V-gei vs. double object construction
The mental representation of the Mandarin
V-gei construction
The present study investigates whether
V-gei constructions [V-gei NP
NP] have the same underlying syntactic structure as Double Object
Constructions (DOC) [V NP NP], using a structural priming paradigm.
Native speakers of Mandarin were primed to produce a
V-gei, DOC, or a Gei-object
Construction (GOC) [V NP gei NP]. They then were
given the opportunity to produce either a V-gei,
DOC, or a GOC at will. We found that Mandarin speakers produced
significantly more DOC and V-gei sentences
following DOC primes than GOC primes. V-gei primes,
however, did not increase the production DOC or
V-gei sentences. We discuss the implications of
these results.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Previous syntactic priming studies
- 3.Experiment
- Participants
- Materials & procedure
- Scoring
- Results
- 4.Discussion
- 5.Conclusion
- Appendix
-
Notes
-
References
References (34)
References
Bock, J. K. 1986. Syntactic persistence in language
production. Cognitive Psychology, 18, 355–387.
Bock, J. K. 1989. Closed-class immanence in sentence
production. Cognition, 31, 163–186.
Bock, J. K., & Loebell, H. 1990. Framing sentences. Cognition, 35, 1–39.
Branigan, H. P., Pickering M. J., & Cleland, A. A. 2000. Syntactic co-ordination in
dialogue. Cognition 75, B13–B25.
Cai, Z. G., Pickering, M. J., & Branigan, H. P. 2012. Mapping concepts to syntax: Evidence from
structural priming in Mandarin Chinese. Journal of Memory and Language, 66, 833–849.
Cai, Z.G., Pickering, M.J., Yan, H., & Branigan, H.P. 2011. Lexical and syntactic representations in closely
related languages: Evidence from Cantonese-Mandarin
bilinguals. Journal of Memory and Language, 65(4), 431–445.
Cleland, A. A., & Pickering, M. J. 2003. The use of lexical and syntactic information in
language production: Evidence from the priming of
noun-phrase structure. Journal of Memory and Language, 49, 214–230.
Corley, M., & Scheepers, C. 2002. Syntactic priming in English sentence production:
Categorical and latency evidence from an Internet-based
study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 126–131.
Ferreira, V. S. 2003. The persistence of optional complementizer
production: Why saying ‘‘that’’ is not saying ‘‘that’’ at
all. Journal of Memory and Language, 48, 379–398.
Fox Tree, J. E., & Meijer, P. J. A. 1999. Building syntactic structure in
speaking. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 28, 71–92.
Goldberg, A. 1995. Construction: A Construction Grammar Approach to
Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A. 2006. Construction at Work: The Nature of Generalization in
Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Goldberg, A., & Jackendoff, R. 2004. The English resultative as a family of
constructions. Language 80, 532–568.
Gu, Y. 1999. 双宾语结构 [Double object
constructions]. In Universals and specifics: Controversy in Chinese
linguistics (共性与个性:汉语语言学中的争议), L. Xu (ed.). Beijing: Beijing Language Culture University Press.
Hartsuiker, R.J., & Kolk H. H. J. 1998. Syntactic persistence in Dutch. Language and Speech 41, 143–184.
Her, O. 2006. Justifying part-of-speech assignments for
Mandarin gei. Lingua 116 (8), 1274–1302.
Hwang, H., & Chun, E. 2018. Influence of social perception and social
monitoring on structural priming. Cognitive Science, 42(51), 303–313.
Hwang, H., & Shin, J-A. 2019. Cumulative effects of syntactic experience in a
between- and a within-language context: Evidence for
implicit learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 109, 104054.
Huang, C., & Ahrens K. 1999. The function and category of gei in Mandarin
ditransitive constructions. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 27(2), 1–26.
Kaan, E., & Chun, E. 2017. Priming and adaptation in native speakers and
second-language learners. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 21(2), 228–242.
Kaschak, M. P., Loney, R. A., & Borreggine, K. L. 2006. Recent experience affects the strength of
structural priming. Cognition, 99(3), B73–B82.
Konopka A.E., & Bock K. 2009. Lexical or syntactic control of sentence
formulation? Structural generalizations from idiom
production. Cognitive Psychology, 58(1), 68–101.
Li, A., 1990. Order and Constituency in Mandarin Chinese. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Li, C., & Thompson S. 1981. Mandarin Chinese: A Functional Reference
Grammar. University of California Press, Berkeley and Los Angeles.
Lin, T.-H., & Huang Y.-S. 2015. Structures of the Mandarin gei
constructions. Journal of East Asian Linguistics, 24(3), 309–388.
Liu, D. 2001. Hanyu geiyulei shuangjiwu jiegou de leixingxue
kaocha [A typological study on the double-object
construction of Chinese give verbs]. Zhongguo Yuwen 5.
Liu, F. 2006. Dative constructions in Chinese. Language and Linguistics, 7(4). 863–904.
Pickering, M.J., & Branigan, H.P. 1998. The representation of verbs: Evidence from
syntactic priming in language production. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 633–651.
Pickering, M. J., & Ferreira, V. S. 2008. Structural priming: A critical
review. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 427–459.
Scheepers C. 2003. Syntactic priming of relative clause attachments:
persistence of structural configuration in sentence
production. Cognition 89, 179–205.
Shen, Y., He Y., & Gu. Y. 2001. 生成语法理论与汉语语法研究 [Generative Grammar and Chinese Grammar
Research]. Harbin: Harbin Educational Press.
Tang, T.-C. 1978. Double object constructions in
Chinese. In Proceedings of Symposium on Chinese
Linguistics, Linguistics Institute of the
Linguistics Society of America 1977, Robert L. Cheng, Li Ying-Che & Ting-Chi Tang (eds.), 67–96. Taipei: Student.
Ting, J., & Chang M. 2004. The category of gei in Mandarin Chinese and
grammaticalization. Taiwan Journal of Linguistics, 2 (2), 45–74.
Zhang, N. 1998. Argument interpretation in the ditransitive
construction. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 21, 179–209.
Cited by (1)
Cited by one other publication
Li, Yi, Benedikt Szmrecsanyi & Weiwei Zhang
2024.
Across time, space, and genres: measuring probabilistic grammar distances between varieties of Mandarin.
Linguistics Vanguard
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 15 september 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers.
Any errors therein should be reported to them.