Anagnostopoulou, Elena
2006Clitic doubling. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Martin Everaert & Henk C. van Riemsdijk (eds), 519–581. Oxford: Blackwell.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Anne H., Bader, Miles, Gurman Bard, Ellen, Boyle, Elizabeth, Doherty, Gwineth, Garrod, Simon, Isard, Stephen, Kowtko, Jaqueline, McAllister, Jan, Miller, Jim, Sotillo, Catherine, Thompson, Henry S. & Weinert, Regina
1991The HCRC map task data. Language and Speech 34(4): 351–366.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Andorno, Cecilia
2000Focalizzatori fra connessione e messa a fuoco. Il punto di vista delle varietà di apprendimento. Milano: Angeli.Google Scholar
Andorno, Cecilia & Rosi, Fabiana
2015Short replies in Italian: ‘Sì / no’ and other markers between polarity and agreement. Journal of Pragmatics 87: 105–126.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Badan, Linda & Crocco, Claudia
2018Focus in Italian echo wh-questions: An analysis at syntax prosody interface. Probus, 0(0), pp. –. Retrieved 17 Jul. 2018, from DOI logo.Google Scholar
Benazzo, Sandra & Andorno, Cecilia
2010Discourse cohesion and topic discontinuity in native and learner production: Changing topic entities on maintained predicates. In EUROSLA Yearbook 10, Leah Roberts, Martin Howard, Muiris Ò Laoire & David Singleton (eds), 92–118. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Benazzo, Sandra, Andorno, Cecilia, Patin, Cedric & Interlandi, Grazia
Benincà, Paola, Salvi, Giampaolo & Frison, Lorenza
1988L’ordine degli elementi della frase e le costruzioni marcate. In Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, Vol. I, Lorenzo Renzi (ed.), 115–194. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Bernini, Giuliano
1995Le profrasi. In Grande grammatica italiana di consultazione, Vol. III, Lorenzo Renzi, Giampaolo Salvi & Anna Cardinaletti (eds), 175–222. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
2003The copula in learner Italian. Finiteness and verbal inflection. In Information Structure and the Dynamics of Language Acquisition [Studies in Bilingualism 26], Christine Dimroth & Marianne Starren (eds), 159–185. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005The acquisition of negation in Italian L2. In The Structure of Learner Varieties, Henriette Hendricks (ed.), 315–353. Berlin: de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2009Constructions with preposed infinitive: Typological and pragmatic notes. In Information Structure and its Interfaces, Lunella Mereu (ed.), 105–128. Berlin: de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina & Bocci, Giuliano
2012Should I stay or should I go? Optional focus movement in Italian. Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9: 1–18.Google Scholar
Bocci, Giuliano
2013The Syntax-prosody Interface: A Cartographic Perspective with Evidence from Italian [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 204]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bocci, Giuliano & Avesani, Cinzia
2006Focus contrastivo nella periferia sinistra della frase: Un solo accento, ma non solo un accento. In Proceedings of AISV 2005, Renata Savy & Claudia Crocco (eds), 111–141. Torriana: EDK Editore.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David
2016Praat: Doing phonetics by Computer (computer software), version 6.0.22. [URL] (15 November 2016).
Bonvino, Elisabetta
2005Le sujet postverbal: Une étude sur l’italien parlé. Paris: Orphrys.Google Scholar
Brunetti, Lisa
2009Discourse functions of fronted foci in Italian and Spanish. In Focus and Background in Romance Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 112], Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jacob (eds), 43–81. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Büring, Daniel & Gunlogson, Christine
2000Aren’t positive and negative polar questions the same? Ms, UCSC/UCLA.Google Scholar
Carletta, Jean, Isard, Amy, Isard, Stephen, Kowtko, Jacqueline, Doherty-Sneddon, Gwyneth & Anderson, Anne
1996HCRC Dialogue Structure Coding Manual (HCRC/TR-82). Edinburgh: HCRC, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Cecchetto, Carlo
1999A comparative analysis of left and right dislocation in Romance. Studia Linguistica 53(1): 40–67.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Crocco, Claudia
2013Is Italian clitic right dislocation grammaticalised? A prosodic analysis of yes/no questions and statements. Lingua 133: 30–52.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dimroth, Christine
2002Topics, assertions, and additive words: how L2 learners get from information structure to target-language syntax. Linguistics 40(4): 891–923.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dimroth, Christine, Andorno, Cecilia, Benazzo, Sandra & Verhagen, Josje
2010Given claims about new topics. How Romance and Germanic speakers link changed and maintained information in narrative discourse. Journal of Pragmatics 42(12): 3328–3344.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Elordieta, Gorka
2014The word in phonology. In To Be or Not to Be a Word: New Reflections on the Definition of Word, Iraide Ibarretxe-Antuñano & José-Luis Mendívil-Giró (eds), 6–68. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Féry, Caroline & Krifka, Manfred
2008Information structure: Notional distinctions, ways of expression. In Unity and Diversity of Languages, Piet van Sterkenburg (ed.), 123–135. Amsterdam: Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Frascarelli, Mara
2000The Syntax-phonology Interface in Focus and Topic Constructions in Italian. Dordrecht: Kluwer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gili-Fivela, Barbara, Avesani, Cinzia, Barone, Marco, Bocci, Giuliano, Crocco, Claudia, D‘Imperio, Mariapaola, Giordano, Rosa, Marotta, Giovanna, Savino, Michelina & Sorianello, Patrizia
2015Varieties of Italian and their intonational phonology. In Intonation in Romance, Sóna Frota & Pilar Prieto (eds), 140–197. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Martine, D‘Imperio, Mariapaola, Savino, Michelina & Avesani, Cinzia
2005Towards a strategy for labelling varieties of Italian. In Prosodic Typology, Sun-Ah Jun (ed.), 55–83. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grice, Martine & Savino, Michelina
2004Information structure and questions – Evidence from task-oriented dialogues in a variety of Italian. In Regional Variation in Intonation, Peter Gilles & Jörg Peters (eds), 161–187. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos
1983Focus, mode and the nucleus. Journal of Linguistics 19(2): 377–417.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel
2012Verum – Fokus – Verum-Fokus? Fokus-basierte und lexikalische Ansätze. In Wahrheit – Fokus – Negation, Horst Lohnstein & Hardarik Blühdorn (eds), 67–103. Hamburg: Buske.Google Scholar
Heritage, John
2002The limits of questioning: Negative interrogatives and hostile question content. Journal of Pragmatics 34(10–11): 1427–1446.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Höhle, Tilman N.
1992Über Verum-Fokus im Deutschen. In Informationsstruktur und Grammatik, Joachim Jacobs (ed.), 112–141. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
2007Basic notions of information structure. In The Notions of Information structure, Caroline Féry & Manfred Krifka (eds), 13–55. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
2017Negated polarity questions as denegations of assertions. In Contrastiveness in Information Structure, Alternatives and Scalar Implicatures, Chungmin Lee, Ferenc Kiefer & Manfred Krifka (eds), 359–398. Berlin: Springer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Krifka, Manfred & Musan, Renate
2012Information structure: Overview and linguistic issues. In The Expression of Information Structure, Manfred Krifka & Renate Musan (eds), 1–44. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Labov, William
1972Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert
1981A first look at the semantics and pragmatics of negative questions and tag questions. Papers from the Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society 17: 164–171.
2008Intonational Phonology, 2nd edn. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia & Zanuttini, Raffaella
2013Emphasis as reduplication: Evidence from ‘sì che’/‘no che’ sentences. Lingua 128: 124–141.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Reese, Brian
2007Bias in Questions. PhD dissertation, University of Texas.Google Scholar
Repp, Sophie
2010Defining ‘contrast’ as an information-structural notion in grammar. Lingua 120(6): 1333–1345.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2013Common ground management: Modal particles, illocutionary negation and VERUM. In Beyond Expressives: Explorations in Use-conditional Meaning, Daniel Gutzmann & Hans-Martin Gärtner (eds), 231–274. Leiden: Brill.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Romero, Maribel
2005Two approaches to biased yes/no questions. In Proceedings of the 24th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, John Alderete (ed.), 352–360. Sommerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Scarano, Antonietta
2003Les constructions de syntaxe segmentée: Syntaxe, macrosyntaxe et articulation de l’information. In Macrosyntaxe et pragmatique. L‘analyse linguistique de l’oral, Antonietta Scarano (ed.), 183–201. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Selkirk, Elisabeth
1996The prosodic structure of function words. In Signal to Syntax: Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition, James Morgan & Katherine Demuth (eds), 187–212. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
2011The syntax-phonology interface. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, 2nd edn, John Goldsmith, Jason Riggle & Alan Yu (eds), 435–483. Oxford: Blackwell.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Turco, Giuseppina
2014Contrasting Opposite Polarity in Germanic and Romance Languages: Verum Focus and Affirmative Particles in Native Speakers and Advanced L2 Learners. PhD dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen.Google Scholar
Turco, Giuseppina, Braun, Bettina & Dimroth, Christine
2014When contrasting polarity, the Dutch use particles, Germans intonation. Journal of Pragmatics 62: 94–106.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015Prosodic and lexical marking of contrast in L2 Italian. Second Language Research 31(4): 465–491.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Andorno, Cecilia, Sandra Benazzo & Christine Dimroth
2023. Contrast marking variation in Romance and Germanic languages. Functions of Language 30:1  pp. 92 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 22 april 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.