Chapter published in:
Current Issues in Syntactic Cartography: A crosslinguistic perspective
Edited by Fuzhen Si and Luigi Rizzi
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 267] 2021
► pp. 1526
Aboh, Enoch O. & Pfau, Roland
2010What’s a wh-word got to do with it? In Mapping the Left Periphery. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 5, Paola Benincà & Nicola Munaro (eds), 91–125. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam
2001Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1–50. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999Adverbs and Functional Heads: A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
den Dikken, Marcel
2007Phase extension contours of a theory of the role of head movement in phrasal extraction. Theoretical Linguistics 33(1): 1–41. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lipták, Anikó K.
2001On the Syntax of Wh-items in Hungarian. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Nissenbaum, Jon
2000Investigations of Covert Phrase Movement. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Nye, Rachel
2013How Complement Clauses Distribute: Complementiser-how and the Case against Clause-type. PhD dissertation, University of Ghent.Google Scholar
Paoli, Sandra
2003COMP and the Left-periphery: Comparative Evidence from Romance. PhD dissertation, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
Preminger, Omer
2010Nested interrogatives and the locus of wh. In The Complementizer Phase: Subjects and Operators, Phoevos Panagiotidis (ed.), 200–235. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar: A Handbook of Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001On the position “int(errogative)” in the left periphery of the clause. In Current Studies in Italian Syntax: Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 267–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2005aPhase theory and the privilege of the root. In Organizing Grammar: Linguistic Studies in Honor of Henk van Riemsdijk, Hans Broekhuis, Norbert Corver, Riny Huybregts, Ursula Kleinhenz & Jan Koster (eds), 529–553. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
2005bOn the grammatical basis of language development: A case study. In The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax, Richard S. Kayne & Guglielmo Cinque (eds), 70–109. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2011Minimality. In A Handbook of Minimalism, Cedric Boeckx (ed.). Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2013Notes on cartography and further explanation. Probus 25(1): 197–226. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2017Locality and the functional sequence in the left periphery. In Elements of Comparative Syntax, Enoch Aboh, Eric Haeberli, Genoveva Puskás & Manuela Schönenberger (eds), 319–348. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur
2014aTopicalization and focalization: A preliminary exploration of the Hebrew left periphery. In On Peripheries, Anna Cardinaletti, Guglielmo Cinque & Yoshio Endo (eds.), 327–341. Tokyo: Hitsuzi Synobo.Google Scholar
2014bSubject positions, subject extraction, EPP and the subject criterion. In Locality, Enoch O. Aboh, Maria Teresa Guasti & Ian Roberts (eds), 58–86. Oxford: OUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur & Bocci, Giuliano
2019Syntactic cartography. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Linguistics. Oxford: OUP. http://​linguistics​.oxfordre​.com/ Crossref
Shlonsky, Ur & Soare, Gabriela
2011Where’s why? Linguistic Inquiry 42(4): 651–669. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Sočanac, Tomislav
2017Subjunctive Complements in Slavic Languages. PhD dissertation, University of Geneva.Google Scholar
Suñer, Margarita
1994V-movement and the licensing of argumental wh-phrases in Spanish. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 12(2): 335–372. CrossrefGoogle Scholar