Cover not available
Part of
Brazilian Portuguese, Syntax and Semantics: 20 years of Núcleo de Estudos Gramaticais
Edited by Roberta Pires De Oliveira, Ina Emmel and Sandra Quarezemin
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 260] 2020
► pp. 151–166

Chapter 6
Some low ellipses in Portuguese

A phase-based analysis

| University of Campinas | CNPq
The paper aims to offer an analysis for the anaphoric null objects found in Brazilian Portuguese as a case of ellipsis. This was first proposed by Cyrino (1994) solely based on the fact that such null elements exhibit strict and sloppy readings, a test not considered trustworthy as a diagnosis for ellipses (see Merchant 2013a; a.o.). We will thus test them based on Jackendoff’s (1971) tests for VP-ellipsis, showing, however, that null objects cannot be subsumed under VP-ellipsis. A phase-based analysis for both cases of ellipsis will be proposed.
Offering a phase-based analysis not only contributes to the understanding of what can be a phase but also accommodates the facts examined in BP as well as its differences with EP.
Keywords: V-stranding VP ellipsis, anaphoric null objects, phases, Brazilian Portuguese
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.V-VPE in Portuguese
  • 3.Properties of ANOs in BP
  • 4.ANOs: Why ellipsis and why not V-VPE?
  • 5.ASPP and elliptical phases
  • 6.Some predictions and problems
  • 7.Final remarks
  • Acknowledgements
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 May 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.260.06lop
References (53)
References
Aelbrecht, Lobke. 2016. What ellipsis can do for phases and what it can’t, but not how. The Linguistic Review 33(4): 453–482. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aissen, Judith. 2003. Differential object marking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21(3): 435–483. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ambar, Manuela, Gonzaga, Manuela & Negrão, Esmeralda. 2004. Tense, quantification and clause structure in EP and BP. Evidence from a comparative study on sempre. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2002 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 256], Reineke Bok-Bennema, Bart Hollebrandse, Brigitte Kampers-Manhe & Petra Sleeman (eds), 1–17. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina & Figueiredo Silva, Maria Cristina. 1994. On some properties of Agreement-object in Italian and Brazilian Portuguese. In Issues and Theory in Romance Languages, Michael Mazzola (ed.), 181–197. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko. 2013. Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase. Linguistic Inquiry 45: 27–89. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Brito, Ana Maria. 1999. Concordância, estrutura da frase e movimento do verbo no português europeu, no português brasileiro e no português de Moçambique. In Lindley Cintra. Homenagem ao homem, ao mestre e ao cidadão, Isabel H. Faria (ed.), 333–365. Lisboa: Cosmos/FLUL.Google Scholar
. 2001. Clause structure, subject positions and verb movement. About the position of sempre in European Portuguese and Brazilian Portuguese. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 1999 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 221], Yves D’Hulst, Johan Rooryck & Jan Schroten (eds), 63–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 2001. Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael J. Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Costa, João, Martins, Ana Maria & Pratas, Fernanda. 2012. VP Ellipsis: New evidence from Capeverdean. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2010. Selected Papers from ‘Going Romance’ Leiden 2010 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 4], Irene Franco, Sara Lusini & Andrés Saab (eds), 155–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Costa, João, Lobo, Maria & Silva, Carolina. 2010. Which category replaces an omitted clitic? The case of European Portuguese. In Pronouns and Clitics in Early Language, Pilar Larranaga & Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes (eds), 105–130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cyrino, Sonia & Lopes, Ruth. 2016. Null objects are ellipsis in Brazilian Portuguese. The Linguistic Review 33(4): 483–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cyrino, Sonia & Matos, Gabriela. 2002. VP elllipsis in European and Brazilian Portuguese – A comparative analysis. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 1: 177–196. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Local licensers and recovering in VP ellipsis. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 4: 79–112. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Null objects and VP ellipsis in European and Brazilian Portuguese. In Handbook of Portuguese Linguistics, W. Leo Wetzels, João Costa & Sergio Menuzzi (eds), 294–317. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cyrino, Sonia. 1994. O objeto nulo no português brasileiro – Um estudo sintático-diacrônico. PhD dissertation, University of Campinas.Google Scholar
. 2013. On richness of tense and verb movement in Brazilian Portuguese. In Information Structure and Agreement, [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 197], Victoria Camacho-Taboada, Ángel L. Jiménez-Fernández, Javier Martín-González & Mariano Reyes-Tejedor (eds), 297–318. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Duarte, Maria Eugenia L. 1986. Variação e Sintaxe: Clítico acusativo, pronome lexical e categoria vazia no português do Brasil. MA thesis, PUCSP.Google Scholar
Fiéis, Alexandra. 2010. On the position of sempre in Medieval Portuguese and in Modern European Portuguese. The Linguistic Review 27: 75–105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gallego, Ángel. 2007. Phase Theory and Parametric Variation. PhD dissertation, UAB.Google Scholar
. 2009. Ellipsis by Phase. Paper presented at the XIX Colloquium on Generative Grammar, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea.
Galves, Charlotte. 1989. Objet nul et la structure de la proposition en Portugais Brésilien. Review des Langues Romanes 93: 305–336.Google Scholar
. 1990. V-movement, levels of representation and the structure of S. 13th GLOW Colloquium, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
. 1994. V-movement, levels of representation and the structure of S. Letras de Hoje 96: 35–58.Google Scholar
Gengel, Kirsten. 2007. Phases and ellipsis. In NELS 37: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, Vol. 1, Emily Elfner & Martin Walkow (eds), 233–246. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Lotus. 2005. Verb-Stranding VP Ellipsis: A Cross-Linguistic Study. PhD dissertation, McGill University.Google Scholar
Gonzaga, Manuela. 1997. Aspectos da sintaxe do advérbio em português. MA thesis. University of Lisbon.Google Scholar
Harwood, William. 2013. Being Progressive is Just a Phase: Dividing the Functional Hierarchy. PhD dissertation, Ghent University.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders. 2006. Null subjects and polarity focus. Studia Linguistica 61(3): 212–236. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. The syntax of yes and no in Finnish. Studia Linguistica 55:141–175. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, C. T. James. 1984. On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–574.Google Scholar
Irimia, Monica Alexandrina & Cyrino, Sonia. 2015. Syntactic positions for DOM: The case of Brazilian Portuguese and Romanian. Paper presented at Going Romance, 2015.
Jackendoff, Ray. 1971. Gapping and related rules. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 21–36.Google Scholar
Kato, Mary. 1994. A theory of null objects and the development of a Brazilian child grammar. In How tolerant is Universal Grammar? [Linguistische Arbeiten 309], Rosemarie Tracy & Elsa Lattey (eds), 125–154. Tübingen: Niemeyer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2016. Affirmative polar replies in Brazilian Portuguese. In Romance Linguistics 2013: Selected papers from the 43rd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), New York, 17–19 April, 2013 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 9], Christina Tortora, Marcel den Dikken, Ignacio Montoya & Teresa O’Neill (eds), 195–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kim, Soowon. 1999. Sloppy/strict identity, empty objects, and NP ellipsis. Journal of East Asia Linguistics 8: 255–284. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lipták, Anikó & Saab, Andrés. 2014. No N-raising out of NPs in Spanish: Ellipsis as a diagnostic of head movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32: 1242–1271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lopes, Ruth. 2019. Not every stranding verb makes a VP ellipsis. Paper presented at MOTH 2019, Ottawa.
Lopes, Ruth & Cyrino, Sonia. 2016. On null objects and ellipses in Brazilian Portuguese. In Romance Linguistics 2013: Selected papers from the 43rd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), New York, 17–19 April, 2013 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 9], Christina Tortora, Marcel den Dikken, Ignacio L. Montoya & Teresa O’Neill (eds), 257–276. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
López, Luis. 2012. Indefinite Objects. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martins, Ana Maria. 1994. Enclisis, VP-deletion and the nature of Sigma. Probus 6: 173–205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Matos, Gabriela. 1992. Construções de elipse de predicado em Português – SV nulo e despojamento. PhD dissertation, University of Lisbon.Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason. 2001. The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2008. An asymmetry in voice mismatches in VP-ellipsis and pseudogapping. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 169–179. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013a. Diagnosing ellipsis. In Diagnosing Syntax, Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Nobert Corver (eds). Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013b. Voice and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 44: 77–108. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ohara, Masako. n.d. Object drop in English and in Japanese. Ms.
Raposo, Eduardo. 1986. On the null object in European Portuguese. In Studies in Romance Linguistics. Osvaldo Jaeggli & Carmen-Silva Corvalán (eds), 373–390. Dordrecht: Foris. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, Cilene. 2004. Effects of Loss of Morphology in Partial Pro-drop Languages. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Rouveret, Alain. 2012. VP ellipsis, phases and the syntax of morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30: 897–963. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Santos, Ana Lucia. 2006. Minimal Answers. Ellipsis, Syntax and Discourse in the Acquisition of European Portuguese. PhD dissertation, University of Lisbon.Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott & Silva, Gláucia. 2002. Overt vs. null direct objects in spoken Brazilian Portuguese: A semantic/pragmatic account. Hispania 85(3): 577–586. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Torrego, Esther. 1998. The Dependencies of Objects. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Yoshida, Masaya & Gallego, Ángel. 2012. Ellipsis and phases. In Local Modelling of Non-local Dependencies in Syntax, Artemis Alexiadou, Tibor Kiss & Gereon Muller (eds), 353–370. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar