Cover not available
Part of
Formal Studies in Slovenian Syntax: In honor of Janez Orešnik
Edited by Franc Lanko Marušič and Rok Žaucer
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 236] 2016
► pp. 193–220

The left periphery of multiple wh-questions in Slovenian

| University of Nova Gorica
In this paper I focus on multiple wh-questions in Slovenian and argue for an analysis in which wh-phrases move to the extended left periphery of the sentence. Assuming the Cartographic approach, I consider the order of wh-phrases in Slovenian multiple wh-questions, which was previously described as free, e.g. Golden (1997). While I confirm that the order of wh-phrases in the left periphery is generally free, I show that there are some exceptions, e.g. zakaj ‘why’ and kako ‘how’ tend to precede other wh-phrases. In addition, I show that the order of wh-phrases with respect to focus and topic phrases is free, but that one wh-phrase needs to appear in a clause initial position for a question to get a true wh-question reading. Based on this, I propose that the clause initial wh-phrase moves to the Interrogative Projection, in the sense of Rizzi (2001a), and the remaining wh-phrases to Wh-Projections. Crucially, because wh-movement is not restricted by a requirement on chains, cf. Krapova & Cinque (2005), the order of wh-phrases is free.
Published online: 8 December 2016
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.236.09mis
References (33)
References
Aboh, Enoch O. & Pfau, Roland. 2011. What’s a wh-word got to do with it? In Mapping the Left Periphery: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 5, Paola Benincà & Nicola Munaro (eds), 91–124. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Baker, Carl L. 1970. Notes on the description of English questions: The role of an abstract question morpheme. Foundations of language 6: 197–219.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2002. On multiple wh-fronting. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 351−383. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Topicalization, focalization, lexical insertion, and scrambling. Linguistic Inquiry 35(4): 613–638. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai Shen. 1991. On the Typology of Wh-questions. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Rizzi, Luigi. 2008. The cartography of syntactic structures. Studies in Linguistics 2: 42–58.Google Scholar
Dyakonova, Marina. 2009. A phase-based approach to Russian free word order. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amsterdam.Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert. 2010. Semantic type effects on crossing movement in German. Language and Logos: Studies in Theoretical and Computational Linguistics 72: 48–63.Google Scholar
Fanselow, Gisbert & Aäussler, Jana & Weskott, Thomas. 2013. Constituent order in German multiple questions: Normal order and (apparent) anti-superiority effects. The Mind Research Repository (beta), Vol. 1.Google Scholar
Golden, Marija. 1997. Multiple wh-questions in Slovene. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The Cornell Meeting, 1995, Wayles Browne, Ewa Dornisch, Natasha Kondrashova & Draga Zec (eds), 240−266. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold & Postal, Paul. 1964. An integrated theory of linguistic descriptions. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Krapova, Iliyana. 2004. Word order in Topic-Focus structures in the Balkan languages. In Romània Orientale XVII. Atti del IX convegno internazionale di studi sul sud-est europeo (Tirana, 30.08–3.09. 2004): 139–162.Google Scholar
Krapova, Iliyana & Cinque, Guglielmo. 2005. On the order of wh-phrases in Bulgarian multiple wh-fronting. University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 171–197.Google Scholar
Kuno, Susumu. 1993. Grammar and Discourse Principles: Functional Syntax and GB Theory. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Laenzlinger, Christopher & Soare, Gabriela. 2005. On merging positions for arguments and adverbs in the Romance Mittelfeld. In Contributions to the thirtieth Incontro di Grammatica Generativa 2005, Laura Brugè, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro, Walter Schweikert & Giuseppina Turano (eds), 105–128. Venice: Università Ca’Foscari Venezia.Google Scholar
Lambova, Mariana. 2003. On the interaction of multiple (non) wh-fronting and multiple Topicalization in Bulgarian. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 8(1): 127–142.Google Scholar
Marvin, Tatjana & Stegovec, Adrian. 2012. On the syntax of ditransitive sentences in Slovenian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 59(1–2): 177–203. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Meyer, Roland. 2004. Superiority effects in Russian, Polish and Czech: Judgments and Grammar. Ms, University of Leipzig & University of Regensburg.Google Scholar
Mišmaš, Petra. 2014. Multiple wh-fronting can be optional too. In Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: the McMaster Meeting 2013, Cassandra Chapman, Olena Kit & Ivona Kučerová (eds), 225–244. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
. 2015. On the Optionality of Wh-fronting in a Multiple Wh-fronting Language. PhD dissertation, University of Nova Gorica.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar. A Handbook in Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
. 2001a. On the position ―Int(errogative) in the left periphery of the clause. In Current studies in Italian syntax: Essays offered to L. Renzi, Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 287–296. Oxford: Elsevier.Google Scholar
. 2001b. Relativized minimality effects. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Martin Baltin & Chris Collins (eds), 89–110. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 223–251. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Rojina, Nina. 2011. The Syntactic Structures of Russian Wh-questions. PhD dissertation, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
Rudin, Catherine. 1988. On multiple questions and multiple fronting. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 445−501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur & Soare, Gabriela. 2011. Where’s ‘Why’? Linguistic inquiry 42(4): 651–669. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Soare, Gabriela. 2007. A cross-linguistic typology of question formation and the antisymmetry hypothesis. Generative Grammar in Geneva 5: 107–133.Google Scholar
Stepanov, Arthur. 1998. On Wh-fronting is Russian. In Proceedings of NELS 28, Pius N. Tamanji & Kiyomi Kusumoto (eds), 453–467. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Stepanov, Arthur & Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2008. Cartography and licensing of wh-adjuncts: A cross-linguistic perspective. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 26(3): 589–638. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Toporišič, Jože. 2004. Slovenska slovnica (Slovenian grammar). Maribor: Obzorja.Google Scholar