Cover not available
Part of
Morphological Metatheory
Edited by Daniel Siddiqi and Heidi Harley
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 229] 2016
► pp. 121–162

Phase domains at PF

Root suppletion and its implications

| McGill University
| McGill University
| McGill University
| McGill University
This chapter investigates some implications of Spell-Out in a phase-based, realizational derivational system. It is argued that all operations on the PF branch within a phase, specifically Vocabulary Insertion and phonological rule, application are predicted to have isomorphic domains of application. This has implications for the proposals on how to extend suppletion domains found in Embick (2010) and Bobaljik & Wurmbrand (2013). Apparent mismatches in suppletive vs. phonological domains are examined in a number of languages, including English, Yiddish, Turkish, Ojibwe, Malagasy, and German. The data are argued to support modifications to both (i) certain theoretical proposals held in the literature, and (ii) the syntactic location of triggers for suppletion generally assumed.
Published online: 29 June 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.229.05kil
References (77)
References
Aquaviva, Paolo. 2008. Roots and lexicality in Distributed Morphology. University College Dublin/University of Konstanz. <[URL]>
Berent, Iris & Pinker, Steven. 2007. The dislike of regular plurals in compounds. The Mental Lexicon 2(2): 129–181. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo. 2011. Cyclicity. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology 4, Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth V. Hume & Keren Rice (eds), 2019–2048. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan D. 2014. Features, structure, and locality in words. Handout 5, UCLA, May.
Bobaljik, Jonathan D. & Harley, Heidi. To appear. Suppletion is local: Evidence from Hiaki. In The Structure of Words at the Interfaces, Heather Newell, Máire Noonan, Glyne Piggott & Lisa Travis (eds). Oxford: OUP.
Bobaljik, Jonathan D. & Wurmbrand, Susanne. 2013. Suspension across domains. In Distributed Morphology Today: Morphemes for Morris Halle, Ora Matushansky & Alec Marantz (eds), 185–198. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2012. Universals in Comparative Morphology: Suppletion, Superlatives, and the Structure of Words. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Booij, Geert & Rubach, Jerzy. 1987. Postcyclic versus postlexical rules in lexical phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 1–44.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005. In Name Only. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Butt, Miriam. 2010. The light verb jungle: Still hacking away. In Complex Predicates in Cross-linguistic Perspective, Mengistu Amberber, Brett Baker & Mark Harvey (eds), 48–78. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cable, Seth. 2003. The remarkable Yiddish pseudo-infinitive: Evidence for phases? Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
. 2004. Predicate clefts and base generation: Evidence from Yiddish and Brazilian Portuguese. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–156. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris. 1968. The Sound Pattern of English. New York, NY: Harper & Row, Publishers. Reprinted 1991, Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clahsen, Harald & Penke, Martina. 1992. The acquisition of agreement morphology and its syntactic consequences: New evidence from the Simone corpus. In The Acquisition of Verb Placement: Functional Categories and V2 Phenomena in Language Acquisition, Jürgen Meisel (ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
D’Alessandro, Roberta & Scheer, Tobias. 2015. Modular PIC. Linguistic Inquiry 46: 593–624. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Davis, Lori J. & Prince, Ellen F. 1986. Yiddish verb-topicalization and the notion ‘Lexical Integrity’. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistic Society 22, Anne M. Farley, Peter T. Farley & Karl-Erik McCullough (eds). Chicago IL: CLS.Google Scholar
Den Dikken, Marcel. 2007. Phase extension: Contours of a theory of the role of headmovement in phrasal extraction. Theoretical Linguistics 33: 1–41. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dobler, Eva, Newell, Heather, Piggott, Glyne, Skinner, Tobin, Sugimura, Mina & Travis, Lisa. 2009. Narrow syntactic movement after spell-out. Ms, McGill University.Google Scholar
Dubinsky, Stanley & Simango, Silvester Ron. 1996. Passive and stative in Chichewa: Evidence for modular distinctions in grammar. Language 72: 749–793. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, David. 2010. Localism Versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fuhrhop, Nanna. 1996. Fugenelemente. In Deutsch – typologisch, Ewald Lang & Gisela Zifonun (eds). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Goad, Heather & White, Lydia. 2006. Ultimate attainment in interlanguage grammars: A prosodic approach. Second Language Research 22: 243–268. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes K. 2003. Prolific domains: On the Anti-locality of Movement Dependencies [Linguistic Aktuell/Linguistics Today 66]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. The road to PF. In Proceedings of the 17th International Symposium on Theoretical and Applied Linguistics, Eleni Agathopoulou, Maria Dimitrikapoulkou & Despina Papadopoulou (eds). Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, School of English.Google Scholar
Hale, Ken & Keyser, Samuel Jay. 2002. Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harbour, Daniel. 2008. Klivaj predika or predicate clefts in Haitian. Lingua 118: 853–871. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2008. When is a syncretism more than a syncretism? In Phi Theory, Daniel Harbour, David Adger & Susana Béjar (eds), 251–294. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2014. On the identity of roots. Theoretical Linguistics 40: 225–276. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harley, Heidi, Tubino-Blanco, Mercedes & Haugen, Jason D. To appear. Locality conditions on suppletive verbs in Hiaki. In The Morphosyntax-phonology Connection: Locality and Directionality, Vera Gribanova & Stephanie Shih (eds). Oxford: OUP.
Haugen, Jason D. 2016. Readjustment: Rejected? In Morphological Metatheory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 229], Heidi Harley & Daniel Siddiqi (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Haugen, Jason D. & Siddiqi, Daniel. 2013. Roots and the derivation. Linguistic Inquiry 44: 493–517. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Towards a restricted realization theory: Multimorphemic monolistemicity, stem suppletion, and portmanteaux in realizational models. In Morphological Metatheory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 229], Heidi Harley & Daniel Siddiqi (eds). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Itô, Junko & Mester, Ralf-Armin. 1986. The phonology of voicing in Japanese. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 49–73.Google Scholar
Kean, Mary-Louise. 1974. The strict cycle in phonology. Linguistic Inquiry 5: 179–203.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul. 1982. From cyclic phonology to lexical phonology. In The Structure of Phonological Representations, Harry van der Hulst & Norval Smith (eds), 30–175. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda. 1984. The Syntax of Verbs. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Kornfilt, Jaklin. 1996. On some copular clitics in Turkish. In ZAS Papers in Linguistics: Papers on the Conference ‘The Word as a Phonetic Unit’, Artemis Alexiadou, Nanna Fuhrop, Paul Law & Sylvia Lohken (eds), 96–114. Berlin: Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard K. & Lefebvre, Claire. 1991. Predicate clefting in Haitian Creole. In Proceedings of NELS 21, Tim Sherer (ed.), 247–261. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Claire. 1992. Toward a typology of predicate cleft languages. Journal of West African Languages 22: 53–61.Google Scholar
Lewis, Geoffrey L. 1967. Turkish Grammar. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Manfredi, Victor. 1993. Verb focus in the typology of Kwa/Kru and Haitian. In Focus and Grammatical Relations in Creole Languages [Creole Language Library 12], Francis Byrne & Donald Winford (eds), 3–51. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 2007. Phases and words. In Phases in the Theory of Grammar, Sook-Hee Choe (ed.), 191–222. Seoul: Dong In.Google Scholar
Marvin, Tatjana. 2002. Topics in Stress and the Syntax of Words. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Mathieu, Éric. 2012. Flavors of division. Linguistic Inquiry 43: 650–679. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2015. How much context is enough? Two cases of spanconditioned stem allomorphy. Linguistic Inquiry 46(2): 273–303. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Michaels, Jennifer. 2009. To alternate or not to alternate: What is the boundary? In Proceedings of North East Linguistic Society 40, Seda Kahn, Claire Moore-Cantwell & Robert Staubs (eds), 93–106. Cambridge MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Mohanan, Karuvannur P. 1986. The Theory of Lexical Phonology. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
. 2005. Move NP or lexical rules? Evidence from Malayalam causativisation. In Lexical Semantics in LFG, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds), 59–120. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Moskal, Beata. 2013. Limits on noun-suppletion. In GLOW 36 . Lund: Lund University.
Newell, Heather. 2005. Bracketing paradoxes and particle verbs: A late adjunction analysis. In Proceedings of Console XIII, Sylvia Blaho, Luis Vicente & Erik Schoorlemmer (eds). Leiden: University of Leiden.Google Scholar
. 2008. Aspects of the Morphology and Phonology of Phases. Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University.
. 2014. Phonological persistence. Talk given at 8th North American Phonology Conference (NAPhC8), Concordia University, May 9–11.
Newell, Heather & Noonan, Maire. in prep. A re-portage on spanning. Ms, UQAM and McGill.
Newell, Heather & Piggott, Glyne. 2006. The morphological control of phonology within Ojibwa lexical categories. In Papers of the 37th Algonquian Conference, H. Christoph Wolfart (ed.), 269–289. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba.Google Scholar
. 2014. Interactions at the syntax-phonology interface: Evidence from Ojibwe. Lingua 150: 332–362. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ojibwe People’s Dictionary. 2015. <[URL]> (1 February 2015).
Peperkamp, Sharon. 1997. Prosodic Words [HIL Dissertations 34]. The Hague: HAG.Google Scholar
Pfau, Roland. 2000. Features and Categories in Language Production. Ph.D. dissertation, Johann Wolfgang Goethe University Frankfurt.
. 2009. Grammar as Processor: A Distributed Morphology Account of Spontaneous Speech Errors [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 137]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian Catriona. 2008. Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax [Cambridge Studies in Linguistics]. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Samuels, Brigitte. 2010. Phonological derivation by phase: Evidence from Basque. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Penn Linguistics Colloquium [UPenn Working Papers in Linguistics 16, Article 19]. <[URL]>
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2011. The syntax-phonology interface. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan C. Yu (eds). Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Siddiqi, Daniel. 2009. Syntax within the Word: Economy, Allomorphy, and Argument Selection in Distributed Morphology [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 138]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Tobin. 2009. Investigations of Downward Movement. Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University.
Steriopolo, Olga. 2013. Diminutive affixes in the number domain: A syntactic variation. Questions and Answers in Linguistics 1: 33–56. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stewart, Osamuyimen Thompson. 2001. The Serial Verb Construction Parameter. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2004. On the edge. In Peripheries: Syntactic Edges and their Effects, David Adger, Cécile De Cat & George Tsoulas (eds), 259–287. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Two domains of causatives. <[URL]>
. 2012. Spanning. Ms. CASTL, University of Tromsø. [URL]
Travis, Lisa deMena. 1992. Inner tense in NPs: The position of number. In Proceedings of the 1992 Canadian Linguistics Association [Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics], 329–345.
. 2000. The L-syntax/S-syntax boundary: Evidence from Austronesian. In Formal Issues in Austronesian Linguistics, Ileana Paul, Vivianne Phillips & Lisa Travis (eds), 167–194. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2003. Reduplication feeding syntactic movement. In Proceedings of Canadian Linguistics Association (CLA) 2003, Stanca Somesfalean (ed.). Montreal: University of Quebec.Google Scholar
. 2010. Inner Aspect: The Articulation of VP. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Veselinova, Ljuba. 2006. Suppletion in Verb Paradigms. Bits and Pieces of the Puzzle [Typological Studies in Language 67]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Suppletion according to tense and aspect. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). <[URL]> (15 May 2015).Google Scholar
Waletzky, Joshua. 1969. Topicalization in Yiddish. Senior thesis, University of Chicago.
Cited by (6)

Cited by six other publications

Dolatian, Hossep & Peter Guekguezian
2023. Relativized Locality: Phases and Tiers in Long-Distance Allomorphy in Armenian. Linguistic Inquiry 54:3 ► pp. 505 ff. DOI logo
Arregi, Karlos & Asia Pietraszko
2021. The Ups and Downs of Head Displacement. Linguistic Inquiry 52:2 ► pp. 241 ff. DOI logo
Dolatian, Hossep
2021. The role of heads and cyclicity in bracketing paradoxes in Armenian compounds. Morphology 31:1 ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo
Kiparsky, Paul
2021. Phonology to the rescue: Nez Perce morphology revisited. The Linguistic Review 38:3 ► pp. 391 ff. DOI logo
Calabrese, Andrea
2020. Remarks on the Role of the Perfect Participle in Italian Morphology and on its History. Probus 32:2 ► pp. 209 ff. DOI logo
Ganenkov, Dmitry
2020. Missing Elsewhere: Domain Extension in Contextual Allomorphy. Linguistic Inquiry 51:4 ► pp. 785 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.