Part of
When Data Challenges Theory: Unexpected and paradoxical evidence in information structureEdited by Davide Garassino and Daniel Jacob
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 273] 2022
► pp. 1–36
Edited by Davide Garassino and Daniel Jacob
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 273] 2022
► pp. 1–36
IntroductionWhen data challenges theory
The analysis of information structure and its paradoxes
This article provides a comprehensive survey on current research on information structure so as to clarify some ‘paradoxical’ effects stemming from the tension between data and theory. Paradoxes are here defined as unexpected data in light of certain assumptions held in mainstream literature. More specifically, we explore two possible sources of paradoxes: certain features of the experimental design and, above all, inadequate discourse models. Mainly considering dislocation and cleft sentences in French and Italian we suggest that some apparent paradoxes (such as non-focalizing clefts or dislocation expressing focus-related functions) can be conceived of as the effect of general pragmatic mechanisms and rhetorical strategies exploited by speakers. We also claim that these effects can be better understood through explicit models of discourse.
Article outline
- 1.Introduction
- 2.Information structure and discourse organization
- 2.1Common ground
- 2.2Information structure and (implicit) questions
- 2.3Alternatives and types of focus
- 3.The ‘building blocks’ of information structure
- 4.The realization of information structure and its ‘natural
paradoxes’
- 4.1Information structure and prosody
- 4.2The IS-prosody-syntax triangle
- 4.3‘Non-canonical’ syntax: Left dislocation and cleft sentences in French and
Italian
- 4.3.1Left dislocation
- 4.3.2Cleft sentences
- 5.Conclusion and overview of the volume
- 5.1As a way of conclusion
- 5.2Contributions to this volume
-
Acknowledgments -
Notes -
References
References
Angermuller, Johannes, Maingueneau, Dominique & Wodak, Ruth
2014 The
Discourse Studies Reader: An
introduction. In The
Discourse Studies Reader, Johannes Angermuller, Dominique Maingueneau & Ruth Wodak (eds), 2–14. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 
Arvaniti, Amalia
. In
press. The Autosegmental-Metrical
model of intonational
phonology. In Prosodic
Theory and Practice. Stefanie Shattuck-Hufnagel & Jonathan Barnes (eds) Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press. [URL]> (11 June 2021).
Asher, Nicholas & Lascarides, Alex
2003 Logics
of
Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Austin, John L.
1962 How
to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered at
Harvard University in
1955. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Baumann, Stefan, Grice, Martine & Steindamm, Susanne
2006 Prosodic
marking of focus domains – categorical or
gradient? In Proceedings
of Speech Prosody
2006, 301–304. [URL]> (11 June 2021).
Baumann, Stefan & Riester, Arndt
2012 Referential
and lexical givenness: Semantic, prosodic and cognitive
aspects. In Prosody
and Meaning, Gorka Elordieta & Pilar Prieto (eds), 119–162. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Beaver, David I. & Clark, Brady Z.
2008 Sense
and Sensitivity: How Focus Determines
Meaning. Hoboken, N.J.: John Wiley & Sons.
Berretta, Monica
2002 “Quello
che voglio dire è che”: le scisse da strutture topicalizzanti a
connettivi
testuali. In La
parola al testo. Scritti per Bice Mortara
Garavelli, Gian Luigi Beccaria & Carla Marello (eds), 15–31, Alessandria: Edizioni dell’Orso.
Bianchi, Valentina, Bocci, Giuliano & Cruschina, Silvio
2015 Focus
fronting and its
implicatures. In Romance
Languages and Linguistic Theory 2013. Selected Papers from ‘Going
Romance’, Enoch O. Aboh, Jeannette Schaeffer & Petra Sleeman (ed), 3–19. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2016 Focus
fronting, unexpectedness, and evaluative
implicatures. Semantics and
Pragmatics 9(3): 1–54.
Borreguero Zuloaga, Margarita
2016 Elementi
anaforici e frasi scisse nei testi giornalistici
contemporanei. In La
lingua variabile nei testi letterari, artistici e funzionali
contemporanei (1915–2014): analisi, interpretazione,
traduzione, Giovanni Ruffino (ed), 529–542. Firenze, Franco Cesati.
Brunetti, Lisa
2009 On
links and tails in
Italian. Lingua 119(5): 756–781.
Brunetti, Lisa & Avanzi, Mathieu
2017 Discourse
properties of French clitic left dislocated NPs and their effect on
prosody. Ms. [URL]> (11 June 2021).
Bühler, Karl
2011 Theory
of Language. The Representational Function of
Language. [Sprachtheorie. Die
Darstellungsfunktion der
Sprache. Jena: G. Fischer 1934] Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Büring, Daniel
2003 On
D-trees, beans, and
B-accents. Linguistics and
Philosophy 26: 511–545.
2016 (Contrastive)
Topic. In The
Oxford Handbook of Information
Structure, Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), 64–85. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cantini, Andrea & Bruni, Riccardo
2017 Paradoxes
and contemporary
logic. In The
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed). [URL]> (11 June 2021).
Cartoni, Bruno & Meyer, Thomas
2012 Extracting
directional and comparable corpora from a multilingual corpus for
translation
studies. In Proceedings
of the Eighth International Conference on Language Resources and
Evaluation (LREC), Nicoletta Calzolari, Khalid Choukri, Thierry Declerck, Mehmet Uğur Doğan, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Asuncion Moreno, Jan Odijk & Stelios Piperidis (eds), 2132–2137. Paris: European Language Resources Association.
Chafe, Wallace
1976 Givenness,
contrastiveness, definiteness, subjects, topics, and point of
view. In Subject
and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed), 25–55. New York: Academic Press.
1994 Discourse,
Consciousness, and Time: The Flow and Displacement of Conscious
Experience in Speaking and
Writing. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Clark, Herbert H.
1994 Discourse
in
production. In Handbook
of Psycholinguistics, Morton A. Gernsbacher (ed), 985–1021. San Diego: Academic Press.
1996 Using
Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Cresti, Emanuela
2018 The
illocution-prosody relationship and the Information Pattern in
spontaneous speech according to the Language into Act Theory
(L-AcT). Linguistik
Online, 88(1).
Cruschina, Silvio
2019 Focus
Fronting in Spanish: Mirative implicature and information
structure. Probus 31(1): 119–146.
De Cesare, Anna-Maria
2017 Cleft
constructions. In Manual
of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax [Manuals
of Romance
Linguistics 17], Elisabeth Stark & Andreas Dufter (eds), 536–568. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
2020 È
con piacere che … / C’est avec plaisir que … On Italian
and French manner adverbial clefts expressing emotional
states. In Pour
une perspective fonctionnelle des constructions syntaxiques
marquées [Special
issue], Anna-Maria De Cesare & Mervi Helkkula (eds). Neuphilologische
Mitteilungen 120: 429–448.
This
volume. To be or not to be focus
adverbials? A corpus-driven study of It. anche in
spontaneous spoken
Italian. In When
Data Challenges Theory. Unexpected and Paradoxical Evidence in
Information Structure, Davide Garassino & Daniel Jacob eds Amsterdam-Philadelphia John Benjamins
De Cesare, Anna-Maria, Garassino, Davide, Agar Marco, Rocío, Albom, Ana & Cimmino, Doriana
2016 Sintassi
marcata dell’italiano contemporaneo in prospettiva contrastiva con
il francese, lo spagnolo, il tedesco e l’inglese. Uno studio basato
sulla scrittura dei quotidiani
online. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Declerck, Renaat
1984 The
pragmatics of it-clefts and
wh-clefts. Lingua 64(4): 251–289.
1988 Studies
on Copular Sentences, Clefts and
Pseudo-clefts. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
De Kuthy, Kordula, Brunetti, Lisa & Berardi, Marta
Delin, Judith
1992 Properties
of it-cleft
presupposition. Journal of
Semantics 9: 179–196.
Delin, Judith & Oberlander, Jon
1995 Syntactic
constraints on discourse structure: The case of
it-clefts. Linguistics 33: 465–500.
Destruel, Emilie
2012 The
French c’est-cleft: An empirical study on its
meaning and
use. In Empirical
Issues in Syntax and
Semantics 9, Christopher Piñon (ed), 95–112. [URL]> (11 June 2021).
Destruel, Emilie & Féry, Caroline
2020 Prominence
in French dual focus. Language and
Speech 64(2): 319–345.
Dryer, Matthew S.
1996 Focus,
pragmatic presupposition, and activated
propositions. Journal of
Pragmatics 26(4): 475–523.
2006 Descriptive
theories, explanatory theories, and basic linguistic
theory. In Catching
Language: Issues in Grammar Writing, Felix Ameka, Alan Dench & Nicholas Evans (eds), 207–234. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Dufter, Andreas
2008 On
explaining the rise of c’est-clefts in
French. In The
Paradox of Grammatical Change, Ulrich Detges & Richard Waltereit (eds), 31–56. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
2009 Clefting
and discourse organization: Comparing Germanic and
Romance. In Focus
and Background in Romance Languages, Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jacob (eds), 83–121. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Dufter, Andreas & Gabriel, Christoph
2016 Information
structure, prosody, and word
order. In Manual
of Grammatical Interfaces in
Romance [Manuals of Romance
Linguistics 10], Susann Fischer & Christoph Gabriel (eds), 419–455. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
É. Kiss, Katalin
1998 Identificational
focus versus information
focus. Language 74(2): 245–273.
Evans, Nicholas & Levinson, Stephen C.
2009 The
myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance
for cognitive science. Behavioral and
Brain
Sciences (32): 429–492.
Face, Timothy & D’Imperio, Mariapaola
2005 Reconsidering
a focal typology: Evidence from Spanish and
Italian. Italian Journal of
Linguistics 17(2): 271–289.
Frascarelli, Mara
2003 Topicalizzazione
e ripresa clitica. Analisi sincronica, confronto diacronico e
considerazioni
tipologiche. In Italia
linguistica anno Mille. Italia linguistica anno
Duemila, Nicoletta Maraschio & Teresa Poggi Salani (eds), 547–562. Roma: Bulzoni.
2017 Dislocations
and
Framings. In Manual
of Romance Morphosyntax and Syntax [Manuals
of Romance
Linguistics 17], Elisabeth Stark & Andreas Dufter (eds), 472–501. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Frascarelli, Mara & Ramaglia, Francesca
2013 Pseudoclefts
at the Syntax-Prosody-Discourse
Interface. In The
Structure of Clefts, Katherina Hartmann & Tonjes Veenstra (eds), 97–138. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Garassino, Davide
2014 Reverse
pseudo-clefts in Italian and English. A contrastive
analysis. In Tra
romanistica e germanistica: lingua, testo, cognizione e cultura /
Between Romance and Germanic: Language, Text, Cognition, and
Culture, Iørn Korzen, Angela Ferrari & Anna-Maria De Cesare (eds), 55–74. Bern: Peter Lang.
2016 Using
Cleft sentences in Italian and English. A multifactorial
analysis. In Current
Issues in Italian, Romance and Germanic Non-canonical Word Orders.
Syntax – Information Structure – Discourse
Organization, Anna-Maria De Cesare & Davide Garassino (eds), 181–204. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
This
volume. Translation as a source of
pragmatic interference? An empirical investigation of French and
Italian cleft
sentences. In When
Data Challenges Theory. Unexpected and Paradoxical Evidence in
Information Structure, Davide Garassino & Daniel Jacob eds Amsterdam-Philadelphia John Benjamins
Garassino, Davide & Jacob, Daniel
2018 Polarity
Focus and non-canonical syntax in Italian, French and Spanish.
Clitic left dislocation and sì che / sí
que-constructions. In The
Grammatical Realization of Polarity Contrast. Theoretical,
Empirical, and Typological Approaches, Christine Dimroth & Stefan Sudhoff (eds), 227–254. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
García García, Marco & Uth, Melanie
2018 Introduction.
Core issues of focus realization in
Romance. In Focus
Realization in Romance and Beyond, Marco García García & Melanie Uth (eds), 1–30. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Ginzburg, Jonathan
2012 The
Interactive Stance: Meaning for
Conversation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Groenendijk, Jeroen & Stokhof, Martin
1991 Dynamic
Predicate Logic. Linguistics and
Philosophy 14: 39–100.
Gundel, Jeanette K. & Fretheim, Thorstein
2004 Topic
and
focus. In The
Handbook of Pragmatics, Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds), 175–195. Oxford: Blackwell.
Hasselgård, Hilde
2010 Adjunct
Adverbials in
English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hedberg, Nancy & Fadden, Lorna
2007 The
information structure of it-clefts,
wh-clefts and reverse
wh-clefts in
English. In The
Grammar Pragmatics Interface: Essays in Honor of Jeanette K.
Gundel, Nancy Hedberg & Robert Zacharski (eds), 49–76. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Heidinger, Steffen
2018 Acceptability
and frequency in Spanish focus
marking. In Focus
Realization in Romance and Beyond, Marco García García & Melanie Uth (eds), 99–128. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Höhle, Tilman N.
1992 Über
Verum-Fokus im
Deutschen. In Informationsstruktur
und Grammatik. Linguistische Berichte
Sonderhefte (Vol. 4), Jacobs Joachim (ed), 112–141. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
Horton, William S. & Gerrig, Richard J.
2016 Revisiting
the memory-based processing approach to common
ground. In Memory
and Common Ground Processes in
Language [Special
Issue], Sarah Brown-Schmidt, Melissa C. Duft & William S. Horton (eds). Topics 8(4): 780–795.
Jacob, Daniel
2015 Anaphorische
Spaltsätze im Französischen: Grammatik – Text –
Rhetorik. In Informationsstrukturen
im Kontrast, Séverine Adam, Michael Schecker & Daniel Jacob (eds), 101–122. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
Jacobs, Joachim
2001 The
dimensions of
topic-comment. Linguistics 39(4): 641–681.
Kamp, Hans, van Genabith, Josef & Reyle, Uwe
2011 Discourse
Representation
Theory. In The
Handbook of Philosophical
Logic, volume 15, Dov M. Gabbay & Franz Guenthner (eds), 124–394. Dordrecht: Springer.
Karssenberg, Lena
2018 Non-Prototypical
Clefts in French. A Corpus Analysis of “il y a”
clefts. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Karssenberg, Lena & Lahousse, Karen
2018 The
information structure of French il y a &
c’est clefts: A corpus-based
analysis. Linguistics 56(3): 513–548.
Keenan, Edward L.
1976 Towards
a universal definition of
‘subject’. In Subject
and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed), 305–333. New York: Academic Press.
Klein, Wolfgang & Von Stutterheim, Christiane
1992 Textstruktur
und referentielle
Bewegung. Zeitschrift für
Literaturwissenschaft und
Linguistik 86: 67–92.
Koehn, Philipp
2005 Europarl:
A Parallel Corpus for Statistical Machine
Translation. In Proceedings
of Machine Translation Summit
X, 79–86.
Kratzer, Angelika
1991 The
representation of
focus. In Semantik
/ Semantics. Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen
Forschung. An International Handbook of Contemporary
Research, Armin von Stechow & Dieter Wunderlich (eds), 825–834. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Kratzer, Angelika & Selkirk, Elisabeth
2020 Deconstructing
information
structure. Glossa 5(1): 113, 1–53.
Krifka, Manfred
2006 Association
with focus
phrases. In Architecture
of Focus, Victoria Molnar, & Susanne Winkler (eds), 105–136. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
2008 Basic
notions of information
structure. Acta Linguistica
Hungarica 55(3–4): 243–276.
Krifka, Manfred & Musan, Renate
2012 Information
structure: Overview and linguistic
issues. In The
Expression of Information Structure, Manfred Krifka & Renate Musan (eds), 1–44. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Ladd, Robert D.
2008 Intonational
Phonology, 2nd
edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lahousse, Karen & Lamiroy, Béatrice
2015 “C’est
ainsi que”: grammaticalisation ou lexicalisation ou les deux à la
fois? Journal of French Language
Studies 27: 161–185.
Lambrecht, Knud
1994 Information
Structure and Sentence Form: Topic, Focus, and the Mental
Representation of Discourse
Referents. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2001 A
framework for the analysis of cleft
constructions. Linguistics 39(3): 463–516.
Larrivée, Pierre
This
volume. The curious case of the rare
focus movement in
French. In When
Data Challenges Theory. Unexpected and Paradoxical Evidence in
Information Structure, Davide Garassino & Daniel Jacob eds Amsterdam-Philadelphia John Benjamins
Leonetti, Manuel & Escandell-Vidal, Maria Victoria
2009 Fronting
and verum focus in
Spanish. In Focus
and Background in Romance Languages, Andreas Dufter & Daniel Jacob (eds), 155–204. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Li, Charles N. & Thompson, Sandra
1976 Subject
and topic: A new typology of
language. In Subject
and Topic, Charles N. Li (ed), 459–489. New York: Academic Press.
Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo
This
volume. Distinguishing psychological
Given/New from linguistic Topic/Focus makes things
clearer. In When
Data Challenges Theory. Unexpected and Paradoxical Evidence in
Information Structure, Davide Garassino & Daniel Jacob eds Amsterdam-Philadelphia John Benjamins
Masia, Viviana
This
volume. Remarks on Information
Structure marking asymmetries: The epistemological view on the
micropragmatic profile of
utterances. In When
Data Challenges Theory. Unexpected and Paradoxical Evidence in
Information Structure, Davide Garassino & Daniel Jacob eds Amsterdam-Philadelphia John Benjamins
Matić, Dejan
This
volume. Alternatives to information
structure. In When
Data Challenges Theory. Unexpected and Paradoxical Evidence in
Information Structure, Davide Garassino & Daniel Jacob eds Amsterdam-Philadelphia John Benjamins
Matić, Dejan & Nikolaeva, Irina
2018 From
polarity focus to salient polarity: From things to
processes. In The
Grammatical Realization of Polarity Contrast. Theoretical,
Empirical, and Typological Approaches, Christine Dimroth & Stefan Sudhoff (eds), 9–53. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Matić, Dejan & Wedgwood, Daniel
2013 The
meaning of focus: The significance of an interpretation-based
category in cross-linguistic
analysis. Journal of
Linguistics 49: 127–163.
Mertens, Piet
2012 La
prosodie des
clivées. In Penser
les langues avec Claire
Blanche-Benveniste, Sandrine Caddéo, Marie-Noëlle Roubaud, Magali Rouquier & Frédéric Sabio (eds), 127–139. Aix-en-Provence: Presses Universitaires de Provence.
Neeleman, Ad & Vermeulen, Reiko
2012 The
syntactic expression of information
structure. In The
Syntax of Topic, Focus, and Contrast. An Interface-based
Approach, Ad Neeleman & Reiko Vermeulen (eds), 1–38. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Onea, Edgar
2016 Potential
Questions at the Semantic-Pragmatic
Interface. Leiden: Brill.
Ozerov, Pavel
2018 Tracing
the sources of Information Structure: Towards the study of
interactional management of
information. Journal of
Pragmatics 138: 77–97.
2021 Multifactorial
Information Management (MIM): Summing up the emerging alternative to
information structure. Linguistics
Vanguard 7(1).
.
Patten, Amanda L.
2012 The
English It-cleft: A Constructional Approach and a Diachronic
Investigation. Berlin-New York: De Gruyter Mouton.
Paul, Hermann
1898 Prinzipien
der Sprachgeschichte. Halle (Saale): Niemeyer.
Pekarek Doehler, Simona, De Stefani, Elwis, & Horlacher, Anne-Sylvie
2015 Time
and Emergence in Grammar. Dislocation, Topicalization and Hanging
Topic in French
Talk-in-interaction. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Primus, Beatrice
2010 Case
marking
typology. In The
Oxford Handbook of Linguistic
Typology, Jae Jung Song (ed), 303–321. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Prince, Ellen F.
1978 A
comparison of WH-clefts and it-clefts in
discourse. Language 54: 883–906.
1981 Toward
a taxonomy of given-new
information. In Radical
Pragmatics, Peter Cole (ed), 233–255. New York: Academic Press.
Repp, Sophie
2016 Contrast:
Dissecting an elusive information-structural notion and its role in
grammar. Oxford Handbook of
Information Structure, Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), 270–289. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Riester, Arndt
2015 Analyzing
Questions under Discussion and information structure in a Balinese
narrative. In Proceedings
of the Second International Workshop on Information Structure of
Austronesian Languages, Linguistics
Dynamics Science
Project 2, 1–26. Tokyo: Research Institute for Languages and Cultures of Asia and Africa.
2019 Constructing
QUD
trees. In Questions
in Discourse. Vol. 2: Pragmatics, Malte Zimmermann, Klaus von Heusinger & Edgar Onea (eds), 163–192. Leiden: Brill.
Riester, Arndt & Baumann, Stefan
2013 Focus
triggers and focus types form a corpus
perspective. Dialogue &
Discourse 4 (2): 215–248.
Riester, Arndt & Shiohara, Asako
2018 Information
structure in Sumbawa: A QUD
analysis. In Perspectives
on Information Structure in Austronesian
Languages, Sonja Riesberg, Asako Shiohara & Atsuko Utsumi (eds), 285–311. Berlin: Language Science Press.
Riester, Arndt, Brunetti, Lisa & De Kuthy, Kordula
2018 Annotation
guidelines for Questions under Discussion and information
structure. In Information
Structure in Lesser-Described Languages: Studies in Syntax and
Prosody, Evangelia Adamou, Katharina Haude & Martine Vanhove (eds), 403–443. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Rizzi, Luigi
1997 The
fine structure of the left
periphery. In Elements
of Grammar: A Handbook of Generative
Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed), 281–337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Roberts, Craige
2004 Context
in dynamic
interpretation. In The
Handbook of Pragmatics, Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds), 197–220. Oxford: Blackwell.
2012
[1996] Information structure: Towards
an integrated formal theory of
pragmatics. Semantics &
Pragmatics 5: 1–69.
Roggia, Carlo Enrico
2009 Le
frasi scisse in italiano. Struttura informativa e funzioni
discorsive. Geneva: Slatkine.
Rooth, Mats
1985 Association
with Focus. PhD
Dissertation, University of Massachusetts at Amherst.
1992 A
theory of focus
interpretation. Natural Language
Semantics 1(1): 75–116.
1996 Focus. In The
Handbook of Contemporary Semantic
Theory, Shalom Lappin (ed), 271–297. Oxford; Blackwell.
Rosemeyer, Malte, Jacob, Daniel & Konieczny, Lars
This
volume. How alternatives are
created: Specialized background knowledge affects the interpretation
of clefts in
discourse. In When
Data Challenges Theory. Unexpected and Paradoxical Evidence in
Information Structure, Davide Garassino & Daniel Jacob eds Amsterdam-Philadelphia John Benjamins
Shlonski, Ur & Bocci, Giuliano
Sperber, Dan & Wilson, Deirdre
1995 Relevance:
Communication and Cognition, 2nd
edn. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stalnaker, Robert
2002 Common
ground. Linguistics and
Philosophy 25: 701–721.
2009 A
response to Abbott on presupposition and common
ground. Linguistics and
Philosophy 31: 539–44.
Torregrossa, Jacopo
2018 Distinguishing
focus and contrast at PF: A view from
Italian. In Focus
Realization and Interpretation in Romance and
Beyond, Marco García-García & Melanie Uth (eds), 173–200. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
Turco, Giuseppina
2014 Contrasting
Opposite Polarity in Germanic and Romance Languages: Verum Focus and
Affirmative Particles in Native Speakers and Advanced L2
Learners. PhD
thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen.
Turco, Giuseppina, Dimroth, Christine & Braun, Bettina
2013 Intonational
means to mark verum focus in German and
French. Language and
Speech 56(4): 460–490.
Vallduví, Enric
1991 The
role of plasticity in the association of focus and
prominence. Proceedings of the
Eastern States Conference on
Linguistics (ESCOL) 7: 295–306.
Vallduví, Enric & Vilkuna, Maria
1998 On
rheme and
kontrast. In The
Limits of Syntax [Syntax and
Semantics 29], Peter Culicover & Louise McNally (eds), 79–108. New York: Academic Press.
van der Wal, Jenneke
van Kuppevelt, Jan
1995 Discourse
structure, topicality and
questioning. Journal of
Linguistics 31: 109–147.
Velleman, Leah & Beaver, David I.
2016 Question-based
models of information
structure. In Oxford
Handbook of Information Structure, Caroline Féry & Shinichiro Ishihara (eds), 86–107. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wilder, Chris
2013 English
‘emphatic
do’. Lingua 128: 142–171.
Wilson, Deirdre & Sperber, Dan
2004 Relevance
theory. In The
Handbook of Pragmatics, Laurence R. Horn & Gregory Ward (eds), 607–632. Oxford: Blackwell.
Zimmermann, Malte & Onea, Edgar
2011 Focus
marking and focus
interpretation. Lingua 121: 1651–1670.
Cited by
Cited by 3 other publications
De Cesare, Anna-Maria
2022. To be or not to be focus adverbials?. In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273], ► pp. 204 ff. 
Garassino, Davide
2022. Translation as a source of pragmatic interference?. In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273], ► pp. 272 ff.
Lombardi Vallauri, Edoardo
2022. Distinguishing psychological Given/New from linguistic Topic/Focus makes things clearer. In When Data Challenges Theory [Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today, 273], ► pp. 40 ff.
This list is based on CrossRef data as of 20 march 2024. Please note that it may not be complete. Sources presented here have been supplied by the respective publishers. Any errors therein should be reported to them.