Chapter published in:Beyond Markedness in Formal Phonology
Edited by Bridget D. Samuels
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 241] 2017
► pp. 23–46
Contrast is irrelevant in phonology
A simple account of Russian /v/ as /V/
Halle’s (1959) argument against a distinction between morphophonemic and phonemic rules can be understood as an argument against the relevance of contrast to phonology. After adducing further arguments against a role for contrast, the paper provides a simple contrast-free analysis of the classic problem of the voicing behavior of Russian /v/. This segment undergoes voicing assimilation (like other obstruents), but does not trigger it (thus acting like the sonorants). In contrast to a long history of treating /v/ as a covert sonorant, the paper attributes the behavior of Russian /v/, which surfaces always as an obstruent, to underspecification with respect to the feature Voice.
Keywords: contrast, unification, feature-changing, feature-filling, underspecification, Russian, Tangale, vowel harmony, neutralization, allophony, epistemology, Sonorant Voicing, natural class, rule, insertion, deletion, longdistance rules
Published online: 16 November 2017
Bale, Alan, Papillon, Maxime & Reiss, Charles
Bale, Alan, Reiss, Charles & Ta-Chun Shen, David
Burton, Martha W. & Robblee, Karen E.
Gordon, Matthew & Ladefoged, Peter
Hale, Mark, Kissock, Madelyn & Reiss, Charles
van der Hulst, Harry & van de Weijer, Jeroen
Mailhot, Frederic & Reiss, Charles
McCawley, James D.
Poser, William J.
Cited by 1 other publications
DRESHER, B. ELAN & DANIEL CURRIE HALL
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 19 october 2021. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.