Cover not available
Part of
Beyond Emotions in Language: Psychological verbs at the interfaces
Edited by Bożena Rozwadowska and Anna Bondaruk
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 263] 2020
► pp. 23–74

Chapter 2
Polish psych verbs as non-achievements

| University of Wrocław
In this chapter it is argued, on the basis of the evidence from Polish, that the traditional Vendlerian classification of verbs is insufficient to accommodate Polish psych verbs. It is demonstrated that Polish perfective psych verbs are initial boundary events, different from final boundary events, such as change of state events or achievements. The analysis of temporal entailments in the domain of Polish Subject Experiencer (SE) verbs and Object Experiencer (OE) verbs supports the claim that perfectivity overtly marks the left boundary (beginning) of the state in Polish. Consequently, there is no culmination or result phrase in the denotation of either SE or OE verbs. This correlates with their behavioral syntactic properties such as passivization. The paper provides further support for the importance of inceptive/initial events different from telic right-boundary events. An attempt is made to accommodate the observations made in this chapter in the framework developed in Ramchand (2004 and subsequent work).
Keywords: achievements, change of state, event structure, experiencer verbs, first phase syntax, inceptive events, inchoative states, perfectivity, psych verbs, result states
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Final end-point oriented accounts of psych verbs
  • 3.Initial events
    • 3.1Terminology
    • 3.2Initial points in Skwxwu7mesh: Bar-el (2005)
    • 3.3 Marín and McNally’s (2011) initial point approach to psych verbs
  • 4. Polish Psych verbs vs. achievements
  • 5.Passivization of psych verbs in Polish
  • 6.Analysis
  • 7.Conclusions
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 8 December 2020
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.263.02roz
References (73)
References
Aalstein, A., & Blackburn, P. (2009). An aspectual classification of Polish verbs. Retrieved from <[URL]> (17 April, 2020).
Alexiadou, A., Anagnostopoulou, E., & Schäfer, F. (2015) External arguments in transitivity alternations. A layering approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Anagnostopoulou, E. (2017) Voice, manners and results in adjectival passives. In R. D’Alessandro, I. Franco, & Á. Gallego (Eds.), The verbal domain (pp. 105–129). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Arad, M. (1998a). VP structure and the syntax-lexicon interface (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University College London.
(1998b). Psych-notes. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics, 10, 203-223.Google Scholar
(1999). What counts as a class? The case of psych verbs. MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, 35, 1–23.Google Scholar
Bach, E. (1986). The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9, 5–16.Google Scholar
Bar-el, L. (2005). Aspectual distinctions in Squamish (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of British Columbia.
Belletti, A., & Rizzi, L. (1988). Psych-verbs and θ-theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 6, 291–352. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Biały, A. (2005). Polish psychological verbs at the lexicon-syntax interface in cross-linguistic perspective. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2020). Encoding inception in the domain of psych verbs in Polish. In B. Rozwadowska & A. Bondaruk (Eds.), Beyond Emotions in Language. Psychological verbs at the interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjaminse. (this volume) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bondaruk, A., & Rozwadowska, B. (2018a). Heterogeneity of states in Polish stative passives. In W. Guz & B. Szymanek (Eds.), Canonical and non-canonical structures in Polish (pp. 33–53). Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.Google Scholar
(2018b). Stative and eventive passives of Subject Experiencer verbs in Polish. Poznań Studies in Contemporary Linguistics, 54(4), 437–467. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Polish Object Experiencer verbs in the stative and eventive passive. In A. Bondaruk & K. Jaskuła (Eds.), All around the word. Papers in honour of Bogdan Szymanek on his 65th birthday (pp. 47–78). Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.Google Scholar
Brennan, J., & Pylkkänen, L. (2010). Processing psych verbs: Behavioural and MEG measures of two different types of semantic complexity. Language and Cognitive Processes, 25(6), 777–807. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Choi, J. Y. (2011). On the universality of aspectual classes: Inchoative states in Korean. Presented at Chronos 10: 10th International Conference on Tense, Aspect, Modality and Evidentiality, Aston University Birmingham, 18-20 April, 2011.
Choi, J., & Demirdache, H. (2014). Reassessing the typology of states: Evidence from Korean (degree) inchoative states. Handout, Workshop on the Ontology and the Typology of States, France.
Comrie, B. (1976). Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Croft, W. (1987). Categories and relations in syntax: The clause-level organization of information (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University.
Cuervo, M. C. (2015). Causation without a cause. Syntax, 18(4), 388–424. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Dowty, D. (1979). Word meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Embick, D. (2004). On the structure of resultative participles in English. Linguistic Inquiry, 35(3), 355–392. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fábregas, A., & Marín, R. (2015). Deriving individual-level and stage-level psych verbs in Spanish. The Linguistic Review, 32(2), 227–275. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2017). On non-dynamic eventive verbs in Spanish. Linguistics, 55(3), 451–488. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2020). Agents, states and passives in Spanish psych verbs. In B. Rozwadowska & A. Bondaruk (Eds.), Beyond Emotions in Language. Psychological verbs at the interfaces. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. (this volume) DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fritz-Huechante, P., Verhoeven, E., & Rott, J. A.(2018). Inchoative states, gradable states and (anti-)causativization in the psych domain: The cases of Spanish and Korean. A paper presented at the conference Endpoints 2018 . Berlin: Humboldt-University.
García Pardo, A. (2018). The morphosyntax of states. Deriving aspect and event roles from argument structure (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Southern California.
Gehrke, B., & Grillo, N. (2009) How to become passive. In K. Grohmann (Ed.), Explorations of Phase Theory: Features, arguments and interpretation at the interfaces (pp. 231–268). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
van Gelderen, E. (2018). The diachrony of verb meaning. Aspect and argument structure. London: Routledge. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Grafmiller, J. (2013). The semantics and syntactic choice. An analysis of English emotion verbs (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Stanford University.
Grimshaw, J. (1990). Argument structure. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Husband, E. (2012). On the compositional nature of states. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiyota, M. (2005). Aspectual classification and properties of verbs in Sǝnčáɵǝn (Unpublished manuscript). University of British Columbia.Google Scholar
(2008). Situation aspect and viewpoint aspect: From Salish to Japanese (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of British Columbia.
Kratzer, A. (2000). Building statives. Berkeley Linguistic Society, 26, 385–399. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Landau, I. (2010). The locative syntax of Experiencers. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Levin, B., & Rappaport Hovav, M. (1998). Building verb meanings. In M. Butt & W. Geuder (Eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors (pp. 97–134). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
(1999). Two structures for compositionally derived events. In Proceedings of SALT 9. Cornell Linguistics Circle Publications (pp. 199–223). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University.Google Scholar
Marín, R., & McNally, L. (2005). The aktionsart of Spanish reflexive psychological verbs. In E. Maier, C. Bary, & J. Huitink (Eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung (Vol. 9, pp. 212–225). Nijmegen: NCS. Google Scholar
(2011). Inchoativity, change of state, and telicity: Evidence from Spanish reflexive psychological verbs. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 29(2), 467–502. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Martin, F., & Schäfer, F. (2014). Causation at the syntax/semantics interface. In B. Copley & F. Martin (Eds.), Causation in grammatical structures (pp. 209–244). Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Melloni, C. (2017). Aspect-related properties in the nominal domain: The case of Italian psych nominals. In M. Bloch-Trojnar & A. Malicka-Kleparska (Eds.), Aspect and valency in nominals (pp. 253–284). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Mittwoch, A. (1991). In defence of Vendler’s achievements. In C. Vetters & W. Vandeweghe (Eds.), Perspectives on aspect and Aktionsart. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 6 , 71–85. Google Scholar
Nossalik, L. (2008). The aspectual function of inceptive morphemes. In S. Jones (Ed.), Proceedings of the 2008 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. Ottawa: Canadian Linguistic Association.Google Scholar
(2009). Slavic inceptive verbs: Accomplishments or achievements? In Proceedings of the 2009 annual conference of the Canadian Linguistic Association. Ottawa: Canadian Linguistic Association.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, D. (1995). Zero syntax: Experiencers and cascades. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, D., & Torrego, E. (2004). Tense, case, and the nature of syntactic categories. In J. Gueron & J. Lecarme (Eds.), The syntax of time (pp. 495–538). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Piñón, C. (1997). Achievements in an event semantics. In A. Lawson (Ed.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory VII (pp. 273–296). Ithaca, NY: CLC Publications.Google Scholar
Pustejovsky, J. (1988). The geometry of events. In C. Tenny (Ed.), Studies in generative approaches to aspect (pp.19-39). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
(1991). The syntax of event structure. Cognition, 41, 47–81. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pylkkänen, L. (1997). Stage and individual level psych verbs in Finnish. Paper presented in the Workshop on events in syntax and semantics , LSA Summer Institute, Cornell University.
(2000). On stativity and causation. In C. Tenny & J. Pustejovsky (Eds.), Events as grammatical objects: The converging perspective of lexical semantics and syntax (pp. 417–444). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Ramchand, G. (2004). Time and the event: The semantics of Russian prefixes. In P. Svenonius (Ed.), Special issue on Slavic prefixes. Nordlyd, 32(2), 323–361.Google Scholar
(2008). Verb meaning and the Lexicon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2019). Event structure and verbal decomposition. In R. Truswell (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of event structure (pp. 314–341). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rappaport Hovav, M., & Levin, B. (1998). Building verb meanings. In M. Butt & W. Geuder (Eds.), The projection of arguments: Lexical and compositional factors (pp. 97–134). Stanford, CA: CSLI.Google Scholar
Reinhart, T. (2002). The Theta System – An overview. Theoretical Linguistics, 28(3), 229–290.Google Scholar
Rothmayr, A. (2009). The structure of stative verbs. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rothstein, S. (2004). Structuring events: A study in the semantics of aspect. Oxford: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
(2008). Two puzzles of lexical aspect: Semelfactives and degree achievements. In J. Dolling, T. Heyde-Zybatow, & M. Schäfer (Eds.), Event structures in linguistic form and interpretation (pp. 175–198). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rozwadowska, B. (2003). Initial boundary and telicity in the semantics of perfectivity. In P. Kosta, J. Błaszczak, J. Frasek, L. Geist, & M. Żygis (Eds.), Investigations into formal Slavic linguistics (pp. 859–872). Berlin: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
(2012). On the onset of psych eventualities. In E. Cyran, H. Kardela, & B. Szymanek (Eds.), Sound structure and sense. Studies in memory of Edmund Gussmann (pp. 533–544). Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.Google Scholar
Rozwadowska, B., & Bondaruk, A. (2019). Against the psych causative alternation in Polish. Studies in Polish Linguistics, 1, 77–79. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Schäfer, F. (2008). The syntax of anticausatives. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Sichel, I. (2010). Event structure constraints in nominalization. In A. Alexiadou & M. Rathert (Eds.), The syntax of nominalizations across languages and frameworks (pp.151–190). Berlin: Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Smith, C. S. (1997). The parameter of aspect (2nd ed.). Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Talmy, L. (1978). Figure and ground in complex sentences. In J. H. Greenberg (Ed.), Universals of human language (Vol. 4, pp. 625–649). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
(2000). Toward a cognitive semantics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Torrego, E. (1998). The dependencies of objects. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Vendler, Z. (1957). Verbs and times. The Philosophical Review, 66(2), 143–160. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Verhoeven, E. (2010). Agentivity and stativity in experiencer verbs: Implications for a typology of verb classes. Linguistic Typology, 14(2–3), 213–251.Google Scholar
van Voorst, J. (1992). The aspectual semantics of psychological verbs. Linguistics and Philosophy, 15, 65–92. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Żychliński, S. (2016). On some aspects of the syntax of object Experiencers in Polish and English. Poznań: Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM. Adam Mickiewicz University.Google Scholar
Cited by (3)

Cited by three other publications

Biały, Adam
2020. Chapter 3. Encoding inception in the domain of psych verbs in Polish. In Beyond Emotions in Language [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 263], ► pp. 75 ff. DOI logo
Willim, Ewa
2020. On Scalarity in the Verbal Domain. The Case of Polish Psych Verbs. Part 1: Polish Perfective Psych Verbs and Their Prefixes. Studies in Polish Linguistics 15:4 ► pp. 221 ff. DOI logo
Willim, Ewa
2021. On Scalarity in the Verbal Domain. The Case of Polish Psych Verbs. Part 2: The Aspectual Classes of Polish Psych Verbs, Perfectivity, and Scales. Studies in Polish Linguistics 16:1 ► pp. 41 ff. DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.