Cover not available
Part of
New Explorations in Chinese Theoretical Syntax: Studies in honor of Yen-Hui Audrey Li
Edited by Andrew Simpson
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 272] 2022
► pp. 431–444

On the syntax of mirativity

Evidence from Mandarin Chinese

| National Tsing Hua University
| National Chung Hsing University

This chapter proposes a unified analysis of Mandarin miratives in terms of their syntax and pragmatics. We examine the rather curious behavior of sentential adverbs such as yuanlai ‘turn out’ and zenme ‘how come’ in conjunction with the sentence final particle a. Specifically, the construals in question encode unexpectedness from the viewpoint of the speaker, as observed in other languages with overt morphology. It is argued extensively that the mirativity involved is syntactically represented by a functional projection in the left periphery, i.e., Speech Act Phrase. The evidence is drawn from the sentence-initial position of yuanlai and zenme, as well as their distribution in relation to evaluative adverbs and their exclusion from certain embedded clauses. Furthermore, the compatibility between Mandarin mirative expressions and indicative/interrogative mood presents a strong case for the separation of Force and Mood in cartographic terms.

Article outline
  • 1.Setting the stage
  • 2.Mirativity as a distinctive category
  • 3.The syntax of speech act and mirativity
  • 4.Further issues
  • 5.Concluding remarks
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References
Published online: 13 April 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.272.15tsa
References
Aikhenvald, A. Y
2004 Evidentiality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2012 The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology, 16(3), 435–486. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2014 The grammar of knowledge: a cross-linguistic view of evidentials and the expression of information source. The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic typology, 1, 51. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan A. & Dan I. Slobin
1986 A psychological account of the development and use of evidentials in Turkish. In Chafe & Nichols (eds) 1986, 159–167. DeLancey, Scott 1997 Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1. 33–52.Google Scholar
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen
1991 On the typology of wh-questions. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
Cheng, L. L. S
1997 On the typology of wh-questions. Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999 Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2004 Issues in adverbial syntax. Lingua 114(6): 683–710. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Coniglio, Marco & Iulia Zegrean
2012 Splitting up force: Evidence from discourse particles. In Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds.) Main Clause Phenomena: New Horizons. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 229–256. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
DeLancey, S
1997 Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1: 33–52. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2001 The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 369–382. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2012 Still mirative after all these years. Linguistic Typology 16: 529–564. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, L
2014 West Flemish verb-based discourse markers and the articulation of the speech act layer. Studia Linguistica 68 (1): 116–139. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hill, Virginia
2007 Vocatives and the Pragmatics-syntax Interface, Lingua 117: 2077–2105. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Huang, C. T. J., & Ochi, M
2004 Syntax of the hell: Two types of dependencies. In Proceedings-nels 34 (1): 279–294.Google Scholar
Li, Boya
2006 Chinese sentence-final particles and the syntax of the periphery. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Leiden.Google Scholar
Lü, Shu-Xiang
et al. 1980 Xiandai Hanyu Babai Ci [Eight Hundred Words in Modern Chinese], Peking: Shangwu Yinshuguan.Google Scholar
Pan, Victor Junnan
2015 Mandarin Peripheral Construals at the Syntax-Discourse Interface. The Linguistic Review 32.4:819–868. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, Waltraud
2014 Why particles are not particular: sentence-final particles in Chinese as heads of a split CP. Studia Linguistica 68:77–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 New perspectives on Chinese syntax. De Gruyter Mouton. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Tyler
2016 Mirativity as Surprise: Evidentiality, Information, and Deixis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 45(6): 1327–1357. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portner, Paul
2009 Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2010 On Some Properties of Criterial Freezing. In The Complementizer Phase: Subjects and Operators, E. Phoevos Panagiotidis (ed.), Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2016 Cartography and further explanation: The role of interface Principles, and Locality. Paper presented at Journées suisses de linguistique 9.Google Scholar
Speas, P., & Tenny, C
2003 Configurational properties of point of view roles. Asymmetry in grammar 1: 315–345. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Tang, Weiqun
2006 Fuci ‘yuanlai’ de duo jiaodu kaocha [Examination of adverbial yuanlai from multiple perspectives]. Changjiang xueshu [Yangtze River Academic] 4: 117–123.Google Scholar
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan
2008 Left periphery and how-why alternations. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17(2): 83. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 On the topography of Chinese modals. In Beyond functional sequence, Ur Shlonsky (ed.), 275–294. Oxford. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wang, Y. F., Goodman, D., Chen, S. Y., & Hsiao, Y. H
2011 Making claims and counterclaims through factuality: The uses of Mandarin Chinese qishi (‘actually’) and shishishang (‘in fact’) in institutional settings. Discourse Studies 13(2): 235–262. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Watters, David E
2002 A grammar of Kham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, Jiun-Shiung
2012 “One-way Contrast vs. Two-way Contrast: On the Semantics of běnlái and yuánlái in Mandarin Chinese.” Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 41(2): 163–271. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Wu, R.R.-J
2004 Stance in Talk. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Xing, Fuyi
1985 Cong yuanlai de cixing kan cide guilei wenti [On the issue of syntactic categorization from the syntactic category of yuanlai]. Hanyu xuexi [Chinese Language Learning] 6: 1–4.Google Scholar
Cited by

Cited by 1 other publications

Łukasz Jędrzejowski & Carla Umbach
2023. Non-Interrogative Subordinate Wh-Clauses, DOI logo

This list is based on CrossRef data as of 14 may 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.