Chapter published in:
The Determinants of Diachronic Stability
Edited by Anne Breitbarth, Miriam Bouzouita, Lieven Danckaert and Melissa Farasyn
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 254] 2019
► pp. 215243
References

References

Abraham, Werner
2006Introduction. In Datives and Other Cases [Studies in Language Companion Series 75], Daniel Hole, André Meinunger & Werner Abraham (eds), 3–46. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Anagnostopoulou, Elena & Sevdali, Christina
2014Opaque and transparent datives, and how they behave in passives. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 17(1): 1–34.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Cynthia
1995Case Marking and Reanalysis: Grammatical Relations from Old to Early Modern English. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Arteaga, Deborah L. & Herschensohn, Julia
2013A diachronic view of Old French genitive constructions. In Research on Old French: The State of the Art, Deborah L. Arteaga (ed.), 19–44. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bernolet, Sarah, Hartsuiker, Robert J. & Pickering, Martin J.
2009Persistence of emphasis in language production: A cross-linguistic approach. Cognition 112: 300–317.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bock, Kathryn
1986Syntactic persistence in language production. Cognitive Psychology 18: 355–387.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Coetsem, Frans
1988Loan Phonology and the Two Transfer Types in Language Contact [Publications in Language Sciences 27]. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2002A General and Unified Theory of the Transmission Process in Language Contact. Heidelberg: Universitätsverlag C. Winter.Google Scholar
Denison, David
1993English Historical Syntax. Harlow: Pearson Longman.Google Scholar
Dupuy, Estèle
2010La voix passive et les auxiliaires factitifs en moyen français: Maillage inter-verbal des systèmes valentico-référentiels. In Actes du XXVe Congrès International de Linguistique et de Philologie Romanes, Tome VI, Maria Iliescu, Heidi Siller-Runggaldier & Paul Danler (eds), 105–114. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emirkanian, Louisette & Jebali, Adel
2013Acquiring argument structure in French L2: The case of ditransitive structures. In Conference Proceedings of 6th ICT for Language Learning, Florence, Italy, 14–15 November, Pixel (ed.), 469–473. Padova: Libreria universitaria.Google Scholar
Feldman, Harry
1978Passivizing on datives in Greek. Linguistic Inquiry 9(3): 499–502.Google Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly
2006A History of the English Language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haeberli, Eric
2010Investigating Anglo-Norman influence on Late Middle English syntax. In The Anglo-Norman Language and its Contexts, Richard Ingham (ed.), 143–163. Woodbridge: Boydell and Brewer.Google Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
2016Canonical goal passives in Dutch and its dialects. Ms.Google Scholar
Hartsuiker, Robert J., Pickering, Martin J. & Veltkamp, Eline
2004Is syntax separate or shared between languages? Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in Spanish-English bilinguals. Psychological Science 15(6): 409–414.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Heine, Bernd & Kuteva, Tania
(eds) 2005Language Contact and Grammatical Change. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herschensohn, Julia
1996Case Suspension and Binary Complement Structure in French [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 132]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Herslund, Michael
1980Problèmes de syntaxe de l’ancien français. Compléments datifs et génitifs. Uppsala: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Ingham, Richard
2012Middle English and Anglo-Norman in contact. Bulletin de l’Association des Médiévistes Anglicistes de l’Enseignement Supérieur 81: 1–23.Google Scholar
2017The Middle English prepositional dative: Grammaticalisation and contact with French. Talk held at the SLE 2017 in Zurich.Google Scholar
Jensen, Frede
1990Old French and Comparative Gallo-Romance Syntax [Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 232]. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Johanson, Lars
2002Contact-induced change in a code-copying framework. In Language Change: The Interplay of Internal, External and Extralinguistic Factors, Mari C. Jones & Edith Esch (eds), 285–313. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Koopman, Willem
1990The Double Object Construction in Old English. In Papers from the 5th International Conference on English Historical Linguistics, Sylvia Adamson Vivien A. Law, Nigel Vincent & Susan Wright (eds), 225–243. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kroch, Anthony & Taylor, Ann
(eds) 2000The Penn-Helsinki Parsed Corpus of Middle English, 2nd edn (PPCME2). Philadelphia PA: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Lieber, Rochelle
1979The English passive: An argument for historical rule stability. Linguistic Inquiry 10(4): 667–688.Google Scholar
Lightfoot, David
1991How to Set Parameters: Arguments from Language Change. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lucas, Christopher
2012Contact-induced grammatical change. Towards an explicit account. Diachronica 29(3): 275–300.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McFadden, Thomas
2002The rise of the to-dative in Middle English. In Syntactic Effects of Morphological Change, David Lightfoot (ed.), 107–123. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Parkvall, Mikael
2008Which parts of language are the most stable? Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 61(3): 234–250.Google Scholar
Rothwell, William
2001The teaching and learning of French in later medieval England. Zeitschrift für französische Sprache und Literatur 111: 2–18.Google Scholar
Rothwell, William & Trotter, David
(eds) 2001The Anglo-Norman Online Hub. London: Aberystwyth University and Swansea University.Google Scholar
Russom, Jacqueline Haring
1982An examination of the evidence for OE indirect passives. Linguistic Inquiry 13(4): 677–680.Google Scholar
Santoro, Maurizio
2007Second language acquisition of Italian accusative and dative clitics. Second Language Research 23(1): 37–50.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Short, Ian
1980Bilingualism in Anglo-Norman England. Romance Philology 33(4): 467–479.Google Scholar
Sleeman, Petra
2010L2 acquisition of clitics: Old French as an interlanguage. In Movement and Clitics: Adult and Child Grammar, Vincent Torrens et al.. (eds), 389–416. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.Google Scholar
Taylor, Ann, Nurmi, Arja, Warner, Anthony, Pintzuk, Susan & Nevalainen, Terttu
(eds) 2006Parsed Corpus of Early English Correspondence (PCEEC). York and Helsinki: Universities of York and Helsinki.Google Scholar
Thomason, Sarah Grey & Kaufman, Terrence
1988Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Togeby, Knud
1974Précis historique de grammaire française. Odense: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Toyota, Junichi
2008Diachronic Change in the English Passive. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Trips, Carola & Stein, Achim
2018A comparison of multi-genre and single-genre corpora in the context of contact-induced change. In Diachronic Corpora, Genre and Language Change [Studies in Corpus Linguistics 85], Richard Whitt (ed.), 241–280. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Forthcoming. Contact-induced changes in the argument structure of Middle English verbs on the model of Old French. Journal of Language Contact.
Troberg, Michelle
2008Dynamic Two-place Indirect Verbs in French: A Synchronic and Diachronic Study in Variation and Change of Valence. PhD Thesis: University of Toronto.Google Scholar
Vasilyeva, Marina & Waterfall, Heidi
2012Beyond syntactic priming: Evidence for activation of alternative syntactic structures. Journal of Child Language 39(2): 258–283.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vasilyeva, Marina, Waterfall, Heidi, Gamez, Perla, Gomez, Ligia, Bowers, Edmond & Shimpi, Priya
2010Cross-linguistic syntactic priming in bilingual children. Journal of Child Language 37(5): 1047–1064.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Visser, Fredericus Theodorus
1963An Historical Syntax of the English Language. Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Weber, Kirsten & Indefrey, Peter
2009Syntactic priming in German-English bilinguals during sentence comprehension. Neuroimage 46(4): 1164–1167.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Winford, Donald
2003Contact-induced changes: Classification and processes. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 57: 129–150.Google Scholar
Woolford, Ellen
2006Lexical case, inherent case, and argument structure. Linguistic Inquiry 37(1): 111–130.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yanagi, Tomohiro
2012Ditransitive alternation and theme passivization in Old English. In Studies in Variation, Contacts and Change in English, Vol. 10: Outposts of Historical Corpus Linguistics: From the Helsinki Corpus to a Proliferation of Resources, Jukka Tyrkkö et al.. (eds). Helsinki: Varieng. http://​www​.helsinki​.fi​/varieng​/series​/volumes​/10​/yanagi/Google Scholar
Zehentner, Eva
2017Ditransitives in Middle English: On semantic specialisation and the rise of the dative alternation. English Language and Linguistics 22(1): 149–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar