Part of
Pseudo-Coordination and Multiple Agreement Constructions
Edited by Giuliana Giusti, Vincenzo Nicolò Di Caro and Daniel Ross
[Linguistik Aktuell/Linguistics Today 274] 2022
► pp. 149166
References
Carden, Guy and David Pesetsky
1977Double-verb constructions, markedness and a fake coordination. In Papers from the 13th Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago, 82–92. University of Chicago.Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugeniu
1966Tomo y me voy. Ein Problem vergleichender europäischer Syntax. Vox Romanica: Annales Helvetici explorandis linguis Romanicis destinati 25: 13–55Google Scholar
Coseriu, Eugenio
1977« Tomo y me voy »: Un problema de sintaxis comparada europea. In Estudios de lingüística románica, 79–151. Madrid: Editorial Gredos.Google Scholar
Croitor, Blanca
2017Un tip special de coordonare. In Adina Dragomirescu, Alexandru Nicolae, Camelia Stan & Rodica Zafiu (eds.), Sintaxa ca mod de a fi: omagiu Gabrielei Pană Dindelegan, la aniversare (Colecția Personalități Ale Universității Din București), 149–157. București: Editura Universității din București.Google Scholar
Fehling, Detlev
2000Noch einmal tomo y me voy. Vox romanica (59). 136–142.Google Scholar
García Sánchez, Jairo Javier
2004Tomo y me voy: Entre el influjo bíblico y la gramaticalización obvia. Plurilinguismo, Contatti di Lingue e Cultura 10. 139–150.Google Scholar
Guţu-Romalo, Valeria
1961Semiauxiliare de aspect? Limba Romînǎ 10. 3–15.Google Scholar
Kanchev, Ivan
2010Semantika, tipologija i proizxod na konstruktsijata vzemam/vzema če (ta, i) + glagol ot svŭršen vid. Sŭpostavitelno ezikoznanie [Contrastive Linguistics] 35(3). 40–44. [URL]. Last accessed 1 July 2021.
Kiparsky, Valentin
1971« Взял и … л ». In Viktora Ivanoviča Borkovskogo (ed.), Problemy istorii i dialektologii slavjanskich jazykov, 134–139. Moscow: Izdatel’stvo “Nauka.”Google Scholar
Larsson, Lars-Gunnar
1992« Ta och prata om ringfingret » Om begränsningar i den jämförande språkforskningens möjligheter. Årsbok (Kungl. Humanistiska Vetenskaps-Samfundets i Uppsala) 1991–1992: 87–97.Google Scholar
Merlan, Aurélia
1999Sobre as chamadas “perífrases verbais paratácticas” do tipo « PEGAR E+ V2 » nas línguas românicas (com referência especial ao português e romeno). Línguas e Literaturas, Revista da Faculdade de Letras, Universidade do Porto 16. 159–205.Google Scholar
Morreale, Margherita
1966«… Fue y le dijo,» «… cogió y se fue.» Observaciones acerca del uso del verbo sin contenido semántico. Annali del Corso di Lingue e Letterature Straniere dell’Università di Bari 8. 76–88.Google Scholar
Ross, Daniel
2013Verbal Pseudocoordination in English: A syntactic analysis with reference to diachronic, dialectal and cross-linguistic variation. University of Illinois at Urbana- Champaign. Available at [URL]
2016Between coordination and subordination: typological, structural and diachronic perspectives on pseudocoordination. F. Pratas, S. Pereira, C. Pinto (Eds.), Coordination and Subordination: Form and Meaning – Selected Papers from CSI Lisbon 2014, 209–243. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
2017Pseudocoordinación del tipo tomar y en Eurasia: 50 años después [Pseudocoordination with take and in Eurasia: 50 years later]. Presented August 3, 2017, at Lingüística Coseriana VI, Lima, Peru. Available online at: [URL]
Ross, John
1967Constraints on Variables in Syntax. Ph. D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Schmerling, Susan
1975Asymmetric conjunction and rules of conversation, P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.), Speech Acts, Volume 3 of Syntax and Semantics, 211–231. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Vannebo, K. I.
2003Ta og ro deg ned noen hakk:on pseudocoordination with the verb ta ‘take’ in a grammaticalization perspective. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 26(2): 165–193. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
de Vos, Mark Andrew
2004Pseudo coordination is not subordination. L. Cornips and J. Doetjes (eds.), Linguistics in the Netherlands 21, Volume 21: 181–192. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
2005The syntax of verbal pseudo-coordination in English and Afrikaans. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Weiss, Daniel
2008Voz’mu i ne budu! Zum Inexspektativ im modernen Russischen. In Peter Kosta & Daniel Weiss (eds.), Slavistische Linguistik 2006/2007: Referate des XXXII. Konstanzer Slavistischen Arbeitstreffens, Männedorf bei Zürich, 18. – 20. September 2006, und Referate des XXXIII. Konstanzer Slavistischen Arbeitstreffens, Potsdam, 4. – 6. September 2007; Gerd Freidhof zum 65. Geburtstag gewidmet, 473–504. München: Sagner.Google Scholar
Wiklund, Anna-Lena
2008Creating Surprise in Complex Predication. Tromsø Working Papers on Language & Linguistics: Nordlyd 35(1). 163–187. DOI logoGoogle Scholar
Williams, Edwin
1978Across the board rule application. Linguistic Inquiry 9: 31–43Google Scholar