Cover not available
Part of
Word Order Change in Acquisition and Language Contact: Essays in honour of Ans van Kemenade
Edited by Bettelou Los and Pieter de Haan
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 243] 2017
► pp. 241–262

Chapter 11
What comes second

Cross-linguistic analyses of information structure in Dutch between English and German

| Radboud University Nijmegen
On the basis of previous cross-linguistic analyses of (re)narrations of the same animation film in German and English, the present study shows how these (re)narrations in Dutch as another Germanic language seem to side more with German than with English in the temporal management of the story-line. Dutch speakers – just as German speakers – structure their story in sequential, bounded events, typically introduced by en dan ‘and then’ and pushed forward by an animate protagonist. English speakers use a large number of progressive forms, presenting an overlapping series of unbounded situations. In the management of reference to entities however, Dutch differs in a very subtle way from German in subordinate utterances where Dutch speakers use more inanimate entities as a syntactic subject than German speakers.
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The interaction between macro planning rules and grammatical features
  • 3.Progressive aspect, event construal and macro-planning in German and English
    • 3.1Event construal
    • 3.2In macro planning
  • 4.A note about progressive aspect in German, Sandwiched between Dutch and English
  • 5.Word order; English strict SVO and German and Dutch V2
  • 6.Previous findings in film (Quest) retellings; English and German
  • 7.Frequencies in previous comparisons (re) narrations English and German
  • 8.The stimulus and the participants
    • 8.1 Quest
    • 8.2Participants
  • 9. General text properties
  • 10.Features of temporal linking in Dutch compared in English and German
  • 11.Features of reference management in Dutch compared to English and German
  • 12. Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 14 December 2017
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.243.11sta
References (40)
References
van Beek, Gercoline, Flecken, Monique & Starren, Marianne. 2013. Aspectual perspective taking in event construal in L1 and L2 Dutch. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 51(2): 199–227.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Bergen, Geertje, Stoop, Wessel, Vogels, Jorrig & de Hoop, Helen. 2011. Leve hun! Waarom hun nog steeds hun zeggen. Nederlandse Taalkunde 16(1): 2–29.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bertinetto, Pier, Marco, Ebert, Karen & de Groot, Casper. 2000. The progressive in Europe. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe, Östen Dahl (ed.), 517–558. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Boogaart, Ronny. 1999. Aspect and Temporal Ordering. A Contrastive Analysis of English and Dutch. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Bybee, Joan, Perkins, Revere & Pagliuca, William. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago IL: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carroll, Mary & Lambert, Monique. 2003. Information structure in narratives and the role of grammaticised knowledge: A study of adult French and German learners of English. In Dimroth & Starren (eds), 167–200.Google Scholar
Carroll, Mary, Murcia Serra, Jorge, Watorek, Marzena & Bendiscioli, Alessandra. 2000. The relevance of information organisation to second language acquisition studies: The descriptive discourse of advanced adult learners of German. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 22(3): 441–466. (special issue edited by Clive Perdue)  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Mary, Natale, Silvia & Starren, Marianne. 2008. Acquisition du marquage du progressif par des apprenants germanophones de l’italien et néerlandophones du français. Acquisition et Interaction en Langue Étrangère (AILE) 26: 18–43.Google Scholar
Carroll, Mary, Rossdeutscher, Antje, Lambert, Monique & von Stutterheim, Christiane. 2008. Subordination in narratives and macrostructural planning: A comparative point of view. In ‘Subordination’ Versus ‘coordination’ in Sentence and Text [Studies in Language Companion Series 98], Cathrine Fabricius-Hansen & Wiebke Ramm (eds), 161–184. Amsterdam: John Benjamins  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Mary & von Stutterheim, Christiane. 2002. Typology and information organization: Perspective taking and language-specific effects in the construal of events. In Typology and Second Language Acquisition, Anna Ramat (ed.), 365–403). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2010. Event representation, time event relations, and clause structure: A crosslinguistic study of English and German. In Event Representation in Language and Cognition, Jürgen Bohnemeyer & Eric Pederson (eds), 68–82. Cambridge: CUP.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Carroll, Mary, von Stutterheim, Christiane & Nuese, Ralf. 2004. The language and thought debate: A psycholinguistic approach. In Multidisciplinary Approaches to Language Production, Thomas Pechmann & Christopher Habel (eds), 183–218. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Dimroth, Christine & Starren, Marianne (eds). 2003. Information Structure, Linguistic Structure and the Dynamics of Acquisition [Studies in Bilingualism 26]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Doherty, Monika. 2003. Language Processing in Discourse: A Key to Felicitous Translation [Routledge Studies in Germanic Linguistics]. Oxford: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ebert, Karen. 2000. Progressive markers in Germanic languages. In Tense and Aspect in the Languages of Europe [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology 20], Östen Dahl (ed.), 605–653. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Flecken, Monique. 2011a. What native speaker judgements tell us about the grammaticalization of a progressive aspectual marker in Dutch. Linguistics 49(3): 479–524.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011b. Macro-planning in narratives: Assessing bilingual attainment. International Journal of Bilingualism 15(2): 164–186.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hilberink-Schulpen, Béryl, Nederstigt, Ulrike. & Starren, Marianne. 2014. Grammatical preferences in aspect marking in first language and second language: The case of first language Dutch, English, and German and first language Dutch second language English, and first language Dutch second language German. Applied Psycholinguistics 35(6): 969–1000.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Ierland, Suzan. 2010. Grammatical Features Influencing Information Structure: The Case of L1 and L2 Dutch and English. PhD dissertation, Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.Google Scholar
van Kemenade, Ans & Westergaard, Marit. 2012. Syntax and information structure: Verb-second variation in Middle English. In Information Structure and Syntactic Change in the History of English [Oxford Studies in the History of English 2], Anneli Meurman-Solin, Maria-José López-Couso & Bettelou Los (eds), 87–118. Oxford: OUP.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krause, Olaf. 2002. Progressiv im Deutschen: eine Empirische Untersuchung im Kontrast mit Niederländisch und Englisch [Linguistische Arbeiten 462]. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William. 2006. Narrative pre-construction. Narrative Inquiry 16(1): 37–45.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lemmens, Maarten. 2005. Aspectual posture verb constructions in Dutch. Journal of Germanic Linguistics 17: 183–217.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Levelt, Willem. 1989. Speaking: From Intention to Articulation. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Los, Bettelou & Starren, Marianne. 2012. A typological switch in early Modern English and the beginning of one in Dutch? Leuvense Bijdragen 98: 98–126.Google Scholar
Natale, Silvia. (2013). Linkage in narratives: A comparison between monolingual speakers of French and Italian, and early and late French-Italian bilinguals. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 51(2): 151–169.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Nuese, Ralf. 2003. Segmenting event sequences for speaking. In Mediating between Concepts and Grammar, Holden Härtl & Heike Tappe (eds), 255–276. New York NY: Walter de Gruyter.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Pottelberge, Jeroen. 2004. Der Am-Progressiv. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York NY: The Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota. 1997. The Parameter of Aspect [Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 43]. Dordrecht: Kluwer.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Starren, Marianne. 2001. The Second Time: The Acquisition of Temporality in Dutch and French as a Second Language [LOT Dissertation Series]. Utrecht: Igitur.Google Scholar
. 2006. The acquisition of temporal adverbials. In Semantics in Acquisition, Veerle van Geenhoven (ed.), 219–241. Dordrecht: Springer  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, Christiane. 2003. Linguistic structures and information organization. The case of very advanced learners. In EUROSLA Yearbook 3, Susan Foster-Cohen & Simona Pekarek Doehler (eds), 183–206. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
von Stutterheim, Christiane & Carroll, Mary. 2005. The impact of grammatical temporal categories on ultimate attainment in L2 learning. In Educating for Advanced Foreign Language Capacities: Constructs, Curriculum, Instruction, Assessment, Heidi Byrnes, Heather Weger-Guntharp & Katherine Sprang (eds), 40–53. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
von Stutterheim, Christiane, Carroll, Mary & Klein, Wolfgang. 2003. Two ways of construing complex temporal structures. In Deictic Conceptualization of Space, Time and Person [Cognitive Linguistics Research], Friedrich Lenz (ed.), 97–133. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, Christiane & Lambert, Monique. 2005. Cross-linguistic analysis of temporal perspectives in text production. In The Structure of Learner Varieties, Henriëtte Hendriks (ed.), 203–230. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.  DOI logoGoogle Scholar
von Stutterheim, Christiane & Nuese, Ralf. 2003. Processes of conceptualization in language production: language-specific perspectives and event construal. Linguistics 41(5): 851–881.Google Scholar
Tavecchio, Lotte. 2010. Sentence Patterns in English and Dutch. A Contrastive Corpus Analysis. PhD dissertation, Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Vismans, Roel, Hüning, Matthias & Weerman, Fred (eds). 2010. Dutch between English and German. Special issue of Journal of Germanic Linguistics 22(4).Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Starren, Marianne
2023. Language-specific principles of discourse conceptualization in L2 English. Language, Interaction and Acquisition 14:1 ► pp. 106 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.