Chapter published in:
Word Order Change in Acquisition and Language Contact: Essays in honour of Ans van Kemenade
Edited by Bettelou Los and Pieter de Haan
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 243] 2017
► pp. 213239
References

Corpora used

"
Die Winteney-Version etc."
LEON – alpha – University of Leuven
. Peter Petré 2010Die Winteney-Version der Regula S. Benedicti Lateinische und Englisch mit Einleitung, Anmerkungen, Glossar und einem Facsimile zum erstenmale 1888 St. Benedict, Arnold Schröer (ed.).Google Scholar
Halle
: M. Niemeyer. Electronic edition from the University of Michigan Library. http://​name​.umdl​.umich​.edu​/AGV8488​.0001​.001> (6 July 2007).
HC: Helsinki Corpus of English Texts: Diachronic Part (ICAME, version 2)
1999Matti Rissanen et al. Helsinki: Department of English.Google Scholar
The Paris psalter and the Meters of Boethius (The Anglo-Saxon poetic records, 5)
1961George P. Krapp (ed.). New York NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
PPCME2: Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English, 2nd edn.
Anthony Kroch. Pennsylvania PA: http://​www​.ling​.upenn​.edu​/hist​-corpora/> (6 July 2007).
The Middle English Genesis and Exodus [Lund Studies in English 36]
, Olof Arngart (ed.) 1968 Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
YCOE: The York-Toronto-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Prose
2003Ann Taylor et al. York: Department of Language and Linguistic Science.Google Scholar
YPC: York-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Old English Poetry
2001Susan Pintzuk & Leendert Plug. York: Linguistics Department.Google Scholar

References

Benincà, Paola & Laura Vanelli
1985Italiano, veneto, friulano: Fenomeni sintattici a confronto. Revista Italiana di Dialettologia. Bologna. Clueb 8, 166-194.Google Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Roberts, Ian
2008Cascading parameter changes: Internally-driven change in Middle and Early Modern English. In Grammatical Change and Linguistic Theory. The Rosendal papers [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 113], Thórhallur Eythórsson (ed.), 79–113. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit
1989Anaphoric AGR. In The Null Subject Parameter [Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 15], Osvaldo Jaeggli & Kenneth J. Safir (eds), 69–109. Dordrecht: Kluwer.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Buridant, Claude
2000Grammaire nouvelle de l’ancien français. Paris: SEDES.Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi
1986Italian Syntax: A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard
1985Tense. Cambridge: CUP.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Coopmans, Peter
1985Language types: Continua or parameters. PhD Dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Einhorn, Elsabe
1974Old French: A Concise Handbook. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Fuss, Eric
2003On the historical core of V2 in Germanic. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 26: 195–231.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Fuss, Eric & Trips, Carola
2002Variation and change in Old and Middle English. On the validity of the Double Base Hypothesis. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 4: 171–224.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Green, Eugene
2009Synonomy and obsolence: The example of Old English weorþan . Paper presented at Studies in the History of the English Language (SHEL) 6. Alberta: Banff.
Giorgi, Alessandra
1997Tense and Aspect: From Semantics to Morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Haeberli, Eric
1999Features, Categories and the Syntax of A-positions: Synchronic and Diachronic Variation in the Germanic Languages. PhD dissertation, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
Haiman John & Benincà, Paola
1992The Rhaeto-Romance Languages. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Hecht, Hans
1900Bishop Waerferth von Worcester: Uebersetzung der Dialoge Gregors den Grossen. Leipzig: Wigand’s Verlag.Google Scholar
Iliescu, Maria
1982La typologie du verbe frioulan. Studi linguistici in onore di G.B. Pellegrini, 193-204. Pisa: Pacini.Google Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert
1990As Time Goes By. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jensen, Frede
1990Old French and Comparative Gallo-Romance Syntax. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie. Berlin: De Gruyter.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1975French Syntax. The Transformational Cycle. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans
1987Syntactic Case and Morphological Case in the History of English. Dordrecht: Foris.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Westergaard, Marit
2012Syntax and Information Structure: Verb Second variation in Middle English. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change [Oxford Studies in the History of English 2], Anneli Meurman-Solin, Maria José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds), 87–118. Oxford: OUP.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kibler, William W.
1984Introduction to Old French. New York: Modern language Association of America.Google Scholar
Klingebiel, Josef
1937Die Passivumschreibungen im Altenglischen. Bottrop: Postberg.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony & Taylor, Ann
1997Verb movement in Old and Middle English: Dialect variation and language contact. In Parameters of Morphosyntactic Change, Ans van Kemenade & Nigel Vincent (eds), 297–325. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kroch, Anthony
1989Reflexes of grammar in patterns of language change. Language Variation and Change 1: 199–244.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony, Taylor, Ann & Ringe, Donald
2000The Middle English Verb-Second constraint: A case study in language contact and language change. In Textual Parameters in Older Languages [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 195], Susan C. Herring, Pieter van Reenen & Lene Schøsler (eds), 353–391. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou
2009The consequences of the loss of verb-second in English: Information structure and syntax in interaction. English Language and Linguistics 13: 97–125.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Bruce
1985Old English Syntax, Vol. I: Concord, the Parts of Speech and the Sentence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Moignet, Gérard
1976Grammaire de l’ancien Français: Morphologie, syntaxe. Paris: Éditions Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Petré, Peter
2010aThe functions of weorðan and its loss in the past tense in Old and Middle English. English Language and Linguistics 14(3): 457–484.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Petré, Peter
2010bOn the Interaction between Constructional & Lexical Change: Copular, Passive and Related Constructions in Old and Middle English. PhD dissertation, Leuven University.Google Scholar
2014What grammar reveals about sex and death: Interdisciplinary applications of corpus-based linguistics. Digital Scholarship in the Humanities 30(3): 371–387.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Postma, Gertjan
1993The syntax of the morphological defectivity of be . HIL Manuscripts 1: 31–67.Google Scholar
Petré, Peter
2014Constructions and Environments: Copular, Passive, and Related Constructions in Old and Middle English [Oxford Studies in the History of English 1]. Oxford: OUP.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pintzuk, Susan
1999Phrase structures in competition: Variation and change in Old English word order. Garland, New York.Google Scholar
Postma, Gertjan
2010The impact of failed changes. In Continuity and Change in Grammar [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 159], Christopher Lucas, Sheila Watts, Anne Breitbarth, & David Willis (eds), 269–302. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Clause-typing by [2]: The loss of the 2nd person pronoun du ‘you’ in Dutch, Frisian and Limburgian dialects. In Information Structure and Agreement [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 197], Victoria Camacho-Taboada, Ángel L. Jiménez-Fernández, Javier Martín-González & Mariano Reyes-Tejedor (eds), 217–254. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
In press. Modeling transient states in language change. In From Micro-change to Macro-change: Proceedings of DIGS 15I, Rob Truswell & Eric Mattieu eds. Oxford OUP
Reichenbach, Hans
1947Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
Russ, Charles V. J.
2002Die Mundart von Bosco Gurin: Eine Synchronische und Diachronische Untersuchung [Zeitschrift für Dialektologie und Linguistik, Beiheft 120]. Stuttgart: Steiner.Google Scholar
SAND
: Barbiers, Sjef et al. et al. 2006Dynamische Syntactische Atlas van de Nederlandse Dialecten (DynaSAND). Amsterdam: Meertens Instituut.Google Scholar
Strang, Barbara
1970A History of English. London: Methuen & Co.Google Scholar
Trips, Carola
2002From OV to VO in Early Middle English [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 60]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Verdam, Jacob
1911Middelnederlandsch Woordenboek. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Visser, Fredericus T.
1973A Historical Syntax of the English Language. London: Fisher Unwin.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel, Labov, William & Herzog, M. I.
1968Empirical foundations for a theory of language change. In Directions for Historical Linguistics: A Symposium, Winfred P. Lehmann (ed.), 95–195. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Zieglschmid, Andreas
1931 Werden and wesan with the passive in various Germanic languages. Germanic Review 6(4): 389.Google Scholar