Abe, Jun. 2014. Make short answers shorter: Support for the in-situ approach. Ms, Tohoko Gakuin University.
Abe, Jun & Tancredi, Christopher. 2013. Non-constituent deaccenting and deletion: A phase-based approach. Ms, Tohoku Gakuin University and Keio Tancredi.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Abeillé, Anne, Bîlbie, Gabriela & Mouret, François. 2014. A Romance perspective on gapping constructions. In Romance Perspectives on Construction Grammar [Constructional Approaches to Language 15], Hans C. Boas & Francisco Gonzálvez-García (eds), 227–265. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Abels, Klaus. 2012a. Don’t repair that island! It ain’t broke. Presented at Islands in Contemporary Linguistic Theory. < [URL]> ![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Abels, Klaus. 2012b. The Italian left periphery: A view from locality. Linguistic Inquiry 43: 229–254. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Abels, Klaus. 2016. Locality of covert operations: Lessons from multiple sluicing. Paper presented at the Ellipsis across Borders Conference, 20–21 June, Sarajevo University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Abels, Klaus & Neeleman, Ad. 2009. Universal 20 without the LCA. In Merging Features: Computation, Interpretation, and Acquisition, José M. Brucart, Anna Gavarró & Joan Solà (eds). Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aboh, Enoch. 2004. The Morphosyntax of Complement – Head Sequences. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ackema, Peter & Neeleman, Ad. 2004. Beyond Morphology: Interface Conditions on Word Formation. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Adger, David. 2003. Core Syntax. A Minimalist Approach. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aelbrecht, Lobke. 2011. The Syntactic Licensing of Ellipsis [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 149]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aelbrecht, Lobke. 2016. What ellipsis can do for phases, and what it can’t, but not why. Linguistic Review 33(4): 453–482. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Aijmer, Karin. 1989. Themes and tails: The discourse functions of dislocated elements. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 12: 137–154. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
An, Duk-Ho. 2007. Syntax at the PF Interface: Prosodic Mapping, Linear Order, and Deletion. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 2003. The Syntax of Ditransitives: Evidence from Clitics. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anagnostopoulou, Elena. 2006. Clitic doubling. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. 1, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 519–581. Oxford: Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Angelopoulos, Nikos and Dominique, Sportiche 2017. Scrambling(s)+clitics=CLLD (The case of French). Paper presented at the 2016 Going Romance conference at Goethe Universität Frankfurt![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arregi, Karlos. 2003. Clitic left dislocation is contrastive topicalization. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 9(1): 31–44.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arregi, Karlos. 2010. Ellipsis in split questions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 28: 539–592. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Astruc, Lluisa. 2004. Right dislocations: Influence of information structure on prosodic phrasing and intonation. Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1: 1–14.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Authier, J.-Marc & Haegeman, Liliane. 2015. French adverbial clayses, rescue by ellipsis and the truncation vs intervention approach. Probus 27: 33–71. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Averintseva-Klisch, Maria. 2008b. To the right of the clause: Right dislocation vs. afterthought. In ‘Subordination’ vs. ‘Coordination’ in Sentence and Text. A Cross-linguistic Perspective [Studies in Language Companion Series 98], Catherine Fabricius-Hansen & Wiebke Ramm (eds), 217–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Averintseva-Klisch, Maria & Buecking, Sebastian. 2008. Dislocating NPs to the right: Anything goes? Semantic and pragmatic constraints. In Proceedings of SuB12, Atle Grønn (ed.), 32–46. Oslo: University of Oslo.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bach, Emmon & Horn, George. 1976. Remarks on ‘Conditions on Transformations’. Linguistic Inquiry 7: 265–299.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Baker, Mark. 2003. Lexical Categories. Verbs, Nouns and Adjectives. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barker, Chris. 2012. Quantificational binding does not require c-command. Linguistic Inquiry 43: 614–633. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barrenechea, Ana María. 1973. A propósito de la elipsis en la coordinación. In Studia Hispanica in Honorem R. Lapesa, Vol. II, 105–121. Madrid: Gredos.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barros, Matthew. 2014. Sluicing and Identity in Ellipsis. PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Barros, Matthew, Elliott, Patrick & Thoms, Gary. 2014. There is no island repair. Ms, Rutgers, UCL & University of Edinburgh.
Batllori, Montserrat & Hernanz, M. Lluïsa. 2009. Foco oracional y polaridad: En torno a una asimetría entre el español y el catalán. In Actas del VIII cogreso internacional de historia de la lengua española, Emilio Montero Cartelle (ed.), 2621–2636. Santiago de Compostela.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belletti, Adriana. 1998. Inversion as focalization. Ms, University of Siena.
Belletti, Adriana. 2001. Inversion as focalization. In Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar, Aafke C. J. Hulk & J.-Yves Pollock (eds), 60–90. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belletti, Adriana. 2004. Aspects of the low IP area. In The Structure of CP and IP, The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Luigi Rizzi (ed.). Oxford: Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Belloro, Valeria A. 2015. To the Right of the Verb: An Investigation of Clitic Doubling and Right Dislocation in Three Spanish Dialects. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benincà, Paola. 2001. The position of topic and focus in the left periphery. In Current Studies in Italian Syntax. Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 39–64. Amsterdam: Elsevier.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Benincà, Paola & Poletto, Cecilia. 2004. Topic, Focus and V2: Defining the CP sublayers. In The Structure of CP and IP. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Luigi Rizzi (ed.). Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Berruto, G. 1985. Dislocazioni a sinistra e grammatica dell’italiano parlato. In Sintassi e morfologia della lingua italiana d’uso. Teoria e applicazioni descrittive, Annalisa Franchi de Bellis & Leonardo Maria Savoia (eds), 59–82. Roma: Bulzoni.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bianchi, Valentina & Frascarelli, Mara. 2010. Is topic a root phenomenon? Iberia 2(1): 43–88.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bleam, Tonia. 1999. Leísta Spanish and the Syntax of Clitic Doubling. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.
Boeckx, Cedric. 2008. Bare Syntax. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bolinger, Dwight. 1958. A theory of pitch accent in English. Word 14: 109–149. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bonet, Eulàlia. 1984. Aproximació a l’entonació del català central. MA thesis, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Bonet, Eulàlia. 1990. Subjects in Catalan. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics 13: 1–26.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Boone, Enrico. 2015. The Syntax and Licensing of Gapping and Fragments. PhD dissertation, University of Leiden.
Borer, Hagit. 1984. Parametric Syntax: Case Studies in Semitic and Romance Languages. Dordrecht: Foris. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bošković, Željko. 2014. Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase: On the variability of phases with extraction and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 45(1): 27–89. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bosque, Ignacio & Gallego, Ángel. 2014. Reconsidering subextraction: Evidence from Spanish. Borealis 3: 223–258. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bosque, Ignacio & Picallo, Carme. 1996. Postnominal adjectives in Spanish DPs. Journal of Linguistics 32: 349–385. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brucart, José M. 1987. La elisión sintáctica en español. Bellaterra: Publicacions de la UAB.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brucart, José M. 1999. La elipsis. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua Española, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte (eds), 2787–2863. Madrid: Espasa.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brucart, José M., Gallego, Ángel & Fernández-Sánchez, Javier. 2019. Ellipsis (in Romance languages). Ms, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona/Uniwersytet Gdański.
Bruening, Benjamin. 2009. Selectional asymmetries between CP and DP suggest that the DP hypothesis is wrong. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 15: 27–35.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bruening, Benjamin. 2015. Non-constituent coordination: Prosody, not movement. U. Penn Working Papers in Linguistics 21(1): article 5.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Brunetti, Lisa. 2003. “Information” focus movement in Italian and contextual constraints on ellipsis. In WCCFL 22: Proceedings of the 22nd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Gina Garding & Mimu Tsujimura (eds), 95–108. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Buell, Leston. 2008. VP-internal DPs and right-dislocation in Zulu. In Linguistics in the Netherlands, Vol. 25, Marjo van Koppen & Bert Botma (eds), 37–49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Büring, Daniel. 2003. On D-trees, beans and B-accents. Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 511–545. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Burton-Roberts, Noel. 1999. Language, linear precedence and parentheticals. In The Clause in English: In Honour of Rodney Huddleston [Studies in Language Companion Series 45], Peter Collins & David Lee (eds), 33–52. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Camacho, José. 2002. Wh-doubling: Implications for the syntax of wh movement. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 157–164. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Camacho, José. 2003. The coarse structure of the center periphery. Ms, Rutgers University.
Cardinaletti, Anna. 2002. Against optional and null clitics. Right dislocation vs. marginalization. Studia Linguistica 56: 29–57. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cecchetto, Carlo. 1999. A comparative analysis of left and right dislocation in Romance. Studia Linguistica 53: 40–67. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cecchetto, Carlo. 2000. Doubling structures and reconstruction. Probus 12(1): 1–34. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cecchetto, Carlo & Chierchia, Gennaro. 1999. Reconstruction in dislocation constructions and the syntax/semantics interface. In WCCFL 17: The Proceedings of the Seventeenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Kinary N. Shahin, Susan Blake & Eun-Sook Kimpp (eds), 132–146. Stanford CA: CSLI.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cecchetto, Carlo & Donati, Caterina. 2015. Please do not move that remnant too much! In Remnant Movement, Günther Grewendorf (ed.), 179–200. Berlin: De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chafe, Wallace L. 1976. Givenness, contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics and point of view. In Subject and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed.), 27–55. New York, NY: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1977. On wh-movement. In Formal Syntax, P. Culicover, T. Wasow, A. Akmajian (eds). New York NY: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. In The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Ken Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 2000. Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels & Juan Uriagereka (eds). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–54. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam. 2008. On phases. In Foundational Issues in Linguistic Theory: Essays in Honour of Jean-Roger Vergnaud, Maria-Luisa Zubizarreta, Robert Freidin & Carlos Peregrín Otero (eds). Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam & Lasnik, Howard. 1977. Filters and control. Linguistic Inquiry 8(3): 425–504.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, Noam & Lasnik, Howard. 1993. A minimalist program for linguistic theory. The View from Building 20. Essays in Linguistics in Honor of Sylvain Bromberger, Ken Hale & Samuel J. Keyser (eds), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chung, Sandra. 2005. Sluicing and the lexicon: The point of no return. In Proceedings of the 31st Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, Rebecca Cover & Yuni Kim (eds), 73–91. Berkeley CA: BLS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chung, Sandra. 2013. Syntactic identity in sluicing: How much and why. Linguistic Inquiry 44: 1–44. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chung, Sandra, Ladusaw, William & McCloskey, James. 2011. Sluicing(:) Between structure and inference. In Representing Language: Essays in Honor of Judith Aissen, Rodrigo Gutiérrez-Bravo, Line Mikkelsen & Eric Potsdam (eds), 31–50. San Diego CA: University of California.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1977. The movement nature of left dislocation. Linguistic Inquiry 8: 397–412.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1983. Topic constructions in some European languages and connectedness. In Connectedness in Sentence, Discourse and Text, Konrad Ehlich & Henk van Riemsijk (eds), 7–41. Tilburg: KUB.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of A-dependencies. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1993. A null theory of phrase and compound stress. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 239–297.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cinque, Guglielmo & Rizzi, Luigi. 2008. The cartography of syntactic structures. In CISCL Working Papers on Language and Cognition, Vol.2, Vicenzo Moscati (ed.), 43–59. Siena: Università degli Studi di Siena.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Constantini, Francesco. 2005. On obviation in subjunctive clauses: The state of the art. Annali di CaFoscari 44(1-2): 97–132.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Coppock, Elizabeth. 2001. Gapping: In defense of deletion. In Proceedings of the Chicago Linguistics Society, Mary Andronis (ed.), 133–147. Chicago IL: CLS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Crocco, Claudia. 2013. Is Italian clitic right dislocation grammaticalised? A prosodic analysis of YN-questions and statements. Lingua 133: 30–52. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cruschina, Silvio. 2010. Syntactic extraposition and clitic resumption in Italian. Lingua 120: 50–73. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Culicover, Peter W. & Jackendoff, Ray. 2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Cat, Cécile. 2002. French Dislocation. PhD dissertation, University of York.
De Cat (2007) French dislocation without movement, Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25: 485–534. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
De Cat, Cécile. 2007. French Dislocation. Interpretation, Syntax, Acquisition. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Delais-Roussaire, Elisabeth, Doetjes, Jenny & Sleeman, Petra. 2004. Dislocation. In Handbook of French Semantics, Francis Corblin & Henriëtte de Swart (eds), 505–530. Stanford CA: CSLI.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Demirdache, Hamida. 1991. Resumptive Chains in Restrictive Relatives, Appositives and Dislocation Structures. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Depiante, Marcela. 2000. The Syntax of Deep and Surface Anaphora. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut, Storrs.
Depiante, Marcela. 2004. Dos casos de elipsis con partícula de polaridad en español: Evidencia a favor de una visión no uniforme de la elipsis. Revista de la Sociedad Argentina de Lingüística 1: 53–69.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
den Dikken, Marcel. 2005. A comment on the topic of topic-comment. Lingua 115: 691–710. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen. 1990. Clitic doubling, wh-movement and quantification in Romanian. Linguistic Inquiry 21(3): 351–397.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Döring, Sandra. 2015. Parentheticals are – presumably – CPs. In Parenthesis and Ellipsis, Marlies Kluck, Dennis Ott & Mark de Vries (eds), 109–145. Berlin: De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Downing, Laura J. (2011). The prosody of dislocation in selected Bantu languages. Lingua 121: 722–786. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Duarte, Ineŝ & Figuereido-Silva, M. Cristina. 2016. The null subject parameter and the structure of the sentence in EP and BP. In The Handbook of Portuguese Linguistics, W. Leo Wetzels, João Costa & Sergio Menuzzi (eds), 234–253. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Emonds, Joseph. 1976. A Transformational Approach to English Syntax. New York, NY: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 1997. The Dynamics of Focus Structure. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Erteschik-Shir, Nomi. 2007. The architecture of topic and focus. In The Architecture of Focus, Valéria Molnár & Susanne Winkler (eds), 33–58. Berlin: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Escobar, Linda. 1995. Lefthand Satellites in Spanish. PhD dissertation, Utrecht University.
Espinal, Maria Teresa. 1991. The representation of disjunct constituents. Language 67: 726–762. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fábregas, Antonio. 2016. Complementizer phenomena in Spanish: Information structure and its syntactic manifestation. Borealis 5(2). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fanselow, Gisbert. 2006. On pure syntax (uncontaminated by information structure). In A Festschrift Presented to Günther Grewendorf on Occasion of his 60th Birthday, Patrick Brandt & Eric Fuss (eds), 137–157. Berlin: Akademie Verlag. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Feldhausen, Ingo. 2008. The Prosody-Syntax Interface in Catalan. PhD dissertation, University of Potsdam.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fernández-Lagunilla, Marina. 1983. El comportamiento de "un" con sustantivos y adjetivos en función de predicado nominal. Sobre el llamado "un" enfático. In Serta Philologica F. Lázaro Carreter, 195–208. Madrid: Cátedra.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fernández-Rubiera, Francisco J. 2014. When phonology undergenerates: Evidence from Asturian enclitic structures. In Proceedings of the 40th Berkeley Linguistics Society, 85–101. Berkeley CA: BLS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fernández-Sánchez, Javier. 2012. The Syntax of PredNPs. MA thesis, University College London.
Fernández-Sánchez, Javier. 2013. How left is right? Locating Romance CLRD. In XXIII Colloquium on Generative Grammar. Madrid.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fernández-Sánchez, Javier. 2016. Topics at the left edge of infinitive clauses in Spanish and Catalan. Borealis 5(2): 111–134. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fernández-Sánchez, Javier. 2017. Embedded gapping isn’t gapping. Ms, UAB/CLT.
Fernández-Sánchez, Javier. 2019. Against a clausal ellipsis account of all stripping strings in Spanish. Poznan Studies in Contemporary Linguistics 55(1): 53–89. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fiengo, Robert & May, Robert. 1994. Indices and Identity. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fortin, Catherine. 2007. Indonesian Sluicing and Verb Phrase Ellipsis: Description and Explanation in a Minimalist Framework. PhD dissertation, University of Michigan.
Fox, Danny. 1999a. Focus, parallelism and accomodation. In Proceedings of the 9th SALT, Tanya Matthews & Devon Strolovitch (eds), 70–90. Ithaca NY: CLC Publications.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fox, Danny. 1999b. Reconstruction, binding theory, and the interpretation of chains. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 157–196. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fox, Danny & Lasnik, Howard. 2003. Successive-cyclic movement and island repair: The difference between sluicing and VP-ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 143–154. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Francesconi, Armando. 2005. La dislocación en la sintaxis italiana y española. Aspectos textuales y traductivos. Actas del XXIII AISPI (Associazione ispanisti italiani), 202–222.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Franks, Steven. 2005. What is “that”? Indiana University Working Papers in Linguistics 5: 33–62.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frascarelli, Mara. 2000. The Syntax-phonology Interface in Topic and Focus Constructions. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frascarelli, Mara. 2017. Dislocations and framings. In Manual of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax, Andreas Dufter & Elizabeth Stark (eds), 472–501. Berlin: De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frascarelli, Mara & Hinterhölzl, Roland. 2007. Types of topics in German and Italian. In On Information Structure, Meaning and Form. Generalizations across Languages [Linguitstik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 100], Kerstin Schwabe & Susanne Winkler (eds), 87–116. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frazier, Lyn & Clifton Jr, Charles. 2005. The syntax-discourse divide: Processing ellipsis. Syntax 8(2): 121–174. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Frey, Werner. 2004. Notes on the syntax and pragmatics of German left dislocation. In The Syntax and Semantics of the Left Periphery, Horst Lohnstein & Susanne Trissler (eds), 203–234. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fuentes Rodríguez, Catalina. 2012. El margen derecho del enunciado. Revista Española de Lingüística 42(2): 63–93.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fukaya, T. 2007. Sluicing and Stripping in Japanese and Some Implications. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.
Gallego, Ángel. 2009a. Defective C-T in Romance. Probus 21: 163–216. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gallego, Ángel. 2009b. Ellipsis by phase. Paper presented at the XIX CGG, EHU-UPV.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Giusti, Giuliana. 1996. Is there a FocusP and a TopicP in the noun phrase structure? University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 6(2): 105–128.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gracanin-Yuksek, Martina. 2007. On Sharing. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Greenberg, Joseph H. 1963. Some universals of grammar with particular reference to the order of meaningful elements. In Universals of Language, Joseph H. Greenberg (ed.), 73–113. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grewendorf, Günther. 2002. Left dislocation as movement. Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 2: 31–81.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Griffiths, James. 2013. Parenthetical verb constructions, fragment answers and constituent modification. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 33(1): 191–229. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Griffiths, James. 2015. On appositives. Utrecht: LOT.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Griffiths, James. 2019. A Q-based approach to clausal ellipsis: Deriving the P-stranding and island sensitivity generalisations without movement. Glossa 4(1). ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Griffiths, James & Lipták, Anikó. 2014. Contrast and island sensitivity in clausal ellipsis. Syntax 17(3): 189–234. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grohmann, Kleanthes K. 2000. A movement approach to contrastive left dislocation. Rivista di Grammatica Generativa 25: 3–65.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Gutiérrez-Bravo, Rodrigo. 2002. Structural Markedness and Syntactic Structure: A Study of Word Order and the Left Periphery in Mexican Spanish. PhD dissertation, University of California Santa Cruz.
Gutiérrez-Rexach, Javier & González-Rivera, Melvin. 2013. Spanish PredNPs and the left periphery. In Selected Proceedings of the 16th HLS, Jennifer Cabrelli-Amaro (ed.), 1–14. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, Liliane. 1991. Parenthetical adverbial: The radical orphanage approach. In Aspects of Modern English: Papers Presented to Masatomo Ukaji on his 60th birthday, Shuki Chiba, Akira Ogawa, Yasuaki Fuiwara, Norio Nawada, Osamu Koma & Takao Yagi (eds), 232–254. Tokyo: Kaitakushi.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, Liliane. 2003. Notes on long adverbial fronting in English. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 640–649. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, Liliane. 2006. Conditionals, factives and the left periphery. Lingua 116: 1651–1669. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haegeman, Liliane. 2012. Adverb Clauses, Main Clause Phenomena and the Composition of the Left Periphery. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Haider, Hubert. 2006. Mittelfeld phenomena (Scrambling in Germanic). In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. 3, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 204–274. Malden MA: Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, Michael A. K. 1967. Notes on transitivity and theme in English: Part 2. Journal of Linguistics 3(2): 199–244. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halliday, Michael A. K. & Matthiessen, Christian. 2004. Hallidays Introduction to Functional Grammar, 4th edn. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Halpert, Claire. 2012. Argument Licensing and Agreement in Zulu. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Halpert, Claire & Zeller, Jochen. 2013. Right dislocation and raising-to-object in Zulu. Ms, University of Minnesota and University of KwaZulu-Natal.
Hankamer, Jorge. 1973. Unacceptable ambiguity. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 17–68.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hankamer, Jorge. 1979. Deletion in Coordinate Structures. New York, NY: Garland.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harizanov, Boris. 2014. Clitic doubling at the syntax-morphophonology interface: A-movement and morphological merger in Bulgarian. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32(4): 1033–1088. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hartmann, Katherina. 2000. Right Node Raising and Gapping. Interface Conditions on Prosodic Deletion. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Herburger, Elena. 2000. What Counts. Focus and Quantification. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hernanz, M. Lluïsa. 2001. En bonito lío me he metido! Notas sobre la afectividad en español. Moenia 7: 93–109.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hernanz, M. Lluïsa. 2007a. Emphatic polarity and C in Spanish. In Studies in Spanish Syntax, Laura Brugè (ed.), 105–150. Venezia: Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hernanz, M. Lluïsa & Brucart, José M. 1987. La sintaxis, 1: Principios teóricos. La oración simple. Barcelona: Crítica.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hernanz, M. Lluïsa & Suñer, Avellina. 1999. La predicación no copulativa. Las construcciones absolutas. In Gramática descriptiva de la lengua Española,Vol.2, Ch.39, Ignacio Bosque & Violeta Demonte. Madrid: Espasa.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Herringa, Herman. 2012. A multidominance approach to appositional constructions. Lingua 122(6): 554–581. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Holmberg, Anders. 2015. Verb second. In Syntax: Theory and Analysis, Vol. 1, Tibor Kiss & Artemis Alexiadou (eds), 324–383. Berlin: De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Hooper, Joan & Thompson, Sandra. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 465–497.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Huang, Cheng-Teh J. 1982. Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Iatridou, Sabine. 1995. Clitics and island effects. In University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics, Vol. 2, Roumyana Izvorski & Victoria Tredinnick (eds), 11–30. University of Pennsylvania.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Irurtzun, Aritz. 2007. The grammar of focus at the interfaces. PhD dissertation, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU).
Irurtzun, Aritz. 2009. Why Y: On the centrality of syntax in the architecture of grammar. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 8: 141–160. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Irurtzun, Aritz. 2016. On the nature and distribution of split wh-questions in Basque. Talk given at the Information Structure Workshop at the UAB, November.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1971. Gapping and related rules. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 21–35.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray. 1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jackendoff, Ray. 2002. Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jaeggli, Osvaldo. 1982. Topics in Romance Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jayaseelan, Karattuparambil. 1990. Incomplete VP deletion and gapping. Linguistic Analysis 20: 39–75.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jiménez-Fernández, Ángel L. & Miyagawa, Shigeru. 2014. A feature Inheritance approach to root phenomena and parametric variation. Lingua 145: 276–302. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, Kyle. 2006. Gapping. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 407–435. Oxford: Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Johnson, Kyle. 2009. Gapping is not (VP-) ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 289–328. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jones, Michael Allan. 1993. Sardinian Syntax. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kalbertodt, Janina, Primus, Beatrice & Schumacher, Petra. 2015. Punctuation, prosody and discourse: Afterthought vs. right dislocation. Frontiers in Psychology 6.
. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kayne, Richard. 1994. The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kayne, Richard. 2010. Why there are no directionality parameters? In WCCFL 28: Proceedings of the 28th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Mary Byram Washburn, Katherine McKinney-Bock, Erika Varis, Ann Sawyer & Barbara Tomaszewicz (eds), 2–23. Somerville, MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kempchinsky, Paula. 1986. Romance Subjunctive Clauses and Logical Form. PhD dissertation, University of California, Los Angeles.
Kempchinsky, Paula. 2009. What can the subjunctive disjoint reference effect tell us about the subjunctive? Lingua 119(12): 1788–1810. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kimura, Hiroko. 2010. A wh-in-situ strategy for sluicing. English Linguistics 27: 43–59. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kluck, Marlies. 2014. Who, me? Ellipsis in inquisitive fragment answers. Paper presented at the TINdag 2014.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kluck, Marlies, Ott, Dennis & de Vries, Mark (eds). 2015. Parenthesis and Ellipsis: Crosslinguistic and Theoretical Perspectives. Berlin: De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kluck, Marlies & de Vries, Mark. 2013. Cumulative rightward processes. In Rightward Movement in a Comparative Perspective [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 200], Gert Webelhuth, Manfred Sailer & Heike Walker (eds), 281–318. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kölbel, Max. 2003. Faultless disagreement. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104: 53–73. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koster, Jan. 1978. Why subject sentences don’t exist. In Recent Transformational Studies in European Languages, Samuel J. Keyser (ed.), 53–64. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Koster, Jan. 2000. Extraposition as parallel construal. Ms, University of Groningen.
Kramer, Ruth. 2014. Clitic doubling or object agreement: The view from Amharic. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 32: 593–634. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krifka, Manfred & Féry, Caroline. 2008. Information structure. Notional distinctions, ways of expression. In Unity and Diversity of Languages, Piet van Sterkenburg (ed.), 123–136. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kuno, Susumu. 1978. Danwa-no Bunpoo. Tokyo: Taishuukan.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ladd, Robert D. 1996. Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Larsson, Eva. 1979. La dislocation en français. Étude de syntaxe générative. Lund: Gleerup.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lasnik, Howard. 2001. When can you save a structure by destroying it? In Proceedings of the North Eastern Linguistic Society 31, Vol.2, Minjoo Kim & Uri Strauss (eds), 301–320. Amherst MA: GSLA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lasnik, Howard. 2013. Multiple sluicing in English? Syntax 17(1): 1–20. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lasnik, Howard & Stowell, Tim. 1991. Weakest crossover. Linguistic Inquiry 22(4): 687–720.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Laurens, Frédéric. 2008. French predicative verbless utterances. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar, Stefan Muller (ed.), 152–172. Stanford CA: CSLI.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lebeaux, David. 1988. Language Acquisition and the Form of Grammar. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Lechner, Winfried. 2004. Ellipsis in Comparatives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lee, Jeong-Shik. 2009. A verb initial single clause analysis of right dislocated constructions in Korean. Studies in Modern Grammar 57: 127–157.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leonetti, Manuel & Escandell, Victoria. 2009. Fronting and verum focus in Spanish. In Focus and Background in Romance Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 112], Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jacob (eds), 155–204. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Leung, Tommi. 2014. The preposition stranding generalization and conditions on sluicing: Evidence from Emirati Arabic. Linguistic Inquiry 45: 332–340. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Liberman, Mark & Pierrehumbert, Janet. 1984. Intonational invariance under changes in pitch range and length. In Language Sound Structure, Mark Aronoff & Richard T. Oehrle (eds), 157–233. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lin, Vivian. 2002. Coordination and sharing at the interfaces. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Lobeck, Anne. 1995. Ellipsis: Functional Heads, Licensing and Identification. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
López, Luis. 1999. VP-ellipsis in English and Spanish and the features of auxiliaries. Probus 11(2): 263–297. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
López, Luis. 2009. A Derivational Syntax for Information Structure. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
López, Luis. 2016. Dislocations. In The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), 402–421. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Luján, Marta. 1999. A unified approach to control and obviation. In Grammatical Analyses in Basque and Romance Linguistics. Papers in Honor of Mario Saltarelli . [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 187], Jon A. Franco, Alazne Landa & Juan Martín, 104–130. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Manzini, Rita. 1994. Syntactic dependencies and their properties: A note on strong islands. Ms, University College London.
Mayol, Laya. 2007. Right dislocation in Catalan. Languages in Contrast 7(2): 203–219.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCloskey, James. 1982. Parentheticals and discontinuous constituent structure. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 91–106.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCloskey, James. 1990. Resumptive pronouns, A-bar binding and levels of representation in Irish. In Syntax of the Modern Celtic Languages, Randall Hendrick (ed.), 199–248. New York NY: Academic Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCloskey, James. 2006. Resumption. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. IV, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 94–117. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The Syntax of Silence. Oxford: Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Merchant, Jason. 2004a. Fragments and ellipsis. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 661–738. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Merchant, Jason. 2004b. Resumptivity and non-movement. Studies in Greek Linguistics 24: 471–481.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Merchant, Jason. 2005. Revisiting syntactic identity conditions. Handout given at the Workshop on ellipsis, University of California, Berkeley.
Merchant, Jason. 2010. Three kinds of ellipsis. In Context-dependence, Perspective and Relativity, Francois Recanati, Isidora Stojanovic & Neftali Villanueva (eds), 141–192. Berlin: De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morgan, Jerry. 1973. Sentence fragments and the notion of ’sentence’. In Issues in Linguistics: Essays in Honour of Henry and Renée Kahane, Braj Kachru (ed.), 719–751. Urbana IL: University of Illinois Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Morimoto, Yukiko. 2002. Prominence mismatches and differential object marking in Bantu. In Proceedings of the LFG 02 Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds), 292–314. Stanford CA: CSLI.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Murphy, Andrew. 2016. Subset relations in ellipsis licensing. Glossa. A Journal of General Linguistics 1(1): 1–44. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Neeleman, Ad & Szendröi, Kriszta. 2004. Superman sentences. Linguistic Inquiry 35, 149–159. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Neeleman, Ad & Vermeulen, Reiko (eds). 2012. The Syntax of Topic, Focus and Contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Neijt, Anneke. 1979. Gapping: A Contribution to Sentence Grammar. Dordrecht: Foris. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nespor, Marina & Vogel, Irene. 1986. Prosodic Phonology. Dordrecht: Foris.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nevins, Andrew. 2011. Multiple agree with clitics: Person complementarity vs omnivorous number. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 29: 939–971. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nishigauchi, Taisuke. 1998. Multiple sluicing in Japanese and the functional nature of wh-phrases. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 7: 121–152. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nykiel, Joanna. 2013. Clefts and preposition omission in sluicing. Lingua 123: 74–117. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Nykiel, Joanna. 2017. Preposition stranding and ellipsis alternation. English Language and Linguistics 21: 127–145. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ordóñez, Francisco. 1997. Word Order and Clause Structure in Spanish and other Romance Languages. PhD dissertation, CUNY Graduate Center, New York.
Ordóñez, Francisco. 1998. Postverbal asymmetries in Spanish. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 16: 313–345. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ordóñez, Francisco & Treviño, Esthela. 1999. Left dislocated subjects and the pro-drop parameter: A case study of Spanish. Lingua 107: 39–68. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ormazábal, Javier & Romero, Juan. 2011. Object clitics and agreement. Ms, University of the Basque Country, University of Extremadura.
Ortega-Santos, Iván, Yoshida, Masaya & Nakao, Chizuru. 2014. On ellipsis structures involving a wh-remnant and a non-wh-remnant simultaneously. Lingua 138: 55–85. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ott, Dennis. 2008. Notes on noun ph(r)ases. Ms, Harvard University.
Ott, Dennis. 2012. Movement and ellipsis in contrastive left-dislocation. In WCCFL 30: Proceedings of the 30th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Nathan Arnett & Ryan Bennet (eds), 281–291. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ott, Dennis & de Vries, Mark. 2016. Right dislocation as deletion. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 34(2): 641–690. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ott, Dennis & Struckmeier, Volker. 2016. Deletion in clausal ellipsis: Remnants in the middle field. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Penn Linguistics Conference 22: 225–234.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Padilla, Xavier. 2001. El orden de palabras en el español coloquial. València: Publicaciones Universitat de València.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Park, Myung-Kwan & Kim, Sun-Woong. 2009. The syntax of afterthoughts in Korean: Move and Delete. The Linguistic Association of Korea Journal 17: 25–53.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paul, Ileana. 2006. Great coffee, that Maxwell House. Paper presented at the 37th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Paul, Ileana & Stainton, Robert. 2006. Really Intriguing, that Pred NP! Philosophy Publications, paper 24.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pérez Bello, G. 1998. Uso de las dislocaciones a la derecha y a la izquierda en castellano e italiano. Interlingüística 9: 253–259.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Philippova, Tatiana. 2014. P-omission under sluicing, P-clitic and the nature of P-stranding. In Proceedings of ConSOLE XXII, Martin Kohlberg, Kate Bellamy & Eleanor Dutton (eds), 133–155. Leiden: Leiden University.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Picallo, Carme. 1985. Opaque Domains. PhD dissertation, CUNY.
Planas-Morales, Sílvia & Villalba, Xavier. 2013. The right periphery of interrogatives in Catalan and Spanish: Syntax/prosody interactions. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 12: 193–217. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Poletto, Cecilia & Pollock, Jean-Yves. 2004. On the left periphery of some Romance wh-questions. In The Structure of CP and IP, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 251–296. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Preminger, Omar. 2009. Breaking agreements: Distinguishing agreement and clitic doubling by their failures. Linguistic Inquiry 40(4): 619–666. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prieto, Pilar. 2002. Entonació. In Gramàtica del català contemporani, Joan Solà, M. Rosa Lloret, Joan Mascaró & Manuel Pérez Saldanya (eds), 393–462. Barcelona: Empúries.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Prince, Ellen. 1984. Topicalization and left dislocation: A functional analysis. In Discourses in Reading and Linguistics, Sheila White & Virginia Teller (eds), 213–225. New York NY: Anyas.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Quirk, Randolph, Greenbaum, Sidney, Leech, Geoffrey & Svartvik, Jan. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. London: Longman.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reich, Ingo. 2006. Toward a uniform analysis of short answers and gapping. In Proceedings of the 2004 Texas Linguistics Society Conference, Pascal Denis (ed.), 69–78. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reinhart, Tanya. 1981. Pragmatics and linguistics: An analysis of sentence topics. Philosophica 27: 53–93.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rezac, Milan. 2008. Phi-agree and theta-related case. In Phi Theory, Daniel Harbour, David Adger & Susana Béjar (eds), 83–129. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rivero, Maria L. 1980. On left dislocation and topicalization in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 11: 363–393.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi. 1982. Issues in Italian Syntax. Dordrecht: Foris. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi. 1986. Null Objects in Italian and the Theory of pro. Linguistic Inquiry 17(3): 501–557.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized Minimality. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi. 2001. Relativized minimality effects. In The Handbook of Contemporary Syntactic Theory, Mark Baltin & Chris Collins. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Structures and Beyond, Vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 223–251. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rizzi, Luigi & Bocci, Giuliano. 2016. The left periphery of the clause – primarily illustrated for Italian. Ms, to appear in Blackwell Companion to Syntax,2nd edn.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roca, Francesc. 1999. La determinación y la modificación nominal en español. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Rodman, Robert. 1974. On left dislocation. Papers in Linguistics 7: 437–466. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rodrigues, Cilene, Nevins, Andrew & Vicente, Luis. 2009. Cleaving the interaction between sluicing and P-stranding. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2006: Selected Papers from “Going Romance” [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 303], Danièle Torck & W. Leo Wetzels (eds), 175–198. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rodrigues, Cilene & Saab, Andrés. 2018. The limits of pseudo-sluicing. Paper presented at the VIII Encuentro de Gramática Generativa, Buenos Aires.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1: 75–116. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ross, John Robert. 1967. Constraints on Variables in Syntax. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Ross, John Robert. 1969. Guess who? In Papers from the 5th RegionalMeeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Robert Binnick et al.. (eds), 252–286. Chicago IL: CLS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ross, John Robert. 1970. Gapping and the order of constituents. In Progress in Linguistics, Manfred Bierwisch & Karl Heidolph (eds), 249–259. The Hague: Mouton.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rossi, M. 1999. L’intonation. Le système du français: description et modélisation. Paris: Ophrys.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rubio, Carlos. 2014. Syntactic Constraints on Topicalization Phenomena. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona.
Sæbø, Kjell J. 1997. Topic, focus and quantifier raising. In Proceedings of the 11th Amsterdam Colloquium, Paul Dekker & Michael Franke (eds), 67–72. Amsterdam: ILLC.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sæbø, Kjell J. 2009. Judgement ascriptions. Linguistics and Philosophy 32: 327–352. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sailor, Craig & Schütze, Carson T. 2014. Is there repair by ellipsis? Ms, University of Groningen and UCLA.
Sailor, Craig & Thoms, Gary. 2014. On the non existence of non constituent coordination and non constituent ellipsis. In WCCFL 31: Proceedings of the 31st West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Robert E. Santana-LaBarge (ed.), 361–370. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri. 2006. When right dislocation meets the left periphery. Lingua 116: 687–755. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri. 2008. Information structure in Italian clauses. Talk given at the Information Structure Workshop, UCL, November.
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri. 2009. Topic, focus and background in Italian clauses. In Focus and Background in Romance Languages [Studies in Language Companion Series 112], Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jakob (eds), 359–362. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Samek-Lodovici, Vieri. 2015. The Interaction of Focus and Givenness. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Santos, Ana Lucía. 2009. The problem of fragment answers. Iberia 1(1): 115–142.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sato, Yosuke. 2011. P-stranding under sluicing and repair by ellipsis: Why is Indonesian (not) special? Journal of East Asian Linguistics 20: 339–382. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schachter, Paul. 1977. Constraints on coordination. Language 53: 86–103. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schwarzschild, Roger. 1999. GIVENness, AvoidF and other constraints in the placement of accent. Natural Language Semantics 7: 141–177. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sedano, Mercedes. 2012. Dislocación a la izquierda y a la derecha: Semejanzas y diferencias. In Cum corde et in nova grammatica: Estudios ofrecidos a Guillermo Rojo, Tomás Jiménez-Juliá et al.. (eds), 791–805. Santiago de Compostela: Servizio de Publicacións da Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Sedano, Mercedes. 2013. Dislocación a la izquierda y derecha en España y Latinoamérica. Lingüística 29(2): 153–190.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1978. On prosodic structure and its relation to syntactic structure. In Nordic Prosody, Torsten Fretheim (ed.), 128–149. Trondheim: TAPIR.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1984. Phonology and Syntax: The Relation between Sound and Structure. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 1995. The prosodic structure of function words. In Papers in Optimality Theory, Vol. 18, Jill N. Beckman, Laura Walsh Dickey & Suzanne C. Urbanczyk (eds). Amherst MA: GLSA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Selkirk, Elisabeth. 2011. The syntax-phonology interface. In The Handbook of Phonological Theory, John A. Goldsmith & Alan C. L. Yu (eds). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shaer, Benjamin. 2009. German and English left-peripheral elements and the ‘orphan’ analysis of non-integration. In Dislocated Elements in Discourse, Syntactic, Semantic and Pragmatic Perspectives, Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 366–397. London: Routledge.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shaer, Benjamin, Cook, Philippa, Frey, Werner & Maienborn, Claudia (eds). 2009. Dislocated Elements in Discourse. Syntactic, Semantic and Pragmatic Perspectives. London: Routledge. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shaer, Benjamin & Frey, Werner. 2003. Integrated and non-integrated left peripheral elements in German and English. In Proceedings of the Dislocated Elements Workshop, Benjamin Shaer, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn, 435–484. Berlin: ZAS.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shimoyama, Junko, Drummond, Alex, Schwarz, Bernhard & Wagner, Michael. 2015. Movement and ellipsis in afterthought right dislocation, sluicing and fragments. In Proceedings of the 2015 Annual Conference of the Canadian Linguistics Association. Ottawa: CLA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Shopen, T. 1972. A Generative Theory of Ellipsis. PhD dissertation, UCLA.
Sportiche, Dominique. 2006. Reconstruction, binding, and scope. In The Blackwell Companion to Syntax, Vol. IV, Martin Everaert & Henk van Riemsdijk (eds), 35–93. Oxford: Blackwell. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stainton, Robert. 2006. Words and Thoughts: Subsentences, Ellipsis and the Philosophy of Language. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stalnaker, Robert. 1974. Pragmatic presuppositions. In Semantics and Philosophy, Milton K. Munitz & Peter K. Unger (eds), 197–214. New York NY: New York University Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Stepanov, A. 2001. Cyclic Domains in Syntactic Theory. PhD dissertation, University of Connecticut.
Stigliano, Laura. 2018. Revisiting the interaction between P-stranding and clausal ellipsis in Spanish. Ms, The University of Chicago.
Stowell, Tim. 1981. Origins of Phrase Structure. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Suñer, Margarita. 1988. The role of agreement in clitic-doubled constructions. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 6: 391–434. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Szczegielniak, Adam. 2008. Islands in sluicing in Polish. In Proceedings of the 27th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, Natasha Abner & Jason Bishop (eds), 404–412. Somerville MA: Cascadilla Proceedings Project.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Takahashi, Shiochi & Husley, Sarah. 2009. Wholesale late merger: Beyond the A/A’-distinction. Linguistic Inquiry 40: 387–426. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Takita, Kensuke. 2012. Pseudo-right dislocation and the bare-topic construction in Japanese. Nauzan Linguistics 8: 147–171.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tanaka, Hidekazu. 2001. Right-dislocation as scrambling. Journal of Linguistics 37: 551–579. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tancredi, Christopher. 1992. Deletion, Deaccenting and Presupposition. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Temmerman, Tanja. 2013. The syntax of Dutch embedded fragment answers. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 31(1): 235–285. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Thráinsson, Höskuldur. 2007. The Syntax of Icelandic. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tomlin, Russell S. 1986. Basic Word Order. Functional Principles. London: Croom Helm.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Toosarvandani, Maziar. To appear. Embedding the antecedent in gapping: Low coordination and the role of parallelism. Linguistic Inquiry.
Torrego, Esther. 1998. Pronouns and determiners: A DP analysis of Spanish nominals. University of Massachusetts, Boston.
Torrence, Harold. 2005. On the Distribution of Complementizers in Wolof. PhD dissertation, UCLA.
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 1995. Phonological Phrases: Their Relation to Syntax, Focus and Prominence. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 1999. On the relation between syntactic phrases and phonological phrases. Linguistic Inquiry 30: 219–255. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2006. The syntax-phonology interface. In The Cambridge Handbook of Phonology, Paul de Lacy (ed.), 435–456. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2013. Some distinctions in the German Nachfeld. Ms, ZAS Berlin.
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2015. Intonation phrases and speech acts. In Parenthesis and Ellipsis. Crosslinguistic and Theoretical Perspectives, Marlies Kluck, Dennis Ott & Mark de Vries (eds), 301–349. Berlin: De Gruyter.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Truckenbrodt, Hubert. 2016. Some distinctions in the right periphery of the German clause. In: Innersentential Propositional Proforms. Syntactic Properties and Interpretative Effects [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 232], Werner Frey, André Meinunger & Kerstin Schwabe (eds), 105–147. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Umbach, Carla. 2016. Evaluative propositions and subjective judgements. In Subjective Meaning, Cécile Meier & Janneke van Wijnbergen-Huitink (eds), 127–168. Berlin: De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Uriagereka, Juan. 1995. Aspects of the syntax of clitic placement in Western Romance. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 79–123.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vallduví, Enric. 1992. The Informational Component. New York NY: Garland.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Valmala, Vidal. 2007. The syntax of little things. Ms, UPV/EHU.
Valmala, Vidal. 2014. Island repair by ellipsis: Handle with care. In XI Workshop on Syntax, Semantics and Phonology, 5–6 June, Barcelona.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen (ed.). 2009. Alternatives to Cartography. Berlin: Mouton. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Craenenbroeck, Jeroen & Merchant (eds). 2013. Ellipsis phenomena. In Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax, Marcel den Dikken (ed.), 701–745. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vat, Jan. 1981. Left dislocation, connectedness and reconstruction. Groninger Arbeiten zur Germanistischen Linguistik 20: 80–103.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vicente, Luis. 2008. Syntactic isomorphism and non-isomorphism under ellipsis. Ms, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Villalba, Xavier. 1996. Sobre la dislocació a la dreta. Llengua i Literatura 7: 209–234.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Villalba, Xavier. 1998. Right dislocation is not right dislocation. In Studies on the Syntax of Central Romance Languages, Olga Fultana & Fransesc Roca (eds), 227–241. Girona: University of Girona.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Villalba, Xavier. 1999. Nihil est in LF quod prius non fuerit in SS. Catalan Working Papers in Linguistics 7: 239–252.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Villalba, Xavier. 2000. The Syntax of the Sentence Periphery. PhD dissertation, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona.
Villalba, Xavier. 2007. La dislocació a la dreta en català i castellà: Microvariació en la intefície sintaxi/pragmàtica. Caplletra 42: 273–302.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Villalba, Xavier & Bartra-Kauffman, Anna. 2009. Predicate focus fronting in the Spanish determiner phrase. Lingua 120(4): 819–849. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vinet, Marie-Thérèse. 1991. French non-verbal exclamative constructions. Probus 3: 77–100. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Vries, Mark. 2009. Specifying coordination: An investigation into the syntax of dislocation, extraposition and parenthesis. In Language and Linguistics: Emerging Trends, Cynthia R. Dreyer (ed.), 37–98. New York NY: Nova.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Vries, Mark. 2012a. Unconventional mergers. In Ways of Structure Building, Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria & Vidal Valmala (eds), 143–166. Oxford: OUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
de Vries, Mark. 2002. The Syntax of Relativization. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.
de Vries, Mark. 2013b. Multidominance and locality. Lingua 134: 149–169. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wang, Arthur. 2007. Sluicing and resumption. In NELS 37: Proceedings of the Thirty-seventh Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society. Amherst MA: GLSA.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weir, Andrew. 2012. Left-edge deletion in English and subject omission in diaries. English Language and Linguistics 16: 105–129. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Weir, Andrew. 2014. Fragments and Clausal Ellipsis. PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
Wells, John C. 2006. English Intonation: An Introduction. Cambridge: CUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Whitman, John. 2000. Right dislocation in English and Japanese. In Syntactic and Functional Explorations in Honor of Susumu Kuno, Kenichi Takami, Akio Kamio & John Whitman (eds), 445–470. Tokyo: Kurosio.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wilder, Chris. 1995. Some properties of ellipsis in coordination. In Studies on Universal Grammar and Typological Variation [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 13]. Artemis Alexiadou & Tracy Alan Hall (eds), 59–107. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Williams, Edwin. 1978. Across the board rule application. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 31–43.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Winkler, Susanne. 2005. Ellipsis and Focus in Generative Grammar. Berlin: De Gruyter. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2017. Stripping and topless complements. Linguistic Inquiry 48(2): 341–366. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zagiu, Rodica. 2013. Information structure. In The grammar of Romanian,Gabriela Pană Dindelegan (ed.), 568–574. Oxford: OUP.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zeller, Jochen. 2012. Object marking in Zulu. Southern African Linguistics and Applied Language Studies 30(2): 219–236. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zerbian, Sabine. 2007. Phonological phrasing in Northern Sotho (Bantu). The Linguistic Review 24: 233–262. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1994. Grammatical representation of topic and focus: Implications for the structure of the clause. Cuadernos de Lingüística 2: 181–208.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zubizarreta, Maria Luisa. 1998. Prosody, Focus and Word Order. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 2001. Backgrounding (right-dislocation) in Dutch. Ms, University of Groningen.![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Zwart, Jan-Wouter. 2011. The Syntax of Dutch. Cambridge: CUP. ![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)