Chapter published in:
Structuring Variation in Romance Linguistics and Beyond: In honour of Leonardo M. Savoia
Edited by Mirko Grimaldi, Rosangela Lai, Ludovico Franco and Benedetta Baldi
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 252] 2018
► pp. 161–175

Chapter 11
Italian faire-infinitives

The special case of volere

| University of Cambridge
| Anglia Ruskin University
The first aim of this squib is to show that, under the correct syntactic configuration, volere ‘want’ can be embedded in Italian faire-infinitives (FI), contrary to previous claims. Secondly, we show that want-FIs exhibit peculiar properties: (i) they disallow a full DP causee; (ii) they permit intermediate cliticisation onto volere; (iii) they allow optional splitting of clitic clusters; and (iv) they marginally permit an accusative causee in transitive contexts where the object is a clitic. We attribute these effects to defective intervention which bans a full DP causee and requires the creation of a biclausal ECM construction, where accusative is exceptionally licensed, and where the selection of a silent OBTAIN by ‘want’ creates an additional clitic position.
Keywords: Italian, faire-infinitives, want, clitics, ECM constructions
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Embedding volere in Italian faire-infinitives
  • 3.Want-FIs: Syntactic properties
  • 4.Clitic transitive causee: defective intervention
  • 5.Accusative transitive causee: ECM construction
  • 6.Intermediate cliticisation: Silent OBTAIN
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 December 2018
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.252.11sch
References
Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi
2012 Moving verbal chunks in the low functional field. In Cartography of Syntactic Structures 7, Laura Brugè, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto (eds) 129–137. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bonet, M. Eulàlia
1991 Morphology after Syntax: Pronominal Clitics in Romance. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Brandi, Luciana & Savoia, M. Leonardo
1990 Proprietà morfosintattiche e assegnazione del caso nel causativo arbëresh. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 15: 29–121.Google Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin
2014 Defects of Defective Intervention. Linguistic Inquiry 45 (4). 707–719.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Burzio, Luigi
1981 Intransitive Verbs and Italian Auxiliaries. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
1986 Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Shlonsky, Ur
2004 Clitic positions and restructuring in Italian. Linguistic Inquiry 35(4): 519–557.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999 Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2003 The interaction of passive, causative, and ‘restructuring’ in Romance. In The Syntax of Italian Dialects, Cristina Tortora (ed.) 50–66. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2004 ‘Restructuring’ and functional structure. In Structures and Beyond, Adriana Belletti (ed.) 132–191. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2006 Restructuring and Functional Heads. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris
2005 A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax 8: 81–120.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Folli, Raffaella & Harley, Heidi
2007 Causation, obligation, and argument structure: On the nature of little v. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 197–238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grano, Thomas
2015 Control and Restructuring. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa
1993 Causative and Perception Verbs: A Comparative Study. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
1996 Semantic restrictions in Romance causatives and the incorporation approach. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 294–313.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi
2004 Wanting, having, and getting: A note on Fodor and Lepore 1998. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 255–267.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harves, Stephanie
2008 Intentional transitives and silent HAVE: Distinguishing between want and need. In Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Natasha Abner & Jason Bishop (eds) 211–219. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Harves, Stephanie & Kayne, Richard
2012 Having need and needing have . Linguistic Inquiry 43: 120–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard
1975 French Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
1993 Towards a modular theory of auxiliary selection. Studia Linguistica 47(1): 3–31.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam
2016 Italian, Tuscan, and Corsican. In The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds) 206–227. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Forthcoming. ‘The verb phrase: VP-related functional projections’. In The Syntax of Italian, Giuseppe Longobardi ed. Cambridge CUP
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M.
2007 A Unification of Morphology and Syntax. London: Routledge.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marchis Moreno, Mihaela & Carolina Petersen
2016 In defense of defective intervention: Locality effects in Romance. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, Ernestina Carrilho, Alexandra Fiéis, Maria Lobo & Sandra Pereira, 171–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
2017 Is there any defective intervention in the syntax? In Aaron Kaplan, Abby Kaplan, Miranda K McCarvel & Edward J Rubin (eds), Proceedings of WCCFL 34, 355–363. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
McGinnis, Martha
1998 Locality in A-movement. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
2000 Phases and the syntax of applicatives. In Proceedings of NELS 31, Min-joo Kim & Uri Strauss (eds) 333–349. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David
1971 Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1976 Ristrutturazione. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 1: 1–54.Google Scholar
1986 On chain formation. In Syntax and Semantics 19. The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, Hagit Borer (ed.) 65–96. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian
2016 Clitics. In The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds) 786–801. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ross, John R.
1976 To ‘have’ and to not have ‘have’. In Linguistic and Literary Studies, in Honor of Archibald A. Hill, Mohammad Ali Jazayery, Edgar C. Polomé & Werner Winter (eds) 263–270. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Michelle
2016 Complex predicates. In The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, Adam, Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds) 981–993. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017 The Romance Person Case Constraint is not about clitic clusters. Datives, ed. by Mateu, Jaume and Pineda, Anna. Language Science Press.Google Scholar
In progress. A parameter hierarchy for the Romance faire-infinitif. Ms, Anglia Ruskin University.
Vincent, Nigel
1988 Italian. In The Romance Languages, Martin Harris & Nigel Vincent (eds) 279–313. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Sheehan, Michelle
2020. The Development of Exceptional Case Marking in Romance with a Particular Focus on French. Probus 32:2 ► pp. 367 ff. Crossref logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 01 april 2022. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.