Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition, Jack Richards (ed.), 95–123. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Falk, Ylva & Bardel, Camilla
2010The study of the role of the background languages in third language acquisition. The state of the art. International Review of Applied Linguistics48:185–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Genevska – Hanke, Dobrinka
2012New information focus and null subjects in Bulgarian: An empirical study. Talk delivered at CISCL, University of Siena.
Hamann, Cornelia & Belletti, Adriana
2006Developmental patterns in the acquisition of complement clitics pronouns. Comparing different acquisition modes with some emphasis on French. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 31: 213–219.Google Scholar
Hamann, Cornelia, Penner, Zvi & Lindner, Katrin
1998German impaired grammar: The clause structure revisited. Language Acquisition 7: 193–245. Crossref
Haugen, Einar
1953The Norwegian Language in America. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hermans, Dirk, Bongaerts, Theo, de Bot, Kees & Schreuder, Robert
1998Producing words in a foreign language: Can speakers prevent interference from their first language? Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 1: 213–219. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hulk, Aafke & Müller, Natasha
2000Crosslinguistic influence at the interface between syntax and pragmatics. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition 3: 227–244. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyams, Nina
1996The underspecification of functional categories in early grammar. In Generative Perspectives in Language Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 14],Harald Clahsen (ed.), 91–128. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ionin, Tania & Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa
2010Introduction to the special issue: Selective First Language Influence and Retreat from Negative Transfer. Second Language Research 26(3): 283–291. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kotz, Sonja
2009ERP and fMRI evidence on L2 syntactic processing. Brain and Language 109: 68–74. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lardiere, Donna
2008Feature assembly in second language acquisition. In The Role of Formal Features in Second Language Acquisition, Juana Liceras, Helmut Zobl & Helen Goodluck (eds), 106–140. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Montrul, Sylvina
2011Multiple interfaces and incomplete acquisition. Lingua 121: 591–604. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Penner, Zvi & Roeper, Thomas
1998Trigger theory and the acquisition of complement idioms. In Essays in Language Acquisition: Festschrift in Honour of Jürgen Weissenborn, Norbert Dittmar & Zvi Penner (eds), 77–111. Bern: Peter Lang. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richards, Jack
(ed) 1974Error Analysis: Perspectives on Second Language Acquisition. London: Longman. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005On some properties of subjects and topics. In Proceedings of the XXX Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, Laura Brugé, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro, Walter Schweikert & Giuseppina Turano (eds), 203–224. Venezia: Cafoscarina.Google Scholar
2006On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Wh- Movement: Moving on, Lisa Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds), 97–133. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2011On the elements of syntactic variation. In StiL (Studies in Linguistics – CISCL Working Papers in Linguistics) Vol. 4, Emilio Servidio & Vincenzo Moscati (eds), 242–264. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Roeper, Thomas
1996The role of merger theory and formal features in acquisition. In Generative Perspectives in Language Acquisition [Language Acquisition and Language Disorders 14], Harald Clahsen (ed.), 415–450. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, Bonnie & Sprouse, Rex
1996L2 cognitive states and the Full Transfer/Full Access model. Second Language Research 12(1): 40–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sheldon, Amy
1974The role of parallel function in the acquisition of relative clauses in English. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour 13: 272–281. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, Antonella
2011Pinning down the concept of ‘interface’ in bilingualism. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism 1: 1–33. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sorace, Antonella & Filiaci, Francesca
2006Anaphora resolution in near-native speakers of Italian. Second Language Research 22: 339–368. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Soriano, Olga
1989Strong pronouns in null-subject languages and the Avoid Pronoun Principle. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 11: 228–240.Google Scholar
Sweet, Henry
1899[1964]The Practical Study of Languages. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Tsimpli, Ianthi, Sorace, Antonella, Heycock, Caroline & Filiaci, Francesca
2004First language attrition and syntactic subjects: A study of Greek and Italian near-native speakers of English. International Journal of Bilingualism 8: 257–277. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel
1952Languages in Contact. New York NY: Publications of the Linguistic Circle of New York.Google Scholar
Wexler, Ken
1994Finiteness and head movement in early child grammar. In Verb Movement, David Lightfoot & Norbert Hornstein (eds), 305–350. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
White, Lydia
2000Second language acquisition: From initial to final state. In Second Language Acquisition and Linguistic Theory, John Archibald (ed.), 130–155. London: Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar