Cover not available
Part of
Structuring Variation in Romance Linguistics and Beyond: In honour of Leonardo M. Savoia
Edited by Mirko Grimaldi, Rosangela Lai, Ludovico Franco and Benedetta Baldi
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 252] 2018
► pp. 161–175

Chapter 11
Italian faire-infinitives

The special case of volere

| University of Cambridge
| Anglia Ruskin University
The first aim of this squib is to show that, under the correct syntactic configuration, volere ‘want’ can be embedded in Italian faire-infinitives (FI), contrary to previous claims. Secondly, we show that want-FIs exhibit peculiar properties: (i) they disallow a full DP causee; (ii) they permit intermediate cliticisation onto volere; (iii) they allow optional splitting of clitic clusters; and (iv) they marginally permit an accusative causee in transitive contexts where the object is a clitic. We attribute these effects to defective intervention which bans a full DP causee and requires the creation of a biclausal ECM construction, where accusative is exceptionally licensed, and where the selection of a silent OBTAIN by ‘want’ creates an additional clitic position.
Keywords: Italian, faire-infinitives, want, clitics, ECM constructions
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Embedding volere in Italian faire-infinitives
  • 3.Want-FIs: Syntactic properties
  • 4.Clitic transitive causee: defective intervention
  • 5.Accusative transitive causee: ECM construction
  • 6.Intermediate cliticisation: Silent OBTAIN
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.252.11sch
References (37)
References
Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi. 2012. Moving verbal chunks in the low functional field. In Cartography of Syntactic Structures 7, Laura Brugè, Anna Cardinaletti, Giuliana Giusti, Nicola Munaro & Cecilia Poletto (eds) 129–137. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bonet, M. Eulàlia. 1991. Morphology after Syntax: Pronominal Clitics in Romance. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Brandi, Luciana & Savoia, M. Leonardo. 1990. Proprietà morfosintattiche e assegnazione del caso nel causativo arbëresh. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 15: 29–121.Google Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin. 2014. Defects of Defective Intervention. Linguistic Inquiry 45 (4). 707–719.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Burzio, Luigi. 1981. Intransitive Verbs and Italian Auxiliaries. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
. 1986. Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Reidel.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cardinaletti, Anna & Shlonsky, Ur. 2004. Clitic positions and restructuring in Italian. Linguistic Inquiry 35(4): 519–557.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
. 2003. The interaction of passive, causative, and ‘restructuring’ in Romance. In The Syntax of Italian Dialects, Cristina Tortora (ed.) 50–66. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2004. ‘Restructuring’ and functional structure. In Structures and Beyond, Adriana Belletti (ed.) 132–191. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2006. Restructuring and Functional Heads. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Collins, Chris. 2005. A smuggling approach to the passive in English. Syntax 8: 81–120.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Folli, Raffaella & Harley, Heidi. 2007. Causation, obligation, and argument structure: On the nature of little v. Linguistic Inquiry 38: 197–238.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grano, Thomas. 2015. Control and Restructuring. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Guasti, Maria Teresa. 1993. Causative and Perception Verbs: A Comparative Study. Torino: Rosenberg & Sellier.Google Scholar
. 1996. Semantic restrictions in Romance causatives and the incorporation approach. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 294–313.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi. 2004. Wanting, having, and getting: A note on Fodor and Lepore 1998. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 255–267.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Harves, Stephanie. 2008. Intentional transitives and silent HAVE: Distinguishing between want and need. In Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Natasha Abner & Jason Bishop (eds) 211–219. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Harves, Stephanie & Kayne, Richard. 2012. Having need and needing have. Linguistic Inquiry 43: 120–132.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kayne, Richard.1975. French Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1993. Towards a modular theory of auxiliary selection. Studia Linguistica 47(1): 3–31.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ledgeway, Adam. 2016. Italian, Tuscan, and Corsican. In The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds) 206–227. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. Forthcoming. ‘The verb phrase: VP-related functional projections’. In The Syntax of Italian, Giuseppe Longobardi (ed.) Cambridge: CUP.
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M. 2007. A Unification of Morphology and Syntax. London: Routledge.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Marchis Moreno, Mihaela & Carolina Petersen. 2016. In defense of defective intervention: Locality effects in Romance. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory, Ernestina Carrilho, Alexandra Fiéis, Maria Lobo & Sandra Pereira, 171–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
. 2017. Is there any defective intervention in the syntax? In Aaron Kaplan, Abby Kaplan, Miranda K McCarvel & Edward J Rubin (eds), Proceedings of WCCFL 34, 355–363. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
McGinnis, Martha. 1998. Locality in A-movement. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
. 2000. Phases and the syntax of applicatives. In Proceedings of NELS 31, Min-joo Kim & Uri Strauss (eds) 333–349. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Perlmutter, David. 1971. Deep and Surface Structure Constraints in Syntax. New York NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1976. Ristrutturazione. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 1: 1–54.Google Scholar
. 1986. On chain formation. In Syntax and Semantics 19. The Syntax of Pronominal Clitics, Hagit Borer (ed.) 65–96. New York NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian. 2016. Clitics. In The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, Adam Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds) 786–801. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ross, John R. 1976. To ‘have’ and to not have ‘have’. In Linguistic and Literary Studies, in Honor of Archibald A. Hill, Mohammad Ali Jazayery, Edgar C. Polomé & Werner Winter (eds) 263–270. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Sheehan, Michelle. 2016. Complex predicates. In The Oxford Guide to the Romance Languages, Adam, Ledgeway & Martin Maiden (eds) 981–993. Oxford: OUP.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2017. The Romance Person Case Constraint is not about clitic clusters. Datives, ed. by Mateu, Jaume and Pineda, Anna. Language Science Press.Google Scholar
. In progress. A parameter hierarchy for the Romance faire-infinitif. Ms, Anglia Ruskin University.
Vincent, Nigel. 1988. Italian. In The Romance Languages, Martin Harris & Nigel Vincent (eds) 279–313. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Sheehan, Michelle
2020. The Development of Exceptional Case Marking in Romance with a Particular Focus on French. Probus 32:2 ► pp. 367 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 27 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.