Cover not available
Part of
New Explorations in Chinese Theoretical Syntax: Studies in honor of Yen-Hui Audrey Li
Edited by Andrew Simpson
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 272] 2022
► pp. 509–536

Sentence-internal discourse particles in Mandarin Chinese

| Peking University

This article investigates a group of sentence-internal discourse particles in Mandarin Chinese. We start with the general properties and proposes an approximation of the effects of three particles: yòu, dào, and yě. We then turn to their word order in the main clause and restricted distribution in embedded clauses. The observations are analyzed in correlation with functional projections in an expanded CP domain. In terms of meaning contributions, based on the Table model of discourse (Farkas and Bruce 2011), the core meaning of dào is captured as contributing to the speaker’s discourse commitment, which marks misalignment between the discourse participants’ beliefs. The findings suggest viable formal frameworks for explaining the distribution, meaning, and pragmatic effect of discourse particles.

Article outline
  • 1.Introduction
  • 2.General meaning and properties of S-internal DisPs
    • 2.1Meaning contributions and discourse effects
    • 2.2General properties
  • 3.Syntactic properties of S-internal DisPs
    • 3.1Linear order in the clause
    • 3.2DisPs in embedded clauses
  • 4.Meaning contribution of S-internal DisPs
    • 4.1Discourse components and the table model
    • 4.2 Marking unexpectedness : The particle dào
  • 5.Conclusion
  • Acknowledgments
  • Notes
  • References:
Published online: 13 April 2022
DOI logo
https://doi.org/10.1075/la.272.18wei
References
Bayer, Josef & Hans-Georg Obenauer
2011 Discourse particles, clause structure, and question types. The Linguistic Review 28 (4): 449–491. < DOI logo>
Cardinaletti, Anna
2011 German and Italian modal particles and clause structure. The Linguistic Review 28 (4): 493–531. < DOI logo>
Chomsky, Noam
2000 Minimalist inquiries: the framework. In Step by Step: Essays on Minimalist Syntax in Honor of Howard Lasnik, Roger Martin, David Michaels, and Juan Uriagereka (eds), 89–155. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
2001 Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (eds), 1–52. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Chu, Chauncey C
1998 A Discourse Grammar of Mandarin Chinese. New York: Peter Lang Publishing.Google Scholar
Cinque, Guglielmo
1999 Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Condoravdi, Cleo & Sven Lauer
2012 Imperatives: Meaning and illocutionary force. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 9, Christopher Piñón (eds), 37–58.Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco
2006 German Modal Particles in the Functional Structure of IP. In University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 16, 57–95.Google Scholar
2007 German modal particles in root and embedded clauses. In University of Venice Working Papers in Linguistics 17, 109–141.Google Scholar
Coniglio, Marco & Iulia Zegrean
2012 Splitting up force. In Main clause phenomena: New horizons, Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds), 229–255. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Csipak, Eva & Sarah Zoebel
2016 Discourse particle denn in the Antecedent of Conditionals. In Empirical Issues in Syntax and Semantics 11, Christopher Piñón (eds), 31–60.Google Scholar
Egg, Markus & Johannes Mursell
2016 The syntax and semantics of discourse particles. In Discourse Particles: Formal Approaches to their Syntax and Semantics, Josef Bayer & Volker Struckmeier (eds), 15–48. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Emonds, Joseph
1970 Root and structure-preserving transformations. PhD dissertation, MIT.
Ettinger, A. & Malamud, S
2015 Mandarin utterance-final particle ba in the conversational scoreboard. In Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 19. Eva & and Hedde Zeijlstra (eds), 232–251.Google Scholar
Farkas, Donka F. & Kim B. Bruce
2010 On reacting to assertions and polar questions. Journal of semantics 27 (1): 81–118. < DOI logo>
Fraser, Bruce
1990 An approach to discourse markers. Journal of Pragmatics 14 (3): 383–398. < DOI logo>
Frey, Werner
2012 On two types of adverbial clauses allowing root-phenomena. In Main clause phenomena: New horizons, Lobke Aelbrecht, Liliane Haegeman & Rachel Nye (eds), 405–429. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Ginzburg, Jonathan
1996 Dynamics and the semantics of dialogue. In Language, Logic, and Computation, vol. 1. Jerry Seligman and Dag Westerståhl (eds), 221–237. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.Google Scholar
Grice, H. Paul
1975 Logic and conversation. In Syntax & Semantics 3: Speech Acts, Peter Cole & Jerry L. Morgan (eds), 41–58. New York: Academic Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Gunlogson, Christine
2001 True to Form: Rising and Falling Declaratives as Questions in English. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gutzmann, Daniel
2015 Use-Conditional Meaning: Studies in Multidimensional Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane
2002 Anchoring to speaker, adverbial clauses and the structure of CP. In Georgetown University Working Papers in theoretical Linguistics 2: 117–180.Google Scholar
2012 Adverbial clauses, main clause phenomena, and composition of the left periphery. Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Haegeman, Liliane & Virginia Hill
2013 The syntacticization of discourse. In Syntax and its limits 48, Raffaella R Folli, Christina Sevdali & Robert Truswell (eds), 370–390. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Hamblin, Charles L
1971 Mathematical models of dialogue. Theoria 37 (2): 130–155. < DOI logo>
Hooper, Joan B., & Sandra A. Thompson
1973 On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic inquiry 4 (4): 465–497.Google Scholar
Huang, C.-T. James, Y.-H. Audrey Li, and Yafei Li
2009 The syntax of Chinese. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, David
1997 The meaning of ‘ouch’ and ‘oops’. Manuscript, UCLA.Google Scholar
Karagjosova, Elena
2004 The meaning and function of German modal particles. PhD dissertation, Freie Universität Berlin.
Kaufmann, Stefan
2010 Strong and weak presupposition: German ja under quantifiers. Manuscript, Northwestern University. [URL]Google Scholar
Kaufmann, Magdalena & Stefan Kaufmann
2012 Epistemic particles and performativity. In Proceedings of the 22nd Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, Anca Chereches (eds), 208–225. Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Kratzer, Angelica
1999 Beyond Ouch and Oops: How descriptive and expressive meaning interact. Paper presented at the Cornell Context-Dependency Conference.Google Scholar
2004 Interpreting focus: Presupposed or expressive meanings? A comment on Geurts and van der Sandt. Theoretical Linguistics, 30 (1):123–136. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Kraus, Kelsey
2018 Great Intonations. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Landau, Idan
2015 A two-tiered theory of control. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Li, Boya
2006 Chinese Final Particles and the Syntax of the Periphery. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.
Li, Charles N., & Sandra A. Thompson
1981 Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference Grammar. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Li, Zongjiang
2005 Fuci ‘dao’ ji xiangguan fuci de yuyi gongneng he lishi yanbian [On the semantic functions and diachronic development of adverbs ‘dao’ and other relevant adverbs]. Hanyu xuebao. 10: 33–39.Google Scholar
Ma, Zhen
1983 Shuo ‘fan’er’. [On ‘fan’er’]. Zhongguo yuwen. 3.Google Scholar
Müller, Sonja
2017 Combining ja and doch: A case of discourse structural iconicity. In Discourse Particles. Formal Approaches to their Syntax and Semantics, Josef Bayer & Volker Struckmeier (eds), 203–240. Berlin: De Grutyer.Google Scholar
Paul, Waltraud
2009 Consistent disharmony: Sentence-final particles in Chinese. Manuscript, Paris. [URL].Google Scholar
2014 Why particles are not particular: Sentence-final particles in Chinese as heads of a split CP. Studia Linguistica 68 (1): 77–115. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 New Perspectives on Chinese Syntax. Berlin: De Gruyter. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Paul, Waltraud & Victor Pan
2017 What you see is what you get: Chinese sentence-final particles as head-final complementisers. In Discourse Particles. Formal Approaches to their Syntax and Semantics, Josef Bayer & Volker Struckmeier (eds), 49–77. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pesetsky, David & Esther Torrego
2007 The syntax of valuation and the interpretability of features. In Phrasal and clausal architecture: Syntactic derivation and interpretation. In honor of Joseph E. Emonds, Simin Karimi, Vida Samiian, & Wendy K. Wilkins (eds), 262–294. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Portner, Paul
2004 The semantics of imperatives within a theory of clause types. In Proceedings of the 14th Semantics and Linguistic Theory Conference, Robert B. Young (eds), 235–252. Linguistic Society of America. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Potts, Christopher
2007 The expressive dimension. Theoretical Linguistics 33 (2), 165–198. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2015 Presupposition and implicature. In The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory [Second Edition], Shalom Lappin & Chris Fox (eds), 168–202. Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rett, Jessica
2021 The Semantics of Emotive Markers and Other Illocutionary Content. Journal of Semantics 38(2),305–340. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar, Liliane Haegeman (eds), 289–330. Dordrecht: Kluwer. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Craige
1996 Information structure in discourse. In osu Working Papers in Linguistics 49, J.H. Yoon and A. Kathol (eds), 91–136. Columbus: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Rudin, Deniz
2018 Rising above commitment. PhD dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.
Schiffrin, Deborah
1987 Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Shi, Dingxu, Mi Zhou, & Yao Yao
2017 Pingjia fuci yu Beijing mingti – ‘pianpian’ de yuyi yu jufa texing [Evaluative adverbs and background proposition – the syntax and semantics of Chinese pianpian]. Waiyu jiaoxue yu yanjiu. 49 (6): 914–926.Google Scholar
Simpson, Andrew
2014 Sentence-final particles. In The Handbook of Chinese Linguistics, C.-T. James Huang, Y.-H. Audrey Li, & Andrew Simpson (eds), 156–179. Malden, MA: Blackwell. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert
1978 Assertion. In Syntax and Semantics (9), Peter Cole (eds), 315–332. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Tang, Jane Chih-Chen
1990 Chinese Phrase Structure and the Extended X-bar Theory. Phd dissertation, Cornell University.
Thurmair, Maria
1989 Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Max Niemeyer Verlag. < DOI logo> Google Scholar
Wei, Haley Wei & Yen-hui Audrey Li
2018 Adverbial clauses in Mandarin Chinese. Linguistic Analysis, 42(1&2): 163–298.Google Scholar
Wei, Wei
2020 Discourse Particles: clause structure and syntax-to-discourse relation. PhD dissertation, University of Southern California.
Wu. Jiun-Shiung
2008 Antonyms? Presuppositions? On the semantics of two evaluative modals jingran and guoran in Mandarin. Journal of Chinese language and computing 18(1): 161–173.Google Scholar
Zeevat, Henk
2003 Particles: Presupposition triggers, context markers or speech act markers. In Optimality theory and pragmatics, Reinhard Blutner & Henk Zeevat (eds), 91–111. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Zhou, Hong
2006 Fuci ‘dao’ de yuqi tuiduan yu yufa yiyi [On the Anticipation Conclusion and Grammatical Meaning of the Chinese Adverb ‘dao’]. Yunnan shifan daxue xuebao [Journal of Yunnan Normal University]. 4: 1–7.Google Scholar
Zhu, Dexi
1982 Yufa jiangyi. [Lectures in Grammar]. Beijing: The Commercial Press.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Malte
2004 Discourse Particles in the Left Periphery. In zas Papers in Linguistics 35: Proceedings of the Dislocated Elements Workshop [volume 2], Benjamin Shaer, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds) 543–566. ZAS Berlin, DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2008 Discourse particles in the left periphery. In Dislocated Elements in Discourse: Syntactic, Semantic, and Pragmatic Perspectives, Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds), 200–231. London: Routledge,Google Scholar
2011 Discourse particles. In Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning [Volume 2], Klaus von Heusinger, Claudia Maienborn & Paul Portner (eds), 2011–2038. Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar