Cover not available
Part of
Italian Dialectology at the Interfaces
Edited by Silvio Cruschina, Adam Ledgeway and Eva-Maria Remberger
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 251] 2019
► pp. 319–355

Syntactic variation across Greek dialects

The case of demonstratives

| Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia
| University of York
The syntax of demonstratives in the Greek varieties of southern Italy and more broadly in diaspora Greek can serve as a case study of how long-term unbalanced contact can give rise to syntactic borrowing, shedding light on both necessary and sufficient formal conditions of contact-induced reanalysis and change. Diachronically, Greek features adjective-like demonstratives. In southern Italy and Asia Minor, the adjectival syntax of demonstratives is being and has been lost under pressure from Italo-Romance dialects and Turkish respectively. This radical departure from the traditional Greek pattern is, arguably, impossible in the absence of contact. Crucially, however, a new grammatical rule can only be borrowed if its most characteristic outputs are already possible in the target language, or are made possible through language-internal dynamics.
Keywords: demonstratives, syntactic contact, dialects of southern Italy, Italiot Greek, Asia Minor Greek, polydefiniteness
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.The dialects
  • 3.Demonstratives across Greek
    • 3.1Standard Greek
    • 3.2Cypriot Greek
    • 3.3Asia Minor Greek
    • 3.4.Italiot Greek
    • 3.5.Summary
  • 4.Patterns of internal variability and the role of contact
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgement
  • Notes
  • References
  • Appendix
Published online: 5 February 2019
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.251.14gua
References (82)
References
Alexiadou, Artemis. 2014. Multiple Determiners and the Structure of DPs [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 211]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Haegeman, Liliane & Stavrou, Melita. 2007. The Noun Phrase in the Generative Perspective. Berlin: DeGruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anagnostopoulou,, Eleni 1994. Clitic Dependencies in Modern Greek.. PhD dissertation, Salzburg University.
Anastasiadis, Β.Κ. 1976. Η σύνταξη στο φαρασιώτικο ιδίωμα της Καππαδοκίας. PhD dissertation, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki.
1994. Μερικά ακόμη συντακτικά φαινόμενα στο γλωσσικό ιδίωμα των Φαράσων τής Καππαδοκίας. Νεοελληνική Διαλεκτολογία 1: 11–42.Google Scholar
Andriotis, Nikolaos. 1948. Τ Ǹ γλωσσικ Ǹ ίδ ίωμα τ ω ̃ ν Φαρ άσων. Athens: Ikaros.Google Scholar
Aprile, Giannino. 1972. Calimera e i suoi traúdia. Galatina: Editrice Salentina.Google Scholar
Aprile, Rocco. 1998. Canti d’amore della Grecìa Salentina. Thessaloniki: Malliaris-Paedia.Google Scholar
Aprile, Rocco, Buratti, Gustavo, Rohlfs, Gerhard & Colella, Lina. 1978. Grecìa Salentina, Problemi e Documenti, Vol. I. Cavallino: Lorenzo Capone Editore.Google Scholar
Aprile, Rocco, Lisi, Giuseppe, Montinaro, Maria & Corlianò, Franco. 1980. Grecìa Salentina, Problemi e Documenti, Vol. II. Cavallino: Lorenzo Capone Editore.Google Scholar
Bentley, Delia 2004. Ne-cliticization and split intransitivity. Journal of Linguistics 40, 2219–262.Google Scholar
Bobaljik, Jonathan David. 2012. Universals in Comparative Morphology: Suppletion, Superlatives, and the Structure of Words. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Campos, Hector & Stavrou, Melita. 2011. Definiteness effects in Spanish and Greek (appositive) nominals. Talk delivered at CGG, Sevilla, 7–9 April.
. 2012. Emotional appositives in Spanish, Greek and Balkan Romance. Talk delivered at the Workshop on Balkan-Romance Linguistics Venice, Ca’ Foscari, March 13, 2012.
Capialbi, Ettore & Bruzzano, Luigi. 1885. Racconti greci di Roccaforte. Monteleone: Francesco Raho.Google Scholar
Caracausi, Girolamo & Rossi-Taibbi, Giuseppe. 1959. Testi neogreci di Calabria. Palermo: Istituto Siciliano di Studi Bizantini e Neoellenici.Google Scholar
Chatzikyriakidis, Stergios. 2015. Polydefinites in Modern Greek: the missing link. Proceedings of ICGL11.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2010. The syntax of adjectives. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Condemi, Filippo. 1995. La grammatica grecanica. Cumelca: Editrice ellenofoni di Calabria.Google Scholar
Crisma, Paola, Longobardi, Giuseppe, Michelioudakis, Dimitris & Radkevich, Nina. 2017. The left periphery of nominal phrases and the argument-adjective asymmetry. Paper presented at the 1st International Workshop on the interface of Information Structure and Argument Structure, Seville, October 26–27, 2017.
Crupi, Giovanni Andrea. 1980. La ‘glossa’ di Bova; cento favole esopiche in greco calabro; schema grammaticale; lessico. Rocella Ionica: Associazione Culturale Ionica.Google Scholar
Dawkins, Richard MacGillivray. 1916. Modern Greek in Asia Minor. A Study of Dialect of Silli, Cappadocia and Phárasa. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
denDikken, Marcel. 2006. Relators and Linkers: The Syntax of Predication, Predicate Inversion, and Copulas. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Falcone, Giuseppe. 1973. Il dialetto romaico della bovesia. Milan: Memorie dell’Istituto Lombardo di Scienze e Lettere.Google Scholar
Grohmann, Kleanthes & Panagiotidis, Phoevos. 2004. Demonstrative doubling. Ms, University of Cyprus.
Franco,, Lodovico, Rita, Manzini M., Leonardo, Savoia. 2015. Linkers and agreement. The Linguistic Review 32(2): 277–332. Google Scholar
Guardiano, Cristina. 2012. Demonstratives, word order and the DP between syntax and semantics. Crosslinguistic remarks. In Studies in Greek Linguistics 32, Despina Papadopoulou, Anthi Revithiadou & Alex Tantos (eds), 100–115. Thessaloniki: Ινστιτουτο Νεοελληνικων Σπουδων, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
. 2014. Fenomeni di contatto sintattico in Italia meridionale? Alcune note comparative. Quaderni di Lavoro ASIt 18: 73–102.Google Scholar
. In preparation. The syntax of demonstratives. A crosslinguistic approach. Ms, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia, UCLA.
Guardiano, Cristina, Michelioudakis, Dimitris, Ceolin, Andrea, Irimia, Monica-Alexandrina, Longobardi, Giuseppe, Radkevic, Nina, Silvestri, Giuseppina & Sitaridou, Ioanna. 2016. South by south east. A syntactic approach to Greek and Romance microvariation. L’Italia Dialettale LXXVII: 96–166.Google Scholar
Guardiano, Cristina & Stavrou, Melita. 2014. Greek and Romance in southern Italy: History and contact in nominal structures. L’Italia Dialettale LXXV: 121–147.Google Scholar
. 2017. On the loss of polydefiniteness in Italiot Greek. Paper presented at CIDSM12, July 2017, Cambridge, UK.
. Submitted. Adjective-noun combination in Romance and Greek of southern Italy. Polydefiniteness revised.
Horrocks, Geoffrey & Stavrou, Melita. 1987. Bounding theory and Greek syntax: Evidence for wh-movement in NP. Journal of Linguistics 23(1): 79–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guardiano, Cristina, Michelioudakis, Dimitris, and Radkevich, Nina. 2018. On the Quasi-adjectival Morphosyntax of Demonstratives. Proceedings of WCCFL 36. Sommerville: Cascadilla Press. Google Scholar
Janse, Mark. 1998. Le Grec au contact du turc. Le cas des relatives en Cappadocien. In Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Linguistics, Bernard Caron (ed.). Paris.Google Scholar
. 1999. Greek, Turkish and Cappadocian relatives revis(it)ed. In Linguistics ’97. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Greek Linguistics, A. Mozer (ed.), 453–462. AthensGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Morphological borrowing in Asia Minor. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Greek Linguistics, Yoryia Aggouraki et al. (eds), 473–479. Thessaloniki: University Studio Press.Google Scholar
. 2006. Η Καππαδοκική διάλεκτος. In Νεοελληνικές Διάλεκτοι, Χρήστος Τζιτζιλής (ed.). Thessaloniki: Ινστιτούτο Νεοελληνικών Σπουδών.Google Scholar
Karanastasis, Anastasios. 1984. Ιστορικό λεξικό των νεοελληνικών ιδιωμάτων της Κάτω Ιταλίας. Athens: Ακαδημία Αθηνών.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 1991. Romance clitics, verb movement, and PRO. Linguistic Inquiry 22(4): 647–686.Google Scholar
. 2005. Movement and Silence. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Keenan, Edward. 1994. Creating anaphors: An historical study of the English reflexive pronouns. Ms, University of California, Los Angeles.
. 2002. Explaining the creation of reflexive pronouns in English. In Studies in the History of the English Language: A Millennial Perspective, Donka Minkova & Richard Stockwell (eds), 325–354. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kolliakou, Dimitra. 1995. Definites and possessives in modern Greek: an HPSG syntax for noun phrases. PhD Dissertation, University of Edinburgh.
. 2004. Monadic definites and polydefinites. Their form, meaning and use. Journal of Linguistics 40: 263-323.Google Scholar
Kyriakaki, Maria. 2011. DETs in the functional syntax of Greek nominals. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto.
Kolliakou, Dimitra. 1999. Non.monotone anaphora and the syntax of definiteness. In: F. Corblin, C. Dobrovie-Sorin and J-M. Marandin, Empirical issues in formal Syntax and Semantics. The Hague: Thesus, 21-145.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda. 2000. The Syntax of Specifiers and Heads. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lausberg, Heinrich. 1939. Die Mundarten Südlukaniens. Halle: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. 2016. The dialects of southern Italy. In The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds), 246–269. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Leu, Thomas. 2008. The internal syntax of determiners. PhD dissertation, New York University.
Longobardi, Giuseppe. 2001. Formal syntax, diachronic Minimalism, and etymology: The history of French chez. Linguistic Inquiry 32: 275–302. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2008. Reference to individuals, person, and the variety of mapping parameters. In Essays on Nominal Determination [Studies in Language Companion Series 99], Henrik Høeg Müller & Alex Klinge (eds), 189–211. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Longobardi, Giuseppe & Silvestri, Giuseppina. 2013. The structure of noun phrases. In The Bloomsbury Companion to Syntax, Silvia Luraghi & Claudia Parodi (eds), 88–117. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele. 2009. Profilo linguistico dei dialetti italiani. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin & Parry, Mair. 1997. The Dialects of Italy. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Manolessou, Io. 2001. The evolution of the demonstrative system in Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics 2: 119–148. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manolessou, Io & Panagiotidis, Phoevos. 1999. Τα δεικτικά της Ελληνικής και οι σχετικές επιπλοκές [Greek demonstratives and the relevant complications]. In Studies in Greek Linguistics: Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of the Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Philosophy, Savvas L. Tsochatzidis, Myrto Koutita & Andreas Haralambopoulos (eds), 199–212. Thessaloniki: Aristotle University of Thessaloniki.Google Scholar
Mancini, Augusto. 1903. Canti greci di terra d’Otranto. Lucca: Amedei.Google Scholar
Montinaro, Brizio. 1994. Canti di Pianto e d’Amore dall’ Antico Salento. Milan: Bompiani.Google Scholar
Morosi, Giuseppe. 1870. Studi sui dialetti greci della terra d’Otranto. Lecce: Editrice Salentina.Google Scholar
Palumbo, Vito Domenico. 1886. Un évangile traduit en gréco-salentin. Paris: Thorin.Google Scholar
. 1887. Lamento in dialetto calimerese italico. La Cultura Salentina 1/III.Google Scholar
. 1910. Saggio di un commento dei canti greco-salentini. Martina Franca: Apulia.Google Scholar
. 1912. Ninne Nanne Grecosalentine. Martina Franca: Apulia.Google Scholar
. 1978. Canti Grecanici di Corigliano d’ Otranto. Galatina: Congedo.Google Scholar
Panagiotidis, Phoevos. 2000. Demonstratives, determiners and operators: The case of Greek. Lingua 110: 717–742. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panagiotidis, Phoevos & Marinis, Theo. 2011. Determiner spreading as DP-predication. Studia Linguistica 65(3): 268–298. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Panayidou, Fryni. 2014. Indirect modification and D-composition: The case of 2 Greek polydefinites. Ms, Queen Mary, University of London.
Pellegrini, Giovan Battista. 1977. Carta dei dialetti d’Italia. Pisa: Pacini.Google Scholar
Radkevich, Nina. 2010. On location: The structure of case and adpositions. MA thesis, University of Connecticut.
Roberts, Ian. 2010. Agreement and Head Movement: Clitics, Incorporation, and Defective Goals. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2011. FOFC in DP: Universal 20 and the nature of demonstratives. Ms, University of Cambridge, UK.
. 2017. Inertia. In The Cambridge Handbook of Historical Syntax, Adam Ledgeway & I. Roberts (eds), 425–445. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sicuro, Salvatore. 1999. ÌTELA NA SU PO’… Canti popolari della Grecìa Salentinada un quaderno (1882–1885) di V.D. Palumbo. Calimera: Ghetonìa.Google Scholar
Stavrou, Melita. 2012. Postnominal adjectives in Greek indefinite noun phrases. In Functional Heads, Laura Brugé, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto (eds), 379–394. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. The fine(r) ingredients of adjectival modification in Greek: The Romance connection. Paper presented to the IGG39, February 21–23, Università di Modena e Reggio Emilia.
Stomeo, Paolo. 1980. Racconti Greci Inediti di Sternatia. Lecce: La Nuova Ellade.Google Scholar
Tommasi, Salvatore. 1998. IO MIA FORA’… Fiabe e racconti della Grecìa Salentinadai quaderni (1883–1912) di Vito Domenico Palumbo. Calimera: Ghetonìa.Google Scholar
Weinreich, Uriel. 1953. Languages in contact, findings and problems. New York: Linguistic Circle of New York.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Höhn, Georg F. K.
2022. Preposition Allomorphy in Calabrian Greek (Greko) and Standard Modern Greek and Its Theoretical Implications. Languages 7:3 ► pp. 169 ff. DOI logo
Bağriaçik, Metin
2020. Restrictive relative clauses in the Greek dialects of Pharasa and Cappadocia. In Morphological Complexity within and across Boundaries [Studies in Language Companion Series, 215], ► pp. 64 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.