Article published in:
Discourse-oriented Syntax
Edited by Josef Bayer, Roland Hinterhölzl and Andreas Trotzke
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 226] 2015
► pp. 229–250

Discourse and the syntax of the left periphery

Clitic Left Dislocation and Hanging Topic

| Universita` Ca’ Foscari Venezia
In this work I consider the properties of Clitic Left Dislocation (CLLD) and Hanging Topic (HT) in Italian. Rizzi (1997) proposed that the syntactic space pertaining to the complementizer must be conceived of as a layer, i.e. as a set of hierarchically ordered projections, including those for contrastive focus and topics. In the literature following this hypothesis, a focused phrase is argued to be moved, whereas topics such as CLLD and HT are analyzed as base generated in the left periphery. Here I argue that their unmoved status follows from their very special syntax, given that the heads projecting the phrases where they are hosted belong to a peculiar category, i.e. they are prosody- oriented heads. Prosody-oriented heads are not associated to a lexical content, but to a phonological one, i.e. are read off at the interface with phonology as instructions for the assignment of prosodic values. The properties and distribution of CLLD and HT will be shown to follow from this hypothesis.
Published online: 16 December 2015
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.226.10gio
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Badan, Linda
2020.  Italian Discourse Markers: The Case of Guarda te * . Studia Linguistica 74:2 ► pp. 303 ff. Crossref logo
Cardinaletti, Anna
2020.  In Brazilian Portuguese, Syntax and Semantics [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 260], ► pp. 88 ff. Crossref logo
Giorgi, Alessandra
2016. On the temporal interpretation of certain surprise questions. SpringerPlus 5:1 Crossref logo
Giorgi, Alessandra
2018.  In Further Advances in Pragmatics and Philosophy [Perspectives in Pragmatics, Philosophy & Psychology, 18], ► pp. 153 ff. Crossref logo
Giorgi, Alessandra
2018.  In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 14 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, 14], ► pp. 69 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 28 december 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.

References

References

Burton-Roberts, Noel
2006 Parentheticals. In Encyclopaedia of Language and Linguistics, Vol. 9, 2nd edn, Keith Brown (ed), 179-182. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Poletto, Cecilia
2004 Topic, focus and V2: Defining the CP sublayers. In The Structure of CP and IP, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 52-75. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1990 Types of A-bar Dependencies. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2008 Two types of nonrestrictive relative clauses. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 7, Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds), 99-137. http://​www​.cssp​.cnrs​.fr​/eiss6​/index​_en​.htmlGoogle Scholar
Dehé, Nicole & Kavalova, Yadranka
(eds) 2007 Parentheticals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dehé, Nicole
2009 Clausal parentheticals, intonational phrasing, and prosodic theory. Journal of Linguistics 45: 569-615. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Döring, Sandra
2007 Quieter, faster, lower and set off by pauses? In Parentheticals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106], Nicole Dehé & Yadranka Kavalova (eds), 285-307. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Espinal, Maria Teresa
1991 The representation of disjunct constituents. Language 67: 726-762. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara
2000 The Syntax-Phonology Interface in Focus and Topic Constructions in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004 Dislocation, clitic resumption and minimality: A comparative analysis of left and right topic constructions in Italian. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2002 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 256], Reineke Bok-Bennema, Bart Hollebrandse, Brigitte Kampers-Mahne & Petra Sleeman (eds), 98-118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara & Hinterhölzl, Roland
2007 Types of topics in German and Italian. In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 100], Susanne Winkler & Kerstin Schwabe (eds), 87-116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra
2014 Prosodic signals as syntactic formatives in the left periphery In On Peripheries: Exploring Clause Initial and Clause Final Positions, Anna Cardinaletti, Guglielmo Cinque, Yoshio Endo (eds), 161-188. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo Publishing.Google Scholar
2015 Integrated parentheticals in quotations and free indirect discourse. In Indirect Reports and Pragmatics. Interdisciplinary Studies, Alessandro Capone, Ferenc Kiefer & Franco Lo Piparo (eds). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
To appear. Epistemic adverbs, the prosody-syntax interface and the theory of phases, Proceedings of the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages , NYU, 2014.
Iatridou, Sabine
1995 Clitics and island effects. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 2: 11-30.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1994 The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Camrbidge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
López, Luis
2009 A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moltmann, Friederike
1992 On the interpretation of three-dimensional trees. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 40: 261-281.Google Scholar
Nespor, Marina & Vogel, Irene
1986 Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Potts, Christopher
2002 The syntax and semantics of as-parentheticals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 20: 623-689. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005 The Logic of Conventional Implicatures. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri
2015 The Interaction of Focus and Giveness in Italian Clause Structure. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Selkirk, Lisa
2005 Comments on intonational phrasing. In Prosodies, Sonia Frota, Marina Vigario & Maria Joao Freitas (eds), 11-58. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Suñer, Margarita
2006 Left dislocation with and without epithets. Probus 18: 127-158. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Villalba, Xavier
1998 Right dislocation is not right dislocation. In Studies on the Syntax of Central Romance Language, Olga Fullana & Francesc Roca (eds), 227-241. Girona: Universitat de Girona.Google Scholar
de Vries, Mark
2007 Invisible constituents? In Parentheticals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 106], Nicole Dehé & Yadranka Kavalova (eds), 203-235. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar