Article published in:
Discourse-oriented Syntax
Edited by Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl and Andreas Trotzke
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 226] 2015
► pp. 71–92

Italian verb-based discourse particles in a comparative perspective

| Universita` Ca’ Foscari Venezia
This paper provides a syntactic analysis of Italian verb-based discourse particles. In spite of their utterance-peripheral distribution and their pragmatic content, they should be considered as integrated in the sentence with which they are associated. It is argued that sentence-initial and sentence-final particles are not derivationally related but are merged in different layers of the clause (CP and IP, respectively). Following Haegeman and Hill (2013) and (2014), it is proposed that sentence-initial particles occur in Speech Act projections above Rizzi’s (1997) ForceP. The interaction of particles and vocatives is also discussed. In a comparative perspective, some differences between Italian and West Flemish have been correlated with the different distribution of discourse particles, namely as specifiers and heads, respectively.
Published online: 16 December 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.226.04car
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Badan, Linda
2020.  Italian Discourse Markers: The Case of Guarda te * . Studia Linguistica 74:2 ► pp. 303 ff. Crossref logo
Trotzke, Andreas & Sergio Monforte
2019. Basque question particles. Linguistic Variation 19:2 ► pp. 352 ff. Crossref logo
Özsoy, A. Sumru
2019.  In Word Order in Turkish [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 97], ► pp. 139 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Bayer, Josef
2008 From modal particle to interrogative marker: A study of German denn . In Functional Heads, Laura Brugé, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto (eds), 13-28. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bazzanella, Carla
2001 I segnali discorsivi. In Grande Grammatica Italiana di Consultazione, Vol. III, Lorenzo Renzi, Giampaolo Salvi & Anna Cardinaletti (eds), 225-257. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna
2002 Against optional and zero clitics. Right dislocation vs. marginalization. Studia Linguistica 56: 29-57. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2007 Für eine syntaktische Analyse von Modalpartikeln. In Gesprochene Sprache - Partikeln Band 1, Eva M. Thüne & Franca Ortu (eds), 89-101. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2011 German and Italian modal particles and clause structure. The Linguistic Review 28: 493-531. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1991 Mica: note di sintassi e pragmatica. In Teoria Linguistica e Sintassi Italiana, 311-323. Bologna: Il Mulino.Google Scholar
1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco
2005 Deutsche Modalpartikeln: Eine syntaktische Analyse. MA thesis, University of Venice.Google Scholar
2006 German modal particles in the functional structure of IP. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 57-95.Google Scholar
2008 Modal particles in Italian. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 18: 91-129.Google Scholar
2011 Die Syntax der deutschen Modalpartikeln: Ihre Distribution und Lizenzierung in Haupt- und Nebensätzen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 The fine structure of force: On the interaction of modal particles with illocutionary force and clause type. In On Peripheries. Exploring Clause Initial and Clause Final Positions, Anna Cardinaletti, Guglielmo Cinque & Yoshio Endo (eds), 103-140. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Publishing.Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra
2010 About the Speaker: Toward a Syntax of Indexicality. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Grosz, Patrick
2005  dn in Viennese German. The Syntax of a Clitic Version of the Discourse Particle denn . Diplomarbeit, Universität Wien.
2007 German discourse particles are weak sentence adverbs. In Proceedings of the “XXXII Incontro di Grammatica Generativa”. Firenze, 2-4 March 2006, Maria Cecilia Picchi & Alan Pona (eds), 79-91. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Hill, Virginia
2013 The syntacticization of discourse. In Syntax and its Limits, Raffaella Folli, Robert Truswell & Christina Sevdali (eds), 370-390. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014 Vocatives and speech act projections: A case study in West Flemish. In On Peripheries: Exploring Clause Initial and Clause Final Positions, Anna Cardinaletti, Guglielmo Cinque & Yoshio Endo (eds), 209-236. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Publishing.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1994 The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Moro, Andrea
2003 Notes on vocative case. A case study in clause structure. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2001 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 245], Josep Quer, Jan Schroten, Mauro Scoretti, Petra Sleeman & Els Verheugd (eds), 247-261. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Penello, Nicoletta & Chinellato, Paolo
2008. Le dinamiche della distribuzione di ciò in Veneto. Breve saggio di microvariazione. In L’Italia dei Dialetti. Proceedings of the Dialectology Meeting of Sappada/Plodn – 2007, Gianna Marcato (ed.), 111–118. Padova: Unipress.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schaden, Gerhard
2010 Vocatives: A note on addressee-management. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 176-185.Google Scholar
Schegloff, Emanuel A.
1968 Sequencing in conversational openings. American Anthropologist 70: 1075-1095. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sigurðsson, Halldór Ármann
2004 The syntax of person, tense, and speech features. Italian Journal of Linguistics / Rivista di Linguistica 16: 219-251.Google Scholar
2011 Conditions on argument drop. Linguistic Inquiry 42: 267–304. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Speas, Peggy & Tenny, Carol
2003 Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Asymmetry in Grammar, Vol.1: Syntax and Semantics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 57], Anna-Maria Di Sciullo (ed.), 315-344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar