Chapter published in:
The Grammatical Realization of Polarity Contrast: Theoretical, empirical, and typological approaches
Edited by Christine Dimroth and Stefan Sudhoff
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 249] 2018
► pp. 89108
References

References

Arsenijević, Boban
2009Correlatives as types of conditional. In Correlatives Cross-linguistically [Language Faculty and Beyond 1], Anikó Lipták (ed.), 131–156. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bacskai-Atkari, Julia
2014The Syntax of Comparative Constructions: Operators, Ellipsis Phenomena and Functional Left Peripheries. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag Potsdam.Google Scholar
2015aDegree semantics, polarity, and the grammaticalisation of comparative operators into complementisers. Paper presented at the 17th Diachronic Generative Syntax Conference (DiGS17), Reykjavík, University of Iceland, 29–31 May.http://​www​.ling​.uni​-potsdam​.de​/~bacskai​-atkari​/pdf​/handout​_digs17​_bacskai​_atkari​.pdf (19 September 2016).
2015bGerman dialects and an anti-cartographic approach to the CP-domain. Paper presented at: SaRDiS 2015: Saarbrücker Runder Tisch für Dialektsyntax, Saarbrücken, Universität des Saarlandes, 6–7 November. http://​www​.ling​.uni​-potsdam​.de​/~bacskai​-atkari​/pdf​/handout​_sardis2015​_bacskai​_atkari​.pdf (19 September 2016).
2016aEquative elements in comparative constructions and in relative clauses in the history of German and English. Paper presented at: Equative Constructions, Cologne, Universität zu Köln, 15 December. http://​www​.ling​.uni​-potsdam​.de​/~bacskai​-atkari​/pdf​/handout​_koeln​_bacskai​_atkari​.pdf (31 March 2017).
2016bTowards a cross-linguistic typology of marking polarity in embedded degree clauses. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 63(4): 389–409.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016cVariation in the grammaticalisation of polar operators in West Germanic. Paper presented at Potsdam Summer School in Historical Linguistics 2016. Word Order Variation and Change. Diachronic Insights into Germanic Diversity, Potsdam, Universität Potsdam, 7–9 July. http://​www​.ling​.uni​-potsdam​.de​/~bacskai​-atkari​/pdf​/handout​_sumup​_bacskai​_atkari​.pdf (30 September 2016).
Behaghel, Otto
1928Deutsche Syntax: Eine geschichtliche Darstellung, Band 3: Die Satzgebilde. Heidelberg: Winter.Google Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh & Pancheva, Roumyana
2006Conditionals. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax Vol. I, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 638–687. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Biberauer, Theresa & Roberts, Ian
2017Parameter setting. In The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax, Adam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts (eds), 134–162. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bresnan, Joan
1973The syntax of the comparative clause construction in English. Linguistic Inquiry 4 (3): 275–343.Google Scholar
Chen, Guohua
2000The grammaticalization of concessive markers in Early Modern English. In Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English [Studies in Language Companion Series 53], Olga Fischer, Anette Rosenbach & Dieter Stein (eds), 85–110. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1977On WH-movement. In Formal Syntax, Peter W. Culicover, Thomas Wasow & Adrian Akmajian (eds), 71–132. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Danckaert, Lieven & Haegeman, Liliane
2012Conditional clauses, main clause phenomena and the syntax of polarity emphasis. In Comparative Germanic Syntax: The State of the Art [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 191], Peter Ackema, Rhona Alcorn, Caroline Heycock, Dany Jaspers, Jeroen van Craenenbroeck & Guido Vanden Wyngaerd (eds), 133–168. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
2013Negative morphemes. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online, Martin Haspelmath & Matthew S. Dryer (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://​wals​.info​/chapter​/112 (14 May 2015).
Dückert, Joachim
1961Das geschichtliche Verhältnis des vergleichenden ‘als’ und ‘wie’. Beiträge zur Geschichte der deutschen Sprache und Literatur 83: 205–230.Google Scholar
Duden-Grammatik
2009Die Grammatik, 8th edn. Berlin: Dudenverlag.Google Scholar
Eggs, Frederike
2006Die Grammatik von ‘als’ und ‘wie’. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Ferrell, James
1968On some conditional clause indicators in Slavic and Germanic languages. WORD 24(1–3): 99–111.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Franz, Wilhelm
1939Die Sprache Shakespeares in Vers und Prosa. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene
1985Notes on comparatives and related matters. University of Texas. http://​semanticsarchive​.net​/Archive​/zc0ZjY0M​/Comparatives%2085​.pdf/ (30 March 2017).
2000Degree operators and scope. Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory (SALT) 10: 40–64.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hohaus, Vera & Zimmermann, Malte
2014Equatives outside the domain of degree constructions. Paper presented at Linguistic Evidence 2014, Tübingen, 13–15 February.
Izvorski, Roumyana
1995A DP-shell for comparatives. In Console III Proceedings, Antonietta Bisetti (ed.), 99–121. The Hague: HAG.Google Scholar
Jäger, Agnes
2010Der Komparativzyklus und die Position der Vergleichspartikeln. Linguistische Berichte 224: 467–493.Google Scholar
2016Vergleichskonstruktionen im Deutschen: Diachroner Wandel und synchrone Variation. Habilitationsschrift, Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
Jensen, Frede
1990Old French and comparative Gallo-Romance syntax. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kaufmann, Gerhard
1973Zu den durch ‘als’ , ‘als ob’, ‘wie wenn’, ‘als wenn’ eingeleiteten ‘Komparativsätzen’. Zielsprache Deutsch 4: 91–111.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher
2002Comparative deletion and optimality in syntax. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 20(3): 553–621.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & Merchant, Jason
2000Attributive comparative deletion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 18(1): 89–146.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Klooster, Willem Gerrit
2001Grammatica van het hedendaags Nederlands: Een volledig overzicht. The Hague: Sdu Uitgevers.Google Scholar
König, Ekkehard
1985Where do concessives come from? On the development of concessive connectives. In Historical Semantics – Historical Word-formation, Jacek Fisiak (ed.), 263–282. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kortmann, Bernd
1997Adverbial Subordination: A Typology and History of Adverbial Subordinators Based on European Languages. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ladusaw, William
1979Polarity Sensitivity as Inherent Scope Relations. PhD dissertation, University of Texas.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard
1985On the syntax of disjunction scope. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 3(2): 217–264.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lechner, Winfried
2004Ellipsis in Comparatives. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lightfoot, David
1979Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
López-Couso, María José & Belén Méndez-Naya
2014On comparative complementizers in English: Evidence from historical corpora. In Creation and Use of Historical English Corpora in Spain, Nila Méndez-Naya Vazques (ed.), 311–333. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Paul, Hermann
1920Deutsche Grammatik IV. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Pfeffer, J. Alan
1985Comparative subordinating conjunctions in modern American English. International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching 23(4): 323–330.Google Scholar
Pulgram, Ernst
1983The reduction and elimination of redundancy. In Essays in Honor of Charles F. Hockett, Frederick B. Agard & Gerald Kelly (eds), 107–125. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
Quirk, Randolph
1954The Concessive Relation in Old English Poetry. New Haven CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rudolph, Elisabeth
1996Contrast: Adversative and Concessive Relations and Their Expressions in English, German, Spanish, Portuguese on Sentence and Text Level. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Schrodt, Richard
2004Althochdeutsche Grammatikw II. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Seuren, Pieter
1973The comparative. In Generative Grammar in Europe, Ferenc Kiefer & Nicholas Ruwet (eds), 528–564. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sobin, Nicholas
2002The Comp-trace Effect, the Adverb Effect and minimal CP. Journal of Linguistics 38(3): 527–560.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tarriño, Eusebia
2011Comparative clauses. In Complex Sentences, Grammaticalization, Typology, Philip Baldi (ed.), 373–426. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Thieroff, Rolf
2004The subjunctive mood in German and in the Germanic languages. In Focus on Germanic Typology, Werner Abraham (ed.), 315–358. Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar
Thurmair, Maria
2001Vergleiche und Vergleichen: Eine Studie zu Form und Funktion der Vergleichsstrukturen im Deutschen. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
von Stechow, Arnim
1984Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics 3(1–2): 1–77.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by other publications

Bacskai-Atkari, Julia
2020. German V2 and Doubly Filled COMP in West Germanic. The Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 23:2  pp. 125 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 31 october 2020. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.