Cover not available
Part of
Structuring Variation in Romance Linguistics and Beyond: In honour of Leonardo M. Savoia
Edited by Mirko Grimaldi, Rosangela Lai, Ludovico Franco and Benedetta Baldi
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 252] 2018
► pp. 31–55

Chapter 2
Gender, number and inflectional class in some Northern Italian dialects

The plural inflection ‑i and the interpretation of N morphology

| University of Florence
| New University of Lisbon
In many Northern Italian varieties the plural inflection ‑i has a restricted distribution, targeting feminine class nouns, determiners and adjectives. The ‑i morpheme also occurs with clitic pronouns, both subjects and objects. The crucial point we address is the relation between the plural specialized morpheme ‑i and its distribution among noun classes. We account for the distribution of the inflection ‑i on the basis of a theoretical treatment of the internal structure of the noun, along the lines of Manzini and Savoia (2017a, b).
Keywords: nominal class, gender, number, clitic, Northern Italian dialects
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: The framework
  • 2.The distribution of the plural ‑i in North Italian dialects
  • 3.Plural and D field
    • 3.1The inflection of clitics
  • 4.Some proposals for the analysis
    • 4.1The nature of -i
    • 4.2The nominal inflection
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.252.02bal
References (34)
References
Acquaviva, Paolo. 2008. Lexical Plurals. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 2005. Structuring Sense, Vol. 1: In name only. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 2010. Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese 174: 99–149.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step, Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael J. Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–54. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clackson, James. 2007. Indo-European Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, João & Figueiredo Silva, Maria Cristina. 2004. Notes on nominal and verbal agreement in Portuguese, Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 27: 17–29.Google Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie, Girard, Raphaël, Mudzingwa, Calisto & Wiltschko, Martina. 2014. The internal syntax of Shona class prefixes. Language Sciences 43: 18–46.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. 2013. Coding of nominal plurality. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. <[URL]> (7 August 2017).Google Scholar
Embick, David & Rolf, Noyer. 2001. Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32(4): 555–595.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio. 2012. Structural and lexical aspects of the grammar of desinences. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 48: 239–284.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferrari Bridgers, Franca. 2008. A unified syntactic analysis of Italian and Luganda nouns. In The Bantu-Romance Connection [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 131] Cécile De Cat & Katherine Demuth (eds), 239–260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franco, Ludovico, Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M. 2015. N class and its interpretation: The neuter in Central Italian varieties and its implications. Special issue on Italo-Romance Morphosyntax, Diego Pescarini & Silvia Rossi (eds). Isogloss, 41–68.Google Scholar
Franco, Ludovico, Baldi, Benedetta & Savoia, Leonardo M. 2018. Collectivizers in Italian (and beyond). The interplay between collectivizing and evaluating morphology (and the Div paradox). Ms, Lisboa & Firenze.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec, Marantz. 1993. Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samual J. Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harris, James. 1991. The exponence of gender in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 27–62.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, James. 1985. On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 547–621.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 2010. Comparisons and Contrasts. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kihm, Alain. 2005. Noun class, gender, and the lexicon/syntax/morphology interfaces: A comparative study of Niger-Congo and Romance languages. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, Guglielmo Cinque & Richard Kayne (eds), 459–512. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kramer, Ruth. 2014. Gender in Amharic: A morphosyntactic approach to natural and grammatical gender. Language Sciences 43: 102–115.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. The Morphosyntax of Gender. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M. 2005. I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
2007. A Unification of Morphology and Syntax. Investigations into Romance and Albanian dialects. London: Routledge.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011a. Grammatical Categories. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011b. Reducing ‘case’ to denotational primitives: Nominal inflections in Albanian. Linguistic Variation 11: 76–120.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012. Case categories in the Geg Albanian variety of Shkoder. Res Albanicae 1: 23–42.Google Scholar
2017a. N morphology and its interpretation: The neuter in Italian and Albanian varieties. In Constraints on Structure and Derivation in Syntax, Phonology and Morphology, Anna Bloch-Rozmej & Anna Bondaruk (eds), 213–236. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2017b. Gender, number and inflectional class in Romance. In Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium, ‘Categorial features of Nouns and their projections’.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec 1997. No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4: 201–225.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Alan J. 2014. Feminine, abstract, collective, neuter plural: Some remarks on each (expanded handout). In Studies on the Collective and Feminine in Indo-European from a Diachronic and Typological Perspective, Sergio Neri & Roland Schuhmann (eds), 273–306. Leiden: Brill.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Picallo, Carme. 2008. Gender and number in Romance. Lingue e LinguaggioVII: 47–66.Google Scholar
Ritter, Elizabeth. 1991. Two functional categories in noun phrases: Evidence from Modern Hebrew. In Syntax and Semantics 25: Perspectives on Phrase Structure, Susan Rothstein (ed.), 37–62. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten. 1997. V-to-I movement and inflection for person in all tenses. Working papers in Scandinavian Syntax 55: 1–27.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1994. Thematic Structure in Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by (2)

Cited by two other publications

Baldi, Benedetta & Leonardo Maria Savoia
2021. Possessives, from Franco-Provençal and Occitan Systems to Contact Dialects in Apulia and Calabria. Languages 6:2 ► pp. 63 ff. DOI logo
Manzini, Maria Rita, Leonardo M. Savoia & Benedetta Baldi
2021. Chapter 8. -ŋ plurals in North Lombard varieties. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2018 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 357], ► pp. 152 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.