Chapter 1
Psych verbs
Setting the scene
The main reason why this book is important for current linguistic debates is the fact that the puzzle of psychological verbs, dating back to the seminal paper by Belletti and Rizzi (1988) (henceforth B&R) is far from being settled. Recently it has been gaining even more attention, with research on typologically different languages bringing new empirical data and new insights (e.g., Marín & McNally, 2011; Alexiadou & Iordăchioaia, 2014; Fábregas & Marín, 2015, 2017; Fábregas et al., 2017; Temme & Verhoeven, 2016; García-Pardo, 2018; Hirsch, 2018). There is a whole variety of approaches to the “psych phenomenon” or “psych properties” (see Landau, 2010 for a list of the puzzling psych properties attested cross-linguistically), each looking at the problem from a different angle, depending on the language and the specific puzzle. The purpose of the present book is to focus on issues that were not central to the previous debate or which still remain very controversial. The collection of chapters in this volume focuses on Polish and Spanish psychological verbs, two typologically different languages, in comparison with English, which bring to light new overt contrasts that remain covert in other languages (e.g., overt aspectual distinctions, the peculiarities of dative structures, including the constructivist account of some stative Experiencer eventualities, the role of information structure in word-order phenomena with psych verbs). This makes it possible to discover new relations at the interfaces of language subsystems.
Article outline
- 1.The state of the art in synchronic studies
- 2.Psych verbs from diachronic perspective
- 2.1Case selection in English psych verbs from diachronic perspective
- 2.2Impersonal/personal shift in English
- 2.3OE/SE shift
- 2.4The rise of the progressive with psych verbs
- 2.5Causativity and inchoativity of psych verbs
- 3.An overview of the chapters
-
Notes
-
References
References
References
Ackema, P., & Schoorlemmer, M.
(
2006)
Middles. In
M. Everaert &
H. van Riemsdijk (Eds.),
The Blackwell companion to syntax III (pp. 131–203). Oxford: Blackwell.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alexiadou, A.
(
2010)
On the morphosyntax of (anti-)causative verbs. In
M. Rappaport Hovav,
E. Doron, &
I. Sichel (Eds.),
Lexical semantics, syntax, and event structure (pp. 177–203). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alexiadou, A.
(
2014)
Active, middle, and passive: The morphosyntax of voice.
Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 13, 19–40.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Alexiadou, A., & Iordăchioaia, G.
(
2014)
The psych causative alternation.
Lingua, 148, 53–79.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Allen, C.
(
1995)
Case marking and reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Anderson, J.
(
1986)
A note on Old English impersonals.
Journal of Linguistics, 22, 167–77.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arad, M.
(
1998a)
VP structure and the syntax-lexicon interface
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University College London.
Arad, M.
(
1998b)
Psych-notes.
UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 10, 203–223.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Arad, M.
(
1999)
What counts as a class? The case of psych verbs.
MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 35, 1–23.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bar-el, L.
(
2005)
Aspectual distinctions in Squamish
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of British Columbia.
Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L.
(
1988)
Psych-verbs and θ theory.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, 291–352.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bennis, H.
(
2000)
Adjectives and argument structure. In
P. Coopmans,
M. Everaert, &
J. Grimshaw (Eds.),
Lexical specification and insertion (pp. 27–67). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bennis, H.
(
2004)
Unergative adjectives and psych verbs. In
A. Alexiadou,
E. Anagnostopoulou, &
M. Everaert (Eds.),
The unaccusativity puzzle. Explorations of the syntax-lexicon interface (pp. 84–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Biały, A.
(
2005)
Polish psychological verbs at the lexicon-syntax interface in cross-linguistic perspective. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bondaruk, A., & Szymanek, B.
(
2007)
Polish nominativeless constructions with dative experiencers: Form, meaning and structure.
Studies in Polish Linguistics, 4, 61–99.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bouchard, D.
(
1995)
The semantics of syntax. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Broekhuis, H., & Corver, N.
(
2015)
Syntax of Dutch: Verbs and verb phrases, Vol. 1. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Bylinina, L.
(
2017)
Judge-dependence in degree constructions.
Journal of Semantics, 34, 291–331.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Chomsky, N., Gallego, Á. J., & Ott, D.
(
2019)
Generative grammar and the faculty of language: Insights, questions, and challenges.
Catalan Journal of Linguistics, Special Issue, 229–261.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cuervo, M. C.
(
2003)
Datives at large
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.
Doron, E.
(
2003)
Agency and voice: The semantics of the Semitic templates.
Natural Language Semantics, 11(1), 1–67.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dowty, D.
(
1979)
Word meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Dowty, D.
(
1991)
Thematic Proto-roles and argument selection.
Language, 67, 547–619.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Elmer, W.
(
1981)
Diachronic grammar: The history of Old and Middle English subjectless constructions. Tubingen: Mouton de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fábregas, A., & Marín, R.
(
2015)
Deriving individual-level and stage-level psych verbs in Spanish.
The Linguistic Review, 32, 227–275.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fábregas, A., & Marín, R.
(
2017)
On non-dynamic eventive verbs in Spanish.
Linguistics, 55, 451–488.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fábregas, A., Jiménez Fernández, Á. L., & Tubino, M.
(
2017)
What’s up with dative Experiencers? In
R. E. V. Lopes,
J. Ornelas de Avelar, &
S. M. L. Cyrino (Eds.),
Romance languages and linguistic theory 12: Selected papers from the 45th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), Campinas, Brazil (pp. 29–48). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fischer, O., & van der Leek, F.
(
1983)
The demise of the Old English impersonal construction.
Journal of Linguistics, 19, 337–368.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Fisiak, J.
(
1976)
Subjectless sentences in Middle English.
Kwartalnik Neofilologiczny, 23, 263–270.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van der Gaaf, W.
(
1904)
The transition from the impersonal to the personal construction in Middle English. Heidelberg: Winter.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
García-Pardo, A.
(
2018)
The morphosyntax of states. Deriving aspect and event roles from argument structure
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California.
van Gelderen, E.
(
2014)
Changes in psych-verbs: A reanalysis of little v.
Catalan Journal of Linguistics, 13, 99–122.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Gelderen, E.
(
2018)
The diachrony of verb meaning: Aspect and argument structure. New York, NY: Routledge.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Guidi, L. G.
(
2011)
Old English psych verbs and quirky experiencers.
York Papers in Linguistics, 2, 30–46.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Grafmiller, J.
(
2013)
The semantics of syntactic choice. An analysis of English emotion verbs
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University.
Grimshaw, J.
(
1990)
Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Harley, H.
(
1995)
Subjects, events, and licensing
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). MIT.
Hirsch, N.
(
2018)
German psych verbs – Insights from a decompositional perspective
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin.
Jackendoff, R.
(
1972)
Semantic interpretation in generative grammar. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jespersen, O.
(
1894)
Progress in language. London: Allen and Unwin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jespersen, O.
(
1927)
A Modern English Grammar on Historical Principles (Vol. 3). London: Allen and Unwin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jespersen, O.
(
1909–1949)
Modern English grammar. London: Allen and Unwin.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jiménez-Fernández, Á. L., & Rozwadowska, B.
(
2016)
The information structure of dative experiencer psych verbs. In
B. Cetnarowska,
M. Kuczok, &
M. Zabawa (Eds.),
Various dimensions of contrastive studies (pp. 100–121). Katowice: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Śląskiego.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Jiménez-Fernández, Á. L., & Rozwadowska, B.
(
2017)
On subject properties of datives in psych predicates. A comparative approach.
Acta Linguistica Hungarica/Academica, 64(2), 1–24.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kastner, I.
(
2016)
Nonactive voice in Hebrew and elsewhere: Between unaccusativity and agentivity.
UPENN Working Papers in Linguistics, 22(1), 167–176.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kemmer, S.
(
1995)
Emphatic and reflexive – self: Expectations, viewpoint, and subjectivity. In
D. Stein,
S. Wright, &
E. Finegan (Eds.),
Subjectivity and subjectivisation: Linguistic perspectives (pp. 55–82). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kiyota, M.
(
2005)
Aspectual classification and properties of verbs in Sənčáqən (Unpublished manuscript). University of British Columbia.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Klein, K., & Kutscher, S.
(
2002)
Psych-verbs and lexical economy. Theorie des Lexikons Nr. 122.
Arbeiten des Sonderforschungsbereichs, 282, 1–48.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Kratzer, A.
(
1996)
Severing the external argument from the verb. In
J. Rooryck, &
L. Zaring (Eds),
Phrase structure and the Lexicon (pp. 109–137). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Krzek, M.
(
2013)
The syntax of impersonal constructions in Polish
(Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Newcastle University, UK.
Kulikov, L., & Lavidas, N.
Landau, I.
(
2002)
A typology of psych passives. In
M. Hirotani, (Ed.),
Proceedings of the 32 NELS (pp. 271–286). Amherst, MA: GLSA.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Landau, I.
(
2010)
The locative syntax of experiencers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lavidas, N.
(
2007)
The diachrony of the Greek anticausative morphology. In
A. Alexiadou (Ed.),
Studies in the morpho-syntax of Modern Greek (pp. 106–138). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M.
(
1999)
Two structures for compositionally derived events. In
T. Matthews &
D. Strolovitch (Eds.),
Proceedings of SALT 9 (pp. 199–223). Ithaca, NY: Cornell Linguistics Circle Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lightfoot, D. W.
(
1979)
Principles of diachronic syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Lightfoot, D. W.
(
1991)
How to set parameters: Arguments from language change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malak, J.
(
2008)
The demise of subjectless clauses in English. Opole: Uniwersytet Opolski.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Malchukov, A., & Siewierska, A.
Marín, R., & McNally, L.
(
2005)
The Aktionsart of Spanish reflexive psychological verbs and their English counterparts. In
E. Maier,
C. Bary, &
J. Huitink (Eds.),
Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 9 (pp. 212–225). Nijmegen: NCS.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Marín, R., & McNally, L.
(
2011)
Inchoativity, change of state, and telicity: Evidence from Spanish reflexive psychological verbs.
Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 29, 467–502.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
McCawley, N. A.
(
1976)
From OE/ME “impersonal” to “personal” constructions: What is a “subject-less” S? In
S. B. Steever,
C. A. Walker, &
S. S. Mufwene (Eds.),
Papers from the parasession on diachronic syntax (pp. 192–204). Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Miura, A
2015 Middle English verbs of emotion and impersonal constructions: Verb meaning and syntax in diachrony. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Möhlig-Falke, R.
(
2012)
The Early English impersonal construction: An analysis of verbal and constructional meaning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Mustanoja, T. F.
(
1960)
A Middle English syntax: Part one – parts of speech. Helsinki: Societe Neophilologique.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pesetsky, D.
(
1995)
Zero syntax: Experiencers and cascades. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Piñón, C.
(
1997)
Achievements in an event semantics. In
A. Lawson (Ed.),
Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory VII (pp. 273–296). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pylkkänen, L.
(
2000a)
On stativity and causation. In
C. L. Tenny &
J. Pustejovsky (Eds.),
Events as grammatical objects: The converging perspective of lexical semantics and syntax (pp. 417–444). Stanford, CA: CSLI.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pylkkänen, L.
(
2000b)
Representing causatives. In
B. Jackson &
T. Matthews (Eds.),
Proceedings of SALT 10 (pp. 132–148). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Pylkkänen, L.
(
2008)
Introducing arguments. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ramchand, G.
(
2004)
Time and the event: the semantics of Russian prefixes. In
P. Svenonius (Ed.),
Special issue on Slavic prefixes. Nordlyd, 32(2), 323-361.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Ramchand, G.
(
2008)
Verb meaning and the lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rappaport Hovav, M., & Levin, B.
(
1998)
Building verb meanings. In
M. Butt &
W. Geuder (Eds.),
The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors (pp. 97–134). Stanford, CA: CSLI.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reinhart, T.
(
2001)
Experiencing derivations. In
R. Hastings,
B. Jackson, &
Z. Zvolenszky (Eds.),
Proceedings of SALT 11 (pp. 417–444). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Reinhart, T.
(
2002)
The Theta System – An overview.
Theoretical Linguistics, 28, 229–290.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rivero, M. L.
(
2003)
Reflexive clitic constructions with datives: Syntax and semantics. In
O. Arnaudova,
W. Browne,
M. L. Rivero, &
D. Stojanovic (Eds.),
Proceedings of FASL 12 (pp. 469–494). Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Slavic Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Roberts, I.
(
2007)
Diachronic syntax. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Romanova, E.
(
2004)
Superlexical vs. lexical prefixes. In
P. Svenonius (Ed.),
Special issue on Slavic prefixes. Nordlyd, 32(2), 255-278.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rothstein, S.
(
2004)
Structuring events. Oxford: Blackwell.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rothstein, S.
(
2008)
Two puzzles of lexical aspect: Semelfactives and degree achievements. In
J. Dolling,
T. Heyde-Zybatow, &
M. Schäfer (Eds.),
Event structures in linguistic form and interpretation, (pp. 175–198). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rozwadowska, B.
(
1997)
Towards a unified theory of nominalizations: External and internal eventualities. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rozwadowska, B.
(
2003)
Initial boundary and telicity in the semantics of perfectivity. In
P. Kosta,
J. Błaszczak,
J. Frasek,
L. Geist, &
M. Żygis (Eds.),
Investigations into formal Slavic linguistics, (pp. 859–872). Berlin: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rozwadowska, B.
(
2012)
On the onset of psych eventualities. In
E. Cyran,
H. Kardela, &
B. Szymanek (Eds.),
Sound, structure and sense. Studies in memory of Edmund Gussmann (pp. 533–554). Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Rozwadowska, B., & Bondaruk, A.
(
2019)
Against the psych causative alternation in Polish.
Studies in Polish Linguistics, 1, 77–97.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Schein, B.
(
1993)
Plurals and events. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Smith, C.
(
1997)
The parameter of aspect
(2nd ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Svenonius, P.
(
2004)
Slavic prefixes inside and outside VP. In
P. Svenonius (Ed.),
Special issue on Slavic prefixes. Nordlyd, 32(2), 205-253.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Tajsner, P.
(
2008)
Aspects of the grammar of focus. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Temme, A., & Verhoeven, E.
(
2016)
Verb class, case, and order: A crosslinguistic experiment on non-nominative experiencers.
Linguistics, 54(4), 769–813.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vendler, Z.
(
1967)
Linguistics and philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Vera-Diaz, J.
(
2000)
The development of causation in Old English and its interaction with lexical and diachronic processes.
Cuadernos de Investigacion Filológia, XXVI, 17–38.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Visser, F. H. T.
(
1970)
An historical syntax of the English language. Part one: Syntactical units with one verb. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Voorst, J.
(
1992)
The aspectual semantics of psychological verbs.
Linguistics and Philosophy, 15(1), 65–92.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
van Voorst, J.
(
1993)
A localist model of event semantics.
Journal of Semantics, 10, 65–111.
![DOI logo](https://benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Whaley, L.
(
1997)
An introduction to language typology. Thousand Oak, CA: Sage Publications.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Wiland, B.
(
2016)
Le charme discret of remnant movement: Crossing and nesting in Polish OVS sentences.
Studies in Polish Linguistics, 11(3), 133–165.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Witkoś, J., Paulina Ł., & Dziubała-Szrejbrowska, D.
(
2017)
Positioning the dative and accusative arguments through binding. Paper presented at Linguistics Beyond and Within Conference, 18–19 October, 2017, Lublin.
Witkoś, J., Dziubała-Szrejbrowska, D., Łęska, P., Gogłoza, A., & Meyer, R.
(
2018)
Datives and accusatives as binders in a grammar of subject-oriented reflexives. Paper presented at the SLE conference in Tallinn, 29 August–1 September 2018.
Żychliński, S.
(
2016)
On some aspects of the syntax of object experiencers in Polish and English. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM. Adam Mickiewicz University.
![Google Scholar](https://benjamins.com/logos/google-scholar.svg)
Cited by
Cited by 1 other publications
Willim, Ewa
2021.
On Scalarity in the Verbal Domain. The Case of Polish Psych Verbs. Part 2: The Aspectual Classes of Polish Psych Verbs, Perfectivity, and Scales.
Studies in Polish Linguistics 16:1
► pp. 41 ff.
![DOI logo](//benjamins.com/logos/doi-logo.svg)
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 18 june 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.