Prepositions, Case and Verbal Prefixes

The case of Slavic

| University of Leipzig
HardboundAvailable
ISBN 9789027203083 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
e-Book
ISBN 9789027262646 | EUR 99.00 | USD 149.00
 
This monograph is concerned with prepositional elements in Slavic languages, prepositions, verbal prefixes and functional elements of prepositional nature. It argues that verbal prefixes are incorporated prepositions projecting their argument structure in the complement of the verbal root and that their meaning is based on the two-argument meaning of prepositions, enriched with the CAUSE operator. The book investigates idiomaticity in the realm of prefixed verbs and proposes a novel analysis of non-compositional prefixed verbs based on the operation of predicate transfer. It also offers a uniform analysis of cases. Prepositional as well as non-prepositional cases are treated as a reflection of the agreement operation, whereat the type of prepositional case is determined by semantic properties of the decomposed preposition. Furthermore, it examines prepositions from a diachronic perspective and argues that they can be grammaticalised as future markers under certain circumstances.
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 255]  2019.  vii, 231 pp.
Publishing status: Available
Table of Contents
Abbreviations
Chapter 1. Introduction
1–3
Chapter 2. Verbal prefixes
5–48
Chapter 3. Prefixed verbs and compositionality
49–72
Chapter 4. Prefixes in target state participles
73–125
Chapter 5. The future prefix po-
159–157
Chapter 6. Decomposed prepositional phrases and case
160–206
Chapter 7. Conclusions
207–209
References
211–228
Index
References

References

Ackerman, Farrell & Goldberg, Adele E.
1996Constraints on adjectival past participles. In Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language, Adele E. Goldberg (ed.), 17–30. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Acquaviva, Paolo.
2009Roots and lexicality in Distributed Morphology. In York-Essex Morphology Meeting 5, Alexandra Galani, Daniel Redinger & Norman Yeo (eds), 1–21. York: Department of Language and Linguistic Science, University of York.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis & Anagnostopoulou, Elena
2008Structuring participles. In Proceedings of the 26th WCCFL, Charles B. Chang & Hannah J. Haynie (eds), 33–41. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Alexiadou, Artemis, Rathert, Monika & von Stechow, Arnim
2003Introduction: The modules of perfect constructions. In Perfect Explorations, Artemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert & Arnim von Stechow (eds), vii–xxxviii. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Alsina, Alex, Mohanan, Karuvannur Puthanveetli & Mohanan, Tara
2005How to get rid of the COMP. In Proceedings of the LFG05 Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracey Holloway King (eds), 21–41. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, Elena
2003Participles and voice. In Perfect Explorations, Artemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 1–36. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, John, M.
1971The Grammar of Case: Towards a Localist Theory. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
2006Modern Grammars of Case. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Anstatt, Tanja
2003Das Verbalpräfix po- im Polnischen. Zeitschrift für Slavische Philologie 62: 359–385.Google Scholar
Arsenijević, Boban
2006Inner Aspect and Telicity: The Decompositional and the Quantificational Nature of Eventualities at the Syntax-Semantics Interface. PhD dissertation, Leiden University [LOT Dissertation Series 142].Google Scholar
2007Slavic verb prefixes are resultative. Cahiers Chronos 17: 197–213.Google Scholar
Asbury, Anna, Gehrke, Berit & Hegedűs, Veronika
2007One size fits all: Prefixes, particles, adpositions and cases as members of the category P. In UiL OTS Yearbook 2006, Cem Keskin (ed.), 1–17. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Assmann, Anke, Edygarova, Svetlana, Georgi, Doreen, Klein, Timo & Weisser, Philipp
2014Case stacking below the surface: On the possessor case alternation in Udmurt. The Linguistic Review 31: 447–485.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Babko-Malaya, Olga
1999Zero Morphology: A Study of Aspect, Argument Structure, and Case. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.
2003Perfectivity and prefixation in Russian. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 11: 5–36.Google Scholar
Baker, Mark C.
1988Incorporation: A theory of Grammatical Function Changing. Chicago IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
2008The Syntax of Agreement and Concord. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015Case: Its Principles and Parameters. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bartnicka, Barbara
1970Adiektywizacja imiesłowów w języku polskim. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Bartnicka, Barbara, Hansen, Björn, Klemm, Wojtek, Lehmann, Volkmar & Satkiewicz, Halina
2004Grammatik des Polnischen. München: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Bąnk, Piotr
2010Gramatyka języka polskiego: Zarys popularny. Warszawa: Wiedza Powszechna.Google Scholar
Beck, Sigrid
2005There and back again: A semantic analysis. Journal of Semantics 22: 3–51.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Rizzi, Luigi
1981The syntax of ne: Some theoretical implications. The Linguistic Review 1: 117–154.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bergsma, Shane, Bhargava, Aditya, He, Hua & Kondrak, Grzegorz
2010Predicting the semantic compositionality of prefix verbs. In Proceedings of the 2010 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 293–303. Cambridge MA: MIT, Association for Computational Linguistics.
Bertinetto, Pier Marco
2001On a frequent misunderstanding in the temporal-aspectual domain: The ‘perfective = telic confusion’. In Semantic Interfaces. Reference, Anaphora and Aspect, Carlo Cecchetto, Gennaro Chierchia & Maria Teresa Guasti (eds), 177–210. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Bierwisch, Manfred
1967Syntactic features in morphology: General problems of so-called pronominal inflection in German. In To Honor Roman Jakobson, Vol. 1, 239–270. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1988On the grammar of local prepositions. In Studia grammatica 29, Manfred Bierwisch, Wolfgang Motsch & Ilse Zimmermann (eds), 1–65. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.Google Scholar
1996How much space gets into language? In Language and Space, Paul Bloom, Merrill F. Garrett, Lynn Nadel & Mary A. Peterson (eds), 31–76. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Binnick, Robert I.
1991Time and the Verb. A Guide to Tense and Aspect. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Biskup, Petr
2007P(refixe)s and P(reposition)s. Ms, University of Leipzig.
2009aPrefixes as prepositions and multiple cases. In Studies in Formal Slavic Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, Semantics and Information Structure. Proceedings of FDSL 7, Leipzig 2007, Gerhild Zybatow, Uwe Junghanns, Denisa Lenertová & Petr Biskup (eds), 3–17. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2009bThe syntactic structure of PPs. In Czech in Formal Grammar, Mojmir Dočekal & Markéta Ziková (eds), 9–29. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
2010The syntax and semantics of prefixed adjectival participles. Ms, University of Leipzig.Google Scholar
2011Adverbials and the Phase Model [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 177]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Slavic prefixes and adjectival participles. In Slavic Languages in Formal Grammar. Proceedings of FDSL 8.5, Brno 2010, Markéta Ziková & Mojmir Dočekal (eds), 271–289. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2015On (non-)compositionality of prefixed verbs. In Slavic Languages in the Perspective of Formal Grammar: Proceedings of FDSL 10.5, Brno 2014, Markéta Ziková, Pavel Caha & Mojmir Dočekal (eds), 59–78. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2016aThe non-identity reading in ATB constructions: The case of slavic. Ms, University of Leipzig.Google Scholar
2016bPrefixed adjectival participles. Linguistica Brunensia 64: 7–26.Google Scholar
2016cDas Futur-Präfix po- . In Linguistische Beiträge zur Slavistik. XXIII. JungslavistInnen-Treffen in Dresden, 18.-20. September 2014, Holger Kuße & Marina Scharlaj (eds), 9–26. Munich: Biblion Media.Google Scholar
2017Decomposing prepositional cases in Russian and Polish. In Aspects of Slavic Linguistics: Formal Grammar, Lexicon, and Communication, Olav Mueller-Reichau & Marcel Guhl (eds), 50–68. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
. To appear. Case syncretism in Russian, Polish and Czech ATB constructions. In Proceedings of the 25th Meeting of Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics. The Cornell Meeting 2016, Wayne Browne, Miloje Despić, Naomi Enzinna, Robin Karlin, Simone De Lemos & Draga Zec (eds), 418–437. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Biskup, Petr & Putnam, Michael
2012One P with two spell-outs: The ent-/aus-alternation in German. Linguistic Analysis 38: 69–109.Google Scholar
Biskup, Petr, Putnam, Michael & Smith, Laura C.
2011German particle and prefix verbs at the syntax-phonology interface. Leuvense Bijdragen 97: 106–135.Google Scholar
Biskup, Petr & Zybatow, Gerhild
2015Verbal prefixation in Slavonic: A minimalist approach. In Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 2. [HSK 40.2], Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds), 1492–1515. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Bláha, Ondřej
2008Vyjadřování budoucnosti v současné češtině (se zřetelem k ostatním slovanským jazykům). Olomouc: Univerzita Palackého.Google Scholar
Blake, Barry J.
2001Case. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Błaszczak, Joanna
2007The nom/gen “subject” puzzle in Polish. In Linguistic Investigations into Formal Description of Slavic Languages. Contributions of the Sixth European Conference Held at Potsdam University, November 30-December 02, 2005, Peter Kosta & Lilla Schürcks (eds), 127–146. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Błaszczak, Joanna & Klimek-Jankowska, Dorota
2012Futures in Polish and Slovenian from the perspective of a force-dynamic model. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 16: The Utrecht Meeting, 2011, MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, Ana Aguilar-Guevara, Anna Chernilovskaya & Rick Nouwen (eds), 85–98. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boeckx, Cedric
2008Bare Syntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Bogusławski, Andrzej
1960Prefiksalne pary aspektowe a semantyka prefiksalna czasownika rosyjskiego. Slavia Orientalis 9: 139–175.Google Scholar
1963Prefiksacja czasownikowa we współczesnym języku rosyjskim. Wrocław, Warszawa, Kraków: Zakład Narodowy imienia Ossolińskich, Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Bolinger, Dwight
1971The nominal in the progressive. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 246–250.Google Scholar
Bondarko Aleksandr V.
1961K voprosu o glagolach dviženija v češskom jazyke (formy tipa ponesu, poletím). Slavia 30: 527–547.Google Scholar
Borer, Hagit
2005Structuring Sense. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Borik, Olga
2002Aspect and Reference Time. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University [LOT dissertation series].
2013Past participle formation and the eventive/adjectival passive in Russian. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 17, Emmanuel Chemla, Vincent Homer & Grégoire Winterstein (eds), 115–132. http://​semanticsarchive​.net​/sub2012/Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko
2009More on the no-DP analysis of article-less languages. Studia Linguistica 63: 87–203.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Botwinik-Rotem, Irena
2008An exploration of Hebrew locative PPs. In Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 120], Anna Asbury, Jakub Dotlačil, Berit Gehrke & Rick Nouwen (eds), 331–364. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bowern, Claire & Aygen-Tosun, Gülşat
2000Titan's tensed prepositions. In Proceedings of the 36th Chicago Linguistics Society. Vol. 2, Arika Okrent & John P. Boyle (eds), 35–48. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Brecht, Richard D.
1985The form and function of aspect in Russian. In Issues in Russian Morphosyntax, Michael S. Flier & Richard D. Brecht (eds), 9–34. Columbus OH: Slavica.Google Scholar
Brennan, Jonathan
2008Irish prepositions: Agreement and impoverishment. In Proceedings of the 26th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Charles B. Chang & Hannah J. Haynie (eds), 105–113. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.Google Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin
2014Word formation is syntactic: Adjectival passives in English. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32: 363–422.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bruening, Benjamin & Al Khalaf, Eman
2017Category mismatches in coordination revisited. Ms, University of Delaware and University of Jordan. http://​udel​.edu​/~bruening​/Downloads​/SelectionInCoordination5​.1​.pdf
Caha, Pavel
2009The Nanosyntax of Case. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Caha, Pavel & Ziková, Markéta
2016Vowel length as evidence for a distinction between free and bound prefixes in Czech. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 63: 331–377.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Caponigro, Ivano
2003Free Not to Ask: On the Semantics of Free Relatives and Wh-Words Crosslinguistically. PhD dissertation, UCLA.
Caponigro, Ivano & Pearl, Lisa
2008Silent prepositions: Evidence from free relatives. In Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 120], Anna Asbury, Jakub Dotlačil, Berit Gehrke & Rick Nouwen (eds), 365–385. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cetnarowska, Bożena
2000Resultative adjectives in Polish. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 47: 47–79.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001On inherent inflection feeding derivation in Polish. In Yearbook of Morphology 1999, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 153–183. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
1964Current Issues in Linguistic Theory. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
1973Conditions on transformations. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds), 232–286. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
2000Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–156. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale. A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2008On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory. Essays in Honor of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Robert Freidin, Carlos P. Otero & Maria Luisa Zubizarreta (eds), 133–166. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, Jason H.
2011The Prefix PO- and Aspect in Russian and Polish: A Cognitive Grammar Acccount. PhD dissertation, University of Kansas.
Chvany Catherine V.
1986Jakobson’s fourth and fifth dimensions: On reconciling the cube model of case meanings with the two-dimensional matrices for case forms. In Case in Slavic, Richard D. Brecht & Jafmes S. Levine (eds), 107–129. Columbus OH: Slavica.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
2010Mapping spatial PPs: An introduction. In Mapping Spatial PPs. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 6, Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 3–25. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Craig, Colette G.
1977The Structure of Jacaltec. Austin TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Creissels, Denis
2008Spatial cases. In The Oxford Handbook of Case, Andrej Malchukov & Andrew Spencer (eds), 609–625. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Csirmaz, Aniko
2006Particles and a two component theory of aspect. In Event Structure and the Left Periphery of Hungarian, Katalin É. Kiss (ed.), 107–128. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cvrček, Václav, Kodýtek, Vilém, Kopřivová, Marie, Kováříková, Dominika, Sgall, Petr, Šulc, Michal, Táborský, Jan, Volín, Jan & Waclawičová, Martina
2010Mluvnice současné češtiny 1. Jak se píše a jak se mluví. Praha: Univerzita Karlova v Praze, Karolinum.Google Scholar
Čechová, Marie, Dokulil, Miloš, Hlavsa, Zdeněk, Hrbáček, Josef & Hrušková, Zdeňka
2000Čeština – řeč a jazyk. Praha: ISV nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Damborský, Jiří
1967aParticipium l-ové ve slovanštině. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
1967bNeurčité a jmenné tvary slovesné v polštině. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Danon, Gabi
2006Caseless nominals and the projection of DP. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 24: 977–1008.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Davies, William & Dubinsky, Stanley
1998Sentential subjects as complex NPs: New reasons for an old account of subjacency. In Proceedings of the 34th Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Part 1: Papers from the Main Session, Catherine M. Gruber, Derrick Higgins, Kenneth S. Olson & Tamra Wysocki (eds), 83–94. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Déchaine, Rose-Marie & Wiltschko, Martina
2002Decomposing pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 409–442.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Demirdache, Hamida & Uribe-Etxebarria, Miriam
1997The syntax of temporal relations. A uniform approach to tense and aspect. In Proceedings of the 16th WCCFL, Emily Curtis, James Lyle & Gabriel Webster (eds), 145–159. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2000The primitives of temporal relations. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds), 157–186. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dickey, Stephen M.
2000Parameters of Slavic Aspect: A Cognitive Approach. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Dickey, Stephen. M.
2007A prototype account of the development of delimitative po- in Russian. In Cognitive Paths into the Slavic Domain, Dagmar Divjak & Agata Kochańska (eds), 329–374. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel
1995Particles: On the Syntax of Verb-Particle, Triadic and Causative Constructions. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2010On the functional structure of locative and directional PPs. In Mapping Spatial PPs. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 6, Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 74–126. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dimitrova-Vulchanova, Mila
1999Verb Semantics, Diathesis and Aspect. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
2012Voice. In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, Robert I. Binnick (ed.), 937–959. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Di Sciullo, Anna Maria & Slabakova, Roumyana
2005Quantification and aspect. In Perspectives on Aspect, Henk J. Verkuyl, Henriette de Swart & Angeliek van Hout (eds), 61–80. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Doetjes, Jenny
1997Quantifiers and Selection. On the Distribution of Quantifying Expressions in French, Dutch and English. The Hague: HAG.Google Scholar
Dostál, Antonín
1954Studie o vidovém systému v staroslověnštině. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Dowty, David R.
1979Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Dvořák, Emil
1983Ke kodifikaci pravidel užívání přechodníků. Naše řeč 66: 180–192.Google Scholar
Embick, David
2004On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry 35: 355–392.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph E.
1976A Transformational Approach to English Syntax: Root, Structure Preserving, and Local Transformations. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
1985A Unified Theory of Syntactic Categories. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Endresen, Anna, Janda, Laura A., Kuznetsova, Julia, Lyashevskaya, Olga, Makarova, Anastasia, Nesset, Tore & Sokolova, Svetlana
2012Russian ‘purely aspectual’ prefixes: Not so ‘empty’ after all? Scando-Slavica 58: 231–291.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Engel, Ulrich, Rytel-Kuc, Danuta, Cirko, Lesław, Dębski, Antoni, Gaca, Alicja, Jurasz, Alina, Kątny, Andrzej, Mecner, Paweł, Prokop, Izabela, Sadziński, Roman, Schatte, Christoph, Schatte, Czesława, Tomiczek, Eugeniusz & Weiss, Daniel
1999Deutsch-polnische kontrastive Grammatik, Band 2. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Energeia.Google Scholar
Ertl, Václav
1925/1926A. Mazon: Grammaire de la langue tchèque. Slavia 4: 772–805.Google Scholar
Fasske, Helmut
1981Grammatik der obersorbischen Schriftsprache der Gegenwart. Bautzen: Domowina.Google Scholar
Filip, Hana
1999Aspect, Eventuality Types and Noun Phrase Semantics. New York, NY: Garland.Google Scholar
2000The quantization puzzle. In Events as Grammatical Objects, James Pustejovsky & Carol Tenny (eds), 3–60. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
2003Prefixes and the delimitation of events. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 11: 55–101.Google Scholar
2005On accumulating and having it all. Perfectivity, prefixes and bare arguments. In Perspectives on Aspect, Henk J. Verkuyl, Henriette de Swart & Angeliek van Hout (eds), 125–147. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Lexical aspect. In The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, R. I. Binnick (ed.), 721–751. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Fong, Vivienne
1997The Order of Things: What Directional Locatives denote. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
Forsyth, James
1970A Grammar of Aspect. Usage and Meaning in the Russian Verb. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Fowler, George
1996An articulated theory of aspect and prefixation in Slavic. In Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics: The College Park Meeting 1994, Jindřich Toman (ed.), 97–122. Ann Arbor MI: Slavic.Google Scholar
Franks, Steven
1995Parameters of Slavic Morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gehrke, Berit
2008Ps in Motion: On the Semantics and Syntax of P Elements and Motion Events. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University. [LOT Dissertation Series 184].Google Scholar
Geist, Ljudmila
2010The argument structure of predicate adjectives in Russian. Russian Linguistics 34: 239–260.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, Elly
2004Grammaticalization as Economy [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 71]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011The Linguistic Cycle. Language Change and the Language Faculty. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Giger, Markus
2003Resultativa im modernen Tschechischen unter Berücksichtigung der Sprachgeschichte und der übrigen slavischen Sprachen. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2009Der Resultativ in den slavischen Sprachen. In Die slavischen Sprachen. Ein internationales Handbuch zu ihrer Struktur, ihrer Geschichte und ihrer Erforschung, Sebastian Kempgen, Peter Kosta, Tilman Berger & Karl Gutschmidt (eds), 269–274. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Giorgi, Alessandra & Pianesi, Fabio
1997Tense and Aspect: From Semantics to Morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Gribanova, Vera
2009Phonological evidence for a distinction between Russian prepositions and prefixes. In Studies in Formal Slavic Phonology, Morphology, Syntax, Semantics and Information Structure. Proceedings of FDSL 7, Leipzig 2007, Gerhild Zybatow, Uwe Junghanns, Denisa Lenertová & Petr Biskup (eds), 383–395. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2013Verb-stranding verb phrase ellipsis and the structure of the Russian verbal complex. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31: 91–136.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Grochowski, Maciej
1975Zależności semantyczne między czasownikiem a wyrażeniem lokatywnym. Polonica I: 113–131.Google Scholar
Groves, Terab'ata R., Groves, Gordon W. & Jacobs, Roderick
1985Kiribatese: An Outline Description [Pacific Linguistics 64]. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Gruet-Skrabalova, Hana
2012VP-ellipsis and the Czech auxiliary být (‘to be’). XLinguae 5: 3–15.Google Scholar
Grzegorczykowa, Renata, Laskowski, Roman & Wróbel, Henryk
1984Gramatyka współczesnego języka polskiego. Morfologia. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Gvozdanović, Jadranka
1992The verbal prefixes po- and pro- in Russian: Their meanings and uses. Studies in Slavic and General Linguistics 17: 111–123.Google Scholar
2012Perfective and imperfective aspect. In The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect, Robert I. Binnick (ed.), 781–802. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Hagège, Claude
2010Adpositions. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Haider, Hubert
2004Pre- and postverbal adverbials in OV and VO. Lingua 114: 779–808.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Marantz, Alec
1993Distributed morphology and the pieces of inflection. In The View from Building 20: Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Kenneth Hale & Samuel Jay Keyser (eds), 111–176. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hamel, Patricia
1993Serial verbs in Loniu and an evolving preposition. Oceanic Linguistics 32: 111–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Noyer, Rolf
1999State-of-the-article: Distributed morphology. Glot International 4: 3–9.Google Scholar
Harley, Heidi & Ritter, Elisabeth
2002Person and number in pronouns: A feature-geometric analysis. Language 78: 482–526.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Harlow, Ray
2007Māori: A Linguistic Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Haspelmath, Martin
1993A Grammar of Lezgian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1994Passive participles across languages. In Voice: Form and Function [Typological Studies in Language 27], Barbara A. Fox & Paul J. Hopper (eds), 151–178. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Hausenblas, Karel
1963Slovesná kategorie výsledného stavu v dnešní češtině. Naše řeč 46: 13–28.Google Scholar
Hay, Jen, Kennedy, Christopher & Levin, Beth
1999Scalar structure underlies telicity in degree achievements. In Proceedings of SALT 9, Tanya Matthews & Devon Strolovich (eds), 127–144. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Heim, Irene & Kratzer, Angelika
1998Semantics in Generative Grammar. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hjelmslev, Louis
1935La catégorie des cas: Etude de grammaire générale I. Acta Jutlandica 7: 1–184. Copenhagen: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Horálek, Karel
1955Slovesné tvary typu ponesu, poletím . Naše řeč 38: 21–24.Google Scholar
Horecký, Ján, Buzássyová, Klára, Bosák, Ján
a kolektív 1989Dynamika slovnej zásoby súčasnej slovenčiny. Bratislava: Vydavateľstvo Slovenskej akadémie vied.Google Scholar
van Hout, Angeliek
2008Acquiring telicity crosslinguistically: On the acquisition of telicity entailments associated with transitivity. In Crosslinguistic Perspectives on Argument Structure: Implications for Learnability, Melissa Bowerman & Penelope Brown (eds), 255–278. New York NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Irmer, Matthias & Mueller-Reichau, Olav
2018Script knowledge and the felicity of phase particles in German adjectival passives. Journal of Semantics, 1–53. doi:Crossref.Google Scholar
Isačenko, Aleksandr V.
1962Die russische Sprache der Gegenwart. Formenlehre. Halle (Saale): Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray
1973Base rules for PPs. In A Festschrift for Morris Halle, Stephen R. Anderson & Paul Kiparsky (eds), 345–356. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar
1983Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jacko, Jozef
1973Slovenská morfológia v škole. Bratislava: Slovenské pedagogické nakladateľstvo.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman
1936/1971Beitrag zur allgemeinen Kasuslehre: Gesamtbedeutungen der russischen Kasus. Travaux du Cercle Linguistique de Prague 6 : 240–288. (In Roman Jakobson. Selected Writings, II: Words and Language, 23–71. The Hague: Mouton).Google Scholar
1958/1971Morfologičeskie nabljudenija nad slavjanskim skloneniem. (Sostav russkix padežnyx form). In American Contributions to the Fourth International Congress of Slavicists, Moscow, September 1958, 127–156. s-Gravenhage: Mouton. (In Roman Jakobson. Selected Writings, II: Words and Language, 154–183. The Hague: Mouton.]Google Scholar
Janaš, Pětr
1976Niedersorbische Grammatik für den Gebrauch der Sorbischen Erweiterten Oberschule. Budyšin: Domowina.Google Scholar
Janda, Laura A. & Lyashevskaya, Olga
2012Semantic profiles of five Russian prefixes: po-, s-, za-, na-, pro-. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 21: 211–258.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Junghanns, Uwe
1997On byť (and byti). In Formale Slavistik [Leipziger Schriften zur Kultur-, Literatur-, Sprach- und Übersetzungswissenschaft 7], Uwe Junghanns & Gerhild Zybatow (eds), 251–265. Frankfurt: Vervuert.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Stefan, Ichikawa, Yasuko, Kobayashi, Noriko & Yamamoto, Hilofumi
2013Japanese: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kalakuckaja, Larisa P.
1971Ad”ektivacija pričastij v sovremennom russkom literaturnom jazyke. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Kaleta, Zofia
1995Gramatyka języka polskiego dla cudzoziemców. Kraków: Uniwersytet Jagielloński.Google Scholar
Karlík, Petr
2004Pasivum v češtině. Slovo a slovesnost 65: 82–113.Google Scholar
Karlík, Petr, Nekula, Marek & Rusínová, Zdenka
(eds) 1995Příruční mluvnice češtiny. Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny.Google Scholar
Katz, Jerrold J. & Postal, Paul M.
1964An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kayne Richard
2004Here and there. In Lexique, Syntaxe et Lexique-Grammaire/Syntax, Lexis, and Lexicon-Grammar: Papers in Honour of Maurice Gross [Lingvisticæ Investigationes Supplementa 24], Christian Leclère, Éric Laporte, Mireille Piot & Max Silberztein (eds), 253–275. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Christopher & Levin, Beth
2008Measure of change: The adjectival core of degree achievements. In Adjectives and Adverbs: Syntax, Semantics and Discourse, Louise McNally & Chris Kennedy (eds), 156–182. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kennedy, Rod
1984Semantic roles – the language speaker’s categories (in Kala Lagaw Ya). Papers in Australian Linguistics 16: 153–169.Google Scholar
Kiparsky, Paul
1998Partitive case and aspect. In The Projection of Arguments: Lexical and Compositional Factors, Miriam Butt & Wilhelm Geuder (eds), 265–307. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Klein, Wolfgang
1990Überall und nirgendwo. Subjektive und objektive Momente in der Raumreferenz. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik 78: 9–42.Google Scholar
1991Raumausdrücke. Linguistische Berichte 132: 77–114.Google Scholar
1994Time in Language. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
1995A time-relational analysis of Russian aspect. Language 71: 669–695.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Komárek, Miroslav
1984Prefixace a slovesný vid: K prefixům prostě vidovým a subsumpci. Slovo a slovesnost 45: 257–267.Google Scholar
2006Příspěvky k české morfologii. Olomouc: Periplum.Google Scholar
Koopman, Hilda J.
2000Prepositions, postpositions, circumpositions and particles: The structure of Dutch PPs. In The Syntax of Specifiers and Heads: Collected Essays of Hilda J. Koopman, Hilda J. Koopman (ed.), 204–260. London: Routledge.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kopečný, František
1958Základy české skladby. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.Google Scholar
1959Forma v syntaxi. Jazykovědné studie 4: 51–52.Google Scholar
1962Slovesný vid v češtině. Praha: Nakladatelství Československé akademie věd.Google Scholar
1973Etymologický slovník slovanských jazyků. Slova gramatická a zájmena. Praha: Academia.Google Scholar
Kosta, Peter & Frasek, Jens
2004Neakuzativita (ergativita) vs. neergativita v češtině, polštině a jiných slovanských jazycích na rozhraní morfologie a syntaxe. In Čeština – univerzália a specifika 5, Zdeňka Hladká & Petr Karlík (eds), 172–194. Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny.Google Scholar
Kracht, Marcus
2002On the semantics of locatives. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 157–232.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008The fine structure of spatial expressions. In Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 120], Ana Asbury, Jakub Dotlačil, Berit Gehrke & Rick Nouwen (eds), 35–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika
1994The event argument and the semantics of voice. Ms, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.Google Scholar
2000Building statives. In Proceedings of the Berkeley Linguistics Society 26, Lisa J. Conathan, Jeff Good, Danya Kavitskaya, Alyssa B. Wulf & Alan C. L. Yu (eds), 385–399. Berkeley CA: Berkeley Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Krchňavá, Kristina
2010Verbální a adjektivní participia v češtině. MA dissertation, Masarykova univerzita Brno.Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred
1989Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution. Zur Semantik von Massentermen, Pluraltermen und Aspektklassen. München: Fink.Google Scholar
1992Thematic relations as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In Lexical Matters, Ivan A. Sag & Anna Szabolcsi (eds), 29–53. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Lamprecht, Arnošt, Šlosar, Dušan & Bauer, Jaroslav
1986Historická mluvnice češtiny. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Lang, Ewald
1991A two-level approach to projective prepositions. In Approaches to Prepositions, Gisela Rauh (ed.), 127–167. Tübingen: Gunter Narr.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard K.
1988On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335–391.Google Scholar
Lees, Robert
1960The Grammar of English Nominalizations. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Christian
1984Der Relativsatz. Typologie seiner Strukturen. Theorie seiner Funktionen. Kompendium seiner Grammatik. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Volkmar
2009Aspekt und Tempus. In Slavische Sprachen – Slavic Languages [HSK 32.1], Sebastian Kempgen, Peter Kosta, Tilman Berger & Karl Gutschmidt (eds), 526–556. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Winfred P.
1993Theoretical Bases of Indo-European Linguistics. New York NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lenerz, Jürgen
1984Syntaktischer Wandel und Grammatiktheorie: eine Untersuchung an Beispielen aus der Sprachgeschichte des Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Leu, Thomas
2008The Internal Syntax of Determiners. PhD dissertation, New York University.
Levin, Beth & Rappaport, Malka
1986The formation of adjectival passives. Linguistic Inquiry 17: 623–661.Google Scholar
Levin, Beth & Rappaport Hovav, Malka
1995Unaccusativity: At the Syntax-Lexical Semantics Interface. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Mahajan, Anoop
1997Universal grammar and the typology of ergative languages. In Studies on Universal Grammar and Typological Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 13], Artemis Alexiadou & Tracy Alan Hall (eds), 35–57. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Maienborn, Claudia
2007Das Zustandspassiv: Grammatische Einordnung – Bildungsbeschränkungen – Interpretationsspielraum. Zeitschrift für germanistische Linguistik 35: 83–114.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Marantz, Alec
2001Words and things. Ms, MIT.Google Scholar
2007Phases and words. In Phases in the Theory of Grammar, Sook-Hee Choe (ed.), 191–222. Seoul: Dong In.Google Scholar
Mareš, Franz Wenzel
1984Die partielle Neutralisierung der markierten präpositionalen Rektion in der russischen und weissrussischen Gegenwartssprache. Wiener slawistischer Almanach 13: 197–209.Google Scholar
Markova, Angelina
2011On the nature of Bulgarian prefixes: Ordering and modification in multiple prefixation. Word Structure 4: 244–271.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Markowski, Andrzej
(ed.) 2000Nowy słownik poprawnej polszczyzny. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Maslov, Jurij S.
1958Rol’ tak nazyvaemoj perfektivacii i imperfektivacii v processe vozniknovenija slavjanskogo glagol’nogo vida. Doklady 4 meždunarodnogo c”ezda slavistov Moskva 1958. Moskva: Izdatel’stvo AN SSSR.Google Scholar
1988Resultative, perfect, and aspect. In Typology of Resultative Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 12], Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), 63–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matushansky, Ora
2002On formal identity of Russian prefixes and prepositions. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 42: 217–253.Google Scholar
2008A case study of predication. In Studies in Formal Slavic Linguistics. Contributions from Formal Description of Slavic Languages 6.5, Franc Marušič & Rok Žaucer (eds), 213–239. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
McCawley, James D.
1988Adverbial NPs: Bare or clad in see-through garb? Language 64: 583–590.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
McIntyre, Andrew
2002Idiosyncrasy in particle verbs. In Verb-Particle Explorations, Nicole Dehé, Ray Jackendoff, Andrew McIntyre & Silke Urban (eds), 97–118. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006The integration of directional PPs: Thoughts on the way to getting towards knowing if we are (be)coming or going. Paper presented at the Conference on the Syntax and Semantics of Spatial Prepositions, June 2–4, 2006, Utrecht Institute of Linguistics OTS, Utrecht University.
2007Particle verbs and argument structure. Language and Linguistics Compass 1: 350–367.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Adjectival passives and adjectival participles in English. In Non-Canonical Passives [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 205], Artemis Alexiadou & Florian Schäfer (eds), 21–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015aParticle verb formation. In Word-Formation. An International Handbook of the Languages of Europe, Vol. 1 [HSK 40.1], Peter O. Müller, Ingeborg Ohnheiser, Susan Olsen & Franz Rainer (eds), 434–449. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
2015bEvent modifiers in (German) adjectival passives: Remarks on Gehrke (this issue). Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33: 939–953.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Medová, Lucie
2012Anticausatives are derived unergatives. In Slavic Languages in Formal Grammar. Proceedings of FDSL 8.5, Brno 2010, Markéta Ziková & Mojmir Dočekal (eds), 291–306. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Meltzer-Asscher, Aya
2011Adjectival passives in Hebrew: Evidence for parallelism between the adjectival and verbal systems. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29: 815–855.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Merchant, Jason
2006Polyvalent cases, geometric hierarchies, and split ergativity. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Jackie Bunting, Sapna Desai, Robert Peachey, Chris Straughn & Zuzana, Tomkova (eds), 47–67. Chicago IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Miklosich, Franz
1926Vergleichende Grammatik der slavischen Sprachen, Vol. IV: Syntax . Heidelberg: Carl Winters.Google Scholar
Miller, Gary D.
1993Complex Verb Formation [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 116]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Młynarczyk, Anna Katarzyna
2004Aspectual Pairing in Polish. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.Google Scholar
Mulder, René
1992The Aspectual Nature of Syntactic Complementation. PhD dissertation, Rijksuniversiteit Leiden.
Müller, Gereon
1995A-Bar Syntax. A Study of Movement Types. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1998Incomplete Category Fronting: A Derivational Approach to Remnant Movement in German. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2004A distributed morphology approach to syncretism in Russian noun inflection. In Proceedings of the 12th Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics. The Ottawa Meeting 2003, Olga Arnaudova, Wayles Browne, Maria Luisa Rivero & Danijlo Stojanovic (eds), 353–373. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Müller, Gereon & Sternefeld, Wolfgang
1995Extraction, lexical variation and the theory of barriers. In Lexical Knowledge in the Organization of Language [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 114], Urs Egli, Peter E. Pause, Christoph Schwarze, Arnim von Stechow & Götz Wienold (eds), 35–80. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nedjalkov, Vladimir P. & Jachontov, Sergej Je
1988The typology of resultative constructions. In Typology of Resultative Constructions [Typological Studies in Language 12], Vladimir P. Nedjalkov (ed.), 3–62. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Neidle, Carol
1988The Role of Case in Russian Syntax. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Němec, Igor
1954O slovanské předponě po- slovesné. Slavia 23: 1–22.Google Scholar
1956Kategorie determinovanosti a indeterminovanosti jako základ slovanské kategorie vidu. Slavia 25: 496–534.Google Scholar
1958Vznik a vývoj vidu v souvislosti s vývojem tvoření slovesných kmenů. In Československé přednášky pro IV. mezinárodní sjezd slavistů v Moskvě. Praha, 137–150.Google Scholar
Noonan, Máire
2010À to zu. In Mapping Spatial PPs. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 6, Guglielmo Cinque & Luigi Rizzi (eds), 161–195. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nossalik, Larissa
2007Slavic perfective prefixes: Are they telicity markers? In Proceedings of the 2007 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association, Milica Radišić (ed.). http://​www​.chass​.utoronto​.ca​/~cla​-acl​/actes2007​/Nossalik​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Noyer, Rolf
1997Features, Positions and Affixes in Autonomous Morphological Structure. New York NY: Garland.Google Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey
1995Transfers of meanings. Journal of Semantics 12: 109–132.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey, Sag, Ivan A. & Wasow, Thomas
1994Idioms. Language 70: 491–538.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Nunes, Jairo
2004Linearization of Chains and Sideward Movement. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Nübler, Norbert
2004Česká participia ze syntaktického hlediska. In Čeština – univerzália a specifika 5, Zdeňka Hladká & Peter Karlík (eds), 384–390. Praha: Nakladatelství Lidové noviny.Google Scholar
Oertle, Simon
2016Die slavischen Verbalpräfixe und Präpositionen: Polysemie und Grammatikalisierung. Herne: Gabriele Schäfer Verlag.Google Scholar
Paducheva, Elena
1998On non-compatibility of partitive and imperfective in Russian. Theoretical Linguistics 24: 73–82.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Panevová, Jarmila, Benešová, Eva & Sgall, Petr
1971Čas a modalita v češtině. Praha: Universita Karlova.Google Scholar
Pantcheva, Marina B.
2008The place of PLACE in Persian. In Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 120], Ana Asbury, Jakub Dotlačil, Berit Gehrke & Rick Nouwen (eds), 305–330. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2011Decomposing Path: The Nanosyntax of Directional Expressions. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.Google Scholar
Parsons, Terence
1990Events in the Semantics of English. A Study in Subatomic Semantics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Paslawska, Alla & von Stechow, Arnim
2003Perfect readings in Russian. In Perfect Explorations, Artemis Alexiadou, Monika Rathert & Arnim von Stechow (eds), 307–362. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paul, Hermann & Stolte, Heinz
1962Kurze deutsche Grammatik: Auf Grund der fünfbändigen deutschen Grammatik 3rd edn. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Pauliny, Eugen
1950Odvodzovanie slovies podl’a slovesného vidu. Slovo a tvar 4: 88–93.Google Scholar
Pauliny, Eugen, Ružička, Jozef & Štolc, Jozef
1967Slovenská gramatika. Bratislava: Slovenské pedagogické nakladateľstvo.Google Scholar
Pereltsvaig, Asya
2000On accusative adverbials in Russian and Finnish. In Adverbs and Adjunction, Artemis Alexiadou & Peter Svenonius (eds), 155–176. Potsdam: Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
2004Aspect lost, aspect regained: Restructuring of aspectual marking in American Russian. In Aspectual Inquiries, Paula Kempchinsky & Roumyana Slabakova (eds), 369–395. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
2006Small nominals. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24: 433–500.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pesetsky, David
1995Zero Syntax: Experiencers and Cascades. Cambridge MA: The MIT. Press.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David & Torrego, Esther
2004Tense, case, and the nature of syntactic categories. In The Syntax of Time, Jacqueline Guéron & Jacqueline Lecarme (eds), 495–539. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
2006Probes, goals and syntactic categories. In Proceedings of the Seventh Tokyo Conference on Psycholinguistics, Yukio Otsu (ed.), 25–61. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar
Petr, Jan
(ed.) 1986aMluvnice češtiny 1. Fonetika – Fonologie – Morfonologie a morfemika – Tvoření slov. Praha: Academia.
(ed.) 1986bMluvnice češtiny, II: Tvarosloví. Praha: Academia.Google Scholar
Piernikarski, Cezar
1975Czasowniki z prefiksem po- w języku polskim i czeskim na tle rodzajów akcji w językach słowiańskich. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Piñón, Christopher J.
1994Accumulation and aspectuality in Polish. In Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society, Mercè Gonzàles (ed.), 491–506. Amherst MA: University of Massachusetts.Google Scholar
1995An Ontology for Event Semantics. PhD dissertation, Stanford University.
Pitz, Anneliese P.
1994Nominal Signs in German. PhD dissertation, Trondheim University.
Przybylska, Renata
2002Polisemia przyimków polskich w świetle semantyki kognitywnej. Kraków: Universitas.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, James
1995The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ramchand, Gillian C.
2004Time and the event: The semantics of Russian prefixes. Nordlyd 32.2: Special Issue on Slavic Prefixes: 323–361.Google Scholar
2008Verb Meaning and the Lexicon. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rapp, Irene
1996Zustand? Passiv? – Überlegungen zum sogenannten „Zustandspassiv“. Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 15: 231–265.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997Partizipien und semantische Struktur. Zu passivischen Konstruktionen mit dem 3. Status. Tübingen: Staufenburg.Google Scholar
Reichenbach, Hans
1947Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Rejzek, Jiří
2001Český etymologický slovník. Voznice: Leda.Google Scholar
Richards, Norvin
2013Lardil “case stacking” and the timing of case assignment. Syntax 16: 42–76.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Kylie
2007Case and Aspect in Slavic. Oxford: OUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk C.
1978A Case Study in Syntactic Markedness: The Binding Nature of Prepositional Phrases. Amsterdam: Peter de Ridder Press.Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk C.
1990Functional prepositions. In Unity in Diversity, Pinkster, Harm & Genée Inge (eds), 229–241. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk
2007Case in spatial adpositional phrases: The dative-accusative alternation in German. In Pitar Mos: A Building with a View. Festschrift for Alexandra Cornilescu, Gabriela Alboiu, Andrei Avram, Larisa Avram & Isac Dana (eds), 1–23. Bucharest: Bucharest University Press,Google Scholar
van Riemsdijk, Henk C. & Huijbregts, Riny
2002Location and locality. In Progress in Grammar: Articles at the 20th Anniversary of the Comparison of Grammatical Models Group in Tilburg, Marc van Oostendorp & Elena Anagnostopoulou (eds), 339–364. Amsterdam: Meertens Instituut.Google Scholar
Roberts, Ian & Roussou, Anna
1999A formal approach to grammaticalization. Linguistics 37: 1011–1041.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2003Syntactic change. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Romanova, Eugenia
2004Superlexical vs. lexical prefixes. Nordlyd 32.2: Special Issue on Slavic Prefixes : 255–278.Google Scholar
2006Constructing Perfectivity in Russian. PhD dissertation, University of Tromsø.
Rosenbaum, Peter
1967The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ross, John R.
1967Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD dissertation, Cambridge, MA: MIT.Google Scholar
Rozwadowska, Bożena
2003Initial boundary and telicity in the semantics of perfectivity. In Investigations into Formal Slavic Linguistics. Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Formal Description of Slavic Languages – FDSL 4, Potsdam, 28–30 November 2001, Peter Kosta, Joanna Błaszczak, Jens Frasek, Ljudmila Geist & Marzena Żygis (eds), 859–872. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Rozwadowska, Bożena & Willim, Ewa
2004The role of the accusative/partitive alternation in aspectual composition in Polish. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 39: 125–142.Google Scholar
Rubach, Jerzy
1984Cyclic and Lexical Phonology. The Structure of Polish. Dordrecht: Foris.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rusínová, Zdena
1984Tvoření staročeských adverbií. Brno: Univerzita Jana Evangelisty Purkyně.Google Scholar
Rytel-Schwarz, Danuta, Jurasz, Alina, Cirko, Lesław & Engel, Ulrich
2012Deutsch-polnische kontrastive Grammatik, Bd. 4: Die unflektierbaren Wörter. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
van Schooneveld, Cornelis H.
1951The aspect system of the Old Church Slavonic and Old Russian verbum finitum byti . Word 7: 96–103.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
van Schooneveld Cornelis H.
1959The so-called „préverbes vides“ and neutralization. In Dutch Contributions to the Fourth International Congess of Slavicists: Moscow, September 1958, 159–161. S-Gravenhage: Mouton.Google Scholar
van Schooneveld, Cornelis H.
1986Jakobson’s case system and syntax. In Case in Slavic, Richard D. Brecht & James S. Levine (eds), 373–385. Columbus: Slavica.Google Scholar
Schoorlemmer, Maaike
1995Participial Passive and Aspect in Russian. PhD dissertation, Universiteit Utrecht [OTS Dissertation Series].
1997The role of the internal argument in the Russian aspectual system. In Formale Slavistik, Uwe Junghanns & Gerhild Zybatow (eds), 229–239. Frankfurt: Vervuert.Google Scholar
Sekaninová, Ella
1980Sémantická analýza predponového slovesa v ruštine a slovenčine. Bratislava: Veda.Google Scholar
Skibicki, Monika
2007Polnische Grammatik. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar
Skoumalová, Zdena
1968O komplexní analýzu verbální prefixace. In Kapitoly ze srovnávací mluvnice ruské a české 3. O ruském slovese, Alexandr Vasiljevič Isačenko (ed.), 153–231. Praha: Academia.Google Scholar
Smith, Carlota S.
1991The Parameter of Aspect. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Smyth, Herbert W.
1920/1974Greek Grammar. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Starke, Michal
2001Move Dissolves into Merge. PhD dissertation, University of Geneva.
von Stechow, Arnim
1996The different readings of wieder “again”. Journal of Semantics 13: 87–138.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2006Spatial prepositions in interval semantics. Paper presented at the Semantics Network Worskhop, Barcelona, September 2006.
2007Syntactic and lexical causativization: cause and become again. Draft 10.1.2007. http://​www​.sfs​.uni​-tuebingen​.de​/~astechow​/Handouts​/StechowBruessel​.pdfGoogle Scholar
Stiebels, Barbara
1996Lexikalische Argumente und Adjunkte: Zum semantischen Beitrag von verbalen Präfixen und Partikeln. Berlin: Akademie.Google Scholar
1998Complex denominal verbs in German and the morphology-semantics interface. In Yearbook of Morphology 1997, Geert Booij & Jaap van Marle (eds), 265–302. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Stiebels, Barbara & Wunderlich, Dieter
1994Morphology feeds syntax: The case of particle verbs. Linguistics 32: 913–968.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Stroik, Thomas S.
1996Minimalism, Scope, and VP Structure. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Svenonius, Peter
2003Limits on P: Filling in holes vs. falling in holes. In Nordlyd 31: Proceedings of the 19th Scandinavian Conference of Linguistics, 431–445.Google Scholar
2004Slavic prefixes inside and outside VP. Nordlyd 32(2): Special Issue on Slavic Prefixes: 205–253.Google Scholar
2006The emergence of axial parts. Nordlyd 33: 49–77.Google Scholar
2007Adpositions, particles, and the arguments they introduce. In Argument Structure [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 108], Eric J. Reuland, Tanmoy Bhattacharya & Giogos Spathas (eds), 63–103. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Projections of P. In Syntax and Semantics of Spatial P [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 120], Ana Asbury, Jakub Dotlačil, Berit Gehrke & Rick Nouwen (eds), 63–84. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
de Swart, Henriёtte
2012Verbal aspect. In The Oxford Handbook of Tense and Aspect, Robert I. Binnick (ed.), 753–780. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Szober, Stanisław
1957Gramatyka języka polskiego. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Szucsich, Luka
2007Die (Ohn)Macht zur Veränderung: (Morpho)Syntaktische Eigenschaften von Präfixen in slavischen Sprachen. In Linguistische Beiträge zur Slavistik XIV, Ljudmila Geist & Grit Mehlhorn (eds), 177–196. München: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
2014Restriktionen bei mehrfacher Prä- und Suffigierung. In Linguistische Beiträge zur Slavistik. XXI. JungslavistInnen-Treffen in Göttingen, 13.-15. September 2012 [Specimina Philologiae Slavicae 180], Hagen Pitsch (ed.), 199–217. München: Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
Šimík, Radek
2011Modal Existential Wh-Constructions. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen [LOT Dissertation Series 269].Google Scholar
Šlosar, Dušan
1981Slovotvorný vývoj českého slovesa. Brno: Univerzita Jana Purkyně.Google Scholar
Śmiech, Witold
1986Derywacja prefiksalna czasowników polskich. Wrocław, Warszawa, Kraków: Zakład Narodowy imienia Ossolińskich, Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Šmilauer, Vladimír
1969Novočeská skladba. Praha: Státní pedagogické nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Štícha, František
1986Systémový a funkční status konstrukcí s n/t-ovými participii v současné češtině. Slovo a slovesnost 47: 177–185.Google Scholar
Švedova, Natal’ja Ju
(ed.) 1970Grammatika sovremennogo russkogo literaturnogo jazyka. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
(ed.) 1980Russkaja grammatika. Moskva: Nauka.Google Scholar
Takahashi, Shoichi
2010The hidden side of clausal complements. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28: 343–380.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Taraldsen, Tarald & Medová, Lucie
2007The Czech locative chameleon. Nordlyd 34(2): Special issue on Space, Motion, and Result, 200–238.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Tatevosov, Sergei
2007Measuring individuals, partitioning events: Semantics of cumulative verbs in Russian. In Linguistic Investigations into Formal Description of Slavic Languages, Peter Kosta & Lilia Schürcks (eds), 529–544. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
2008Intermediate prefixes in Russian. In Proceedings of the Annual Workshop on Formal Approaches to Slavic Linguistics 16. The Stony Brook Meeting, Andrei Antonenko, John F. Bailyn & Christina Y. Bethin (eds), 423–445. Ann Arbor MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.Google Scholar
Tichonov, Aleksandr N.
1964Čistovidovye pristavki v sisteme russkogo vidovogo formoobrazovanija. Voprosy jazykoznanija 1: 42–52.Google Scholar
Timofeev, Kirill A.
1966O funkcijax glagol’noj pristavki po- v russkom jazyke. In Voprosy jazyka i literatury 1: 29–41. Novosibirsk: Novosibirskij gosudarstvennyj universitet.Google Scholar
Tokarski, Jan
2001Fleksja polska. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Trávníček, František
1923Studie o českém vidu slovesném. Praha: Česká akademie věd a umění.Google Scholar
1951Mluvnice spisovné češtiny II. Skladba. Praha: Slovanské nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Vasmer, Max
1976Russisches etymologisches Wörterbuch. Heidelberg: Carl Winter Universitätsverlag.Google Scholar
Večerka, Radoslav
1999Das Präfix po- als Morphem des imperfektiven Futurs in den altkirchenslavischen Denkmälern. In Festschrift für Klaus Trost zum 65. Geburtstag. Die Welt der Slaven, Vol. 5, Ernst Hansack, Walter Koschmal, Norbert Nübler & Radoslav Večerka (eds), 301–305. München: Verlag Otto Sagner.Google Scholar
2006Staroslověnština v kontextu slovanských jazyků. Olomouc, Praha: Euroslavica.
Verkuyl, Henk J.
1972On the Compositional Nature of the Aspects. Dordrecht: Reidel.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1999Aspectual Issues: Studies on Time and Quantity. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Veselovská, Ludmila
2008The extended verbal projection in Czech: Three variants of the verb be . In Formal Description of Slavic Languages. The Fifth Conference, Leipzig 2003, Gerhild Zybatow, Luka Szucsich, Uwe Junghanns & Roland Meyer (eds), 555–569. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Veselovská, Ludmila & Karlík, Petr
2004Analytic passives in Czech. Zeitschrift für Slawistik 49: 163–235.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Vinogradov, Viktor V.
1947Russkij jazyk (grammatičeskoe učenie o slove). Moskva, Leningrad: Gosudarstvennoe učebno-pedagogičeskoe izdatel’stvo Ministerstva prosveščenija RSFSR.
1952Grammatika russkogo jazyka. Moskva: Izdatel'stvo Akademii nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Walinska de Hackbeil, Hanna
1986The Roots of Phrase Structure: The Syntactic Basis of English Morphology. PhD dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
Weinsberg, Adam
1973Przyimki przestrzenne w jȩzyku polskim, niemieckim i rumuńskim. Wrocław, Warszawa, Kraków, Gdaňsk: Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Weiss, Daniel
1977Syntax und Semantik polnischer Partizipialkonstruktionen im Rahmen einer generativ-transformationellen Sprachbeschreibung. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Wexler, Kenneth & Culicover, Peter W.
1980Formal Principles of Language Acquisition. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Wierzbicka, Anna
1967On the semantics of verbal aspect in Polish. In To Honor Roman Jakobson: Essays on the Occasion of his Seventieth Birthday, 2231–2249. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Wiese, Bernd
2004Über Lokalisationssysteme. Zur Struktur des Inventars der deutschen Lokalpräpositionen mit Berücksichtigung finno-ugrischer Lokalkasussysteme. Ms, Mannheim: Institut für Deutsche Sprache.
Wiland, Bartosz
2012Prefix stacking, syncretism, and the syntactic hierarchy. In Slavic Languages in Formal Grammar. Proceedings of FDSL 8.5, Brno 2010, Markéta Ziková & Mojmir Dočekal (eds), 307–324. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Wiltschko, Martina
2014The Universal Structure of Categories: Towards a Formal Typology. Cambridge: CUP.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Wróbel, Henryk
2001Gramatyka języka polskiego: podręcznik akademicki. Kraków: Od nowa.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter
1987An investigation of lexical composition: The case of German be-verbs. Linguistics 25: 283–331.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1991How do prepositional phrases fit into compositional syntax and semantics? Linguistics 29: 591–621.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1993On German um: Semantic and conceptual aspects. Linguistics 31: 111–133.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2012Lexical decomposition in Grammar. In The Oxford Handbook of Compositionality, Markus Werning, Wolfram Hinzen & Edouard Machery (eds), 307–327. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Wunderlich, Dieter & Herweg, Michael
1991Lokale und Direktionale. In Semantik. Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung [HSK 6], Arnim von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds), 758–785. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Yadroff, Michael & Franks, Steven
2001The origin of prepositions. In Current Issues in Formal Slavic Linguistics, Gerhild Zybatow, Uwe Junghanns, Grit Mehlhorn & Luka Szucsich (eds), 69–79. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Zaliznjak, Anna A. & Šmelёv, Aleksej D.
1997Lekcii po russkoj aspektologii. München: Otto Sagner.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2000Vvedenie v russkuju aspektologiju. Moskva: Jazyki russkoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Zeller, Jochen
2001aLexical particles, semi-lexical postpositions. In Semi-Lexical Categories, Norbert Corver & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 505–549. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001bParticle Verbs and Local Domains [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 41]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Niina Ning
2002Movement within a spatial phrase. In Perspectives on Prepositions, Hubert Cuyckens & Gunter Radden (eds), 47–63. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Zimmermann, Ilse
2009Satzmodus. In The Slavic Languages. An International Handbook of their Structure, their History and their Investigation, Sebastian Kempgen, Peter Kosta, Tilman Berger & Karl Gutschmidt (eds), 484–509. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zinova, Yulia & Filip, Hana
2015Biaspectual verbs: A marginal category? In Logic, Language, and Computation. 10th International Tbilisi Symposium on Logic, Language, and Computation, TbiLLC 2013, Gudauri, Georgia, September 23–27, 2013, Martin Aher, Daniel Hole, Emil Jeřábek & Clemens Kupke (eds), 310–332. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Zwarts, Joost
2005Prepositional aspect and the algebra of paths. Linguistics and Philosophy 28: 739–779.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008Aspect of a typology of direction. In Theoretical and Crosslinguistic Approaches to the Semantics of Aspects [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 110], Susan D. Rothstein (ed.), 79–106. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Žaucer, Rok
2009A VP-Internal/Resultative Analysis of 4 “VP-External” Uses of Slavic Verbal Prefixes. PhD dissertation, University of Ottawa.
2012The syntax of perdurative-prefixed verbs (and the VP-internal/VP-external prefix distinction). In Slavic Languages in Formal Grammar. Proceedings of FDSL 8.5, Brno 2010, Markéta Ziková & Mojmir Dočekal (eds), 339–355. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Subjects
BIC Subject: CFG – Semantics, Pragmatics, Discourse Analysis
BISAC Subject: LAN009060 – LANGUAGE ARTS & DISCIPLINES / Linguistics / Syntax
U.S. Library of Congress Control Number:  2018061042 | Marc record