Chapter published in:
Topics in Theoretical Asian Linguistics: Studies in honor of John B. Whitman
Edited by Kunio Nishiyama, Hideki Kishimoto and Edith Aldridge
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 250] 2018
► pp. 371–386

Chapter 17
Quantitative and qualitative restrictions on the distribution of lexical tones in Thai

A diachronic study

| Chulalongkorn University

In present-day Thai, contour tones show a more restricted distribution in comparison with level tones that cannot be explained by syllable structure alone. This diachronic study argues that both quantitative and qualitative restrictions are responsible for the puzzling gaps and accounts for them by positing Optimality-Theoretic constraints. In addition, it analyzes the tonal distribution in the early 19th and 20th centuries based on data from published materials. Furthermore, it discusses sound changes and lexical changes that gave rise to the tonal distribution.

Keywords: contour-tone distribution, tonal change, Thai
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Quantity and quality in distributional restrictions of tones
  • 3.Tonal distribution in the early 19th century
  • 4.Tonal distribution in the early 20th century
  • 5.Explaining the distributional changes
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 December 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.250.18pit
References
Anivan, S.
1988 Evolution of Bangkok tones. Paper presented at the The International Symposium on Language and Linguistics, Bangkok, Thailand.Google Scholar
Aroonmanakun, W.
2007 Creating the Thai National Corpus. Manusaya: Journal Humanities, Special Issue 13: 4–17.Google Scholar
Bao, Z.
1999 The Structure of Tone. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bradley, C. B.
1911 Graphic analysis of the tone-accents in the Siamese language. Journal of the American Oriental Society 31(3): 282–289.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1916 On plotting the inflections of the voice. University of California Publications in American Archeology and Ethnology 12(5): 195–218.Google Scholar
Cartwright, B. O.
1906 An Elementary Hand-book of the Siamese Language. Bangkok: The American Presbyterian Mission Press.Google Scholar
1907 A Siamese-English Dictionary. Bangkok: The American Presbytarian MIssion Press.Google Scholar
1915 Student's Manual of the Siamese Language. Bangkok: American Presbyterian Mission Press.Google Scholar
Chao, Y. -R.
1930 A system of tone-letters. Le Maître Phonétique 45: 24–27.Google Scholar
Duanmu, S.
1990 A Formal Study of Syllable, Tone, Stress, and Domain in Chinese Languages. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Dutcher, K. & Paster, M.
2008 Contour tone distribution in Luganda. In Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, N. Abner & J. Bishop (eds.), 123–131. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Frankfurter, O.
1990 Elements of Siamese Grammar with A ppendices. Bangkok: American Presbyterian Mission Press.Google Scholar
Gandour, J.
1975. 1974 On the representation of tone in Siamese. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 27: 118–146.Google Scholar
Gordon, M.
2001 A typology of contour tone restriction. Studies in Language 25(3): 423–462.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Griswold, A. B. & na Nagara, P.
1971 The inscription of King Rama Gamheng of Sukhodaya (1292 A.D.). Journal of the Siam Society, 59(1): 179–228.Google Scholar
Haudricourt, A. -G.
1954 De l'origine des tons en vietnamien. Journal Asiatique 242: 69–82.Google Scholar
Henderson, E. J. A.
1976 Thai phonetics sixty years ago: Gleanings from the unpublished notes of Daniel Jones. In Tai Linguistics in Honor of Fang-Kuei Li, T. W. Gething, J. G. Harris & P. Kullavanijaya (eds.), 162–170. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
Hombert, J. -M.., Ohala, J. J. & Ewan, W. G.
1979 Phonetic explanations for the development of tones. Language 55(1): 37–58.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hyman, L. M.
1976 On some controversial questions in the study of consonant types and tones. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 33: 90–98.Google Scholar
Jones, J. T.
1842 Brief Grammatical Notices of the Siamese Language: With an Appendix. Bangkok: The Mission Press.Google Scholar
Kingston, J.
2001 Tonogenesis. In The Blackwell Companion to Phonology, Vol. 9, M. van Oostendorp, C. J. Ewen, E. Hume & K. Rice (eds.), 2304–2333. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lord, D.
1968 Mo Bradley and Thailand. Grand Rapids MI: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Low, C. J.
1828 A Grammar of the Thai or Siamese Language. Calcutta: Baptist Mission Press.Google Scholar
Maddieson, I.
1976 A further note on tone and consonants. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 33: 131–159.Google Scholar
1977 Tone effects on consonants. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 36: 91–110.Google Scholar
McFarland, G. B.
1900 English-Siamese Pronouncing Handbook Bangkok: American Presbyterian Mission Press.Google Scholar
1944 Thai-English Dictionary. Stanford CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Michell, E. B.
1892 A Siamese-English Dictionary. Bangkok.Google Scholar
Michuthon, U.
2004 Mo Bratl kap kan prakat satsana nai Siam (Bradley and mission in Siam). Silpa Watthanatham [Art and culture] 25(9): 87–95.Google Scholar
Morén, B. & Zsiga, E.
2006 The lexical and post-lexical phonology of Thai tones. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24(1): 113–178.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pallegoix, J. -B.
1850 Grammatica linguae Thai. Bangkok: Typographia Collegii Assumptionis B.M.V..Google Scholar
1854 Dictionarium linguae Thai: Sive Siamensis interpretatione Latina, Gallica et Anglica. Parisiis: Jussu Imperatoris Impressum.Google Scholar
Pallegoix, J. -B. & Vey, J. -L.
1896 Dictionnaire Siamois Français Anglais. Bangkok: Imprimerie de la Mission Catholique.Google Scholar
Pittayaporn, P.
2007 Directionality of tone change. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, Saarbrücken, Germany, 6–10 August 2007 J. Trouvain & W. J. Barry (eds.), 1421–1424. Saarbrücken, Germany.Google Scholar
2016  Chindamani and reconstruction of Thai tones in the 17th century. Diachronica 33(2): 187–219.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2018 Phonetic and systemic biases in tonal contour changes in Bangkok Thai. In Tonal change and neutralization, H. Kubozono & M. Giriko (eds.), 249–278. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Prince, A., & Smolensky, P.
2004 Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Malden MA: Blackwell.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ruangjaroon, S.
2006 Consonant-tone interaction in Thai: An OT analysis. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics 4(2): 1–66.Google Scholar
Taylor, L. F.
1920 On the tones of certain languages of Burma. Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies, University of London 1(4): 91–106.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Teeranon, P.
2002 Thai tones in the reigns of King Rama VI and King Rama IX. Journal of Language and Linguistics 21(1): 32–46.Google Scholar
2007 The change of the Standard Thai high tone: An acoustic study and a perceptual experiment. SKASE Journal of Theoretical Linguistics 4(3): 1–16.Google Scholar
Teeranon, P. & Rungrojsuwan, R.
2009 Change in the Standard Thai High Tone: An Acoustic Study. Manusya: Journal of Humanities, Special Issue 17: 34–44.Google Scholar
Thepboriruk, K.
2010 Bangkok Thai tones revisited. Journal of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society 3(1): 86–105.Google Scholar
van Heuven, W. J. B., Mandera, P., Keuleers, E., & Brysbaert, M.
(2014) Subtlex-UK: A new and improved word frequency database for British English. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 67: 1176–1190.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Xu, Y.
2004 Understanding tone from the perspective of production and perception. Language and Linguistics 5: 757–797.Google Scholar
Yip, M.
1980 The Tonal Phonology of Chinese PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
1982 Against a segmental analysis of Zahao and Thai: A laryngeal tier proposal. Linguistic Analysis 9: 79–94.Google Scholar
Zhang, J.
2002 The Effects of Duration and Sonority on Contour Tone Distribution. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
2004 Contour tone licensing and contour tone representation. Language and Linguistics 5(4): 925–968.Google Scholar