Cover not available
Part of
Structuring Variation in Romance Linguistics and Beyond: In honour of Leonardo M. Savoia
Edited by Mirko Grimaldi, Rosangela Lai, Ludovico Franco and Benedetta Baldi
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 252] 2018
► pp. 31–55

Chapter 2
Gender, number and inflectional class in some Northern Italian dialects

The plural inflection ‑i and the interpretation of N morphology

| University of Florence
| New University of Lisbon

In many Northern Italian varieties the plural inflection ‑i has a restricted distribution, targeting feminine class nouns, determiners and adjectives. The ‑i morpheme also occurs with clitic pronouns, both subjects and objects. The crucial point we address is the relation between the plural specialized morpheme ‑i and its distribution among noun classes. We account for the distribution of the inflection ‑i on the basis of a theoretical treatment of the internal structure of the noun, along the lines of Manzini and Savoia (2017a, b).

Keywords: nominal class, gender, number, clitic, Northern Italian dialects
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction: The framework
  • 2.The distribution of the plural ‑i in North Italian dialects
  • 3.Plural and D field
    • 3.1The inflection of clitics
  • 4.Some proposals for the analysis
    • 4.1The nature of -i
    • 4.2The nominal inflection
  • 5.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.252.02bal
References
Acquaviva, Paolo
2008 Lexical Plurals. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2005 Structuring Sense, Vol. 1: In name only. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro
2010 Mass nouns, vagueness and semantic variation. Synthese 174: 99–149.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
2000 Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step, Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael J. Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–54. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Clackson, James
2007 Indo-European Linguistics: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, João & Figueiredo Silva, Maria Cristina
2004 Notes on nominal and verbal agreement in Portuguese, Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 27: 17–29.Google Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie, Girard, Raphaël, Mudzingwa, Calisto & Wiltschko, Martina
2014 The internal syntax of Shona class prefixes. Language Sciences 43: 18–46.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S.
2013 Coding of nominal plurality. In The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. Matthew S. Dryer & Martin Haspelmath (eds). Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. [URL] (7 August 2017).Google Scholar
Embick, David & Rolf, Noyer
2001 Movement operations after syntax. Linguistic Inquiry 32(4): 555–595.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, Antonio
2012 Structural and lexical aspects of the grammar of desinences. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 48: 239–284.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ferrari Bridgers, Franca
2008 A unified syntactic analysis of Italian and Luganda nouns. In The Bantu-Romance Connection [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 131] Cécile De Cat & Katherine Demuth (eds), 239–260. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Franco, Ludovico, Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M.
2015 N class and its interpretation: The neuter in Central Italian varieties and its implications. Special issue on Italo-Romance Morphosyntax , Diego Pescarini & Silvia Rossi (eds). Isogloss, 41–68.Google Scholar
Franco, Ludovico, Baldi, Benedetta & Savoia, Leonardo M.
2018 Collectivizers in Italian (and beyond). The interplay between collectivizing and evaluating morphology (and the Div paradox). Ms, Lisboa & Firenze.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Alec, Marantz
1993 Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samual J. Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Harris, James
1991 The exponence of gender in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 22: 27–62.Google Scholar
Higginbotham, James
1985 On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 547–621.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard
2010 Comparisons and Contrasts. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kihm, Alain
2005 Noun class, gender, and the lexicon/syntax/morphology interfaces: A comparative study of Niger-Congo and Romance languages. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, Guglielmo Cinque & Richard Kayne (eds), 459–512. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kramer, Ruth
2014 Gender in Amharic: A morphosyntactic approach to natural and grammatical gender. Language Sciences 43: 102–115.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 The Morphosyntax of Gender. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M.
2005 I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
2007 A Unification of Morphology and Syntax. Investigations into Romance and Albanian dialects. London: Routledge.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011a Grammatical Categories. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2011b Reducing ‘case’ to denotational primitives: Nominal inflections in Albanian. Linguistic Variation 11: 76–120.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Case categories in the Geg Albanian variety of Shkoder. Res Albanicae 1: 23–42.Google Scholar
2017a N morphology and its interpretation: The neuter in Italian and Albanian varieties. In Constraints on Structure and Derivation in Syntax, Phonology and Morphology, Anna Bloch-Rozmej & Anna Bondaruk (eds), 213–236. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2017b Gender, number and inflectional class in Romance. In Proceedings of the Olomouc Linguistics Colloquium, ‘Categorial features of Nouns and their projections’.Google Scholar
Marantz, Alec
1997 No escape from syntax: Don’t try morphological analysis in the privacy of your own lexicon. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 4: 201–225.Google Scholar
Nussbaum, Alan J.
2014 Feminine, abstract, collective, neuter plural: Some remarks on each (expanded handout). In Studies on the Collective and Feminine in Indo-European from a Diachronic and Typological Perspective, Sergio Neri & Roland Schuhmann (eds), 273–306. Leiden: Brill.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Picallo, Carme
2008 Gender and number in Romance. Lingue e LinguaggioVII: 47–66.Google Scholar
Ritter, Elizabeth
1991 Two functional categories in noun phrases: Evidence from Modern Hebrew. In Syntax and Semantics 25: Perspectives on Phrase Structure, Susan Rothstein (ed.), 37–62. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Vikner, Sten
1997 V-to-I movement and inflection for person in all tenses. Working papers in Scandinavian Syntax 55: 1–27.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin
1994 Thematic Structure in Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Manzini, Maria Rita, Leonardo M. Savoia & Benedetta Baldi
2021. Chapter 8. -ŋ plurals in North Lombard varieties. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2018 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory, 357], ► pp. 152 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 16 september 2023. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.