On the syntax of mirativity
Evidence from Mandarin Chinese
This chapter proposes a unified analysis of
Mandarin miratives in terms of their syntax and pragmatics. We
examine the rather curious behavior of sentential adverbs such as
yuanlai ‘turn out’ and zenme
‘how come’ in conjunction with the sentence final particle
a. Specifically, the construals in question
encode unexpectedness from the viewpoint of the speaker, as observed
in other languages with overt morphology. It is argued extensively
that the mirativity involved is syntactically represented by a
functional projection in the left periphery, i.e., Speech Act
Phrase. The evidence is drawn from the sentence-initial position of
yuanlai and zenme, as well as
their distribution in relation to evaluative adverbs and their
exclusion from certain embedded clauses. Furthermore, the
compatibility between Mandarin mirative expressions and
indicative/interrogative mood presents a strong case for the
separation of Force and Mood in cartographic terms.
Article outline
- 1.Setting the stage
- 2.Mirativity as a distinctive category
- 3.The syntax of speech act and mirativity
- 4.Further issues
- 5.Concluding remarks
-
Acknowledgments
-
Notes
-
References
References (34)
References
Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2004. Evidentiality. New York: Oxford University Press.
Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2012. The essence of mirativity. Linguistic Typology, 16(3), 435–486.
Aikhenvald, A. Y. 2014. The grammar of knowledge: a cross-linguistic view
of evidentials and the expression of information
source. The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic
typology, 1, 51.
Aksu-Koç, Ayhan A. & Dan I. Slobin. 1986. A psychological account of the development and
use of evidentials in Turkish. In Chafe & Nichols (eds.) 1986, 159–167. DeLancey, Scott. 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected
information. Linguistic Typology 1. 33–52.
Cheng, Lisa Lai-Shen. 1991. On the typology of
wh-questions. Doctoral Dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Cheng, L. L. S. 1997. On the typology of wh-questions. Taylor & Francis.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads: A cross-linguistic
perspective. New York: Oxford University Press.
Cinque, Guglielmo. 2004. Issues in adverbial syntax. Lingua 114(6): 683–710.
DeLancey, S. 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected
information. Linguistic Typology 1: 33–52.
DeLancey, S. 2001. The mirative and evidentiality. Journal of Pragmatics 33: 369–382.
DeLancey, S. 2012. Still mirative after all these
years. Linguistic Typology 16: 529–564.
Haegeman, L. 2014. West Flemish verb-based discourse markers and the
articulation of the speech act layer. Studia Linguistica 68 (1): 116–139.
Hill, Virginia 2007. Vocatives and the Pragmatics-syntax
Interface, Lingua 117: 2077–2105.
Huang, C. T. J., & Ochi, M. 2004. Syntax of the hell: Two types of
dependencies. In Proceedings-nels 34 (1): 279–294.
Li, Boya. 2006. Chinese sentence-final particles and the syntax of the
periphery. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Leiden.
Lü, Shu-Xiang et al.. 1980. Xiandai Hanyu Babai Ci [Eight Hundred Words in Modern
Chinese], Peking: Shangwu Yinshuguan.
Pan, Victor Junnan. 2015. Mandarin Peripheral Construals at the
Syntax-Discourse Interface. The Linguistic Review 32.4:819–868.
Paul, Waltraud. 2014. Why particles are not particular: sentence-final
particles in Chinese as heads of a split CP. Studia Linguistica 68:77–115.
Paul, Waltraud. 2015. New perspectives on Chinese syntax. De Gruyter Mouton.
Peterson, Tyler. 2016. Mirativity as Surprise: Evidentiality,
Information, and Deixis. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 45(6): 1327–1357.
Portner, Paul. 2009. Modality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left
periphery. In Elements of grammar: Handbook of generative
syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Rizzi, Luigi. 2010. On Some Properties of Criterial
Freezing. In The Complementizer Phase: Subjects and
Operators, E. Phoevos Panagiotidis (ed.), Oxford Studies in Theoretical Linguistics.
Rizzi, Luigi. 2016. Cartography and further explanation: The role of
interface Principles, and Locality. Paper presented at Journées suisses de
linguistique 9.
Tang, Weiqun. 2006. Fuci ‘yuanlai’ de duo jiaodu kaocha [Examination
of adverbial yuanlai from multiple
perspectives]. Changjiang xueshu [Yangtze River
Academic] 4: 117–123.
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2008. Left periphery and how-why
alternations. Journal of East Asian Linguistics 17(2): 83.
Tsai, Wei-Tien Dylan. 2015. On the topography of Chinese
modals. In Beyond functional sequence, Ur Shlonsky (ed.), 275–294. Oxford.
Wang, Y. F., Goodman, D., Chen, S. Y., & Hsiao, Y. H. 2011. Making claims and counterclaims through
factuality: The uses of Mandarin Chinese
qishi (‘actually’) and
shishishang (‘in fact’) in
institutional settings. Discourse Studies 13(2): 235–262.
Watters, David E. 2002. A grammar of Kham. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Wu, Jiun-Shiung. 2012 “One-way Contrast vs. Two-way Contrast: On the
Semantics of běnlái and
yuánlái in Mandarin
Chinese.” Cahiers de Linguistique – Asie Orientale 41(2): 163–271.
Xing, Fuyi. 1985. Cong yuanlai de cixing kan cide guilei wenti [On
the issue of syntactic categorization from the syntactic
category of yuanlai]. Hanyu xuexi [Chinese Language
Learning] 6: 1–4.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Łukasz Jędrzejowski & Carla Umbach
2023.
Non-Interrogative Subordinate Wh-Clauses,
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 5 july 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.