Cover not available
Part of
Structuring Variation in Romance Linguistics and Beyond: In honour of Leonardo M. Savoia
Edited by Mirko Grimaldi, Rosangela Lai, Ludovico Franco and Benedetta Baldi
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 252] 2018
► pp. 149–160

Chapter 10
A note on left-peripheral maps and interface properties

| University of Genève & University of Siena
The cartographic analysis of the left periphery leads to the identification of invariant and variable properties in the syntactic expression of scope-discourse configurations, such as topic-comment and focus-presupposition. One notable property is that languages typically permit a unique focus in the left periphery of a clause, whereas left-peripheral topics may proliferate in many languages. A comparative analysis of Italian and Gungbe reveals that Italian disallows distinct LP foci also in distinct clauses of complex sentences, an option which is permitted in Gungbe. The proposal developed in this paper capitalizes on computational mechanisms applying at the interfaces with sound and meaning to capture the invariant core and the variability in these left-peripheral properties across languages.
Keywords: cartography, left periphery, focus, interfaces
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Syntactic and interface properties of criterial heads
  • 3.There can be multiple topics, but LP focus is unique: The role of LF interface principles
  • 4.Principles and parameters: A role for PF interface?
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.252.10riz
References (21)
References
Aboh, Enoch Olade. 2004. The Morphosyntax of Complement-head Sequences: Clause Structure and Word Order Patterns in Kwa. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana. 2001. Inversion as focalization. In Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar , Aafke C.J. Hulk & Jean-Yves Pollock (eds) 60–90. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2004. Aspects of the low IP area. In The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2, Luigi Rizzi (ed.) 16–51. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina, Giuliano Bocci & Silvio, Cruschina. 2014. Focus and its implicatures. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory: selected papers from Going Romance 2013,[Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 8] Enoch Aboh, Jeannette Schaefer & Petra Sleeman (eds) 1–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bocci, Giuliano. 2013. The Syntax–Prosody Interface: A Cartographic Perspective with Evidence from Italian.[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 204] Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.) 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Rizzi, Luigi. 2010. The cartography of syntactic structures. In The Oxford Handbook of Linguistic Analysis, Bernd Heine & Heiko Narrog (eds). Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Cruschina, Silvio. 2012. Discourse-related Features and Functional Projections. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Durrleman, Stephanie. 2008. The Syntax of Jamaican Creole.[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 127] Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallego, Ángel J. 2010. Phase Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 152] Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hager M'Boua, Clarisse. 2014. Structure de la phrase en Abidji. PhD dissertation, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
Kayne, Richard. 2005. Parameters and Universals. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M. 2005. I dialetti italiani e romanci. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Poletto, Cecilia. 2000. The Higher Functional Field: Evidence from Northern Italian Dialects. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Puskás, Genoveva. 2000. Word Order in Hungarian: The Syntax of Ā-positions [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 33] Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar: A Handbook of Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.) 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Notes on cartography and further explanation. Probus 25(1): 197–226.Google Scholar
. 2017. The left periphery: Cartography, freezing, labeling. In Studies on Syntactic Cartography, Fuzhen Si (ed.). Beijing.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Cinque, Guglielmo. 2016. Functional categories and syntactic theory. Annual Review of Linguistics 2: 139–163.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Bocci, Giuliano. 2015. The left periphery of the clause – Primarily illustrated for Italian. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, 2nd edn, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds). Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur. 2014. Topicalization and focalization: A preliminary exploration of the Hebrew left periphery. In Peripheries, Anna Cardinaletti, Guglielmo Cinque & Yoshio Endo (eds), 327–341. Tokyo: H. Syobo.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Ángel J. Gallego & Dennis Ott
2024. Cartography and Explanatory Adequacy, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 21 october 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.