Cover not available
Part of
Inner-sentential Propositional Proforms: Syntactic properties and interpretative effects
Edited by Werner Frey, André Meinunger and Kerstin Schwabe
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 232] 2016
► pp. 211–240

Sentential proforms and argument conditionals

The paper is about the relationship between German argument wenn-clauses and their proforms as in Lea bedauert es, wenn Mia Klavier spielt ‘Lea regrets it if Mia plays the piano’. Confirming and complementing Fabricius-Hansen’s (1980) view that these clauses are proper adverbials and simultaneously provide a propositional argument for a matrix predicate, the paper regards argument wenn-clauses as left- or right TP-adjuncts that m-command a sentential proform. It shows that the proform can also be pro if it represents an obligatory propositional argument. This pro is locally m-bound by the argument wenn-clause and itself locally m-binds an argument dass-clause. The latter is a right vP-adjunct and can be deleted if it is coreferential with the argument wenn-clause, if both are alike with respect to their information structural status, if they are identical with respect to their C’, and if they are adjacent.
Published online: 26 July 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.232.08sch
References (28)
References
Asher, Nicholas. 1993. Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Boettcher, Wolfgang & Sitta, Horst. 1972. Deutsche Grammatik III. Zusammengesetzter Satz und äquivalente Strukturen [Studienbücher zur Linguistik und Literaturwissenschaft 4]. Frankfurt: Athenäum.Google Scholar
Breindl, Eva. 1989. Präpositionalobjekte und Präpositionalobjektsätze im Deutschen. Berlin: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carstairs, Andrew. 1973. For-to-complements and if-clauses. Quarterly Progress Report of the MIT Research Laboratory of Electronics 109: 147-153.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Peter. 1989. Grundriß der deutschen Grammatik, 2nd revised and expanded edn. Stuttgart: J.B. Metzlersche Verlagsbuchhandlung.Google Scholar
Fabricius-Hansen, Cathrine. 1980. Sogenannte ergänzende wenn-Sätze. Ein Beispiel syntaktisch-semantischer Argumentation. In Festschrift für Gunnar Bech: zum 60. Geburtstag am 23. März [Kopenhagener Beiträge zur germanistischen Linguistik, Sonderband 1], Gunnar Bech, Mogens Dyhr, Karl Hyldgaard-Jensen & Jørgen Olsen (eds), 160-188. København: Institut for germansk filologi.Google Scholar
Gibbard, Allan. 1981. Two recent theories of conditionals. In Ifs, Conditionals, Belief, Decision, Chance, and Time, William L. Harper, Robert Stalnaker & Glenn Pearce (eds), 211–247. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Hamblin, Charles. 1973. Questions in Montague English. Foundations of Language 10: 41-53.Google Scholar
Hartung, Wolf-Dietrich. 1986. Die zusammengesetzten Sätze des Deutschen [Studia Grammatica 4]. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
Hinterwimmer, Stefan. 2010. When-clauses, factive verbs and correlates. In Language and Logos: Festschrift for Peter Staudacher on his 70th Birthday [Studia Grammatica 72], Gisbert Fanselow & Thomas Hanneforth (eds), 176-189. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaiaty, Mohamed. 2010. Überlegungen zu sog. 'ergänzenden wenn-Sätzen' im Deutschen. Deutsche Sprache 4(10): 287-308.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1986. Conditionals. In Papers from the Parasession on Pragmatics and Grammatical Theory, Anne M. Farley, Peter Farley & Karl-Eric McCullogh (eds), 1-15. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Onea, Edgar. 2015. Wenn-Sätze als propositionale Argumente. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 34(1): 79-124. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pasch, Renate, Brauße, Ursula, Breindl, Eva & Waßner, Ulrich Hermann. 2003. Handbuch der deutschen Konnektoren. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1991. Zero Syntax, Part II. Ms, MIT.<[URL]>Google Scholar
Pullum, Geoffrey. 1987. Implications of English extraposed irrealis clauses. In ESCOL '87: Proceedings of the Fourth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, Ann Miller & Joyce Powers (eds), 260-70. Columbus OH: The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Quer, Josep. (2002). Non-Logical if . In Current Issues in Romance Languages. Selected Papers from the 29th Linguistics Symposium on Romance Languages, Teresa Satterfield, Christina Tortora & Diana Cresti (eds), 241-254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Richter, Frank & Soehn, Jan-P. 2006. Braucht niemanden zu scheren: A survey of NPI licensing in German. In Proceedings of the 13th International conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Stefan Müller (ed), 421-440. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Rothstein, Susan, D.1991. Pleonastics and the Interpretation of Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 26(3): 499-529.Google Scholar
Schmid, Hans U. 1987. Überlegungen zu Syntax und Semantik ergänzender wenn-Sätze. Sprachwissenschaft 12: 265-292.Google Scholar
Schwabe, Kerstin. 2013. Eine uniforme Analyse sententialer Proformen im Deutschen. Deutsche Sprache 41: 142-64.Google Scholar
. 2015. On the licensing of argument conditionals. In Logic, Language and Computation. 10th International Tbilisi Symposium TbiLLC 2013, Martin Aher, Emil Jerabek, Daniel Hole & Clemens Kupke (eds), 290-309. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Schwabe, Kerstin & Fittler, Robert. 2014. Über semantische Konsistenzbedingungen deutscher Matrixprädikate, Teil 1 Sprachtheorie und germanistische Linguistik 24(1): 45-75, Teil 2 Sprachtheorie und germanistische Linguistik 24(2): 123-150.Google Scholar
Schwabe, Kerstin, Jędrzejowski, Łukasz & Kellner, Elisa. 2012. A cross-linguistic perspective on complement-like 'if'-clauses. Talk at the ZAS-Workshop (Mis-)matches in clause linkage . 13‑14 April, 2012, Berlin.<[URL]>
Sudhoff, Stefan. 2003. Argumentsätze und es-Korrelate – zur syntaktischen Struktur von Nebensatzeinbettungen im Deutschen. Berlin: WVBGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Anie. 2012. Deriving Some Properties of Protasis-Referring Conditionals. In Proceedings of the 29th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics , Jaehoon Choi, E. Alan Hogue, Jeffrey Punske, Deniz Tat, Jessamyn Schertz, & Alex Trueman (eds), 250-258. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings ProjectGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1974. Rule Ordering in Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT. <[URL]>
Zifonun, Gisela, Hoffmann, Ludger & Strecker, Bruno. 1997. Grammatik der Deutschen Sprache, Band II. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Sæbø, Kjell Johan
2024. Counterfactual mood in Czech, German, Norwegian, and Russian. Natural Language Semantics 32:1 ► pp. 93 ff. DOI logo
Steriopolo, Olga
2016. Sentential homophony: A case study of if-clauses in Russian. Russian Linguistics 40:3 ► pp. 231 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 25 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.