Chapter published in:
Italian Dialectology at the Interfaces
Edited by Silvio Cruschina, Adam Ledgeway and Eva-Maria Remberger
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 251] 2019
► pp. 79100
References
Ackerman, Farrell & Stump, Gregory
2004Paradigms and periphrastic expression. In Projecting Morphology, Louisa Sadler & Andrew Spencer (eds), 111–157. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bentley, Delia
2006Split Intransitivity in Italian. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bentley, Delia & Eythórsson, Thórhallur
2001Alternation according to person in Italo-Romance. In Historical Linguistics 1999. Selected papers from the 14th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Vancouver, 9–13 August 1999 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 215], Laurel J. Brinton (ed.), 63–74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bermúdez-Otero, Ricardo & Luís, Ana
2016A view of the morphome debate. In The Morphome Debate. Diagnosing and Analysing Morphomic Patterns, Ana R. Luís & Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero (eds), 309–340. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bonami, Olivier
2015Periphrasis as collocation. Morphology 25(1): 63–110. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Dunstan, Chumakina, Marina, Corbett, Greville G., Popova, Gergana, & Spencer, Andrew
2012Defining ‘periphrasis’: Key notions. Morphology 22(2): 233–275. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cennamo, Michela
2001L’inaccusatività in alcune varietà campane: Teorie e dati a confronto. In Dati empirici e teorie linguistiche: Atti del XXXIII Congresso della Societa di Linguistica Italiana, Napoli, 28–30 ottobre 1999, Rosanna Sornicola, Eleonora Stenta Krosbakken & Carolina Stromboli (eds), 427–453. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
2010Perfective auxiliaries in the pluperfect in some southern Italian dialects. In Syntactic Variation: The Dialects of Italy, Roberta D’Alessandro, Adam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts (eds), 210–224. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Corbett, Greville G.
2012Features. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Periphrasis and possible lexemes. In Periphrasis. The Role of Syntax and Morphology in Paradigms, Marina Chumakina & Greville G. Corbett (eds), 169–189. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2015Morphosyntactic complexity: A typology of lexical splits. Language 91(1): 145–193. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Morphomic splits. In The Morphome Debate. Diagnosing and Analysing Morphomic Patterns, Ana R. Luís & Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero (eds), 64–89. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
D’Alessandro, Roberta & Roberts, Ian
2010Past participle agreement: Split auxiliary selection and the null-subject parameter. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28(1): 41–72. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd
1993Auxiliaries. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kuteva, Tania
2001Auxiliation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2009Grammatica diacronica del napoletano. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012From Latin to Romance. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2015Romance auxiliary selection in light of Romanian evidence. In Diachronic Variation in Romanian, Gabriela Pană Dindelegan, Rodica Zafiu, Adina Dragomirescu, Irina Nicula, Alexandru Nicolae, & Louise Esher (eds), 3–35. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
In press. From Latin to Romance: The great leap. In The Oxford Handbook of Diachronic and Historical Linguistics, Paola Crisma & Giuseppe Longobardi (eds) Oxford OUP
Legendre, Géraldine
2010A formal typology of person-based auxiliary selection in Italo-Romance. In Syntactic Variation: The Dialects of Italy, Roberta D’Alessandro, Adam Ledgeway & Ian Roberts (eds), 186–200. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele
2001La selezione dell’ausiliare nei dialetti italiani: dati e teorie. In Dati empirici e teorie linguistiche: Atti del XXXIII Congresso della Società di Linguistica Italiana, Napoli, 28–30 ottobre 1999, Rosanna Sornicola, Eleonora Stenta Krosbakken & Carolina Stromboli (eds), 455–476. Rome: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
2007On triple auxiliation in Romance. Linguistics 45(1): 173–222. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2014Perfective auxiliation in Italo-Romance. The complementarity of historical and modern cross-dialectal evidence. In Diachrony and Dialects. Grammatical Change in the Dialects of Italy, Paola Benincà, Adam Ledgeway, & Nigel Vincent (eds), 48–70. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maiden, Martin
2005Morphological autonomy and diachrony. In Yearbook of Morphology 2004, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 137–175. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Morphophonological innovation. In The Cambridge History of the Romance Languages, Vol. I: Structures, Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith, & Adam Ledgeway (eds), 216–267. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2016Some lessons from history. Morphomes in diachrony. In The Morphome Debate. Diagnosing and Analysing Morphomic Patterns, Ana R. Luís & Ricardo Bermúdez-Otero (eds), 33–63. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Manzini, Maria Rita & Savoia, Leonardo Maria
2005I dialetti italiani e romanci: Morfosintassi generativa I–III. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
2011Grammatical Categories. Variation in Romance Languages. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
O’Neill, Paul
2014The morphome in constructive and abstractive models of morphology. Morphology 24(1): 25–70. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pirrelli, Vito
2000Paradigmi in morfologia. Un approccio interdisciplinare alla flessione verbale italiana. Pisa: Ist. Editoriali e Poligrafici.Google Scholar
Pirrelli, Vito & Battista, Marco
2000The paradigmatic dimension of stem allomorphy in Italian verb inflection. Italian Journal of Linguistics / Rivista di Linguistica 12(2): 307–380.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2014Subject clitics and macroparameters. In Diachrony and Dialects. Grammatical Change in the Dialects of Italy, Paola Benincà, Adam Ledgeway & Nigel Vincent (eds), 177–201. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Salvi, Giampaolo & Vanelli, Laura
2004Nuova grammatica italiana. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
Sorace, Antonella
2000Gradients in auxiliary selection with intranstive verbs. Language 76(4): 859–890. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Spencer, Andrew & Popova, Gergana
2015Periphrasis and inflection. In The Oxford Handbook of Inflection, Matthew Baerman (ed.), 197–230. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Stump, Gregory
2001Inflectional Morphology. A Theory of Paradigm Structure. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Inflectional Paradigms. Content and Form at the Syntax-Morphology Interface. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Štichauer, Pavel
2016Paradigmi misti in alcuni dialetti italo-romanzi. Romanistica Pragensia 22(3): 9–20.Google Scholar
2018Lexical splits within periphrasis: Mixed perfective auxiliation systems in Italo-Romance. Morphology 28(1): 1–23. Crossref.Google Scholar
Thornton, Anna M.
2011Overabundance (multiple forms realizing the same cell): A non-canonical phenomenon in Italian verb morphology. In Morphological Autonomy. Perspectives from Romance Inflectional Morphology, Martin Maiden, John Charles Smith, Maria Goldbach & Marc-Olivier Hinzelin (eds), 358–381. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Reduction and maintenance of overabundance. A case study on Italian verb paradigms. Word Structure 5(2): 183–207. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torcolacci, Giuseppe
2015Marking the default. Auxiliary selection in southern Italian dialects. PhD dissertation, University of Leiden.
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Aguila-Multner, Gabriel & Berthold Crysmann
2020. French clitic climbing as periphrasis. Lingvisticae Investigationes 43:1  pp. 23 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.