Cover not available
Part of
Non-canonical Control in a Cross-linguistic Perspective
Edited by Anne Mucha, Jutta M. Hartmann and Beata Trawiński
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 270] 2021
► pp. 1–12

Introduction
Non-canonical control in a cross-linguistic perspective

Introduction to the volume

| Universität Bielefeld
| Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche SpracheMannheim
| Leibniz-Institut für Deutsche SpracheMannheim
Article outline
  • 1.Issues in non-canonical control
  • 2.Overview of the book
    • Part I.Non-canonical control in complement clauses
      • Artemis Alexiadou & Elena Anagnostopoulou: Backward control, long distance agree, nominative case and TP/CP transparency
      • Pilar Barbosa: Alleged obligatorily controlled inflected infinitives
      • Ion Giurgea & Maria Aurelia Cotfas: Agent control in passives in Romanian
      • Hyunjung Lee & Mike Berger: On the obligatory versus no control split in Korean
      • Asako Matsuda: Control from inside: Evidence from Japanese
      • Krisztina Szécsényi: Control and covert modality in Hungarian: MECs and postverbal-only focus constructions
    • Part II.Non-canonical control in adjunct clauses
      • Silke Fischer & Inghild Flaate Høyem: Event control
      • Juliana Gerard: Adjunct control and the poverty of the stimulus: availability vs. evidence
      • Peter Herbeck: The (null) subject of adjunct infinitives in spoken Spanish
  • Acknowledgements
  • References
Available under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives (CC BY-NC-ND) 4.0 license.

For any use beyond this license, please contact the publisher at [email protected].

Published online: 17 September 2021
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.270.int
References (38)
References
Boeckx, Cedric & Hornstein, Norbert. 2003. Reply to “Control is not Movement”. Linguistic Inquiry 34(2): 269–280. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2004. Movement under control. Linguistic Inquiry 35(3): 431–452. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2006. The virtues of control as movement. Syntax 9(2): 118–130. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Borer, Hagit. 1989. Anaphoric AGR. In The Null Subject Parameter, Osvaldo A. Jaeggli & Kenneth J. Safir (eds), 69–109. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Bouchard, Denis. 1984. On the Content of Empty Categories. Dordrecht: Foris.Google Scholar
Bresnan, Joan. 1982. Control and complementation. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 343–434.Google Scholar
Burukina, Irina. 2020. Mandative verbs and deontic modals in Russian: Between obligatory control and overt embedded subjects. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 5(1): 1–37. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro. 1984. Anaphoric properties of infinitives and gerunds. In Proceedings of the 3rd West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics (WCCFL 3), Mark Cobler, Susannah MacKaye & Michael T. Westcoat (eds), 28–39. Stanford CA: Stanford Linguistics Association.Google Scholar
. 1989. Anaphora and attitudes de se. In Semantics and Contextual Expression, Renate Bartsch, Johan van Benthem & Emde Boas (eds), 1–31. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Culicover, Peter W. & Jackendoff, Ray. 2001. Control is not movement. Linguistic Inquiry 32(3): 493–512. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2005. Simpler Syntax. Oxford: OUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Farkas, Donka F. 1988. On obligatory control. Linguistics and Philosophy 11(1): 27–58. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Fischer, Silke. 2018. Locality, control, and non-adjoined islands. Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 3(82): 1–40. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert. 1999. Movement and control. Linguistic Inquiry 30(1): 69–96. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2001. Move! A Minimalist Theory of Construal. Cambridge MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
. 2003. On control. In Minimalist Syntax, Rendall Hendricks (ed.). Malden MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hornstein, Norbert & Polinsky, Maria. 2010. Control as movement: Across languages and constructions. In Movement Theory of Control [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 154], Maria Polinsky & Norbert Hornstein (eds), 1–42. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray. 1972. Semantic Interpretation in Generative Grammar [Studies in Linguistics 2]. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
. 1974. Morphological and Semantic Regularities in the Lexicon. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Jackendoff, Ray & Culicover, Peter W. 2003. The semantic basis of control in English. Language 79(3): 517–556. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Koster, Jan. 1984. On binding and control. Linguistic Inquiry 15: 417–459.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelika. 2009. Making a pronoun: Fake indexicals as windows into the properties of pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 40(2): 187–237. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kuno, Susumo. 1975. Super equi-NP deletion is a pseudo-transformation. In Proceedings of North East Linguistic Society (NELS) 5, 29–44. Amherst MA: GLSA.Google Scholar
Landau, Idan. 2000. Elements of control: Structure and meaning in infinitival constructions. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2013. Control in Generative Grammar: A Research Companion. Cambridge: CUP. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
. 2015. A Two-tiered Theory of Control. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Manzini, Maria Rita. 1983. On control and control theory. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 421–446.Google Scholar
McFadden, Thomas & Sundaresan, Sandhya. 2018. Reducing pro and PRO to a single source. The Linguistic Review 35: 463–518. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Pearson, Hazel A. 2016. The semantics of partial control. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 34(2): 691–738. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Polinsky, Maria & Potsdam, Eric. 2002. Backward control. Linguistic Inquiry 33(2): 245–282. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ružicka, Rudolf. 1983. Remarks on control. Linguistic Inquiry 14: 309–324.Google Scholar
Sag, Ivan A. & Pollard, Carl. 1991. An integrated theory of complement control. Language 67: 63–113. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Sheehan, Michelle. 2014. Portuguese, Russian and the theory of control. In Proceedings of NELS 43, Vol. 2, Hsin-Lun Huang, Ethan Poole & Amanda Rysling (eds), 115–126.Google Scholar
Stiebels, Barbara. 2007. Towards a typology of complement control. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 47: 1–80. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Šimík, Radek. 2011. Modal Existential Wh-constructions. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
. 2013. The PRO-wh connection in modal existential wh-constructions. An argument in favor of semantic control. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31: 1163–1205. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin. 1992. Adjunct control. In Control and Grammar, Richard Kurth Larson, Sabine Iatridou, Utpal Lahiri & James Higginbotham (eds), 297–322. Dordrecht: Springer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wurmbrand, Susi. 2002. Syntactic vs. semantic control. In Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax: Proceedings of the 15th Workshop on Comparative Germanic Syntax [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 53], Jan-Wouter Zwart & Werner Abraham (eds), 95–129. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar