Part of
Morphological MetatheoryEdited by Daniel Siddiqi and Heidi Harley
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 229] 2016
► pp. 201–222
Edited by Daniel Siddiqi and Heidi Harley
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 229] 2016
► pp. 201–222
Spans and words
1. The problem: Words are a pervasive unit of syntax and yet the dominant theory of them, the X0 theory, is problematic, predicting more parallels between phrasal and head movement than are observed. Phrasal movement approaches to word formation fare even worse on that score. Mirror Theory (MT) also has shortcomings, for example in relying on an unmotivated notion of specifier.
2. The solution: A theory of how syntactic structures are mapped onto functional and lexical words, positing syntactic features w for lexical access points and @ for linearization points. The theory draws on the late insertion of DM, the cycles of phase theory, the direct linearization principles of MT, and the non-terminal spell-out of Nanosyntax, separating word formation from linearization and appealing to spans (head-complement sequences) as the units of cyclic lexical access and storage.
References
Adger, David
2007 Stress and phasal syntax. Linguistic Analysis 33(3–4): 238–266.
2013 A Syntax of Substance. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Adger, David, Harbour, Daniel & Watkins, Laurel J.
2009 Mirrors and Microparameters: Phrase Structure Beyond Free Word Order. Cambridge: CUP. 
Baker, Mark C.
1988 Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.
1996 The Polysynthesis Parameter [Oxford Studies in Comparative Syntax]. Oxford: OUP.
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo
2011 Cyclicity. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, Vol. 4, Marc van Oostendorp, Colin Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Keren Rice (eds), 2019–2048. Oxford: Blackwell.
Bobaljik, Jonathan David
1995 Morphosyntax: The Syntax of Verbal Inflection. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
2012 Universals in Comparative Morphology: Suppletion, Superlatives, and the Structure of Words. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Borer, Hagit
2005 Structuring Sense, Vol. I: In Name Only? Oxford: OUP.
Brody, Michael
2000a Mirror Theory: Syntactic representation in perfect syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 31(1): 29–56.
2000b Word order, restructuring, and Mirror Theory. In The Derivation of VO and OV [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 31], Peter Svenonius (ed.), 27–43. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Bye, Patrik & Svenonius, Peter
2012 Non-concatenative morphology as epiphenomenon. In The Morphology and Phonology of Exponence, Jochen Trommer (ed.), 427–495. Oxford: OUP.
Caha, Pavel
2009 The Nanosyntax of Case. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tromsø.
Cardinaletti, Anna & Starke, Michal
1999 The typology of structural deficiency: A case study of three classes of pronouns. In Clitics in the Languages of Europe, Henk van Riemsdijk (ed.), 145–233. Berlin: Mouton.
Carlson, Greg
2006 The meaningful bounds of incorporation. In Non-definiteness and Plurality [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 95], Svetlana Vogeleer & Liliane Tasmowski (eds), 35–50. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Chomsky, Noam
1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
2001 Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
2008 On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999 Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-Linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.
Corver, Norbert
1997 Much-support as a last resort. Linguistic Inquiry 28(1): 119–164.
Déchaine, Rose-Marie
2015 What “spell-out” reveals: Niger-Congo prosodification constrains the syntax-semantics interface. In Current Research in African Linguistics: Papers in Honor of Ọladele Awobuluyi, Ọlanikẹ Ọla Orie, Johnson Fọlọrunso Ilọri & Lendzemo Constantine Yuka (eds), 287–352. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars.
Di Sciullo, Anna-Maria & Williams, Edwin
1987 On the Definition of Word [Linguistic Inquiry Monographs 14]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Dryer, Matthew
1989 Plural words. Linguistics 27: 865–895.
Embick, David
2007 Blocking effects and analytic/synthetic alternations. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 25(1): 1–37.
2010 Localism versus Globalism in Morphology and Phonology. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Embick, David & Marantz, Alec
2008 Architecture and blocking. Linguistic Inquiry 39(1): 1–53.
Embick, David & Noyer, Ralf
2001 Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32(4): 555–595.
Fox, Danny & Pesetsky, David
2005 Cyclic linearization of syntactic structure. Theoretical Linguistics 31(1–2):1–45.
Haider, Hubert
2000 OV is more basic than VO. In The Derivation of VO and OV, [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 31], Peter Svenonius (ed.), 45–67. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
1993 Distributed Morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Harley, Heidi & Ritter, Elizabeth
2002 Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78(3): 482–526.
Ito, Junko & Mester, Armin
2012 Recursive prosodic phrasing in Japanese. In Prosody matters: Essays in Honor of Elisabeth Selkirk, Toni Borowsky, Shigeto Sugahara, Mariko Sugahara & Takahito Shinya (eds), 280–303. Sheffield: Equinox.
Kahnemuyipour, Arsalan
2009 The Syntax of Sentential Stress. Oxford: OUP.
Kayne, Richard S.
1994 The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
2005 Some notes on comparative syntax, with special reference to English and French. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, Guglielmo Cinque & Richard S. Kayne (eds), 3–69. Oxford: OUP.
Kornfilt, Jaklin
1997 Turkish. London: Routledge.
Kratzer, Angelika & Selkirk, Elisabeth
2007 Phase theory and prosodic spellout: The case of verbs. The Linguistic Review 24(2–3): 93–135.
Marantz, Alec
2001 Words. Ms, MIT.
2007 Phases and words. In Phases in the Theory of Grammar, Sook-hee Choe (ed.), 196–226. Seoul: Dong-in.
2013 Locality domains for contextual allomorphy across the interfaces. In Distributed Morphology Today: Morphemes for Morris Halle, Ora Matushansky & Alec Marantz (eds), 95–115. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Marvin, Tatjana
2002 Topics in the Stress and Syntax of Words. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Nespor, Marina, Shukla, Mohinish, van de Vijver, Ruben, Avesani, Cinzia, Schraudolf, Hanna & Donati, Caterina
2008 Different phrasal prominence realizations in VO and OV languages. Lingue e linguaggio 7(2): 139–168.
Newell, Heather
2008 Aspects of the Morphology and Phonology of Phases. Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University, Montréal.
Nikolaeva, Irina
2013 Periphrasis in Tundra Nenets. In Periphrasis: The Role of Syntax and Morphology in Paradigms, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds), 77–140. Oxford: The British Academy.
Noyer, Rolf
1998 Vietnamese ‘morphology’ and the definition of word. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 5(2): 65–89.
Platzack, Christer
2013 Head movement as a phonological operation. In Diagnosing Syntax, Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds), 21–43. Oxford: OUP.
Pollock, Jean Yves
1989 Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20(3): 365–424.
Postal, Paul
1969 Anaphoric islands. In Papers from the Fifth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, 205–239. Chicago IL: CLS.
Ramchand, Gillian
2008 Verb Meaning and the Lexicon. Cambridge: CUP.
Ramchand, Gillian & Svenonius, Peter
2014 Deriving the functional hierarchy. Language Sciences 46(B):152–174.
Rijkhoff, Jan
2002 The Noun Phrase. Oxford: OUP.
Roberts, Ian
2010 Agreement and Head Movement: Clitics, Incorporation, and Defective Goals. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.
Scheer, Tobias
2008 Why the prosodic hierarchy is a diacritic and why the interface must be direct. In Sounds of Silence: Empty Elements in Syntax and Phonology, Jutta Hartmann, Veronika Hegedus & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 145–192. Oxford: Elsevier.
Selkirk, Elisabeth
1996 The prosodic structure of function words. In Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition, James L. Morgan & Katherine Demuth (eds), 187–213. Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2011 The syntax-phonology interface. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 2nd edn, John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan Yu (eds), 435–483. Oxford: Blackwell.
Siddiqi, Daniel
2009 Syntax within the Word: Economy, Allomorphy, and Argument Selection in Distributed Morphology [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 138]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Son, Minjeong & Svenonius, Peter
2008 Microparameters of cross-linguistic variation: Directed motion and resultatives. In Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Natasha Abner & Jason Bishop (eds), 388–396. Somerville MA: Cascadilla.
Starke, Michal
2009 Nanosyntax: A short primer to a new approach to language. In Svenonius, Ramchand, Starke & Taraldsen (eds), 1–6. [URL]
Šurkalović, Dragana
2013 Modularity, phase-phase faithfulness and prosodification of function words in English. Nordlyd 40(1): 301–322.
Svenonius, Peter
2005 Extending the extension condition to discontinuous idioms. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 5: 227–263.
2016 Complex predicates as complementation structures. In Approaches to Complex Predicates, Léa Nash & Pollet Samvelian (eds), 212–247. Leiden: Brill.
Svenonius, Peter, Ramchand, Gillian, Starke, Michal & Taraldsen, Knut Tarald
(eds) 2009 Tromsø Working Papers on Language and Linguistics: Nordlyd 36.1, Special issue on Nanosyntax
. [URL]
Travis, Lisa
1984 Parameters and Effects of Word Order Variation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.
Williams, Edwin
1981 On the notions ‘lexically related’ and ‘head of a word’. Linguistic Inquiry 12(2): 245–274.
Woodbury, Anthony C.
1987 Meaningful phonological processes: A consideration of Central Alaskan Yupik Eskimo prosody. Language 63(4): 685–740.
Cited by
Cited by 31 other publications
Acedo-Matellán, Víctor
2021. Goal, source, and route preverbs in Latin: their interaction with spatial datives. The Linguistic Review 38:2 ► pp. 233 ff. 
Acedo‐Matellán, Víctor
2023. Synthetic versus Analytic Expressions. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology, ► pp. 1 ff.
Arregi, Karlos & Asia Pietraszko
2021. The Ups and Downs of Head Displacement. Linguistic Inquiry 52:2 ► pp. 241 ff.
Bembridge, Gavin
2022. ASL negative incorporation as negative suppletion. Sign Language & Linguistics 25:2 ► pp. 135 ff.
Blix, Hagen
2021. Spans in South Caucasian agreement. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 39:1 ► pp. 1 ff.
Ksenia Bogomolets & Harry van der Hulst
2023. Word Prominence in Languages with Complex Morphologies,
Brodkin, Dan
2022. Two steps to high absolutive syntax: Austronesian voice and agent focus in Mandar. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 31:4 ► pp. 465 ff.
Böhm, Roger
2018. Just for the record. In Substance-based Grammar – The (Ongoing) Work of John Anderson [Studies in Language Companion Series, 204], ► pp. 261 ff.
Carlson, Matthew T., Antonio Fábregas & Michael T. Putnam
2021. How Wide the Divide? – Theorizing ‘Constructions’ in Generative and Usage-Based Frameworks. Frontiers in Psychology 12
Dékány, Éva
2021. Introduction. In The Hungarian Nominal Functional Sequence [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 100], ► pp. 1 ff.
Ermolaeva, Marina & Gregory M. Kobele
2022. Agree as information transmission over dependencies. Syntax 25:4 ► pp. 466 ff.
Fenger, Paula
2023. Multiple and Cumulative Exponence. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology, ► pp. 1 ff.
Georgieva, Ekaterina, Martin Salzmann & Philipp Weisser
2021. Negative verb clusters in Mari and Udmurt and why they require postsyntactic top-down word-formation. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 39:2 ► pp. 457 ff.
Harizanov, Boris & Vera Gribanova
2019. Whither head movement?. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 37:2 ► pp. 461 ff.
Hsu, Brian
2021. Coalescence: A Unification of Bundling Operations in Syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 52:1 ► pp. 39 ff.
Kiparsky, Paul
2021. Phonology to the rescue: Nez Perce morphology revisited. The Linguistic Review 38:3 ► pp. 391 ff.
Kodner, Jordan
2023. What learning Latin verbal morphology tells us about morphological theory. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 41:2 ► pp. 733 ff.
Newell, Heather
2021. Bracketing Paradoxes resolved. The Linguistic Review 38:3 ► pp. 443 ff.
Putnam, Michael & Åshild Søfteland
2022. When covert modality sneaks into your grammar: wh-infinitives in American Norwegian. Second Language Research ► pp. 026765832211037 ff.
Putnam, Michael T., Lara Schwarz & Andrew D. Hoffman
2021. Morphology of Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 613 ff.
Rodríguez-Mondoñedo, Miguel
2023. Argument Structure in Peruvian Sign Language. In Formal Approaches to Languages of South America, ► pp. 79 ff.
Rolle, Nicholas & Lee Bickmore
2022. Outward-sensitive phonologically-conditioned suppletive allomorphy vs. first-last tone harmony in Cilungu. Morphology 32:2 ► pp. 197 ff.
Svenonius, Peter
2021. Prepositions with CP and their implications for extended projections. Linguistic Variation 21:1 ► pp. 11 ff.
Taraldsen, Knut Tarald
2019. An introduction to Nanosyntax. Linguistics Vanguard 5:1
Tat, Deniz
2022. Lexical Borrowing Targets Spans. Languages 7:4 ► pp. 289 ff.
Terenghi, Silvia
2022. Integrating deictic co-speech gestures in demonstrative forms. Linguistics in the Netherlands 39 ► pp. 225 ff.
Ursini, Francesco-Alessio & Keith Tse
2021. Region Prepositions: The View from French. Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique 66:1 ► pp. 31 ff.
Wiślicki, Jan
2021. Light heads and predicate formation: on two scopes of discontinuity. Linguistics 59:6 ► pp. 1389 ff.
Wood, Jim
2023. Icelandic Nominalizations and Allosemy,
[no author supplied]
[no author supplied]
2021. Grammatical Aspects of Heritage Languages. In The Cambridge Handbook of Heritage Languages and Linguistics, ► pp. 579 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 17 november 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.