Article published in:
Structures, Strategies and Beyond: Studies in honour of Adriana Belletti
Edited by Elisa Di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann and Simona Matteini
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 223] 2015
► pp. 303320
References

References

Adams, Catherine
1990Syntactic comprehension in children with expressive language impairment. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 25: 149–171. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana
2014Notes on passive object relatives. In Functional Structure from Top to Toe: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 9, Peter Svenonius (ed.), 97–114. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Contemori, Carla
2010Intervention and attraction. On the production of subject and object relatives by Italian young children and adults. In Language Acquisition and Development: Proceedings of Gala 2009, João Costa, Ana Castro, Maria Lobo & Fernanda Pratas (eds), 39−52. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana, Friedmann, Naama, Brunato, Dominique & Rizzi, Luigi
2012Does gender make a difference? Comparing the effect of gender on children’s comprehension of relative clauses in Hebrew and Italian. Lingua 122(10): 1053–1069. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi
2012Ways of avoiding intervention: Some thoughts on object relatives, passive and control. In Rich Languages from Poor Inputs, Massimo Piattelli-Palmarini & Robert C. Berwick (eds), 115–126. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cipriani, Paola, Bottari, Piero, Chilosi, Anna Maria & Pfanner, Lucia
1998A longitudinal perspective on the study of specific language impairment: The long term follow-up of an Italian child. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 33: 245–280. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Chris
2005A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax 8(2): 81–120. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Contemori, Carla & Belletti, Adriana
2014Relatives and passive object relatives in Italian-speaking children and adults: Intervention in production and comprehension. Applied Psycholinguistics 35(6): 1021–1053. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Crawford, John R. & Howell, David C.
1998Regression equations in clinical neuropsychology: An evaluation of statistical methods for comparing predicted and observed scores. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology 20: 755–762. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Delage, Helene, Monjauze, Cecile, Hamann, Cornelia & Tuller, Laurie
2008Relative clauses in atypical acquisition of French. In Language Acquisition and Development: Proceedings of GALA 2007, Anna Gavarró & M. João Freitas (eds), 166–176. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Delage, Helene & Tuller, Laurie
2007Language development and mild-to-moderate hearing loss: Does language normalize with age? Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research 50: 1–14. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fattal, Iris, Friedmann, Naama & Fattal-Valevski, Aviva
2011The crucial role of thiamine in the development of syntax and lexical retrieval: a study of infantile thiamine deficiency. Brain 134: 1720–1739. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, Naama
2000PETEL: a sentence repetition test. Tel Aviv University.Google Scholar
Friedmann, Naama, Belletti, Adriana, Tuller, Laurie, Costa, João, Guasti, Maria Teresa, Haman, Ewa & Varlokosta, Spyridoula
2012The acquisition of relative clause production in sixteen languages. Ms, COST A33.
Friedmann, Naama, Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi
2009Relativized relatives: Types of intervention in the acquisition of A-bar dependencies. Lingua 119: 67–88. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, Naama & Novogrodsky, Rama
2004The acquisition of relative clause comprehension in Hebrew: A study of SLI and normal development. Journal of Child Language 31: 661–681. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007Is the movement deficit in syntactic SLI related to traces or to thematic role transfer? Brain and Language 101: 50–63. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Which questions are most difficult to understand? The comprehension of Wh questions in three subtypes of SLI. Lingua 121: 367–382. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Friedmann, Naama & Szterman, Ronit
2006Syntactic movement in orally-trained children with hearing impairment. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education 11(1): 56–75. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011The comprehension and production of wh questions in children with hearing impairment. Journal of Deaf Studies and Deaf Education, 16(2): 212–235. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grillo, Nino
2005Minimality effects in agrammatic comprehension. In Proceedings of ConSOLE XIII, Sylvia Blaho, Luis Vicente & Erik Schoorlemmer (eds), 107–120. Leiden: University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Håkansson, Gisela & Hansson, Kristina
2000Comprehension and production of relative clauses: A comparison between Swedish impaired and unimpaired children. Journal of Child Language 27: 313–333. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Hagar & Friedmann, Naama
2009Treatment of syntactic movement in syntactic SLI: A case study. First Language 29: 15–50. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marinellie, Sally A.
2004Complex syntax used by school-age children with specific language impairment (SLI) in child-adult conversation. Journal of Communication Disorders 37: 517–533. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Novogrodsky, Rama & Friedmann, Naama
2006The production of relative clauses in syntactic SLI: A window to the nature of the impairment. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology 8(4): 364–375. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stavrakaki, Stavroula
2001Comprehension of reversible relative clauses in specifically language impaired and normally developing Greek children. Brain and Language 77: 419–431. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Szterman, Ronit & Friedmann, Naama
2014Relative clause reading in hearing impairment: Different profiles of syntactic impairment. Frontiers in Psychology: Language Sciences, 5(1229): 1–16. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Insights into the syntactic deficit of children with hearing impairment from a sentence repetition task. In Language Acquisition and Development: Proceedings of GALA 2013, Cornelia Hamann & Esther Ruigendijk (eds), 492–505. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Press.Google Scholar
van der Lely, Heather K.J.
1997Language and cognitive development in a grammatical SLI boy: Modularity and innateness. Journal of Neurolinguistics 10: 75–107. Crossref.Google Scholar
Yachini, Maya, Szterman, Ronit & Friedmann, Naama
2013, July. The effect of intervention on comprehension and production in developmental syntactic impairment. Presented in the 12th IMAM conference, Language and Brain Lab, Tel Aviv University.
Cited by

Cited by 8 other publications

Abed Ibrahim, Lina & István Fekete
2019. What Machine Learning Can Tell Us About the Role of Language Dominance in the Diagnostic Accuracy of German LITMUS Non-word and Sentence Repetition Tasks. Frontiers in Psychology 9 Crossref logo
Belletti, Adriana & Claudia Manetti
2019. Topics and passives in Italian-speaking children and adults. Language Acquisition 26:2  pp. 153 ff. Crossref logo
Hamann, Cornelia & Lina Abed Ibrahim
2017. Methods for Identifying Specific Language Impairment in Bilingual Populations in Germany. Frontiers in Communication 2 Crossref logo
Ruigendijk, Esther & Naama Friedmann
2017. A Deficit in Movement-Derived Sentences in German-Speaking Hearing-Impaired Children. Frontiers in Psychology 8 Crossref logo
Sukenik, Nufar & Naama Friedmann
2018. ASD Is Not DLI: Individuals With Autism and Individuals With Syntactic DLI Show Similar Performance Level in Syntactic Tasks, but Different Error Patterns. Frontiers in Psychology 9 Crossref logo
Sukenik, Nufar, Eléonore Morin, Naama Friedmann, Philippe Prevost & Laurice Tuller
2021. Coconuts and curtain cakes: The production of wh-questions in ASD. Autism & Developmental Language Impairments 6  pp. 239694152098295 ff. Crossref logo
Szterman, Ronit & Naama Friedmann
2014. Relative clause reading in hearing impairment: different profiles of syntactic impairment. Frontiers in Psychology 5 Crossref logo
Thornton, Rosalind, Kelly Rombough, Jasmine Martin & Linda Orton
2016. Negative sentences in children with specific language impairment. First Language 36:3  pp. 228 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 08 june 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.