Cover not available
Part of
Boundaries, Phases and Interfaces: Case studies in honor of Violeta Demonte
Edited by Olga Fernández-Soriano, Elena Castroviejo Miró and Isabel Pérez-Jiménez
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 239] 2017
► pp. 343–365

State and change of state in Latin

A view from the Lexicon-Syntax interface

This paper offers a syntactic account of Haverling’s (1994 ff.) descriptive insights regarding the formation of both stative verbs and -sco verbs expressing change in Early and Classical Latin. In particular, the formal distinction between incorporation and conflation (cfr. Haugen 2008, 2009 and Mateu 2012, i.a.) is shown to be useful when dealing with the formation of these verbs. Following Acedo-Matellán and Mateu’s (2013) formal account of Talmy’s (1991, 2000) typology of motion events, the paper also addresses the question of why aspectual resultative prefixation is a phenomenon that is expected to be found in a satellite-framed language like Latin (e.g., cfr. inarescere ‘to start becoming dry’) but not in verb-framed languages like Catalan or Spanish.
Keywords: state, change of state, argument structure, conflation, incorporation, lexicon-syntax interface, Talmy’s typology, Latin, -sco verbs
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The data: -sco verbs in Early and Classical Latin
  • 3.The theoretical framework
  • 4.A syntactic analysis of state and change of state verbs in Latin
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Abbreviations (author; work)
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 June 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.239.16mat
References (72)
References
Acedo-Matellán, Víctor. 2010. Argument Structure and the Syntax-Morphology Interface. A Case Study in Latin and other Languages. PhD dissertation, Universitat de Barcelona. <[URL]> Google Scholar
2013. Merging roots in bare phrase structure and the conflation/incorporation distinction. In NELS 42 Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society (pp. 1–14). Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Acedo-Matellán, Víctor & Mateu, Jaume. 2013. Satellite-framed Latin vs. verb-framed Romance: A syntactic approach. Probus 25: 227–265.Google Scholar
. 2014. From syntax to roots: A syntactic approach to root interpretation. In The Syntax of Roots and the Roots of Syntax, Artemis Alexiadou, Hagit Borer & Florian Shäfer (eds), 14–32. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015. Parameters and argument structure, I: Motion predicates and resultatives. In Contemporary Linguistic Parameters, Antonio Fábregas, Jaume Mateu & Michael Putnam (eds), 99–122. New York NY: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Acedo-Matellán, Víctor & Real-Puigdollers, Cristina. 2014. Inserting roots into (functional) nodes: Categories and cross-linguistic variation. Linguistic Analysis 39: 125–168.Google Scholar
Amritavalli, Raghavachari & Jayaseelan, Karattuparambil Achutan. 2003. The genesis of syntactic categories and parametric variation. In Generative Grammar in a Broader Perspective: Proceedings of the 4th GLOW in Asia 2003, Huan Jin Yoon (ed.), 19–41. Seoul: Hankook.Google Scholar
Arsenijević, Boban. 2006. Inner Aspect and Telicity. The Decompositional and the Quantificational Nature of Eventualities at the Syntax-Semantics Interface. PhD dissertation, Universiteit Leiden. <[URL]> Google Scholar
. 2007a. A unified analysis of two classes of Slavic verb prefixes. In Proceedings of ConSOLE XIV, Sylvia Blaho, Erik Schoorlemmer & Luis Vicente (eds), 21–36. Leiden: Universiteit Leiden.<[URL]> Google Scholar
. 2007b. Slavic verb prefixes are resultative. Cahiers Chronos 17: 197–213.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A Theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. Lexical Categories. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Batllori, Montserrat. 2015. La parasíntesis a la luz de los datos históricos de los verbos en a- y -esçer. Ms, Universitat de Girona. <[URL]> Google Scholar
Bowers, John. 2000. Predication. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Mark Baltin & Chris Collins (eds), 299–333. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language [Current Studies in Linguistics 36], Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Crocco-Galèas, Grazia & Iacobini, Claudio. 1993. Lo sviluppo del tipo verbale parasintetico in latino: I prefissi AD-, IN-, EX-. Quaderni Patavini di Lingüística 12: 31–68.Google Scholar
Cuervo, María Cristina. 2003. Datives at Large. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Demonte, Violeta. 1994. La semántica de los verbos de cambio. In II encuentro de lingüistas y filólogos de España y México, Alonso Alegría, Beatriz Garza & José A. Pascual (eds), 535–563. Salamanca: Junta de Castilla y León y Universidad de Salamanca.Google Scholar
. 2006. Qué es sintáctico y qué es léxico en la interficie entre sintaxis y léxico-semántica. Signo y Seña 15: 17–42.Google Scholar
. 2015. Parámetros y variación en la interfaz léxico-sintaxis. In Perspectivas de Sintaxis Formal, Ángel Gallego (ed.), 391–429. Madrid: Akal.Google Scholar
Devine, Andrew M. & Stephens, Laurence D. 2013. Semantics for Latin. An Introduction. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel. 2010. Directions from the GET-GO. On the syntax of manner of motion verbs in directional constructions. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 9: 23–53.Google Scholar
Dowty, David. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, David. 2004. On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 355–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio. 2003. Los verbos de realización gradual: Estructura léxica. Revista de la Sociedad Española de Lingüística 32(2): 475–506.Google Scholar
di Gennaro, Rossana. 2008. Gli aggettivi latini in -idus . Studi e Saggi Linguistici XLVI: 118–165.Google Scholar
Hale, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel J. 1993. On argument structure and the lexical expression of syntactic relations. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 53–110. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2002. Prolegomenon to a Theory of Argument Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2005. How do verbs get their names? Denominal verbs, manner incorporation, and the ontology of verb roots in English. In The Syntax of Aspect. Deriving Thematic and Aspectual Interpretation, Nomi Erteschik-Shir & Tova Rapoport (eds), 42–64. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. A minimalist approach to argument structure. In The Handbook of Linguistic Minimalism, Cedric Boeckx (ed.), 427–448. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2013. External arguments and the mirror principle: On the distinctness of voice and v. Lingua 125: 34–57. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haugen, Jason D. 2008. Morphology at the Interfaces. Reduplication and Noun Incorporation in Uto-Aztecan [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 117]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Hyponymous objects and Late Insertion. Lingua 119: 242–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haverling, Gerd. 1994. On the sco-suffix, on prefixes and on the development of the Latin verbal system. In Linguistic Studies on Latin. Selected Papers from the 6th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics (Budapest, 23–27 March 1991) [Studies in Language Companion Series 28], József Herman (ed.), 41–53. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1996. On sco-verbs, on prefixes and on semantic functions. In Aspects of Latin. Papers from the 7th International Colloquium on Latin Linguistics, Hannah Rosén (ed.), 169–180. Innsbruck: University of Innsbruck.Google Scholar
. 2000. On Sco-verbs, Prefixes and Semantic Functions: A Study in the Development of Prefixed and Unprefixed Verbs from Early to Late Latin [Studia Graeca et Latina Gothoburgensia 64]. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
. 2003. On prefixes and actionality in Classical and Late Latin. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 50(1–2): 113–135. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. On the development of actionality, tense, and viewpoint from Early to Late Latin. In Interdependence of Diachronic and Synchronic Analyses [Studies in Language Companion Series 134], Folke Josephson & Ingmar Söhrman (eds), 73–104. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Actionality, tense, and viewpoint. In Perspectives on Historical Latin Syntax, Vol. II, Ch. 4, Philip Baldi & Pierluigi Cuzzolin (eds), 277–524. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hay, Jennifer, Kennedy, Christopher & Levin, Beth. 1999. Scalar structure underlies telicity in ‘Degree Achievements’. In Proceedings of Semantic and Linguistic Theory 9, Tanya Mathews & Devon Strolovitch (eds), 127–144. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Hoekstra, Teun. 1988. Small clause results. Lingua 74: 101–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Small clauses everywhere. In Arguments and Structure, Rint Sybesma, Sjef Barbiers, Marcel Den Dikken, Jenny Doetjes, Gertjan Postma & Guido Vanden Wyngaerd (eds), 319–390. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 2009. Antisymmetry and the lexicon. Linguistic Variation Yearbook 8: 1–31. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 1996. Severing the external argument from its verb. In Phrase Structure and the Lexicon, Johan Rooryck & Laurie Zaring (eds), 109–137. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lehmann, Christian. 1995. Latin predicate classes from an onomasiological point of view. In DE VSV: Études de Syntax Latine Offertes en Hommages à Marius Lavency [Publications Linguistiques de Louvain], Dominique Longrée (ed.), 163–173. Louvain-la Neuve: Peeters.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka. 2015. Lexicalization Patterns. Ms, Stanford University and The Hebrew University of Jerusalem. <[URL]> Google Scholar
Maienborn, Claudia. 2007. On davidsonian and kimian states. In Existence: Semantics and Syntax, Ileana Comorovski & Klaus von Heusinger (eds), 107–130. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec. 2005. Objects Out of the Lexicon! Argument Structure in the Syntax. Ms, MIT <[URL]> Google Scholar
. 2013. Verbal argument structure: Events and participants. Lingua 130: 152–168. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mateu, Jaume. 2002. Argument Structure. Relational Construal at the Syntax-Semantics Interface. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona. <[URL]> Google Scholar
. 2008. On the lexical syntax of directionality/resultativity: The case of Germanic preverbs. In Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 120], Anna Asbury, Jakub Dotlačil, Berit Gehrke & Rick Nouwen (eds), 221–250. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2012. Conflation and incorporation processes in resultative constructions. In Telicity, Change, and State. A Cross-Categorial View of Event Structure, Violeta Demonte & Louise McNally (eds), 252–278. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2014. Argument structure. In The Routledge Handbook of Syntax, Andrew Carnie, Dan Siddiqi & Yosuke Sato (eds), 24–41. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
. 2015. The fate of -sco verbs from satellite-framed Latin to verb-framed Romance. Paper presented at the workshop on Diachrony of Satellite and Verb-Framed Languages . Ulster University, Belfast, 16 October.
Mateu, Jaume & Rigau, Gemma. 2002. A minimalist account of conflation processes: Parametric variation at the lexicon-syntax interface. In Theoretical Approaches to Universals [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 49], Artemis Alexiadou (ed.), 211–236. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Verb-particle constructions in Romance: A lexical-syntactic account. Probus 22: 241–269. Special issue on The Lexicon-syntax Interface, Violeta Demonte & María Luisa Zubizarreta (eds). DOI logoGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, Andrew. 2004. Event paths, conflation, argument structure, and VP shells. Linguistics 42: 523–571. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mulder, René H. 1992. The Aspectual Nature of Syntactic Complementation. PhD dissertation, Universiteit Leiden.Google Scholar
Oltra-Massuet, Isabel & Castroviejo, Elena. 2013. Approaching results in Catalan and Spanish deadjectival verbs. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 12: 131–154.Google Scholar
. 2014. A syntactic approach to the morpho-semantic variation of -ear . Lingua 151: 120–141. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pérez-Jiménez, Isabel. 2003. Algunas consideraciones sobre los verbos inacusativos atélicos en español. Cuadernos de Lingüística del IUOG 10: 65–83.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David. M. 1978. Impersonal passives and the Unaccusative Hypothesis. Berkeley Linguistics Society 4: 157–189. <[URL]>. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, Liina. 2008. Introducing Arguments. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian C. 2008. Verb Meaning and the Lexicon. A First Phase Syntax. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stolova, Natalya. 2015. Cognitive Linguistics and Lexical Change: Motion Verbs from Latin to Romance [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 331]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stowell, Timothy. 1981. Origins of Phrase Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter. 2004. Slavic prefixes inside and outside VP. Nordlyd 32: 205–253.Google Scholar
Talmy, Leonard. 1991. Path to realization: A typology of event conflation. Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS) 17: 480–519. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Typology and Process in Concept Structuring. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Volpe, Mark. 2004. Affected object unergatives. Snippets 8: 12–13.Google Scholar
Zaucer, Rok. 2009. A VP-Internal/Resultative Analysis of 4 “VP-External” Uses of Slavic Verbal Prefixes. PhD dissertation, University of Ottawa, <[URL]> Google Scholar
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa & Oh, Eunjeong. 2007. On the Syntactic Composition of Manner and Motion. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Mateu, Jaume
2021. On the argument structure of complex denominal verbs in Latin: a syntactic approach. The Linguistic Review 38:2 ► pp. 267 ff. DOI logo
Mateu, Jaume
2023. Parasynthesis. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Morphology, ► pp. 1 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.