References (26)
References
Belletti, Adriana. 2001. ‘Inversion’ as focalization. In Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar, Aafke C. J. Hulk & Jean-Yves Pollock (eds), 60–90. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Belletii, Adriana. 2004. Aspects of the Low IP area. In The Structure of CP and IP: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 2, Luigi Rizzi (ed.), 16–51. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Belletti, Adriana & Shlonsky, Ur. 1995. The order of verbal complements: A comparative study. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 13: 489–526. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and Functional Heads. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Endo, Yoshio. 2007. Locality and Information Structure. A Cartographic Approach to Japanese. [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 116]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fujimaki, Kazuma. 2009. On the relative structural position of high adverbs and the interpretation of Ga-marked subject. Paper Presented at the 139th Meeting of the Linguistic Society of Japan.
Haider, Hubert. 2010. The Syntax of German. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hara, Yurie. 2006. Grammar of Knowledge Representation. PhD dissertation, University of Delaware.Google Scholar
Heycock, Caroline. 2008. Japanese -Wa, -Ga, and information structure. In The Oxford Handbook of Japanese Linguistics, Shigeru Miyagawa & Mamoru Saito (eds), 54–83. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kamio, Akio. 1977. Suuryoosi-no sintakkusu (Syntax of numeral quantifiers). Gengo 6(8): 83–91.Google Scholar
Kenesei, István. 1998. Adjuncts and arguments in VP-focus in Hungarian. Acta Linguistica Hungarica 45: 61–88. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kiss, Katalin É. 1998. Identificational focus versus information focus. Language 74: 245–273. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014. Identificational focus revisited: The issue of exhaustivity. Paper Presented at CLS 50.
Kuno, Susumu. 1973. The Structure of the Japanese Language. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kuroda, Shigeyuki. 1965. Generative Grammatical Studies in the Japanese Language. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
. 2005. Focusing on the matter of topic: A study of Wa and Ga in Japanese. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 14: 1–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Namura, Koichiro. 2017. Japanese particle Wa with a focal stress provokes exhaustive identificational focus. In Studies on Syntactic Cartography: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Syntactic Cartography 2015, Fuzhen Si (ed.), 352–370. Beijing: Chinese Social Sciences Press.Google Scholar
Nakamura, Koichiro. 2020. Types and functions of Wa-marked DPs and their structural distribution in a Japanese sentence. In Information Structural Perspectives on Discourse Particles [Studies in Language Companion Series 213], Pierre-Yves Modicom & Olivier Duplâtre (eds), 161–175. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Noda, Hisasi. 1984. Fukusi-no Gozyun. Nihongo Kyooiku 52: 79–90.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Locality and left periphery. In Structures and Beyond, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 223–251. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Sano, Masaki. 2006. Toritate-si o Meguru Ninka Zyooken to Kara-setu (Licensing conditions on the focus particles and kara-clause). Scientific Approaches to Language 5: 49–69.Google Scholar
Tomioka, Satoshi. 2010. Contrastive topic operates on speech act. In Information Structure: Theoretical Typological, and Experimental Perspective, Malte Zimmermann & Caroline Féry (eds), 115–138. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
. 2015. Embedded Wa-phrases, predication, and judgment theory. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 33: 267–305. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tomoioka, Satoshi. 2016. Information structure in Japanese. In The Oxford Handbook of Information Structure, Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), 753–773, Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Watanabe, Akira. 2006. Functional projections of nominals in Japanese: Syntax of classifiers. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24: 241–306. DOI logoGoogle Scholar