Chapter published in:
Brazilian Portuguese, Syntax and Semantics: 20 years of Núcleo de Estudos Gramaticais
Edited by Roberta Pires De Oliveira, Ina Emmel and Sandra Quarezemin
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 260] 2020
► pp. 151166
References
Aelbrecht, Lobke
2016What ellipsis can do for phases and what it can’t, but not how. The Linguistic Review 33(4): 453–482. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Aissen, Judith
2003Differential object marking. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21(3): 435–483. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ambar, Manuela, Gonzaga, Manuela & Negrão, Esmeralda
2004Tense, quantification and clause structure in EP and BP. Evidence from a comparative study on sempre . In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2002 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 256], Reineke Bok-Bennema, Bart Hollebrandse, Brigitte Kampers-Manhe & Petra Sleeman (eds), 1–17. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Bianchi, Valentina & Figueiredo Silva, Maria Cristina
1994On some properties of Agreement-object in Italian and Brazilian Portuguese. In Issues and Theory in Romance Languages, Michael Mazzola (ed.), 181–197. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Bošković, Željko
2013Now I’m a phase, now I’m not a phase. Linguistic Inquiry 45: 27–89. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Brito, Ana Maria
1999Concordância, estrutura da frase e movimento do verbo no português europeu, no português brasileiro e no português de Moçambique. In Lindley Cintra. Homenagem ao homem, ao mestre e ao cidadão, Isabel H. Faria (ed.), 333–365. Lisboa: Cosmos/FLUL.Google Scholar
2001Clause structure, subject positions and verb movement. About the position of sempre in European Portuguese and Brazilian Portuguese. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 1999 [Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 221], Yves D’Hulst, Johan Rooryck & Jan Schroten (eds), 63–85. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
2001Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael J. Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–52. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Costa, João, Martins, Ana Maria & Pratas, Fernanda
2012VP Ellipsis: New evidence from Capeverdean. In Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 2010. Selected Papers from ‘Going Romance’ Leiden 2010 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 4], Irene Franco, Sara Lusini & Andrés Saab (eds), 155–176. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Costa, João, Lobo, Maria & Silva, Carolina
2010Which category replaces an omitted clitic? The case of European Portuguese. In Pronouns and Clitics in Early Language, Pilar Larranaga & Pedro Guijarro-Fuentes (eds), 105–130. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Cyrino, Sonia & Lopes, Ruth
2016Null objects are ellipsis in Brazilian Portuguese. The Linguistic Review 33(4): 483–502. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cyrino, Sonia & Matos, Gabriela
2002VP elllipsis in European and Brazilian Portuguese – A comparative analysis. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 1: 177–196. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2005Local licensers and recovering in VP ellipsis. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 4: 79–112. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Null objects and VP ellipsis in European and Brazilian Portuguese. In Handbook of Portuguese Linguistics, W. Leo Wetzels, João Costa & Sergio Menuzzi (eds), 294–317. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cyrino, Sonia
1994O objeto nulo no português brasileiro – Um estudo sintático-diacrônico. PhD dissertation, University of Campinas.Google Scholar
2013On richness of tense and verb movement in Brazilian Portuguese. In Information Structure and Agreement, [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 197], Victoria Camacho-Taboada, Ángel L. Jiménez-Fernández, Javier Martín-González & Mariano Reyes-Tejedor (eds), 297–318. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Duarte, Maria Eugenia L.
1986Variação e Sintaxe: Clítico acusativo, pronome lexical e categoria vazia no português do Brasil. MA thesis, PUCSP.Google Scholar
Fiéis, Alexandra
2010On the position of sempre in Medieval Portuguese and in Modern European Portuguese. The Linguistic Review 27: 75–105. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Gallego, Ángel
2007Phase Theory and Parametric Variation. PhD dissertation, UAB.Google Scholar
2009Ellipsis by Phase. Paper presented at the XIX Colloquium on Generative Grammar, Euskal Herriko Unibertsitatea.
Galves, Charlotte
1989Objet nul et la structure de la proposition en Portugais Brésilien. Review des Langues Romanes 93: 305–336.Google Scholar
1990V-movement, levels of representation and the structure of S. 13th GLOW Colloquium, University of Cambridge.Google Scholar
1994V-movement, levels of representation and the structure of S. Letras de Hoje 96: 35–58.Google Scholar
Gengel, Kirsten
2007Phases and ellipsis. In NELS 37: Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society, Vol. 1, Emily Elfner & Martin Walkow (eds), 233–246. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Lotus
2005Verb-Stranding VP Ellipsis: A Cross-Linguistic Study. PhD dissertation, McGill University.Google Scholar
Gonzaga, Manuela
1997Aspectos da sintaxe do advérbio em português. MA thesis. University of Lisbon.Google Scholar
Harwood, William
2013Being Progressive is Just a Phase: Dividing the Functional Hierarchy. PhD dissertation, Ghent University.Google Scholar
Holmberg, Anders
2006Null subjects and polarity focus. Studia Linguistica 61(3): 212–236. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001The syntax of yes and no in Finnish. Studia Linguistica 55:141–175. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C. T. James
1984On the distribution and reference of empty pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 531–574.Google Scholar
Irimia, Monica Alexandrina & Cyrino, Sonia
2015Syntactic positions for DOM: The case of Brazilian Portuguese and Romanian. Paper presented at Going Romance, 2015.
Jackendoff, Ray
1971Gapping and related rules. Linguistic Inquiry 2: 21–36.Google Scholar
Kato, Mary
1994A theory of null objects and the development of a Brazilian child grammar. In How tolerant is Universal Grammar? [Linguistische Arbeiten 309], Rosemarie Tracy & Elsa Lattey (eds), 125–154. Tübingen: Niemeyer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2016Affirmative polar replies in Brazilian Portuguese. In Romance Linguistics 2013: Selected papers from the 43rd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), New York, 17–19 April, 2013 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 9], Christina Tortora, Marcel den Dikken, Ignacio Montoya & Teresa O’Neill (eds), 195–212. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Kim, Soowon
1999Sloppy/strict identity, empty objects, and NP ellipsis. Journal of East Asia Linguistics 8: 255–284. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lipták, Anikó & Saab, Andrés
2014No N-raising out of NPs in Spanish: Ellipsis as a diagnostic of head movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 32: 1242–1271. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lopes, Ruth
2019Not every stranding verb makes a VP ellipsis. Paper presented at MOTH 2019, Ottawa.
Lopes, Ruth & Cyrino, Sonia
2016On null objects and ellipses in Brazilian Portuguese. In Romance Linguistics 2013: Selected papers from the 43rd Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), New York, 17–19 April, 2013 [Romance Languages and Linguistic Theory 9], Christina Tortora, Marcel den Dikken, Ignacio L. Montoya & Teresa O’Neill (eds), 257–276. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
López, Luis
2012Indefinite Objects. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Martins, Ana Maria
1994Enclisis, VP-deletion and the nature of Sigma. Probus 6: 173–205. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Matos, Gabriela
1992Construções de elipse de predicado em Português – SV nulo e despojamento. PhD dissertation, University of Lisbon.Google Scholar
Merchant, Jason
2001The Syntax of Silence: Sluicing, Islands, and the Theory of Ellipsis. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2008An asymmetry in voice mismatches in VP-ellipsis and pseudogapping. Linguistic Inquiry 39: 169–179. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013aDiagnosing ellipsis. In Diagnosing Syntax, Lisa Lai-Shen Cheng & Nobert Corver (eds). Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013bVoice and ellipsis. Linguistic Inquiry 44: 77–108. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Ohara, Masako
n.d. Object drop in English and in Japanese. Ms.
Raposo, Eduardo
1986On the null object in European Portuguese. In Studies in Romance Linguistics. Osvaldo Jaeggli & Carmen-Silva Corvalán (eds), 373–390. Dordrecht: Foris. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rodrigues, Cilene
2004Effects of Loss of Morphology in Partial Pro-drop Languages. PhD dissertation, University of Maryland.Google Scholar
Rouveret, Alain
2012VP ellipsis, phases and the syntax of morphology. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 30: 897–963. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Santos, Ana Lucia
2006Minimal Answers. Ellipsis, Syntax and Discourse in the Acquisition of European Portuguese. PhD dissertation, University of Lisbon.Google Scholar
Schwenter, Scott & Silva, Gláucia
2002Overt vs. null direct objects in spoken Brazilian Portuguese: A semantic/pragmatic account. Hispania 85(3): 577–586. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Torrego, Esther
1998The Dependencies of Objects. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Yoshida, Masaya & Gallego, Ángel
2012Ellipsis and phases. In Local Modelling of Non-local Dependencies in Syntax, Artemis Alexiadou, Tibor Kiss & Gereon Muller (eds), 353–370. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar