Cover not available
Part of
Thetics and Categoricals
Edited by Werner Abraham, Elisabeth Leiss and Yasuhiro Fujinawa
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 262] 2020
► pp. 105–140

Copulas and information structure in Tanti Dargwa

| Russian State University for the Humanities
The paper describes the basic types of independent clauses in the Tanti dialect of Dargwa (Nakh-Dagestanian (= East Caucasian), Russian Federation). Most independent clauses in Tanti are headed either by the identificational copula or a finite verb form. Less frequently, we meet sentences headed by one of the four existential copulas. There are also some independent clauses headed by a non-finite verb form or a non-verbal predicate and containing no copula. The paper shows that the basic difference between the sentences with different copula types and without any copulas is the type of information structure of the relevant sentence. The identificational copula is a feature of categorical sentences; the position of the copula points at the focused constituent. The existential copulas tend to head thetic structures. Copula-less converbal clauses are often interpreted as mirative sentences, which can also be analyzed as thetic, but differ from the existential structures by the moment when the speaker obtains the knowledge of the situation.
Keywords: Nakh-Dagestanian, Dargwa, thetic sentences, existential sentences, mirativity
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Tanti Dargwa: Necessary information
    • 2.1General
    • 2.2Types of clauses
      • 2.2.1Independent clauses
        • Copular clauses
        • Verbal clauses
        • Unmarked clauses
      • 2.2.2Dependent clauses
  • 3.Copulas and focus marking
  • 4.Clauses headed by existential copulas
    • 4.1Nominal predicate clauses with existential copulas
    • 4.2Verbal predicate clauses with existential copulas
      • 4.2.1Verbal predicate clauses retaining the existential meaning
      • 4.2.2Thetic sentences
      • 4.2.3Exclamatives
  • 5.Non-finite independent clauses without a copula
    • 5.1Independent converbal clauses: Mirative and thetic
      • 5.1.1New for the speaker
      • 5.1.2Mirativity and around
    • 5.2Other types of unmarked sentences
  • 6.Conclusions
  • Notes
  • Abbreviations
  • References
Published online: 22 July 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.262.04sum
References (27)
References
Abdullaev, Sajgid N. 1954. Grammatika darginskogo jazyka (fonetika i morfologija) (A Grammar of Dargwa. Phonetics and Morphology). Makhachkala: Dagestanskij Filial Akademii nauk SSSR.Google Scholar
Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2012. The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology 16: 435–485. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Alekseev, Mikhail E. 1998. Naxsko-dagestanskie jazyki (Nakh-Dagestanian languages). Jazyki mira. Kavkazskie jazyki, 156–166. Мoscow: Academia.Google Scholar
Andréasson, M. 2007. The architecture of I-structure. In Proceedings of the LFG07 Conference, Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds), 26–43. Stanford CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Beyssade, Claire. 2009. Presupposition and exclamation. In Implicatures and Presuppositions, Paul Egré & Giorgio Magri (eds), 19–34. Cambridge MA: MITWPL.Google Scholar
Comrie, Bernard & Khalilov, Madzhid. 2010. The Dictionary of Languages and Dialects of the Peoples of the Northern Caucasus. Leipzig: MPI Evolutionary Anthropology.Google Scholar
DeLancey, Scott. 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1: 33–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 22: 369–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Drubig, Hans Bernard & Schaffar, Wolfgang. 2001. Focus constructions. In Language Typology and Language Universals. An International Handbook, Vol. 2, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1079–1104. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Forker, Diana. Information structure in languages of the Caucasus. To appear. In Handbook of Caucasian Languages, Maria Polinsky (ed.). Oxford: OUP.
Friedman, Victor A. 2010. The Caucasus. In The Routledge Handbook of Sociolinguistics around the World, Martin Ball (ed.), 127–138. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Harris, Alice C. 2002. Endoclitics and the Origins of Udi Morphosyntax. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kazenin, Konstantin. 2002. Focus in Dagestanian and word order typology. Linguistic Typology 6: 289–316.Google Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud. 1994. Information Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus and the Mental Representations of Discourse Referents. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Lambrecht, Knud & Polinsky, Maria. 1998. Typological variation in sentence-focus constructions. In Chicago Linguistics Society 33, Papers from the Panels, Kora Singer, Randall Eggert & Gregory Anderson (eds), 189–206. Chicago, IL: CLS.Google Scholar
Michaelis, Laura A. 2001. Exclamative constructions. In Language Typology and Language Universals. An International Handbook, Vol. 2, Martin Haspelmath, Ekkehard König, Wulf Oesterreicher & Wolfgang Raible (eds), 1038–1050. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Portner, Paul & Zanuttini, Raffaella. 2003. Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface. Language 79(1): 39–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rett, Jessica. 2009. A degree account of exclamatives. In Proceedings of SALT 18, Tova Friedman & Satoshi Ito (eds), 601–618. Ithaca NY: CLC publications.Google Scholar
. 2011. Exclamatives, degrees and speech acts. Linguistics and Philosophy 34: 411–442. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rett, Jessica & Murray, Sarah E. 2013. A semantic account of mirative evidentials. In Proceedings of SALT 23, Todd Snider (ed.), 453–472. Ithaca NY: CLC publications.Google Scholar
Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1995. “Theticity” and VS order: A case study. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung (STUF) 48: 3–31.Google Scholar
. 1996. Theticity [Arbeitspapier Nr 27 (Neue Folge)]. Köln: Institut für Sprachwissenschaft. Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar
Sumbatova, Nina. 2004. Kommunikativnye kategorii i sistema glagola (o nekotoryx tipologičeskix osobennostjax dagestanskogo glagola). In 40 let Sankt-Peterburgskoj tipologicheskoj škole, Viktor Xrakovsky, Andrej Malčukov & Sergej Dmitrenko (eds), 487–504. Moscow: Znak.Google Scholar
. 2011. Person hierarchies and the problem of person marker origin in Dargwa: Facts and diachronic problems. In Tense, Aspect, Modality and Finiteness in East Caucasian Languages, Gilles Authier & Timur Maisak (eds), 131–160. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar
Sumbatova, Nina & Lander, Yuri. 2014. Darginskij govor selenija Tanty: Grammatičeskij očerk, voprosy sintaksisa. Moscow: Jazyki slav’anskoj kul’tury.Google Scholar
Testelets, Yakov G. 1998. Word order variation in some SOV languages of Europe. In Constituent Order in the Languages of Europe [Empirical Approaches to Language Typology. EUROTYP 20–1], Anna Siewierska (ed.), 649–680. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zevakhina, Natalia. 2013. Syntactic strategies of exclamatives. Journal of Estonian and Finno-Ugric Linguistics 4(2): 157–178. Special issue Areal Linguistics, Grammar and Contacts.Google Scholar
Cited by (1)

Cited by one other publication

Marina Chumakina, Oliver Bond & Steven Kaye
2023. Agreement beyond the Verb, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 30 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.