Chapter published in:
Current Issues in Syntactic Cartography: A crosslinguistic perspective
Edited by Fuzhen Si and Luigi Rizzi
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 267] 2021
► pp. 261–286

Chapter 12
Multiple counterparts of Mandarin qu (go) in Teochew and their cartographic distributions

A new perspective into its multiple syntactic functions and grammaticalization process

| Georgetown University
Qu (lit. go, 去 ) in Mandarin is a thorny topic for syntactic analyses, considering that it has multiple functions but only one phonetic form, not to mention that Mandarin also has some other complicated syntactic constructions intertwined in the discussions. However, in Teochew, a variety of Southern Min, which boasts a richer phonetic and phonological system, its counterparts of Mandarin qu have different realizations, each corresponding to different syntactic functions. Through analyzing these different phonetic forms in Teochew and exploring their cartographic distributions, this paper aims to provide a new view from the perspective of Chinese dialect on the discussions on this topic. In addition to Zhang’s (2016: 188–197) descriptive observations on two Teochew counterparts of Mandarin qu – k’a and k’u, this paper also discusses another counterpart – k’ə, analyzes their syntactic characteristics and finds out that their cartographic distributions are located from the VP layer all the way up to the CP layer – namely VP, vP, AspectP, TP and SAttP in the CP domain, demonstrating a grammaticalization process. And k’u and k’ə are the outcome of morphological/phonological derivation from k’u. Some crosslinguistic comparisons between Teochew, Old Chinese, Mandarin Chinese and English are also made to make the picture clearer.
Keywords: qu , k’u , k’a , k’ə , Teochew, cartography, grammaticalization
Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.Theoretical primaries: Cartography approach
  • 3.An in-depth analysis of k’u
    • 3.1 k’u as Verb head
    • 3.2 k’u as Comp of VP
    • 3.3 k’u as Aspect head
    • 3.4 k’u as Voice head
    • 3.5 k’u as v head
    • 3.6Interim conclusion
  • 4.An in-depth analysis of k’a
    • 4.1Progressive aspect
    • 4.2Speaker-oriented
    • 4.3Interim conclusion
  • 5.An in-depth analysis of k’ə
  • 6.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 12 October 2021
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.267.12luo
References
Chomsky, Noam
1995 The Minimalist Program. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Xian
2007 A Semantic Analysis of the Modern Chinese Verbs “来” and “去”. PhD dissertation, Fudan University.Google Scholar
Chen, Zheping
1992 On perfective particle “去”. Zhongguo Yuwen 2.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa L.-S. & Sybesma, Rint
2004 Postverhal ‘can’ in Cantonese (and Hakka) and Agree. Lingua 114: 419–445. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999 Adverbs and Functional heads. A Cross-linguistic Perspective. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2010 The Syntax of the Adjectives: A Comparative Study. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo & Rizzi, Luigi
2008 The cartography of syntactic structures. CISCL Working Papers 2.Google Scholar
Gong, Rui
2018 The cartographic distributions of light verb ‘da’ in modern Chinese. Academic report on the International Workshop on Syntactic Analyticity and Grammatical Parameters (IWSAGP).
Hu, Chimin
2006 A case study of the semantic change of “去”. Zhongguo Yuwen 6.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James
1982 Logical Relation in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar. PhD dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
1988 Wo Paode Kuai and Chinese phrase structure. Language 64: 274–311. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
1997 On lexical structure and syntactic projection. Chinese Language and Linguistics 3: 45–89.Google Scholar
2006 Resultative and unaccusatives: A parametric view. Bulletin of the Chinese Linguistic Society of Japan 253: 1–43. Reprinted in C.-T. James Huang 2010 Between Syntax and Semantics, 377–403. London: Routledge. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2008 On Ta De Laoshi Dang-de Hao and related problems. Linguistic Sciences 3(34): 225–241.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James, Li, Y.-H. Audrey & Li, Yafei
2009 The Syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James
2015 On syntactic analyticity and parametric theory. In Chinese Syntax in a Cross-Linguistic Perspective, Audrey Li, Andrew Simpson & Wei-Tien Dylan Tsai (eds), 1–48. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Kang, Xing
2018 The cartographic analyses of speaker-oriented projections in the left periphery. Academic report on the International Workshop on Syntactic Analyticity and Grammatical Parameters (IWSAGP).
Karlgren, Bernhard
1934 Chinese Linguistic Studies, He, Changqun (trans.). Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Larson, Richard K.
1988 On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19(3): 335–391.Google Scholar
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra A.
1981 Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Xinkui
1994 Dialects in Guangdong Province. Guangdong: Guangdong People Publishing House.Google Scholar
Liang, Yinfeng
2006 The evolution of phase complement “来(come)” and “去(go)” in Chinese. Linguistic Science 6.Google Scholar
Lin, Jo-wang
2006 Time in a Language without Tense: The Case of Chinese. Journal of Semantics 23: 1–53. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Lin, Lunlun
1997a The characteristics and research value of Teochew. Wen Shi Zhi Shi 9: 81–85.Google Scholar
1991b See historical sound change of Teochew from the perspective of literary and colloquial readings. Journal of Hanshan Teachers College.Google Scholar
1997c The value of Teochew on the research of Chinese history. Journal of Hanshan Teachers College 3: 78–86.Google Scholar
Lin, Tzong-hong Jonah
2001 Light Verb Syntax and the Theory of Phrase Structure. PhD dissertation, University of California at Irvine.Google Scholar
Liu, Yuehua
1980 Several problems about directional complements “来” and “去”. Language Teaching and Language Studies 3.Google Scholar
Liu, Yuehua, Pan, Wenyu & Gu, Wei
2001 Shiyong Xiandai Hanyu Yufa. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Lu, Jianming
1985 About “去(go)+VP” and “VP+去(go)” structure. Language Teaching and Language Studies 4.Google Scholar
Luo, Zhuosi
2018 Derived heads of Cantonese left periphery and cartographic distributions of its sentence final particles. Academic report on the 8th International Conference on Formal Linguistics, 23–25 November, Hangzhou, China.
2019 The synthetic performances of Teochew. Lingua Sinica 5.Google Scholar
Lv, Jiping
1983 Hanyu Yufa Jichu. Harbin City: Heilongjiang People’s Publishing House.Google Scholar
Lv, Shuxiang
1980/2005 Eight hundred words in Modern Chinese. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Pan, Victor Junnan
2015 Mandarin peripheral construals at the syntax-discourse interface: The linguistic review. Linguistic Review 32(4): 819–868. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Paul, Waltraud
2014 Why particles are not particular: Sentence-final particles in Chinese as heads of a split CP. Studia Linguistica 68(1): 77–115. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2015 New Perspectives on Chinese Syntax. Berlin: De Gruyter. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Pollock, Jean-Yves
1989 Verb movement, universal grammar, and the structure of IP. Linguistic Inquiry 20(3): 365–424.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (eds), 282–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
2001 On the position “int(errogative)” in the left periphery of the clause. In Current Issues in Italian Syntax: Essays Offered to Lorenzo Renzi, Guglielmo Cinque & Giampaolo Salvi (eds), 287–296. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
2004 Locality and left periphery. In Structure and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, Vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (eds), 223–251. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
2013 The functional structure of the sentence, and cartography. In The Cambridge Handbook of Generative Syntax, Marcel den Dikken (ed.). Cambridge: CUP. CrossrefGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi & Bocci, Giuliano
2015 Left periphery of the clause: Primarily illustrated for Italian. In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Syntax, 2nd edn. Malden MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Shlonsky, Ur
1997 Clause Structure and Word Order in Hebrew and Arabic. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Si, Fuzhen
2009 Multiple Feature Checking and its Syntactic Consequences. Beijing: Language and Culture University Press.Google Scholar
2012 A comparative study of Chinese and English derivational morphology. Journal of Yili Normal University (Social Science Edition) 1: 98–102.Google Scholar
2017 On the flexibility and rigidity of Chinese grammar. Journal of Yili Normal University (Social Science Edition) 7: 89–94.Google Scholar
2018 Towards a cartography of light verb. Linguistic Research 1: 11–17.Google Scholar
2019a New horizons in syntactic cartographic studies. Language Teaching and Linguistic Studies 3.Google Scholar
2019b Grammatical phonetic modifications in Chinese. TCSOL Studies 2.Google Scholar
Sun, Fei
2005 The Grammaticalization of “来 (Come)” and “去 (Go)” and Some Related Issues. MA thesis, Shanghai Normal University.Google Scholar
Sybesma, Rint
1992 Causatives and Accomplishments: The Case of Chinese ba. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Tang, Chih-Chen Jane
1990 Chinese Phrase Structure and the Extended X’ – Theory. PhD dissertation, Cornell University.Google Scholar
Tang, Sze-Wing
1997 The parametric approach to the resultative construction in Chinese and English. In UCI Working Papers in Linguistics 3, Luther C.-S. Liu & Kazue Takeda (eds), 203–226. Irvine CA: Irvine Linguistics Students Association.Google Scholar
2010 Formal Chinese Syntax. Shanghai: Shanghai Educational Publishing House.Google Scholar
Tian, Jianwei
2010 The Motives and Mechanism of the Grammaticalization of “来” and “去”. MA thesis, Jinan University.Google Scholar
Tsai, Wei-Tian Dylan
2016 On the distribution and interpretation of inner and outer light verbs in Chinese. Linguistic Science 4.Google Scholar
Wang, Guoshuang
2002 The semantic change of “去” and some related lexical questions. Journal of Hebei University of Science and Technology 2.Google Scholar
2003 The event particle “去” in Mandarin. Yuwen Yanjiu 2.Google Scholar
Wang, Li
1963/2018 Gu Dai Han Yu (1). Beijing: Zhonghua Book Company.Google Scholar
Xiao, Xiqiang
2003 Revisit “来 (come)” and “去(go)”. Chinese Language Learning 2.Google Scholar
Xiong, Zhongru
2004 Causative Sentences in Modern Chinese. Hefei: Anhui University Press.Google Scholar
2014 The Bec (come) ‘De’ in the state complement constructions. Linguistic Sciences.Google Scholar
Xu, Jingqian
1983 About “来(come)” and “去(go)”. Language Teaching and Language Studies 1.Google Scholar
Yang, Shouxun
1998 The syntactic research on ‘De’. Modern Foreign Languages.Google Scholar
Yue-Hashimoto, Anne
1971 Mandarin syntactic structures. Unicom 8.Google Scholar
Zhang, Shengyu
2016 Studies on the Chaoyang Dialect. Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.Google Scholar
Zhu, Dexi
1982 Yufa Jiangyi. Beijing: Commercial Press.Google Scholar