Cover not available
Part of
Topics in Theoretical Asian Linguistics: Studies in honor of John B. Whitman
Edited by Kunio Nishiyama, Hideki Kishimoto and Edith Aldridge
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 250] 2018
► pp. 371–386

Chapter 17
Quantitative and qualitative restrictions on the distribution of lexical tones in Thai

A diachronic study

| Chulalongkorn University
In present-day Thai, contour tones show a more restricted distribution in comparison with level tones that cannot be explained by syllable structure alone. This diachronic study argues that both quantitative and qualitative restrictions are responsible for the puzzling gaps and accounts for them by positing Optimality-Theoretic constraints. In addition, it analyzes the tonal distribution in the early 19th and 20th centuries based on data from published materials. Furthermore, it discusses sound changes and lexical changes that gave rise to the tonal distribution.
Keywords: contour-tone distribution, tonal change, Thai
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Quantity and quality in distributional restrictions of tones
  • 3.Tonal distribution in the early 19th century
  • 4.Tonal distribution in the early 20th century
  • 5.Explaining the distributional changes
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.250.18pit
References (49)
References
Anivan, S. 1988. Evolution of Bangkok tones. Paper presented at the The International Symposium on Language and Linguistics, Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
Aroonmanakun, W. 2007. Creating the Thai National Corpus. Manusaya: Journal Humanities, Special Issue 13: 4–17.Google Scholar
Bao, Z. 1999. The Structure of Tone. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bradley, C. B. 1911. Graphic analysis of the tone-accents in the Siamese language. Journal of the American Oriental Society 31(3): 282–289.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
1916. On plotting the inflections of the voice. University of California Publications in American Archeology and Ethnology 12(5): 195–218.Google Scholar
Cartwright, B. O. 1906. An Elementary Hand-book of the Siamese Language. Bangkok: The American Presbyterian Mission Press.Google Scholar
1907. A Siamese-English Dictionary. Bangkok: The American Presbytarian MIssion Press.Google Scholar
1915. Student's Manual of the Siamese Language. Bangkok: American Presbyterian Mission Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Y. -R. 1930. A system of tone-letters. Le Maître Phonétique 45: 24–27.Google Scholar
Duanmu, S. 1990. A Formal Study of Syllable, Tone, Stress, and Domain in Chinese Languages. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Dutcher, K. & Paster, M. 2008. Contour tone distribution in Luganda. In Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, N. Abner & J. Bishop (eds.), 123–131. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Frankfurter, O. 1990. Elements of Siamese Grammar with A ppendices. Bangkok: American Presbyterian Mission Press.Google Scholar
Gandour, J. 1975. 1974. On the representation of tone in Siamese. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 27: 118–146.Google Scholar
Gordon, M. 2001. A typology of contour tone restriction. Studies in Language 25(3): 423–462.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Griswold, A. B. & na Nagara, P. 1971. The inscription of King Rama Gamheng of Sukhodaya (1292 A.D.). Journal of the Siam Society, 59(1): 179–228.Google Scholar
Haudricourt, A. -G. 1954. De l'origine des tons en vietnamien. Journal Asiatique 242: 69–82.Google Scholar
Henderson, E. J. A. 1976. Thai phonetics sixty years ago: Gleanings from the unpublished notes of Daniel Jones. In Tai Linguistics in Honor of Fang-Kuei Li, T. W. Gething, J. G. Harris & P. Kullavanijaya (eds.), 162–170. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
Hombert, J. -M.., Ohala, J. J. & Ewan, W. G. 1979. Phonetic explanations for the development of tones. Language 55(1): 37–58.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hyman, L. M. 1976. On some controversial questions in the study of consonant types and tones. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 33: 90–98.Google Scholar
Jones, J. T. 1842. Brief Grammatical Notices of the Siamese Language: With an Appendix. Bangkok: The Mission Press.Google Scholar
Kingston, J. 2001. Tonogenesis. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, Vol. 9, M. van Oostendorp, C. J. Ewen, E. Hume & K. Rice (eds.), 2304–2333. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lord, D. 1968. Mo Bradley and Thailand. Grand Rapids MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Low, C. J. 1828. A Grammar of the Thai or Siamese Language. Calcutta: Baptist Mission Press.Google Scholar
Maddieson, I. 1976. A further note on tone and consonants. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 33: 131–159.Google Scholar
1977. Tone effects on consonants. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 36: 91–110.Google Scholar
McFarland, G. B. 1900. English-Siamese Pronouncing Handbook Bangkok: American Presbyterian Mission Press.Google Scholar
1944. Thai-English Dictionary. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Michell, E. B. 1892. A Siamese-English Dictionary. Bangkok.Google Scholar
Michuthon, U. 2004. Mo Bratl kap kan prakat satsana nai Siam (Bradley and mission in Siam). Silpa Watthanatham [Art and culture] 25(9): 87–95.Google Scholar
Morén, B. & Zsiga, E. 2006. The lexical and post-lexical phonology of Thai tones. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24(1): 113–178.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pallegoix, J. -B. 1850. Grammatica linguae Thai. Bangkok: Typographia Collegii Assumptionis B.M.V..Google Scholar
1854. Dictionarium linguae Thai: Sive Siamensis interpretatione Latina, Gallica et Anglica. Parisiis: Jussu Imperatoris Impressum.Google Scholar
Pallegoix, J. -B. & Vey, J. -L. 1896. Dictionnaire Siamois Français Anglais. Bangkok: Imprimerie de la Mission Catholique.Google Scholar
Pittayaporn, P. 2007. Directionality of tone change. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, Germany, 6–10 August 2007 J. Trouvain & W. J. Barry (eds.), 1421–1424. Saarbrücken, Germany.Google Scholar
2016. Chindamani and reconstruction of Thai tones in the 17th century. Diachronica 33(2): 187–219.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2018. Phonetic and systemic biases in tonal contour changes in Bangkok Thai. In Tonal change and neutralization, H. Kubozono & M. Giriko (eds.), 249–278. Berlin: De Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Prince, A., & Smolensky, P. 2004. Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Malden MA: Blackwell.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ruangjaroon, S. 2006. Consonant-tone interaction in Thai: An OT analysis. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 4(2): 1–66.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. F. 1920. On the tones of certain languages of Burma. Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies, University of London 1(4): 91–106.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Teeranon, P. 2002. Thai tones in the reigns of King Rama VI and King Rama IX. Journal of Language and Linguistics 21(1): 32–46.Google Scholar
2007. The change of the Standard Thai high tone: An acoustic study and a perceptual experiment. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 4(3): 1–16.Google Scholar
Teeranon, P. & Rungrojsuwan, R. 2009. Change in the Standard Thai High Tone: An Acoustic Study. Manusya: Journal of Humanities, Special Issue 17: 34–44.Google Scholar
Thepboriruk, K. 2010. Bangkok Thai tones revisited. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 3(1): 86–105.Google Scholar
van Heuven, W. J. B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M. (2014). Subtlex-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 67: 1176–1190.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y. 2004. Understanding tone from the perspective of production and perception. Language and Linguistics 5: 757–797.Google Scholar
Yip, M. 1980. The Tonal Phonology of Chinese PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
1982. Against a segmental analysis of Zahao and Thai: A laryngeal tier proposal. Linguistic Analysis 9: 79–94.Google Scholar
Zhang, J. 2002. The Effects of Duration and Sonority on Contour Tone Distribution. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2004. Contour tone licensing and contour tone representation. Language and Linguistics 5(4): 925–968.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Sirintranon, Noppakao & Feng-fan Hsieh
2024. How word stress is realized in Thai: evidence from the ordering of coordinate compounds. The Linguistic Review 41:2 ► pp. 225 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.