Cover not available
Part of
Structuring Variation in Romance Linguistics and Beyond: In honour of Leonardo M. Savoia
Edited by Mirko Grimaldi, Rosangela Lai, Ludovico Franco and Benedetta Baldi
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 252] 2018
► pp. 215–222

Chapter 14
Clitics and vowel epenthesis

A case study

| University of Padova
| Goethe University Frankfurt
Syncope and epenthesis have been treated as two closely related phenomena in traditional accounts: what syncope destroys, epenthesis restores. In this paper we present some cases of vowel epenthesis in the verbal domain in some Northern Emilian varieties where both syncope and epenthesis are rather restricted. It will be shown that apparently free alternations in some arhizotonic forms, like lizì vs. alzì ‘you.pl read’, are to be considered as the result of two different grammars. Only in one of these there is allomorphy of verb stems triggered by the interaction of morphosyntactic configurations, and morphophonological and phonotactic constraints.
Keywords: Emilian dialects, syncope, epenthetic vowels, syntax-phonology interface
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Syncope and epenthesis in Luzzara, Carpi and Rolo
  • 3.Discussion
  • 4.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 19 December 2018
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.252.14gar
References (12)
References
Bafile, Laura. 2003. Syncope, epenthesis and syllable structure: The case of some Italian Dialects. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 28: 19–29.Google Scholar
Coco, Francesco. 1970. Il dialetto di Bologna: fonetica storica e analisi strutturale Bologna: Forni.Google Scholar
Benincà, Paola & Poletto, Cecilia. 2007. The ASIS enterprise: A view on the construction of a syntactic atlas for the Northern Italian dialects. Nordlyd 34: 35–52.Google Scholar
Di Nunzio, Giorgio M., Garzonio, Jacopo & Diego Pescarini. 2014. ASIt: Atlante Sintattico d’Italia. A linked open data geolinguistic web application. In Collaborative Research Practices and Shared Infrastructures for Humanities Computing, Maristella Agosti & Francesca Tomasi (eds), 197–203. Padova: CLEUP.Google Scholar
Loporcaro, Michele. 1998. Syllable structure and sonority sequencing: Evidence from Emilian. In Romance Linguistics: Theoretical Perspectives. Selected papers from the 27th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL XXVII), Irvine, 20–22 February, 1997 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 160], Armin Schwegler, Bernard Tranel & Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria (eds), 155–170. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2009. Profilo linguistico dei dialetti italiani. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Manzini, M. Rita & Savoia, Leonardo M. 2005. I dialetti italiani e romanci. Morfosintassi generativa. Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.Google Scholar
Marotta, Giovanna. 1999. ‘Degenerate Feet’ nella fonologia metrica dell’italiano. In Fonologia e morfologia dell’italiano e dei dialetti d’Italia. Atti del XXXI congresso della Società di Linguistica Italiana (Padova, 25–27 settembre 1997), Paola Benincà, Alberto Mioni & Laura Vanelli (eds), 97–116. Roma: Bulzoni.Google Scholar
Passino, Diana. 2013. A place in the lexicon for the epenthetic vowels of the Emilian dialects. Lingue e Linguaggio 12(1): 5–30.Google Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1966. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Fonetica. Torino: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Savoia, Leonardo M. 1994. Parametrical variation in prosodic licensing: Evidence from Italo-Albanian dialects. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 20: 105–141.Google Scholar
2015. I dialetti italiani. Sistemi e processi fonologici nelle varietà di area italiana e romancia. Pisa, Pacini.Google Scholar