Cover not available
Part of
Boundaries, Phases and Interfaces: Case studies in honor of Violeta Demonte
Edited by Olga Fernández-Soriano, Elena Castroviejo Miró and Isabel Pérez-Jiménez
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 239] 2017
► pp. 195–222

Multiple Wh-Movement in European Spanish

Exploring the role of interface conditions for variation

| Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona
In this paper I explore Multiple Wh-Movement (MWM) in European Romance, a syntactic pattern that has been regarded as impossible (all Romance languages but Romanian excluding it; cf. Escandell-Vidal 1999; RAE-ASALE 2009; Chernova 2015, among others). After reviewing some data that qualify this well-known observation, I argue that European Spanish can actually display MWM under specific discourse conditions, some of which have not been previously reported. The paper puts forward an analysis of the facts adopting Richards’ (2010) Distinctiness, a PF condition that requires for X and Y to be morphologically or featurally different (within the same domain) for them to be linearized, a solution that places the relevant parameter in the Syntax → PF wing of the grammar.
Keywords: distinctness, interface conditions, label, multiple wh-movement, parametric variation, phase
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Background discussion: The facts
  • 3.Licensing conditions of multiple wh-movement
    • 3.1Licensing conditions: The role of Case
    • 3.2Licensing conditions: The background
  • 4.A Distinctness-based account
    • 4.1MWM and Distinctness
    • 4.2Potential problems
  • 5.The position occupied by non-first wh-phrases in MWM
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 June 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.239.10gal
References (65)
References
Abels, Klaus. 2003. Successive Cyclicity, Anti-Locality, and Adposition Stranding. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
Bañeras, Maria. 2016. La periferia izquierda de la oración. Bases de una propuesta configuracional. Ms, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 2004. Aspects of the low IP area. In The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2 Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 16–51. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa, Holmberg, Anders, Roberts, Ian & Sheehan, Michelle (eds). 2010. Parametric Variation: Null Subjects in Minimalist Theory. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2002. A-movement and the EPP. Syntax 5: 167–218. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brugé, Laura & Cardinaletti, Anna, Giusti, Giuliana, Munaro, Nicola & Poletto, Cecilia. 2012. Functional Heads: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 7. Oxford, NY: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Campos, Héctor. 1999. Spanish as a CP/IP absorption language. In Advances in Hispanic Linguistics. Papers from the 2nd Hispanic Linguistics Symposium, Javier Gutiérrez-Rexach & Fernando Martínez Gil (eds), 332–345. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa & Corver, Norbert. 2006. Wh-Movement: Moving on. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chernova, Ekaterina. 2015. The Syntax of Wh-Movement in Multiple (True and Echo) Questions: A Q-Based Approach. PhD dissertation, Universitat de Girona.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Conditions on transformations. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds), 232–286. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
. 1977. On wh-movement. In Formal Syntax, Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds), 71–132. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step. Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels, Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2004. Beyond explanatory adequacy. In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 104–131. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2010. Some simple evo-devo theses: How true might they be for language? In Alice V. and David H. Morris Symposium on Language and Communication. New York NY: Stony Brook University. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Problems of projection. Lingua 130: 33–49. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. Problems of projection. Extensions. In Structures, Strategies and Beyond. Studies in Honour of Adriana Belletti [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 223], Elisa di Domenico, Cornelia Hamann & Simona Matteini (eds), 1–16. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1993. A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 239–298.Google Scholar
. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Colomina, M. Pilar. 2016. La distintividad en la sintaxis. El caso de la combinación de clíticos en las lenguas iberorrománicas. MA thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris. 2002. Eliminating labels. In Derivation and Explanation in the Minimalist Program, Samuel Epstein & T. Daniel Seely (eds), 106–132. Malden MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida & Uribe-Etxebarria, Myriam. 2002. La grammaire des prédicats spatio-temporels: temps, aspect et adverbes de tems. In Temps et aspect. De la morphologie à l’interprétation, Brenda Laca (ed.), 125–176. Paris: St. Denis Presses Universitaires de Vincennes.Google Scholar
. 2004. The syntax of time adverbs. In The Syntax of Time, Jacqueline Guéron & Alexander Lecarme (eds), 143–180. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Escandell-Vidal, M. Victoria. 1999. Los enunciados interrogativos. Aspectos semánticos y pragmáticos. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua española, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 33.929–33.991. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Etxepare, Ricardo & Uribe-Etxebarria, Myriam. 2005. Word order in wh-questions. Talk given at the III Workshop on Syntax and Semantics (WoSS III), Université de Nantes, 8–9 September.Google Scholar
Gallego, Ángel J. 2009. On freezing effects. Iberia 1: 33–51.Google Scholar
. 2010. Phase Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 152]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Object shift in romance. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31: 409–451. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. In progress. Prolegomena to a configurational approach to the left periphery. Ms, Centre de Lingüística Teòrica - Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Irurtzun, Aritz. 2007. The Grammar of Focus at the Interfaces. PhD dissertation, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1977. X-bar Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne, Ray. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lasnik, Howard. 2014. Multiple sluicing in english? Syntax 17: 1–20. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lasnik, Howard & Saito, Mamoru. 1992. Move a: Conditions on Its Applications and Outputs. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Leonetti, Manuel. 2004. Specificity and differential object marking in Spanish. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 3: 75–114.Google Scholar
López, Luis. 2009. A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Indefinite Objects. Scrambling, Choice Functions, and Differential Marking. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mateu, Jaume. 2002. Argument Structure: Relational Construal at the Syntax-Semantics Interface. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. <[URL]> Google Scholar
. 2012. Conflation and incorporation processes in resultative constructions. In Telicity, Change, and State: A Cross-Categorial View of Event Structure, Violeta Demonte & Louise McNally (eds), 252–278. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ordóñez, Francisco. 1997. Word Order and Clause Structure in Spanish and Other Romance Languages. PhD dissertation, The City University of New York.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia. 2000. The Higher Functional Field in the Northern Italian Dialects. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
RAE-ASALE (Real Academia Española). 2009–2011. Nueva gramática de la lengua española. Madrid: Espasa.Google Scholar
Raposo, Eduardo & Uriagereka, Juan. 2005. Clitic placement in Western Iberian: A minimalist view. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, Guglielmo Cinque & Richard S. Kayne (eds), 639–697. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Richards, Norvin. 1997. What Moves Where When in Which Language? PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
. 2001. Movement in Language. Interactions and Architectures. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2010. Uttering Trees. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk. 2008. Identity avoidance: OCP-effects in Swiss relatives. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory, Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & M. Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 227–250. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar. Handbook in Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 223–251. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2006. On the form of chains: Criterial positions and ECP effects. In Wh-Movement: Moving on, Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Norbert Corver (eds), 97–133. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Rodrigues, Cilene, Nevins, Andrew & Vicente, Luis. 2009. Cleaving the interactions between sluicing and preposition stranding. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2006. Selected papers from 'Going Romance', Amsterdam, 7–9 December 2006 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 303], Danièle Torck & Leo Wetzels (eds), 175–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rudin, Catherine. 1988. On multiple questions and multiple wh-fronting. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 6: 445–501. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Suñer, Margarita. 1994. V-Movement and the licensing of argumental wh-phrases in Spanish. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 12: 335–372. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, P. 2007. Adpositions, particles, and the arguments they introduce. In Argument Structure [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 108], Eric J. Reuland, Tanmoy Bhattacharya & Giorgos Spathas (eds), 63–103. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2008. Projections of P. In Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 120], Anna Asbury, Jakub Dotlačil, Berit Gehrke & Rick Nouwen (eds), 63–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Svenonius, Peter & Son, Minjeong. 2008. Microparameters of cross-linguistic variation: Directed motion and resultatives. In Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Natasha Abner & Jason Bishop (eds), 388–396. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Press.Google Scholar
Torrego, Esther. 1984. On inversion in Spanish and some of its effects. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 103–129.Google Scholar
. 1998. The Dependencies of Objects. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Uriagereka, Juan. 1988. On Government. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.Google Scholar
. 1995. An F position in Western Romance. In Discourse Configurational Languages, Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), 153–175. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2005. A markovian syntax for adjuncts. Talk given at the CLT Seminar, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, June 6.Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1998. Prosody, Focus, and Word Order. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Cortés Rodríguez, Álvaro
2022. Multiple sluicing and islands: a cross-linguistic experimental investigation of the clausemate condition. The Linguistic Review 39:3 ► pp. 425 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.