Cover not available
Part of
Structuring Variation in Romance Linguistics and Beyond: In honour of Leonardo M. Savoia
Edited by Mirko Grimaldi, Rosangela Lai, Ludovico Franco and Benedetta Baldi
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 252] 2018
► pp. 73–84

Chapter 4
Notes on infinitival relatives in Italian

| Ca' Foscari University of Venice
| University of Padova
Here certain properties of Italian infinitival relatives will be discussed which to our knowledge have not been addressed in previous work on this topic (Napoli 1976; Cinque 1988: § 1.1.5; Bianchi 1991, 2007). In particular, we will point out a distinction between two ‘da + infinitive’ relative constructions and a difference between da infinitival relatives and infinitival relatives introduced by relative pronouns; furthermore, we will illustrate the bounded vs unbounded nature of relativization under restructuring, and the properties of restrictive vs non-restrictive infinitival relatives.
Keywords: da and wh-infinitival relatives, modal force, island constraints, restructuring
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Nonrestrictive da infinitival relatives?
  • 3.Two da infinitival relatives in Italian
  • 4.A difference between the da + infinitive and the P cui/art. + qual‑ infinitive construction
  • 5.Another difference between the da + infinitive and the P cui/art. + qual‑ infinitive construction
  • 6.Are there subject infinitival relatives in Italian?
  • 7.Da infinitival relatives and restructuring
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.252.04cin
References (22)
References
Abeillé, Anne, Godard, Danièle, Miller, Philip & Sag, Ivan. 1996. French bounded dependencies. < [URL]> (6 February 2018).
Belletti, Adriana. 1982. ‘Morphological’ passive and pro drop: The impersonal construction in Italian. Journal of Linguistic Research, 2(4): 1–33.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola. 2012. Determiners and relative clauses. Iberia 4(1): 92–109. < [URL]> (6 February 2018).Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Cinque, Guglielmo. 2014. Post-copular relative clauses in the diachrony of Italian. In Diachrony and Dialects, Paola Benincà, Adam Ledgeway, Nigel Vincent (eds), 257–278. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bhatt, Rajesh. 2006. Covert Modalities in Non-finite Contexts. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina. 1991. Le relative infinitive e altre strutture modali infinitive in italiano. Quaderni del Laboratorio di Linguistica 5: 51–69. Pisa: Scuola Normale Superiore.Google Scholar
. 2007. Wh-infinitives and the licensing of “anaphoric tense”. In Proceedings of the ‘XXXII Incontro di Grammatica Generativa’, M. Cecilia Picchi & Alan Pona (eds), 35–47. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Burzio, Luigi. 1986. Italian Syntax. A Government-Binding Approach. Dordrecht: Reidel.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1978. La sintassi dei pronomi relativi ‘cui’ e ‘quale’ nell’italiano moderno. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 3: 31–126.Google Scholar
. 1982. On the theory of relative clauses and markedness. The Linguistic Review 1: 247–294. Reprinted, with corrections, in Cinque, Guglielmo, Italian Syntax and Universal Grammar, 54–103. Cambridge: CUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 1988. La frase relativa. In Grande Grammatica Italiana di Consultazione, Vol. 1, Lorenzo Renzi (ed.), 443–503. Bologna: il Mulino.Google Scholar
. 2006. Restructuring and Functional Heads. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Giurgea, Ion & Soare, Elena. 2010a. Modal non-finite relatives in Romance. In Modality and Mood in Romance: Modal Interpretation, Mood Selection, and Mood Alternation, Martin G. Becker & Eva-Maria Remberger (eds), 57–80. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
. 2010b. Predication and the nature of non-finite relatives in Romance. In Edges, Heads, and Projections. Interface properties [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 156], Anna Maria Di Sciullo & Virginia Hill (eds) 191–213. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hackl, Martin & Nissenbaum Jon. 2012. A modal ambiguity in For-infinitival relative clauses. Natural Language Semantics 20: 59–81.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hasegawa, Iroshi. 1998. English infinitival relatives as prepositional phrases. English Linguistics. Journal of the English Linguistics Society of Japan 15: 1–27.Google Scholar
Huot, Helène. 1981. Constructions infinitives du français: Le subordonnant De. Geneva: Droz.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard S. 2016. Comparative syntax and *IS TO*. Linguistic Analysis 39(1–2): 35–82.Google Scholar
Maiden, Martin & Robustelli, Cecilia. 2013. A Reference Grammar of Modern Italian. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Napoli, Donna Jo. 1976. Infinitival relatives in Italian. In Current Studies in Romance Linguistics, Marta Luján & Frederick Gerald Hensey (eds), 300–329. Washington DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David. 1998. Some optimality principles of sentence pronunciation. In Is the Best Good Enough? Optimality and Competition in Syntax, Pilar Barbosa, Daniel Fox, Paul Hagstrom, Martha McGinnis & David Pesetsky (eds), 337–383. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1980. Predication. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 203–238Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Cinque, Guglielmo
2020. The Syntax of Relative Clauses, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.